Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#564685: regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built against eglibc-2.10.x
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 564685 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > retitle 564685 regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built with > gcc-4.4 Bug #564685 [eglibc] regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built against eglibc-2.10.x Changed Bug title to 'regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built with gcc-4.4' from 'regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built against eglibc-2.10.x' > found 564685 4.4.2-9 Bug #564685 [eglibc] regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built with gcc-4.4 There is no source info for the package 'eglibc' at version '4.4.2-9' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '4.4.2-9' Bug Marked as found in versions 4.4.2-9. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564685: regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built against eglibc-2.10.x
reassign 564685 retitle 564685 regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built with gcc-4.4 found 564685 4.4.2-9 thanks On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:06:46PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: eglibc > Version: 2.10.2-5 > Severity: serious > > The following tests fail: > > Test results, compared with installed binutils: > W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (normal) > (non PIC, load offset) > W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (normal) (non > PIC) > W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility > (hidden_normal) (non PIC) > W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility > (hidden_normal) (non PIC, load offset) > W: [ld-shared/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): shared (PIC main, non > PIC so) > W: [ld-shared/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): shared (non PIC) > W: [ld-shared/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): shared (non PIC, load > offset) > 7 REGRESSIONS (0.68%). > > Seen with 2.11 as well. > I have verified those failures are present when building with gcc-4.4, but not when building with gcc-4.3. Thus the culprit is gcc, not eglibc. Reassigning the bug. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564685: regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built against eglibc-2.10.x
Package: eglibc Version: 2.10.2-5 Severity: serious The following tests fail: Test results, compared with installed binutils: W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (normal) (non PIC, load offset) W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (normal) (non PIC) W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (hidden_normal) (non PIC) W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (hidden_normal) (non PIC, load offset) W: [ld-shared/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): shared (PIC main, non PIC so) W: [ld-shared/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): shared (non PIC) W: [ld-shared/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): shared (non PIC, load offset) 7 REGRESSIONS (0.68%). Seen with 2.11 as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
