Bug#1036464: Acknowledgement (tzdata: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation)
Hello Benjamin, On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 08:06:37PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote: > On Sun, 2023-05-28 at 07:49 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello tzdata maintainers, > > a week ago I provided the update for the German Debconf translation. > > > > Since we are now in hard freeze and the release quickly approaching, > > could you kindly upload this translation so that it reaches bookworm? > > > > I'm pretty sure release managers will accept this small but important > > change (one string in de.po only). > > Okay. Uploaded 2023c-5 with the translation update. Thank you very much! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1036464: Acknowledgement (tzdata: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation)
Hello tzdata maintainers, a week ago I provided the update for the German Debconf translation. Since we are now in hard freeze and the release quickly approaching, could you kindly upload this translation so that it reaches bookworm? I'm pretty sure release managers will accept this small but important change (one string in de.po only). If you need help, please let me know. Thanks! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1027782: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation
Package: glibc Version: 2.36-7 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find the updated German debconf translation for glibc attached. Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload. If you update your template, please use 'msgfmt --statistics ' to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings. If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the German translation. Greetings Helge # Translation of glibc debconf templates to German # Copyright (C) Helge Kreutzmann , 2006-2009, 2011, 2016, 2017, 2023. # This file is distributed under the same license as the glibc package. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.36-7\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2023-01-02 16:21+\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2023-01-03 09:57+0100\n" "Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann \n" "Language-Team: de \n" "Language: German\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: multiselect #. Choices #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1001 msgid "All locales" msgstr "Alle Locales" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "Locales to be generated:" msgstr "Zu generierende Locales (»Standorteinstellungen«):" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "" "Locales are a framework to switch between multiple languages and allow users " "to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc." msgstr "" "Locales ist ein System, um zwischen verschiedenen Sprachen umzuschalten. " "Benutzer können damit ihre Sprache, ihr Land, ihren Zeichensatz, ihre " "Sortierreihenfolge und anderes mehr festlegen." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "" "Please choose which locales to generate. UTF-8 locales should be chosen by " "default, particularly for new installations. Other character sets may be " "useful for backwards compatibility with older systems and software." msgstr "" "Bitte wählen Sie aus, welche Locales erzeugt werden sollen. UTF-8-Locales " "sollten standardmäßig ausgewählt werden, insbesondere für neue " "Installationen. Andere Zeichensätze könnten für Rückkompatibilität mit " "älteren Systemen und Software nützlich sein." #. Type: select #. Choices #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2001 msgid "None" msgstr "Keine" #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "Default locale for the system environment:" msgstr "Standard-Standorteinstellung für die Systemumgebung:" #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "" "Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language " "for the user. You can choose a default locale for the system from the " "generated locales." msgstr "" "Viele Debian-Pakete benutzen Locales, um Text in der für die Benutzer " "korrekten Sprache anzuzeigen. Sie können aus den generierten Locales einen " "Standard für Ihr System auswählen." #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "" "This will select the default language for the entire system. If this system " "is a multi-user system where not all users are able to speak the default " "language, they will experience difficulties." msgstr "" "Bemerkung: Dies wählt die Standardsprache für das gesamte System. Falls dies " "ein Mehrbenutzer-System ist und nicht alle Benutzer die Standardsprache " "sprechen, dann werden diese Schwierigkeiten haben." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001 msgid "Do you want to upgrade glibc now?" msgstr "Möchten Sie das Upgrade von Glibc jetzt durchführen?" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001 msgid "" "Running services and programs that are using NSS need to be restarted, " "otherwise they might not be able to do lookup or authentication any more. " "The installation process is able to restart some services (such as ssh or " "telnetd), but other programs cannot be restarted automatically. One such " "program that needs manual stopping and restart after the glibc upgrade by " "yourself is xdm - because automatic restart might disconnect your active X11 " "sessions." msgstr "" "Laufende Dienste und Programme, die NSS verwenden, müssen
Bug#1026321: locales: Issues in Debians locales man pages
Package: locales Version: 2.36-6 Severity: minor Dear locales maintainer, the manpage-l10n project maintains a large number of translations of man pages both from a large variety of sources (including Locales) as well for a large variety of target languages. During their work translators notice different possible issues in the original (english) man pages. Sometimes this is a straightforward typo, sometimes a hard to read sentence, sometimes this is a convention not held up and sometimes we simply do not understand the original. We use several distributions as sources and update regularly (at least every 2 month). This means we are fairly recent (some distributions like archlinux also update frequently) but might miss the latest upstream version once in a while, so the error might be already fixed. We apologize and ask you to close the issue immediately if this should be the case, but given the huge volume of projects and the very limited number of volunteers we are not able to double check each and every issue. Secondly we translators see the manpages in the neutral po format, i.e. converted and harmonized, but not the original source (be it man, groff, xml or other). So we cannot provide a true patch (where possible), but only an approximation which you need to convert into your source format. Finally the issues I'm reporting have accumulated over time and are not always discovered by me, so sometimes my description of the problem my be a bit limited - do not hesitate to ask so we can clarify them. I'm now reporting the errors for your project. If future reports should use another channel, please let me know. Man page: locale.gen.5 Issue:B → file I "The file B lists the locales that are to be generated by " "the B command." -- Man page: locale.gen.5 Issue:Missing Markup B<> "locale-gen(8), localedef(1), locale(1)" -- Man page: update-locale.8 Issue:B → I "This program can be called by maintainer scripts when Debian packages are " "installed or removed, it updates the B file to reflect " "changes in system configuration related to global locale settings. When " "variables have no value assigned, they are removed from the locale file. " "Some basic checks are performed to ensure that requested settings are valid." "Define file containing locale variables. (Default: B)" "B" -- Man page: update-locale.8 Issue:locale-gen(8), locale(1) → B(8), B(1) "locale-gen(8), locale(1)" -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.0.13 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.80 ii libc-bin 2.36-6 ii libc-l10n 2.36-6 locales recommends no packages. locales suggests no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1017406: glibc: Debconf-Prompt not shown localized
library upgrade. │ │ │ │ Restart services during package upgrades without asking? │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └───┘ -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.18.15 (SMP w/12 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Processed: Re: Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Hello all, I resolved the breakage by "apt-get remove libgcc-8-dev". This removed noting central to me and allowed the subsequent "dist-ugprade" to complete. In the dist-ugprade I noticed two things: a) All Debconf questions were asked in english, although they should be available in my default locale, i.e. de b) The "dist-upgrade" initially failed: … Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-sugar3 wird gewählt. Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb ... Entpacken von python3-sugar3 (0.117-1) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb (--unpack): Versuch, »/usr/bin/sugar-activity-web« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket python-sugar3 0.112-3 ist dpkg-deb: Fehler: »einfügen«-Unterprozess wurde durch Signal (Datenübergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe)) getötet Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../31-libxapian30_1.4.15-1_amd64.deb ... Entpacken von libxapian30:amd64 (1.4.15-1) über (1.4.11-1) ... Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-xapian wird gewählt. Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../32-python3-xapian_1.4.15-1+b1_amd64.deb ... Entpacken von python3-xapian (1.4.15-1+b1) ... Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-carquinyol wird gewählt. Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb ... Entpacken von python3-carquinyol (0.117-1) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): Versuch, »/usr/bin/copy-from-journal« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket python-carquinyol 0.112-1 ist Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../34-sucrose_0.117-3_all.deb ... Entpacken von sucrose (0.117-3) über (0.112-6) ... Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb A subsequent "apt-get -f install" fixed this, however. If you would like to get futher information from me so that other users can avoid these problems (especially the first one) please let me know. Please note, however, that I'm no tracking testing, i.e. the state is now evolving again. Greetings Helge signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
reassign 964477 apt thanks On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 06:58:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2020-07-19 18:48, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Aurelien, > > sorry for answering late, I was a few days offline. > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2020-07-07 21:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > > Package: libc6-dev > > > > Version: 2.28-10 > > > > Severity: important > > > > > > > > Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and > > > > then > > > > apt-get update > > > > apt-get upgrade > > > > > > > > worked. Now: > > > > > > > > apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following: > > > > > > > > root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade > > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > > Building dependency tree > > > > Reading state information... Done > > > > Calculating upgrade... Error! > > > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > > libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be > > > > installed > > > > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be > > > > caused by held packages. > > > > > > This break entry is correct, if we remove it gcc-8 will be left > > > potentially broken after the upgrade. I have no idea how it can be fixed > > > on the glibc side. > > > > Who would be the best party to fix this? (Sorry, at the moment I don't > > have a clue what causes this problem). > > I guess apt developers might be able to help there. > > > > > If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of > > > > programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, > > > > libreoffice etc. > > > > > > Have you tried installing gcc-defaults from testing before starting the > > > upgrade? > > > > I did an upgrade today (dist-upgrade is still broken) and for some > > strange reason I cannot install gcc-defaults: > > > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > E: Unable to locate package gcc-defaults > > > > I also get this in an current (unrelated) sid chroot. Strange. > > Oops sorry. gcc-defaults is the source package. You should try with one > of the corresponding binary packages, like gcc or g++. Ok, then this is not another local problem. However, it does not help. Installing gcc brings in a few packages but then dist-upgrade fails again the same way. g++ is already at the latest version. I reassign this bug to apt as suggested. Thanks for your support. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Hello Aurelien, sorry for answering late, I was a few days offline. On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2020-07-07 21:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Package: libc6-dev > > Version: 2.28-10 > > Severity: important > > > > Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and > > then > > apt-get update > > apt-get upgrade > > > > worked. Now: > > > > apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following: > > > > root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Error! > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be > > installed > > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused > > by held packages. > > This break entry is correct, if we remove it gcc-8 will be left > potentially broken after the upgrade. I have no idea how it can be fixed > on the glibc side. Who would be the best party to fix this? (Sorry, at the moment I don't have a clue what causes this problem). > > If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of > > programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, > > libreoffice etc. > > Have you tried installing gcc-defaults from testing before starting the > upgrade? I did an upgrade today (dist-upgrade is still broken) and for some strange reason I cannot install gcc-defaults: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package gcc-defaults I also get this in an current (unrelated) sid chroot. Strange. Any help much appreciated (or pointers). Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.28-10 Severity: important Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and then apt-get update apt-get upgrade worked. Now: apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following: root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Error! Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, libreoffice etc. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc-dev-bin2.28-10 ii libc6 2.28-10 ii linux-libc-dev 5.7.6-1 libc6-dev recommends no packages. Versions of packages libc6-dev suggests: ii glibc-doc 2.30-8 ii manpages-dev 5.07-1 -- no debconf information -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#960783: tzdata: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation
Package: tzdata Version: 2020a-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find the updated German debconf translation for tzdata attached. Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload. If you update your template, please use 'msgfmt --statistics ' to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings. If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the German translation. Greetings Helge # Translation of tzdata debconf templates to German # Copyright (C) Helge Kreutzmann , 2007, 2008. # Copyright (C) Holger Wansing , 2010, 2011, 2013, 2016, 2017. # This file is distributed under the same license as the tzdata package. # Holger Wansing , 2019. msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: tzdata 2020a-20a-1\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: tzd...@packages.debian.org\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2020-04-24 21:28+0200\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2020-05-16 17:58+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Holger Wansing \n" "Language-Team: German \n" "Language: de\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" "Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" "X-Generator: Lokalize 2.0\n" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "Africa" msgstr "Afrika" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "America" msgstr "Amerika" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "Antarctica" msgstr "Antarktis" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "Australia" msgstr "Australien" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "Arctic" msgstr "Arktis" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "Asia" msgstr "Asien" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "Atlantic" msgstr "Atlantik" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "Europe" msgstr "Europa" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 msgid "Indian" msgstr "Indien" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx" or "GMT-xx" timezones #. - SystemV will give the choice between zone named as per SystemV conventions: #. EST5, MST7, etc. #. Type: select #. Choices #. Translators: do not translate underscores. You can use spaces instead. #: ../tzdata.templates:1001 ../tzdata.templates:13001 msgid "Pacific" msgstr "Pazifik" #. Type: select #. Choices #. Note to translators: #. - "Etc" will present users with a list #. of "GMT+xx&quo
Bug#918455: ETA for upload?
Hello Aurelien,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 06:52:19PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> this German Debconf translation bug has been marked pending for for
> almost a month now. As the freeze is rapdily approaching I would like
> to enquire if (and wehn) an upload for the forthcoming stable is
> intended.
roundabout 7 weeks ago the debconf update was provided. As the hard
freeze is approaching, do you think it is possible to perform another
uplaod (with the translations in #920427, #920598, #923061) in the
next days to ensure propagation to Testing in time?
Thanks!
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#921913: locales: character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory
Hello Aurelien, On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2019-02-21 22:01, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Aurelien, > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:14:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2019-02-10 08:48, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > > Package: locales > > > > Version: 2.28-6 > > > > Severity: minor > > > > > > > > In todays upgrade in my sid chroot I see the following messages > > > > locales (2.28-6) wird eingerichtet ... > > > > Generating locales (this might take a while)... > > > > de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done > > > > de_DE.UTF-8... done > > > > en_GB.UTF-8... done > > > > en_US.UTF-8... done > > > > C.C...[error] character map file `C' not found: No such file or > > > > directory > > > > done > > > > Generation complete. > > > > > > > > I don't know if this is new or older or if this poses a problem. I can > > > > provide you with mor details if necessary. > > > > > > > > > > The list of locales to be generated is defined by /etc/locale.gen, it > > > looks like there is someting wrong there. Could you please send me a > > > copy of this file? > > > > I attached the file. > > The issue is the "C C" line in that file. Now I have no idea how it > ended up there, as it's not one of the value offered by default in the > debconf template. It only appears there if it is found in the > /etc/locale.gen config file. This is my built sid chroot, where I'm not tuning anything. I definitly did not touch this file. If it is unreproducible then I can simply fix up the line and you can close the bug. If you need further information / debugging simply let me know. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#921913: locales: character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory
Hello Aurelien, On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:14:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2019-02-10 08:48, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Package: locales > > Version: 2.28-6 > > Severity: minor > > > > In todays upgrade in my sid chroot I see the following messages > > locales (2.28-6) wird eingerichtet ... > > Generating locales (this might take a while)... > > de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done > > de_DE.UTF-8... done > > en_GB.UTF-8... done > > en_US.UTF-8... done > > C.C...[error] character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory > > done > > Generation complete. > > > > I don't know if this is new or older or if this poses a problem. I can > > provide you with mor details if necessary. > > > > The list of locales to be generated is defined by /etc/locale.gen, it > looks like there is someting wrong there. Could you please send me a > copy of this file? I attached the file. Thanks and Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ locale.gen Description: GENbank data signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#921913: locales: character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory
Package: locales Version: 2.28-6 Severity: minor In todays upgrade in my sid chroot I see the following messages locales (2.28-6) wird eingerichtet ... Generating locales (this might take a while)... de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done de_DE.UTF-8... done en_GB.UTF-8... done en_US.UTF-8... done C.C...[error] character map file `C' not found: No such file or directory done Generation complete. I don't know if this is new or older or if this poses a problem. I can provide you with mor details if necessary. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#918455: ETA for upload?
Hello Aurelien, this German Debconf translation bug has been marked pending for for almost a month now. As the freeze is rapdily approaching I would like to enquire if (and wehn) an upload for the forthcoming stable is intended. Thanks! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#877434: Acknowledgement (glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation)
Hello Aurelien, On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 06:33:55PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2019-01-04 15:51, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Aurelien, > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 08:17:38PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2018-12-26 22:00, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > > Hello Glibc maintainers, > > > > more than one year ago I submitted the updated German man page > > > > > > Sorry this has been missed, that will be in the next upload. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > translation. As the freeze is approaching I (and probably other German > > > > speaking users) would be very happy if you could include it in your > > > > package so that it is part of the next stable release. > > > > > > Note that your update only changes some fuzzy strings, so the German > > > translated files will be unchanged. > > > > Fixing fuzzy strings (i.e. they are not fuzzy anymore) recompletes the > > German translation. I just checked, everything looks fine. Or are > > My point is that while the fuzzy is removed from the po file, the > resulting German translation is unchanged as it was already correct. > Therefore there is no user visible changes. Oh, I see what you mean. The change was a pure english one - it did not affect the translation. Therefore the correct action (which could have been done by you as maintainers as well) was to simply remove the "fuzzy" marker. The change *is* user visible, however. With the fuzzy marker, the english string is shown, without the translated (German) one. > > there some other issues (e.g. new strings I missed) which you want to > > point out? > > No, everything is fine. Then we can let this rest. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#877434: Acknowledgement (glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation)
Hello Aurelien, On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 08:17:38PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2018-12-26 22:00, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Glibc maintainers, > > more than one year ago I submitted the updated German man page > > Sorry this has been missed, that will be in the next upload. Thanks. > > translation. As the freeze is approaching I (and probably other German > > speaking users) would be very happy if you could include it in your > > package so that it is part of the next stable release. > > Note that your update only changes some fuzzy strings, so the German > translated files will be unchanged. Fixing fuzzy strings (i.e. they are not fuzzy anymore) recompletes the German translation. I just checked, everything looks fine. Or are there some other issues (e.g. new strings I missed) which you want to point out? Thanks again for including the update before stable. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#877434: Acknowledgement (glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation)
Hello Glibc maintainers, more than one year ago I submitted the updated German man page translation. As the freeze is approaching I (and probably other German speaking users) would be very happy if you could include it in your package so that it is part of the next stable release. If there are any issues with the translations please let me know so that I can fix them. Thanks and Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Template for from package
reassign 871051 tzdata 2017b-2 thanks The Debconf translation is not for fookebox, but for tzdata. (Fookebox already has several submissions for pt translations) -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#877434: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation
Package: glibc Version: 2.24-17 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find the updated German man page translation for glibc attached. If you update your template, please use 'msgfmt --statistics ' to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings. If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the German translation. Greetings Helge # base-config manual page # Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # Jens Seidel <jenssei...@users.sf.net>, 2005. # Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>, 2013, 2017. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: eglibc 2.24-17\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2014-10-21 15:29+0200\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2017-10-01 20:46+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>\n" "Language-Team: German <debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org>\n" "Language: de\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" # type: TH #. type: TH #: validlocale.8:1 #, no-wrap msgid "validlocale" msgstr "validlocale" # type: TH #. type: TH #: validlocale.8:1 #, no-wrap msgid "0.1" msgstr "0.1" # type: TH #. type: TH #: validlocale.8:1 #, no-wrap msgid "Petter Reinholdtsen" msgstr "Petter Reinholdtsen" # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:2 #, no-wrap msgid "NAME" msgstr "NAME" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:5 msgid "validlocale - Test if a given locale is available" msgstr "validlocale - Prüfen, ob eine übergebene Locale verfügbar ist" # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:5 #, no-wrap msgid "SYNTAX" msgstr "SYNTAX" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:8 msgid "validlocale EIE" msgstr "validlocale EIE" # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:8 #, no-wrap msgid "DESCRIPTION" msgstr "BESCHREIBUNG" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:13 msgid "" "Test if the locale given as argument is a valid locale. If it isn't, print " "on stdout the string to add to /etc/locale.gen to make locale-gen generate " "the locale (if it exists at all)." msgstr "" "Überprüft, ob eine als Argument übergebene Locale gültig ist. Falls sie es " "nicht ist, wird auf der Standardausgabe die Zeichenkette angegeben, die zu /" "etc/locale.gen hinzugefügt werden muss, damit locale-gen die Locale (falls " "sie überhaupt existiert) erstellt." # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:13 #, no-wrap msgid "FILES" msgstr "DATEIEN" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:16 msgid "I" msgstr "I" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:18 msgid "I" msgstr "I" # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:18 #, no-wrap msgid "ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES" msgstr "UMGEBUNGSVARIABLEN" # type: TP #. type: TP #: validlocale.8:20 #, no-wrap msgid "B" msgstr "B" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:24 msgid "" "Which charset to assume if the given locale is missing from the list of " "supported locales." msgstr "" "welcher Zeichensatz angenommen werden soll, falls eine übergebene Locale " "nicht in der Liste der unterstützten Locale enthalten ist" # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:24 #, no-wrap msgid "EXAMPLES" msgstr "BEISPIELE" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:28 msgid "" "If you give a valid locale as parameter, it outputs a string specifying this " "on stderr:" msgstr "" "Falls Sie eine gültige Locale als Parameter übergeben, wird auf der " "Standardfehlerausgabe eine Zeichenkette ausgegeben, die diese angibt:" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:31 msgid "% validlocale C" msgstr "% validlocale C" # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:33 msgid "locale 'C' valid and available" msgstr "locale 'C' valid and available" # type: Plain text # s/invalid/invalid Locale/ #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:37 msgid "" "When given a invalid (not generated or just nonexistent), it outputs a " "string on stderr telling that this is an invalid locale, and a string to " "stdout with the string to add to /etc/locale.gen to have this locale " "generated:" msgstr "" "Wenn eine ungültige (nicht erstellte oder einfach nicht existierende) Locale " "übergeben wird, wird es eine Zeichenkette auf der Standardfehlerausgabe " "ausgeben
Bug#877291: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation
Package: glibc Version: 2.24-17 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find the updated German debconf translation for glibc attached. Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload. If you update your template, please use 'msgfmt --statistics ' to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings. If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the German translation. Greetings Helge # Translation of glibc debconf templates to German # Copyright (C) Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>, 2006-2009, 2011, 2016, 2017. # This file is distributed under the same license as the glibc package. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.24-17\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: gl...@packages.debian.org\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2017-06-13 22:11+0200\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2017-09-30 10:35+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>\n" "Language-Team: de <debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org>\n" "Language: German\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: multiselect #. Choices #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1001 msgid "All locales" msgstr "Alle Locales" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "Locales to be generated:" msgstr "Zu generierende Locales (�Standorteinstellungen�):" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "" "Locales are a framework to switch between multiple languages and allow users " "to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc." msgstr "" "Locales ist ein System, um zwischen verschiedenen Sprachen umzuschalten. " "Benutzer k�nnen damit ihre Sprache, ihr Land, ihren Zeichensatz, ihre " "Sortierreihenfolge und anderes mehr festlegen." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "" "Please choose which locales to generate. UTF-8 locales should be chosen by " "default, particularly for new installations. Other character sets may be " "useful for backwards compatibility with older systems and software." msgstr "" "Bitte w�hlen Sie aus, welche Locales erzeugt werden sollen. UTF-8-Locales " "sollten standardm��ig ausgew�hlt werden, insbesondere f�r neue " "Installationen. Andere Zeichens�tze k�nnten f�r R�ckkompatibilit�t mit " "�lteren Systemen und Software n�tzlich sein." #. Type: select #. Choices #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2001 msgid "None" msgstr "Keine" #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "Default locale for the system environment:" msgstr "Standard-Standorteinstellung f�r die Systemumgebung:" #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "" "Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language " "for the user. You can choose a default locale for the system from the " "generated locales." msgstr "" "Viele Debian-Pakete benutzen Locales, um Text in der f�r die Benutzer " "korrekten Sprache anzuzeigen. Sie k�nnen aus den generierten Locales einen " "Standard f�r Ihr System ausw�hlen." #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "" "This will select the default language for the entire system. If this system " "is a multi-user system where not all users are able to speak the default " "language, they will experience difficulties." msgstr "" "Bemerkung: Dies w�hlt die Standardsprache f�r das gesamte System. Falls dies " "ein Mehrbenutzer-System ist und nicht alle Benutzer die Standardsprache " "sprechen, dann werden diese Schwierigkeiten haben." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001 msgid "Do you want to upgrade glibc now?" msgstr "M�chten Sie das Upgrade von Glibc jetzt durchf�hren?" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001 msgid "" "Running services and programs that are using NSS need to be restarted, " "otherwise they might not be able to do lookup or authentication any more. " "The installation process is able to restart some services (such as ssh or " "telnetd), but other programs cannot be restarted automatically. One such " "program that needs manual stopping and restart after the glibc upgrade by " "yourself is xdm - because automatic restart might discon
Bug#815697: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation
Package: glibc Version: 2.21-9 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find the updated German debconf translation for glibc attached. Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload. If you update your template, please use 'msgfmt --statistics ' to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings. If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the German translation. Greetings Helge # Translation of glibc debconf templates to German # Copyright (C) Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>, 2006-2009, 2011, 2016. # This file is distributed under the same license as the glibc package. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.21-9\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: gl...@packages.debian.org\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-07 14:56+0100\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2016-02-21 19:48+0100\n" "Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>\n" "Language-Team: de <debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org>\n" "Language: German\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: multiselect #. Choices #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1001 msgid "All locales" msgstr "Alle Locales" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "Locales to be generated:" msgstr "Zu generierende Locales (�Standorteinstellungen�):" #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "" "Locales are a framework to switch between multiple languages and allow users " "to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc." msgstr "" "Locales ist ein System, um zwischen verschiedenen Sprachen " "umzuschalten. Benutzer k�nnen damit ihre Sprache, ihr Land, ihren " "Zeichensatz, ihre Sortierreihenfolge und anderes mehr festlegen." #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 msgid "" "Please choose which locales to generate. UTF-8 locales should be chosen by " "default, particularly for new installations. Other character sets may be " "useful for backwards compatibility with older systems and software." msgstr "" "Bitte w�hlen Sie aus, welche Locales erzeugt werden sollen. " "UTF-8-Locales sollten standardm��ig ausgew�hlt werden, " "insbesondere f�r neue Installationen. Andere Zeichens�tze k�nnten f�r " "R�ckkompatibilit�t mit �lteren Systemen und Software n�tzlich sein." #. Type: select #. Choices #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2001 msgid "None" msgstr "Keine" #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "Default locale for the system environment:" msgstr "Standard-Standorteinstellung f�r die Systemumgebung:" #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "" "Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language " "for the user. You can choose a default locale for the system from the " "generated locales." msgstr "" "Viele Debian-Pakete benutzen Locales, um Text in der f�r die " "Benutzer korrekten Sprache anzuzeigen. Sie k�nnen aus den generierten " "Locales einen Standard f�r Ihr System ausw�hlen." #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 msgid "" "This will select the default language for the entire system. If this system " "is a multi-user system where not all users are able to speak the default " "language, they will experience difficulties." msgstr "" "Bemerkung: Dies w�hlt die Standardsprache f�r das gesamte System. Falls dies " "ein Mehrbenutzer-System ist und nicht alle Benutzer die Standardsprache " "sprechen, dann werden diese Schwierigkeiten haben." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001 msgid "Do you want to upgrade glibc now?" msgstr "M�chten Sie das Upgrade von Glibc jetzt durchf�hren?" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/libc.templates:1001 msgid "" "Running services and programs that are using NSS need to be restarted, " "otherwise they might not be able to do lookup or authentication any more. " "The installation process is able to restart some services (such as ssh or " "telnetd), but other programs cannot be restarted automatically. One such " "program that needs manual stopping and restart after the glibc upgrade by " "yourself is xdm - because automatic restart might disconnect your active X11
Bug#771295: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation
Package: glibc Version: 2.19-13 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find the updated German man page translation for glibc attached. If you update your template, please use 'msgfmt --statistics pofile.po' to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings. If there are such strings, please contact me so I can update the German translation. Greetings Helge # base-config manual page # Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # Jens Seidel jenssei...@users.sf.net, 2005. # Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de, 2013, 2014. # msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: eglibc 2.19-13\n POT-Creation-Date: 2014-10-21 15:29+0200\n PO-Revision-Date: 2014-11-28 11:38+0100\n Last-Translator: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de\n Language-Team: German debian-l10n-ger...@lists.debian.org\n Language: de\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n # type: TH #. type: TH #: validlocale.8:1 #, no-wrap msgid validlocale msgstr validlocale # type: TH #. type: TH #: validlocale.8:1 #, no-wrap msgid 0.1 msgstr 0.1 # type: TH #. type: TH #: validlocale.8:1 #, no-wrap msgid Petter Reinholdtsen msgstr Petter Reinholdtsen # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:2 #, no-wrap msgid NAME msgstr NAME # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:5 msgid validlocale - Test if a given locale is available msgstr validlocale - Prüfen, ob eine übergebene Locale verfügbar ist # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:5 #, no-wrap msgid SYNTAX msgstr SYNTAX # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:8 msgid validlocale EltIlocaleEgt msgstr validlocale EltILocaleEgt # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:8 #, no-wrap msgid DESCRIPTION msgstr BESCHREIBUNG # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:13 msgid Test if the locale given as argument is a valid locale. If it isn't, print on stdout the string to add to /etc/locale.gen to make locale-gen generate the locale (if it exists at all). msgstr Überprüft, ob eine als Argument übergebene Locale gültig ist. Falls sie es nicht ist, wird auf der Standardausgabe die Zeichenkette angegeben, die zu / etc/locale.gen hinzugefügt werden muss, damit locale-gen die Locale (falls sie überhaupt existiert) erstellt. # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:13 #, no-wrap msgid FILES msgstr DATEIEN # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:16 msgid I/usr/sbin/validlocale msgstr I/usr/sbin/validlocale # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:18 msgid I/usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED msgstr I/usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:18 #, no-wrap msgid ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES msgstr UMGEBUNGSVARIABLEN # type: TP #. type: TP #: validlocale.8:20 #, no-wrap msgid BDEFAULTCHARSET msgstr BDEFAULTCHARSET # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:24 msgid Which charset to assume if the given locale is missing from the list of supported locales. msgstr welcher Zeichensatz angenommen werden soll, falls eine übergebene Locale nicht in der Liste der unterstützten Locale enthalten ist # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:24 #, no-wrap msgid EXAMPLES msgstr BEISPIELE # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:28 msgid If you give a valid locale as parameter, it outputs a string specifying this on stderr: msgstr Falls Sie eine gültige Locale als Parameter übergeben, wird auf der Standardfehlerausgabe eine Zeichenkette ausgegeben, die diese angibt: # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:31 msgid % validlocale C msgstr % validlocale C # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:33 msgid locale 'C' valid and available msgstr locale 'C' valid and available # type: Plain text # s/invalid/invalid Locale/ #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:37 msgid When given a invalid (not generated or just nonexistent), it outputs a string on stderr telling that this is an invalid locale, and a string to stdout with the string to add to /etc/locale.gen to have this locale generated: msgstr Wenn eine ungültige (nicht erstellte oder einfach nicht existierende) Locale übergeben wird, wird es eine Zeichenkette auf der Standardfehlerausgabe ausgeben, die dies mitteilt und eine Zeichenkette auf die Standardausgabe, der zu /etc/locale.gen hinzugefügt werden muss, damit die Locale erstellt wird: # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:40 msgid % validlocale de_AU@euro msgstr % validlocale de_AU@euro #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:42 msgid locale 'de_AU@euro' not available msgstr locale 'de_AU@euro' not available #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:44 msgid de_AU@euro ISO-8859-15 msgstr de_AU@euro ISO-8859-15 # type: SH #. type: SH #: validlocale.8:44 #, no-wrap msgid AUTHORS msgstr AUTOREN # type: Plain text #. type: Plain text #: validlocale.8:47 msgid Petter Reinholdtsen Eltp...@hungry.comegt msgstr Petter Reinholdtsen Eltp...@hungry.comegt # type: SH #. type
Bug#717979: Info received (Inclusion of German man page translation possible?)
Hello, is there a chance to update the German man page as provided in this bug report? Thanks a lot! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717979: Inclusion of German man page translation possible?
Hello GNU Libc Maintainers, a German translation of the man page was prepared and filed as 717979. Would it be possible to do a maintainer upload targetting jessi with the translation included? Thanks! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Keld, I was told that this e-mail address is the successor to the (no longer working) one keld.simon...@dkuug.dk. If that is not the case please accept my apologizes (and maybe you know the correct current contact details in that case?). You are listed as contact person/author of the following locales: da_DK de_BE de_CH de_LU el_GR en_AU en_CA en_DK en_GB en_IE en_NZ es_AR es_BO es_CL es_CO es_DO es_EC es_ES es_GT es_HN es_MX es_PA es_PE es_PY es_SV es_US es_UY es_VE eu_ES fi_FI fo_FO fr_BE fr_CA fr_CH fr_LU he_IL it_CH iw_IL kl_GL nl_BE nl_NL pl_PL POSIX pt_BR pt_PT ru_RU sv_FI sv_SE hu_HU ro_RO tr_TR These locales come with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Keld, On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:25:02PM +0200, k...@keldix.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:20:29AM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: These locales come with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. They were meant as a licence Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? I am willing to release them under GPL v2 - This hereby granted. Thanks for the clarification and for your work on the locales. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Contact data for Keld Simonsen (ISO PDTR 14652/ISO/IEC 14651)
Dear Ladies and Sirs, I'm working for the Debian organisation and try to clarify some software license issues. One person heavily involved is Keld Simonsen: % Address: Kollegievej 6 %DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Danmark % Contact: Keld Simonsen % Email: keld.simon...@dkuug.dk (alterantively also Sankt Jorgens Alle 8, DK-1615 Kobenhavn V, Danmark). I cannot reach him under the given e-mail address, do you have a more recent / working one? He is (was) most likely active in the Danish mirror committe for ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 2. Thank you very much! Best regards Helge Kreutzmann P.S. If you need more background for my inquery, do not hesitate to read this at http://bugs.debian.org/555168 -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Pablo, according to [1] both e-mail addresses are more recent ones from the former pa...@mandrakesoft.com, pa...@mandriva.com. If that is not the case please accept my apologizes (and maybe you know the correct current contact details in that case?). You are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s): az_AZ ber_DZ ber_MA fur_IT ha_NG ig_NG ik_CA iu_CA sc_IT ug_CN vi_VN wa_BE yo_NG br_FR bs_BA cy_GB fil_PH hy_AM ku_TR mi_NZ pap_AN tg_TJ tk_TM tl_PH tt_RU ur_PK uz_UZ uz_UZ@cyrillic yi_US These locales come with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. Further the following locales only have a part of the above statement: fy_DE li_BE li_NL nds_DE nds_NL Finally, the following ones have no statement at all: dz_BT iso14651_t1_common mt_MT sq_AL As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#566 -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Shehzad, thanks for your answer. Just to make sure I understand you correctly: The license (L)GPL v2 or higher is fine for you, correct? Also thanks for the new address of Pablo, unfortunately, it also does not work. Greetings Helge On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:56:55PM +0100, Shehzad Ali wrote: Hello Dr. Kreutzmann I have absolutely no objections to the statement being modified to allow for modification and re-licensed. Pablo contacted me for help so I have included his updated e-mail in the reply too. As long as the locale can be updated, modified and distributed freely for the benefit of everyone I have no objections :) If you require anything else from me please do not hesitate to ask. Regards Shehzad Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:22:30 +0200 From: deb...@helgefjell.de To: shehzadas...@hotmail.com; pa...@mandrakesoft.com CC: 555...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ur_PK This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Shehzad, On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:49:50PM +, Shehzad Ali wrote: Yes, the license (L)GPL v2 or higher is fine for me. Thanks. Pablo works at Mandriva now according to his LinkedIn profile. Their is another e-mail on his website. Would you like me to find that for you? That would be great if you could find out that other e-mail address, this would help a lot! Thank you Helge Regards Shehzad -Original Message- From: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:36:08 To: shehzadas...@hotmail.com Cc: pa...@mandrakesoft.com; pa...@mandriva.com; shehzadas...@yahoo.com; 555...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you Hello Shehzad, thanks for your answer. Just to make sure I understand you correctly: The license (L)GPL v2 or higher is fine for you, correct? Also thanks for the new address of Pablo, unfortunately, it also does not work. Greetings Helge On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:56:55PM +0100, Shehzad Ali wrote: Hello Dr. Kreutzmann I have absolutely no objections to the statement being modified to allow for modification and re-licensed. Pablo contacted me for help so I have included his updated e-mail in the reply too. As long as the locale can be updated, modified and distributed freely for the benefit of everyone I have no objections :) If you require anything else from me please do not hesitate to ask. Regards Shehzad Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:22:30 +0200 From: deb...@helgefjell.de To: shehzadas...@hotmail.com; pa...@mandrakesoft.com CC: 555...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ur_PK This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: yi_US This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: uk_UA This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ur_PK This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: uz_UZ This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: uz_UZ@cyrillic This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tg_TJ This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tk_TM This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tl_PH This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tr_CY This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tr_TR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tt_RU This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tt_RU@iqtelif This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: se_NO This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: shs_CA This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: sk_SK This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: sl_SI This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello A S Alam, thanks for your reply, and no, you did not miss anything, the e-mail was kindly quickly directed to you (by bubulle). Did you also do the locale file for pa_IN (e-mail address amanli...@netscape.net)? From your reply I assume GNU General Public License V2 or later is fine for both files? Thanks again! Best regards Helge On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:24:36AM +0530, A S Alam wrote: I am really sorry if I missed mail earlier. I am fully agree with any changes in locale file, whichever you think is more suitable free software license. As I am not expert for liceneses, while you people can provide better choice to keep software free. All my contribution for open source should be available as free software and though should be part of debian. Please let me know if anything I need to do other than this. Amanpreet Singh Alam ਬà©à©±à¨§à¨µà¨¾à¨° 27 à¨à©à¨¨ 2012 10:58 ਸਵà©à¨°à© ਨà©à©°, Christian PERRIER ਨ੠ਲਿà¨à¨¿à¨: Amanpreet Singh Alam is also using alternate addresses, which I also CCto this mail to get better chances he sees it. To A S Alam, could you address the below question about the Punjabi locale (this is pa_PK as it seems that pa_IN doesn't have the offending sentence included). Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: pa_PK This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ -- A S Alam -- To unsubscribe, send mail to 555168-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ro_RO This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ru_UA This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: pa_PK This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: oc_FR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: nan_TW@latin This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: nb_NO This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: mn_MN This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: mi_NZ This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: lg_UG This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: lt_LT This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: lv_LV This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ka_GE This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: kk_KZ This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ko_KR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ku_TR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: id_ID This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: is_IS This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: hsb_DE This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ht_HT This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: hu_HU This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: hy_AM This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: [Traduc] Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Jean-Philippe, On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Guérard wrote: At that time, the license was not discussed, as we were under the impression this file was part of the glibc and distributed under the same license. The original author of this file is Keld Jørn Simonsen. Provided that Keld Jørn Simonsen agree with this, we would be very happy to see this file officially put under a Free license. Using the same license as the glibc would be fine for us. Do you have a working e-mail address of Keld? The one listed in the files no longer works. Hope that helps. Yes, definitly. Hopefully Keld can be contacted, this would solve many other problematic locales as well. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ga_IE This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: gl_ES This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: fa_IR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: fil_PH This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: fr_FR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: en_ZA This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). Furthermore, several licences have no statement at all, namely: af_ZA nr_ZA nso_ZA nso_ZA nso_ZA nso_ZA nso_ZA ss_ZA st_ZA ts_ZA tn_ZA ve_ZA xh_ZA zu_ZA To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense these locales to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: et_EE This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Adi, On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 11:43:37PM +0300, Adi Roiban wrote: Hi, I don't know how I ended up as a translator for cv_RU. Anyway, I agree to release all my work as public license. Thanks. Just to clarify: you mean public domain? Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: dv_MV This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Dafydd, On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 07:09:19PM +0100, Dafydd Harries wrote: Indeed, the imaginet.co.uk address is not mine at all. The file says: title Welsh language locale for Great Britain source thanks to Dafydd Tomos (daf...@imaginet.co.uk) So I assume that (unfortunately) you are not the person who did the Welsh locale? Thanks! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Fwd: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
for the record - Forwarded message from \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com - Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:39:58 +0100 From: \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com To: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de, dwa...@translate.org.za Subject: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; af; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19 Helge, Let's see what Dwayne has to say. it might be possible to fix all of my legacy out of all of the locales in one go. I would probably just defer to him in the end. Regards. Op 08/06/2012 17:15, het Helge Kreutzmann geskryf: Hello Schalk, thanks for your quick reply. On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:23:56AM +0100, Schalk W. Cronjé wrote: Absolutely, please remove the text and adjust the license to be the same as whatever af_ZA, en_ZA are licensed as nowadays. This is not possible: af_ZA has no clause while en_ZA has has the same problematic text as en_BW and en_ZW. The no clause text can be interpreted to be the same license as (e)glibc, but if possible an concrete license would be preferable, so either LGPL v 2.1 or later or maybe same license than (e)glibc. I have added that text way back in the 90s when the localisation effort was just starting in Southern Africa. It is worth a review anyway. I have CC'd Dwayne Bailey who coordinated *_ZA locales subsequently. Thanks. I was going to mail him later for his locales. Greetings Helge - End forwarded message - -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Christian, On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Hello Helge, Great but tedious work you're doing on locales licences. IIRC, you already asked me about those I contributed, right? Nope, you already told it the bug before I started[1]. I listed all possibly unclear licenses and their resolution[2]. See [3] and [4] for an explanation. Quoting Tomislav Vujec (tvu...@redhat.com): I suspect that the only reason that this file references me as a contact is since it was based off Croatian locale that I put together two decades ago. I no longer maintain Croatian locale, but since this one is based off my work that was LGPLd, I believe the same license should apply to it, granting rights for use, distribution and modification according to LGPL. I hope this helps. Please let me know if there's anything else I'd need to do. The other contributor, namely Pablo Saratxaga, is a well-known name in the l10n community. He was (is?) working at Mandrakesoft and doing a lot of l10n-related work. See [5]. You can very certainly reach him by googling a bit, which is certainly worth it as he contributed many locales. Trying to find an alternative address to @mandrakesoft.com might be a good idea. Both e-mail adresses known to me failed (with timeouts). My plan is to first send out all e-mails and see what I get. For those who contributed lots of locales, I collected them in one mail (unfortunately all e-mail addresses were invalid), currently I'm working through the remaining list. I'm not going for the implicit list unless the author also worked on the non modify one, at least for now. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#20 [2] http://www.helgefjell.de/debianitem.php?name=bug555168language=en [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#43 [4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#61 [5] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168#56 Greetings Helge P.S. If you need the full e-mail lists, do not hesitate to ask me; I can provide them to you off bug. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: cv_RU This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Tomislav, On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:34:10PM -0400, Tomislav Vujec wrote: - Original Message - From: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: bs_BA [snip] Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? Helge, I suspect that the only reason that this file references me as a contact is since it was based off Croatian locale that I put together two decades ago. I no longer maintain Croatian locale, but Correct, it clearly states that: TODO/bs_BA:% Source: adapted from Croatian locale TODO/bs_BA:source adapted from Croatian locale However, the croation one has the same clause. since this one is based off my work that was LGPLd, I believe the same license should apply to it, granting rights for use, distribution and modification according to LGPL. I hope this helps. Please let me know if there's anything else I'd need to do. Definitly. Just for clarity: So may I note that »LGPGL 2.1 and later« applies to both bs_BA and hr_HR? Thanks! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: cy_GB This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: csb_PL This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: cs_CZ This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: crh_UA This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ca_ES This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Fwd: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, for the record. Helge - Forwarded message from \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com - Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:23:56 +0100 From: \Schalk W. Cronjé\ ysb...@gmail.com To: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de CC: dwa...@translate.org.za Subject: Re: Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; af; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19 Absolutely, please remove the text and adjust the license to be the same as whatever af_ZA, en_ZA are licensed as nowadays. I have added that text way back in the 90s when the localisation effort was just starting in Southern Africa. It is worth a review anyway. I have CC'd Dwayne Bailey who coordinated *_ZA locales subsequently. Regards. Op 07/06/2012 18:51, het Helge Kreutzmann geskryf: Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s): en_BW en_ZW These locales come with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge - End forwarded message - -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello Schalk, thanks for your quick reply. On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:23:56AM +0100, Schalk W. Cronjé wrote: Absolutely, please remove the text and adjust the license to be the same as whatever af_ZA, en_ZA are licensed as nowadays. This is not possible: af_ZA has no clause while en_ZA has has the same problematic text as en_BW and en_ZW. The no clause text can be interpreted to be the same license as (e)glibc, but if possible an concrete license would be preferable, so either LGPL v 2.1 or later or maybe same license than (e)glibc. I have added that text way back in the 90s when the localisation effort was just starting in Southern Africa. It is worth a review anyway. I have CC'd Dwayne Bailey who coordinated *_ZA locales subsequently. Thanks. I was going to mail him later for his locales. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: be_BY This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: be_BY@latin This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: br_FR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: bg_BG This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: bs_BA This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s): en_BW en_ZW These locales come with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Update meaning of table values
Hello, I added an additional value for the third column in http://www.helgefjell.de/debianitem.php?name=bug555168language=en For completeness, here are the meaning of the column entires: The first column is the locale, the second states the status: implicit - no license given, impllicitly the one of (e)glibc GPL versionless - license GPL, but no version given Non-modify - License which does not allow modification Broken - License which is truncated The third column states if the author replied so far: Resolved - The author resolved the license issue Contact - An initial contact was made None - No reply to this issue so far Undeliverable - The e-mail address of the original submitter no longer works A dash indicates that no contact attempt was made so far The fourth column states if the license is now ok: It contains either the name of the license (in green), the word implicit in blue if the licnese is given implicitly, unclear (in orange) if the status is unclear or no in red if the license is not ok. The final column links to relevant e-mails, if any. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s): gd_GB gv_GB kw_GB hy_AM ka_GE oc_FR pap_AN yi_US These locales come with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. Further the following locales only have a part of the above statement: fy_DE li_BE li_NL nds_DE nds_NL As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale(s): fy_DE li_BE li_NL nds_DE nds_NL These locales come with a statement, which seems to be part of % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus they do not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this truncated statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 these locales could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently they are allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense these locale(s) to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
