Re: r3403 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any patches/hppa
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Author: aurel32 > Date: 2009-04-08 08:43:52 + (Wed, 08 Apr 2009) > New Revision: 3403 > > Added: > glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/local-csu-init.diff > glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa/local-nptl-compat.diff > Modified: > glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog > glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series > Log: > * patches/any/local-csu-init.diff, patches/hppa/local-nptl-compat.diff: > new patches from Carlos O'Donell to add a compatibility layer for > binaries built against linuxthreads. What were your test results with these patches? Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: r3403 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any patches/hppa
Carlos O'Donell a écrit : > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Aurelien Jarno > wrote: >> Author: aurel32 >> Date: 2009-04-08 08:43:52 + (Wed, 08 Apr 2009) >> New Revision: 3403 >> >> Added: >> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/local-csu-init.diff >> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa/local-nptl-compat.diff >> Modified: >> glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog >> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series >> Log: >> * patches/any/local-csu-init.diff, patches/hppa/local-nptl-compat.diff: >>new patches from Carlos O'Donell to add a compatibility layer for >>binaries built against linuxthreads. > > What were your test results with these patches? > It is currently still building, I'll mail them when they are available. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: r3403 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any patches/hppa
Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > Carlos O'Donell a écrit : >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Aurelien Jarno >> wrote: >>> Author: aurel32 >>> Date: 2009-04-08 08:43:52 + (Wed, 08 Apr 2009) >>> New Revision: 3403 >>> >>> Added: >>> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/local-csu-init.diff >>> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa/local-nptl-compat.diff >>> Modified: >>> glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog >>> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series >>> Log: >>> * patches/any/local-csu-init.diff, patches/hppa/local-nptl-compat.diff: >>>new patches from Carlos O'Donell to add a compatibility layer for >>>binaries built against linuxthreads. >> What were your test results with these patches? >> > > It is currently still building, I'll mail them when they are available. > Actually it fails to build: ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c: In function ‘__pthread_initialize_minimal_internal’: ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c:348: error: ‘FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET’ undeclared (first use in this function) ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c:348: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c:348: error: for each function it appears in.) ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c:348: error: ‘FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME’ undeclared (first use in this function) Note that I am trying those patches on glibc 2.9, does your patches use features from version 2.10? -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: r3403 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any patches/hppa
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:05:16PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > > Carlos O'Donell a écrit : > >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Aurelien Jarno > >> wrote: > >>> Author: aurel32 > >>> Date: 2009-04-08 08:43:52 + (Wed, 08 Apr 2009) > >>> New Revision: 3403 > >>> > >>> Added: > >>> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/local-csu-init.diff > >>> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa/local-nptl-compat.diff > >>> Modified: > >>> glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog > >>> glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series > >>> Log: > >>> * patches/any/local-csu-init.diff, patches/hppa/local-nptl-compat.diff: > >>>new patches from Carlos O'Donell to add a compatibility layer for > >>>binaries built against linuxthreads. > >> What were your test results with these patches? > >> > > > > It is currently still building, I'll mail them when they are available. > > > > Actually it fails to build: > ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c: In function > ‘__pthread_initialize_minimal_internal’: > ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c:348: error: > ‘FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET’ undeclared (first use in this function) > ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c:348: error: (Each > undeclared identifier is reported only once > ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c:348: error: for each > function it appears in.) > ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/nptl/init.c:348: error: > ‘FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > Note that I am trying those patches on glibc 2.9, does your patches use > features from version 2.10? > I have problems to backport your patches to 2.9 (though I haven't try very hard). As glibc 2.10 is going to be released soon, I think the best is actually to package a snapshot of the current CVS, add your patches, and upload it to experimental. This will have the advantage of introducing your patches with the correct symbol versioning, and to also test this version on other architectures. It will take me a bit more time to upload a package though. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: r3403 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any patches/hppa
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I have problems to backport your patches to 2.9 (though I haven't try > very hard). As glibc 2.10 is going to be released soon, I think the best > is actually to package a snapshot of the current CVS, add your patches, > and upload it to experimental. > > This will have the advantage of introducing your patches with the > correct symbol versioning, and to also test this version on other > architectures. > > It will take me a bit more time to upload a package though. This sounds good. As long it doesn't move out of experimental until we are sure everything is OK. Please don't hesitate to ask if you need some help. Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
