Re: 3 glibc LSB RC bugs filed

[Anthony Towns]

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:04:00PM -0800, Matt Taggart wrote:
 I'd like to leave these bugs open for people working on LSB on testing
 so they know when it was fixed. Once a fixed version goes into testing
 then they can be closed.(so they can be downgraded and tagged fixed or
 something) OK?

The should be left as serious and tagged sarge. HTH.

(Closing a bug doesn't change its severity, open bugs that have distribution
tags are considered to only apply to the distributions named)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

Australian DMCA (the Digital Agenda Amendments) Under Review!
-- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/copyright/digitalagenda


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: 3 glibc LSB RC bugs filed

[GOTO Masanori]

Hi,

At Wed, 29 Oct 2003 01:13:08 -0800,
Matt Taggart wrote:
 I just filed 3 RC bugs against glibc for the following LSB test
 failures,
 
 #218130
  ia64: /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/fwide/T.fwide 4 FAIL
 
 #218129
  ia64: /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/vfprintf/T.vfprintf 5 FAIL
 
 #218131
  ia64/i386: /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/tcgetattr/T.tcgetattr 1 FAIL
  ia64/i386: /tset/POSIX.os/devclass/tcgetattr/T.tcgetattr 2 FAIL
 
 and I added them to the LSB bug page at,
 
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/lsb.cgi
 
 Please see the bugs for more info.
 More Debian/LSB info at http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/

I looked at your bug report, but I can get info about FAIL, so I
pulled files from cvs, but I could't test because we need to make LSB
test suite.  Could you prepare complete source tarballs to test them
for us (because http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/ test suites are
link missing), or inform us where the probelm is?

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]