Re: Processed: Re: Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Hello all, I resolved the breakage by "apt-get remove libgcc-8-dev". This removed noting central to me and allowed the subsequent "dist-ugprade" to complete. In the dist-ugprade I noticed two things: a) All Debconf questions were asked in english, although they should be available in my default locale, i.e. de b) The "dist-upgrade" initially failed: … Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-sugar3 wird gewählt. Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb ... Entpacken von python3-sugar3 (0.117-1) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb (--unpack): Versuch, »/usr/bin/sugar-activity-web« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket python-sugar3 0.112-3 ist dpkg-deb: Fehler: »einfügen«-Unterprozess wurde durch Signal (Datenübergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe)) getötet Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../31-libxapian30_1.4.15-1_amd64.deb ... Entpacken von libxapian30:amd64 (1.4.15-1) über (1.4.11-1) ... Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-xapian wird gewählt. Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../32-python3-xapian_1.4.15-1+b1_amd64.deb ... Entpacken von python3-xapian (1.4.15-1+b1) ... Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-carquinyol wird gewählt. Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb ... Entpacken von python3-carquinyol (0.117-1) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): Versuch, »/usr/bin/copy-from-journal« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket python-carquinyol 0.112-1 ist Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../34-sucrose_0.117-3_all.deb ... Entpacken von sucrose (0.117-3) über (0.112-6) ... Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/30-python3-sugar3_0.117-1_all.deb /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-q4FnQb/33-python3-carquinyol_0.117-1_amd64.deb A subsequent "apt-get -f install" fixed this, however. If you would like to get futher information from me so that other users can avoid these problems (especially the first one) please let me know. Please note, however, that I'm no tracking testing, i.e. the state is now evolving again. Greetings Helge signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 964477 apt Bug #964477 [libc6-dev] libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable Bug reassigned from package 'libc6-dev' to 'apt'. No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.28-10. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #964477 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 964477: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964477 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
reassign 964477 apt thanks On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 06:58:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2020-07-19 18:48, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Aurelien, > > sorry for answering late, I was a few days offline. > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2020-07-07 21:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > > Package: libc6-dev > > > > Version: 2.28-10 > > > > Severity: important > > > > > > > > Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and > > > > then > > > > apt-get update > > > > apt-get upgrade > > > > > > > > worked. Now: > > > > > > > > apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following: > > > > > > > > root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade > > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > > Building dependency tree > > > > Reading state information... Done > > > > Calculating upgrade... Error! > > > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > > libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be > > > > installed > > > > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be > > > > caused by held packages. > > > > > > This break entry is correct, if we remove it gcc-8 will be left > > > potentially broken after the upgrade. I have no idea how it can be fixed > > > on the glibc side. > > > > Who would be the best party to fix this? (Sorry, at the moment I don't > > have a clue what causes this problem). > > I guess apt developers might be able to help there. > > > > > If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of > > > > programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, > > > > libreoffice etc. > > > > > > Have you tried installing gcc-defaults from testing before starting the > > > upgrade? > > > > I did an upgrade today (dist-upgrade is still broken) and for some > > strange reason I cannot install gcc-defaults: > > > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > E: Unable to locate package gcc-defaults > > > > I also get this in an current (unrelated) sid chroot. Strange. > > Oops sorry. gcc-defaults is the source package. You should try with one > of the corresponding binary packages, like gcc or g++. Ok, then this is not another local problem. However, it does not help. Installing gcc brings in a few packages but then dist-upgrade fails again the same way. g++ is already at the latest version. I reassign this bug to apt as suggested. Thanks for your support. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Hi, On 2020-07-19 18:48, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Aurelien, > sorry for answering late, I was a few days offline. > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2020-07-07 21:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > Package: libc6-dev > > > Version: 2.28-10 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and > > > then > > > apt-get update > > > apt-get upgrade > > > > > > worked. Now: > > > > > > apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following: > > > > > > root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > Building dependency tree > > > Reading state information... Done > > > Calculating upgrade... Error! > > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be > > > installed > > > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be > > > caused by held packages. > > > > This break entry is correct, if we remove it gcc-8 will be left > > potentially broken after the upgrade. I have no idea how it can be fixed > > on the glibc side. > > Who would be the best party to fix this? (Sorry, at the moment I don't > have a clue what causes this problem). I guess apt developers might be able to help there. > > > If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of > > > programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, > > > libreoffice etc. > > > > Have you tried installing gcc-defaults from testing before starting the > > upgrade? > > I did an upgrade today (dist-upgrade is still broken) and for some > strange reason I cannot install gcc-defaults: > > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > E: Unable to locate package gcc-defaults > > I also get this in an current (unrelated) sid chroot. Strange. Oops sorry. gcc-defaults is the source package. You should try with one of the corresponding binary packages, like gcc or g++. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Hello Aurelien, sorry for answering late, I was a few days offline. On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2020-07-07 21:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Package: libc6-dev > > Version: 2.28-10 > > Severity: important > > > > Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and > > then > > apt-get update > > apt-get upgrade > > > > worked. Now: > > > > apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following: > > > > root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Error! > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be > > installed > > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused > > by held packages. > > This break entry is correct, if we remove it gcc-8 will be left > potentially broken after the upgrade. I have no idea how it can be fixed > on the glibc side. Who would be the best party to fix this? (Sorry, at the moment I don't have a clue what causes this problem). > > If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of > > programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, > > libreoffice etc. > > Have you tried installing gcc-defaults from testing before starting the > upgrade? I did an upgrade today (dist-upgrade is still broken) and for some strange reason I cannot install gcc-defaults: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package gcc-defaults I also get this in an current (unrelated) sid chroot. Strange. Any help much appreciated (or pointers). Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + help Bug #964477 [libc6-dev] libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable Added tag(s) help. -- 964477: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964477 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
control: tags -1 + help Hi, On 2020-07-07 21:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Package: libc6-dev > Version: 2.28-10 > Severity: important > > Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and > then > apt-get update > apt-get upgrade > > worked. Now: > > apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following: > > root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Calculating upgrade... Error! > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be installed > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by > held packages. This break entry is correct, if we remove it gcc-8 will be left potentially broken after the upgrade. I have no idea how it can be fixed on the glibc side. > If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of > programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, > libreoffice etc. Have you tried installing gcc-defaults from testing before starting the upgrade? Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#964477: libc6-dev: Fails to cleanly upgrade from Stable
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.28-10 Severity: important Until a few hours ago I run stable. Switching sources to testing and then apt-get update apt-get upgrade worked. Now: apt-get dist-ugprade tells me the following: root@samd:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Error! Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev (< 8.4.0-2~) but 8.3.0-6 is to be installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. If I try to remove either libc6-dev or libgcc-8-dev then a long list of programms is scheduled for deinstallation, e.g. lots of KDE, okular, libreoffice etc. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc-dev-bin2.28-10 ii libc6 2.28-10 ii linux-libc-dev 5.7.6-1 libc6-dev recommends no packages. Versions of packages libc6-dev suggests: ii glibc-doc 2.30-8 ii manpages-dev 5.07-1 -- no debconf information -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
