Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
On 19/10/18 11:47 pm, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Allan, > > Any input from Arch Linux? Arch Linux has no issue with that requirement. Allan
Re: glibc testsuite improvement
On 28/08/12 00:30, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 27 August 2012 08:28:50 Tomas Dohnalek wrote: I guess, that you are having the same difficulties so I want to ask, how do you deal with current state? Have you made any internal tool for comparing results or are you doing it manually? i run `make -k log` then grep it for the Error string from make, then look at each test individually. it's a pita. Another grep Error user here... Allan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503c385a.5050...@archlinux.org
Re: Reverting removal of exporting sunrpc code for glibc 2.16?
On 09/05/12 01:44, Jeff Law wrote: On 05/08/2012 08:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: I'd like to have feedback - especially from the glibc distribution maintainers - whether we should revert the following change for glibc 2.16: It'd certainly make our job for Fedora RHEL slightly easier until such time as TI-RPC code is further along. Agreed. I also remember seeing some changes in the relevant makefiles meaning it might not be just a simple revert any more (I have not checked...). So it would be much more efficient for one person to do the revert than many... Allan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa99800.40...@archlinux.org
