Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm should have such header definition itself. Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the kernel. Bastian -- Prepare for tomorrow -- get ready. -- Edith Keeler, The City On the Edge of Forever, stardate unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or linux-kernel-headers package? Regards, -- gotom I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and lvm because it can work around it (thereby reducing its severity to normal). OK. Bastian separated this bug report into #297010 and #298488. Ups, I hope I didn't reopen the wrong bug a few hours ago then. If I did feel free to reclose it. Should a bug reporter get a notice when a bug i cloned or merged? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:26:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the kernel. Ah, I misunderstood, you're right. I first thought it can by fixed in asm/fcntl.h, but I was wrong. Bastian -- Vulcans believe peace should not depend on force. -- Amanda, Journey to Babel, stardate 3842.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or linux-kernel-headers package? Regards, -- gotom I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and lvm because it can work around it (thereby reducing its severity to normal). OK. Bastian separated this bug report into #297010 and #298488. If you don't think l-k-h oder libc6-dev should implement the O_NOATIME it documents then please reassign it to lvm2 alone with an explanation. That is your perogative as maintainer but I stand by my decision that it is a critical bug and both packages are involved. I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm should have such header definition itself. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
