Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or > > linux-kernel-headers package? > > > > Regards, > > -- gotom > > I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and > lvm because it can work around it (thereby reducing its severity to > normal). OK. Bastian separated this bug report into #297010 and #298488. > If you don't think l-k-h oder libc6-dev should implement the O_NOATIME > it documents then please reassign it to lvm2 alone with an > explanation. That is your perogative as maintainer but I stand by my > decision that it is a critical bug and both packages are involved. I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm should have such header definition itself. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also > be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the > actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm > should have such header definition itself. Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the kernel. Bastian -- Prepare for tomorrow -- get ready. -- Edith Keeler, "The City On the Edge of Forever", stardate unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100, > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or >> > linux-kernel-headers package? >> > >> > Regards, >> > -- gotom >> >> I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and >> lvm because it can work around it (thereby reducing its severity to >> normal). > > OK. Bastian separated this bug report into #297010 and #298488. Ups, I hope I didn't reopen the wrong bug a few hours ago then. If I did feel free to reclose it. Should a bug reporter get a notice when a bug i cloned or merged? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:26:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100, > Bastian Blank wrote: > > Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the > > kernel. > Ah, I misunderstood, you're right. I first thought it can by fixed in asm/fcntl.h, but I was wrong. Bastian -- Vulcans believe peace should not depend on force. -- Amanda, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#297010: Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also > > be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the > > actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm > > should have such header definition itself. > > Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the > kernel. Ah, I misunderstood, you're right. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
