Re: sys/mount.h not C++ clean on kfreebsd
Hi, On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:21:33PM +, peter green wrote: Compiling: sal/osl/unx/file_volume.cxx In file included from /build/buildd-libreoffice_3.4.5-3-kfreebsd-amd64-ukEv52/libreoffice-3.4.5/libreoffice-build/build/libreoffice-3.4.5.2/sal/osl/unx/file_volume.cxx:77:0: /usr/include/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/sys/mount.h: In function 'int getvfsbyname(const char*, xvfsconf*)': /usr/include/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/sys/mount.h:398:23: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'xvfsconf*' [-fpermissive] Already pointed out on http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/02/msg00061.html see also http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/02/msg00080.html And aurel32 promised that upload for this weekend :) I would file a bug report but packages.debian.org doesn't seem to want to tell me what package sys/mount.h is in. libc0.1-dev Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120225125603.gf17...@rene-engelhard.de
Bug#442418: sigcontext.h broken
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.6.1-3 Severity: grave Hi, as discussed on IRC: 13:10 _rene_ MadCoder: ping? 13:14 MadCoder _rene_: small pont 13:14 -!- ema (Emanuele Rocca) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 13:14 MadCoder pong 13:14 -!- tdykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds] 13:16 -!- Col_Kernel (Joachim Reichel) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 13:18 -!- pabs (Paul Wise) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 13:23 _rene_ MadCoder: is there a b0rkage of sigcontext.h known? I have it since 2.6.1-3 13:24 -!- kaeso [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit [Quit: E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle] 13:24 -!- Irssi: Pasting 9 lines to #debian-devel. Press Ctrl-K if you wish to do this or Ctrl-C to cancel. 13:24 _rene_ In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:8, from system.h:86, from conditn.c:38: 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:19: error: redefinition of 'struct _fpreg' 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:24: error: redefinition of 'struct _fpxreg' 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:30: error: redefinition of 'struct _xmmreg' 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:34: error: redefinition of 'struct _fpstate' 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:58: error: redefinition of 'struct sigcontext' 13:24 _rene_ dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/conditn.obj' [...] 14:10 MadCoder _rene_: I suppose there is a problem with linux-libc-dev again 14:11 MadCoder _rene_: you have to file a bug against it, it's not a libc problem [...] 16:30 MadCoder waldi: it's bits/sigcontext.h 16:30 MadCoder not sys/ 16:30 MadCoder sorry 16:31 noshadow mrvn: install has the disadvantage that one has to think about all permissions and ownerships, just making the changes one likes after dh_fixperms makes sure only those are changed. 16:31 mrvn noshadow: true. 16:31 dendrite noshadow: In this case we have to think about all if it anyhow, so that's not a real downer. 16:31 dendrite noshadow: (for us.) 16:31 waldi MadCoder: which was mostly empty before the last update 16:31 waldi MadCoder: no bug in the kernel 16:31 MadCoder h 16:31 mrvn dendrite: I find chown -R actually quite efficient. 16:31 dendrite I was also mightily confused between DEBIAN and debian directories. 16:32 MadCoder and aurel32 is off for some days 16:32 dendrite mrvn: Yeah, it certainly works. :-) 16:32 MadCoder and he did the last upload 16:32 MadCoder hmmm 16:32 MadCoder waldi, _rene_: okay, I'll try to see what's the problem is then 16:32 noshadow dendrite: just make sure all those things are set in the binary (or rules invoked at that time like install) of debian/rules. So that at package creation time fakeroot still knows what permissions you set them to. 16:32 dendrite mrvn: Thanks. 16:33 dendrite debian/rules... 16:33 mrvn dendrite: indeed it does :) 16:33 dendrite mrvn: =) 16:34 waldi MadCoder: the kernel exports its interface for more than glibc 16:34 -!- bandini (Michele Baldessari) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 16:34 MadCoder and ? 16:35 _rene_ MadCoder: as said, it broke in -3. afair, -2 did work fine. 16:35 _rene_ MadCoder: (fwiw) 16:35 -!- foka (Anthony Fok) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 16:35 MadCoder yeah it seems to be related to the: 16:35 MadCoder * sysdeps/amd64.mk: uses x86_64 headers also for the i486 flavour now 16:35 MadCoder that they are compatible. 16:35 MadCoder * sysdeps/i386.mk: uses x86_64 headers also for the main flavour. 16:36 MadCoder the problematic header comes from the x86_64/bits/ directory of the glibc sources 16:36 dendrite So the debian/rules file is basically a makefile, and doesn't actually create explicit settings for the packaged files? That really needs to be done before the package is created, using the usual commands? 16:38 waldi MadCoder: yes. sigcontext.h for xx86_64 is split into two [...] 16:49 MadCoder _rene_: okay it's definitely a libc problem 16:49 dendrite Yoe: No, I can IRC @ work, I'm just too busy coding then. :-) 16:49 MadCoder I won't have tiem to deal with it right now, so please open a bug (RC :/) so that I think about Doing :) Regards, Rene
OOo fails to build with glibc 2.5 in Debian (on sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, OOos idlc hangs when building it on sparc. I tried a manual build to check whether it builds (because experimental did never build it and even if it would it would have used the old lib which was in sid at that time; and the buildd has problems keeping up...). Anyway, the machine I tried this one runs Linux 2.6.17-rc6 and when building OOo idlc hangs *randomly*. strace shows it waiting for a futex() call which never ends until I ctrl-c. It works fine when built in a etch chroot, but breaks when building in a sid one. Apparently it builds fine on Ubuntu, too.. No idea whether their libc6 2.5 is sufficiently different or what kernel they run on their buildd... Anyone having an idea? The log doesn't say anything interesting so I'll not post it here... Gr??e/Regards, Ren? - -- .''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGLGV++FmQsCSK63MRAlnMAJ9eSrINRfC59QEhXTpppOhKaWctuACaA9Ps xpo5Ek+/6bV7E/tK/eRfBho= =7J00 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo fails to build with glibc 2.5 in Debian (on sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Engelhard wrote: OOos idlc hangs when building it on sparc. I tried a manual build to [...] Oh, forgotten to say: I am neither subscribed to -sparc nor glibc so please Cc either me or -openoffice. (Latter of cours preffered for transparency) Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGLGi7+FmQsCSK63MRAnRoAJ9C340I1/VKbs3DQh3GuYSsbVkLBACePTkc oMTpu1dozO89MfmOd5K0cOU= =ahr4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313275: /usr/include/asm-ppc/sigcontext.h:12:error excpected `; ' before '*' token
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.6.0+rc6-1 Severity: important Hi, A OOo2 build fails with the new linux-kernel-headers installed (at least on powerpc; not tested on i386 yet.) ccache g++ -fsigned-char -fmessage-length=0 -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../inc -I../../unx/inc -I../../unxlngppc.pro/inc -I. -I/home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/solver/680/unxlngppc.pro/inc/stl -I/home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/solver/680/unxlngppc.pro/inc/external -I/home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/solver/680/unxlngppc.pro/inc -I/home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/solenv/unxlngppc/inc -I/home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/solenv/inc -I/home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/res -I/home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/solver/680/unxlngppc.pro/inc/stl -I/home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I. -I../../res -I. -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fsigned-char -pipe -frtti -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -fno-exceptions -fPIC -DLINUX -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC300 -DPOWERPC -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/3.4 -DCVER=C300 -D_USE_NAMESPACE -DGLIBC=2 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DNEW_SOLAR -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1 -DSTLPORT_VERSION=400 -DPOWERPC -DPPC -D__DMAKE -DUNIX -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DSUPD=680 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DPRODUCT_FULL -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE -DEXCEPTIONS_OFF -DCUI -DSOLAR_JAVA -DSRC680 -DMULTITHREAD -o ../../unxlngppc.pro/obj/rsc.o /home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/rsc/source/rsc/rsc.cxx In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:8, from /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28, from /usr/include/../include/signal.h:333, from /home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/solver/680/unxlngppc.pro/inc/stl/signal.h:23, from /usr/include/sys/wait.h:30, from /home/rene/openoffice.org2-1.9.108/ooo-build/build/src680-m108/rsc/source/rsc/rsc.cxx:73: /usr/include/asm-ppc/sigcontext.h:12: error: expected `;' before '*' token Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#253030: depends on libc6 on ia64
Package: nscd Severity: serious Hi, as grep-excuses shows ncsd depends on libc6 on ia64 where the library is libc6.1 (as you surely know ;) ): glibc (2.3.2.ds1-12 to 2.3.2.ds1-13) Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers Too young, only 6 of 10 days old out of date on arm: libc6, libc6-dbg, libc6-dev, libc6-pic, libc6-prof, nscd (from 2.3.2.ds1-12) nscd/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-13) out of date on sparc: libc6, libc6-dbg, libc6-dev, libc6-dev-sparc64, libc6-pic, libc6-prof, libc6-sparc64, libc6-sparcv9, libc6-sparcv9b, nscd (from 2.3.2.ds1-12) libc6 (arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is (less) buggy! (1 = 1) Not considered -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#210608: glibc: breaks OpenOffice.org build
Package: glibc Version: 2.3.2-6 Severity: serious Hi, during compiling OpenOffice.org (and icu): ccache gcc -D_REENTRANT -I../../common -I../../common -I../../i18n -I./../toolut il -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUCONVMSG_LINK=uconvmsg -O -c -o uwmsg.o uwmsg.c /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs uconvmsg/resources mkdir uconvmsg mkdir uconvmsg/resources LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../common:../../i18n:../../tools/toolutil:../../layout:../../ extra/ustdio:../../tools/ctestfw:../../data/out:../../data:../../stubdata/:$LD_L IBRARY_PATH ../../tools/genrb/genrb -p uconvmsg -e UTF-8 -s resources -d uconvms g/resources root.txt Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-minimal.c: 137: realloc: Assertion `new == p tr' failed! make[3]: *** [uconvmsg/resources/uconvmsg_root.res] Fehler 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpakete/ openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/icu/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/icu/source/extra/uconv' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpakete/ openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/icu/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/icu/source/extra' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpakete/ openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/icu/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/icu/source' dmake: Error code 2, while making './unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_icu' ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org /Hauptpakete/openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/icu This IRC snippet _may_ be helpful; I doubt it, though... 00:05 asuffield oh, I see what that code does. I'd bet on a glibc bug 00:05 asuffield the function has a screwey precondition and fails like that if it doesn't hold 00:05 Overfiend doogie: do diversions of conffiles work? 00:06 Overfiend doogie: i.e., does dpkg not prompt you about updating diverted conffiles? 00:06 jbailey asuffield: Do you have time to work up a bug report / test case? If not, can you send me what you're looking at so I can research more? 00:06 Overfiend (the manpage doesn't mention this case) 00:07 asuffield jbailey: I'm just eyeballing dl-minimal.c. realloc() has to be called with exactly the right argument; it's a 9-line function 00:07 asuffield there are several calls to realloc in elf/, figures. I don't feel like chasing it Unfortunately this at least seems to be an heisenbug on my machine -- if I execute this line manually it works; it doesn't work in the build though -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #3 Mit Aug 6 17:21:44 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#204656: libc-udeb: double udeb
Hi, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sat, 9 Aug 2003 04:12:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Package: libc-udeb Version: 2.3.2-2 (not installed) Severity: minor Description: glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation libc-udeb - GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data - udeb (udeb) I think one udeb is enough and the - udeb could be stripped off. :) No, this (udeb) is added by other tools (how to print above Hmm. Description message?). We need to distinct with libc6 Description I got that from the .changes file of the last libc upload (I copied it from debian-devel-changes) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#204656: libc-udeb: double udeb
Package: libc-udeb Version: 2.3.2-2 (not installed) Severity: minor Description: glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation libc-udeb - GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data - udeb (udeb) I think one udeb is enough and the - udeb could be stripped off. :) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #3 Mit Aug 6 17:21:44 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: binutils error? (autobuilder failure)
Hi, [ please Cc: me as Iam not sucribed to -68k and not to -glibc ] Richard Zidlicky wrote: On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:06:42AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: anyone of you know what causes the follwing build failure and what to do? Versions till -3 built successfully; but binutils got updated recently... http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=firestarterver=0.9.1-4arch=m68kstamp=1044431895file=logas=raw known problem in binutils. Temporary workaround is to patch glibc like this: +++ glibc-2.2.90/sysdeps/m68k/dl-machine.hMon Aug 26 11:45:31 2002 @@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ Elf32_Addr *const reloc_addr = (void *) (l_addr + reloc-r_offset); if (ELF32_R_TYPE (reloc-r_info) == R_68K_JMP_SLOT) *reloc_addr += l_addr; + else if (ELF32_R_TYPE (reloc-r_info) == R_68K_NONE) +return; else _dl_reloc_bad_type (map, ELF32_R_TYPE (reloc-r_info), 1); } No idea if it is fixed or going to be fixed in some newer binutils. The inefficiency introduced by this patch is minimal so it won?t hurt if it stays in glibc for a while. Maybe that patch should be put into our glibc package? (CC'ing) ? Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 msg02979/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#175163: libc6-2.3.1-8 causing mutt SEGV when opening folders with messages in
Hi, Ben White wrote: Whenever I upgrade my libc6/libc6-dev/nscd/locales packages to the 2.3.1-8 packages, it causes mutt to seg fault when opening mailboxes with messages in. Downgrading to 2.3.1-5 fixes the problems. The same problems were occuring with 2.3.1-6 and -7. Hmm. I use mutt 1.4.0-5 with 2.3.1-8 without problems here Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 msg02566/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#175163: libc6-2.3.1-8 causing mutt SEGV when opening folders with messages in
Hi, Ben White wrote: Whenever I upgrade my libc6/libc6-dev/nscd/locales packages to the 2.3.1-8 packages, it causes mutt to seg fault when opening mailboxes with messages in. Downgrading to 2.3.1-5 fixes the problems. The same problems were occuring with 2.3.1-6 and -7. Hmm. I use mutt 1.4.0-5 with 2.3.1-8 without problems here Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgpc99hD26qey.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#171691: mistake
close 171691 thanks Hi, the whole things were intended for 170044, not for 170004. Sorry. Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#171691: mistake
close 171691 thanks Hi, the whole things were intended for 170044, not for 170004. Sorry. Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Bug#170635: libc6 2.3.1-3 to 2.3.1-5 upgrade breaks
Hi, Magnus Danielson wrote: I got the Device or resource busy message as a reply. It's because the file is in use by many tools: That shouldn't happen. File in use != name in use. rm removes names, not files. [...] And you using something weird as your root file system? That is something besides ext[23] or reiserfs? EXT3. No strange options or anything. I can't think of any specific things other than over-generous selection of Debian/unstable packages. I got the same message too on a previous upgrade (IIRC on 2.2.5-x). / was ext3. After resetting / to ext2 it worked. I did not know whz then, and I do not know if that is a bug in glibc, dpkg or kernel. Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170635: libc6 2.3.1-3 to 2.3.1-5 upgrade breaks
Hi, Magnus Danielson wrote: I got the Device or resource busy message as a reply. It's because the file is in use by many tools: That shouldn't happen. File in use != name in use. rm removes names, not files. [...] And you using something weird as your root file system? That is something besides ext[23] or reiserfs? EXT3. No strange options or anything. I can't think of any specific things other than over-generous selection of Debian/unstable packages. I got the same message too on a previous upgrade (IIRC on 2.2.5-x). / was ext3. After resetting / to ext2 it worked. I did not know whz then, and I do not know if that is a bug in glibc, dpkg or kernel. Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Bug#165358: libc6 2.3.1-1 breaks fetchmail/exim (and others?)
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi, I yesterday upgraded glibc to the 2.3.1-1 release and suddenly my fetchmail does not work complaining it cannot connect to local SMTP. Downgrading all *libc* and locales Packages to 2.2.5-15 fixes that... Sid, i386 Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#165358: libc6 2.3.1-1 breaks fetchmail/exim (and others?)
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi, I yesterday upgraded glibc to the 2.3.1-1 release and suddenly my fetchmail does not work complaining it cannot connect to local SMTP. Downgrading all *libc* and locales Packages to 2.2.5-15 fixes that... Sid, i386 Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Bug#165412: libc6: SIGRTMIN defined as -1 with libc 2.3.1, as 32 with 2.2.5
severity 165412 critical
thanks
Hi,
Oskar Liljeblad wrote:
SIGRTMIN is defined glibc-2.3.1/sysdeps/unix/sysv/{arch}/bits/signum.h
as:
#define SIGRTMIN(__libc_current_sigrtmin ())
This is the problem. As I understand, __libc_* is now hidden and
unaccessible.
So the function is unaccessible...
It seems that these problems appear in many programs in the
distribution, maybe with other functions too
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
