Bug#243394: marked as done ([s390 patch] Improved backtrace for s390*)

2004-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#243394: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 20:33:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 12 13:33:49 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BD87n-00070r-00; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:33:47 -0700
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06226
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:30:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3CKUp6S009107;
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:30:51 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:30:51 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [s390 patch] Improved backtrace for s390*
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) Common Lisp XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: glibc

[submitted for keeping track of
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2004/debian-glibc-200404/msg00035.html]

This patch applied upstream
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-12/msg00025.html
is supposed to fix about 900 test failures in the libjava testsuite in
gcc-3.4. Note that I didn't test the patch myself.

 Matthias

Compare the Debian test results
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-03/msg00816.html

=== libjava Summary ===

  # of expected passes  1487
  # of unexpected failures  900
  # of expected failures4
  # of untested testcases   908

with Ulrich's test results
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-04/msg00098.html

=== libjava Summary ===

  # of expected passes  3259
  # of unexpected failures  2
  # of expected failures11
  # of untested testcases   8


---
Received: (at 243394-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2004 22:08:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 29 15:08:07 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUBzr-0002HU-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 15:08:07 -0700
Received: from troup by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUBrc-0003hn-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#243394: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-13_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-13_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.udeb

Bug#243394: marked as done ([s390 patch] Improved backtrace for s390*)

2004-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#243394: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 20:33:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 12 13:33:49 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BD87n-00070r-00; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:33:47 -0700
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06226
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:30:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3CKUp6S009107;
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:30:51 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:30:51 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [s390 patch] Improved backtrace for s390*
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) Common Lisp XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: glibc

[submitted for keeping track of
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2004/debian-glibc-200404/msg00035.html]

This patch applied upstream
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-12/msg00025.html
is supposed to fix about 900 test failures in the libjava testsuite in
gcc-3.4. Note that I didn't test the patch myself.

 Matthias

Compare the Debian test results
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-03/msg00816.html

=== libjava Summary ===

  # of expected passes  1487
  # of unexpected failures  900
  # of expected failures4
  # of untested testcases   908

with Ulrich's test results
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-04/msg00098.html

=== libjava Summary ===

  # of expected passes  3259
  # of unexpected failures  2
  # of expected failures11
  # of untested testcases   8


---
Received: (at 243394-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2004 22:08:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 29 15:08:07 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUBzr-0002HU-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 15:08:07 -0700
Received: from troup by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUBrc-0003hn-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#243394: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-13_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-13_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-13_i386.udeb