Re: gnome-terminal: FTBFS on kfreebsd hurd archs

2014-06-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 18:50:22 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:

 On 31/05/14 18:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
 IMVHO -release@ doesn't need to know about what happens to every single
 package. Feel free to keep that kind of Q  A between maintainers and
 porters.
 
 I was under the impression that -release was overseeing the QA requirements
 for Jessie are being satisfied when it comes to GNOME on non-Linux ports.
 
That's not what your mail was about though.  The details of what part of
gnome we can still ship on kfreebsd I'm sure you can figure out just
fine with the gnome maintainers.  And come to us if there's a question
that actually needs input from us.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: gnome-terminal: FTBFS on kfreebsd hurd archs

2014-06-01 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 15:43, Robert Millan wrote:
 I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell. There 
 are
 dozens of terminal applications, and so far they seem to manage without 
 dragging
 their own desktop environment of choice with them.

FWIW I just noticed there isn't an install-time dependency declared
on gnome-shell, it's only needed at build time.

(Yes, it's really odd that a whole desktop environment is needed on a
buildd, to compile a standalone terminal emulator application).

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnome-terminalarch=i386ver=3.12.2-3stamp=1401560257
| gdm3 [...] gnome-bluetooth gnome-common gnome-desktop3-data
| gnome-doc-utils gnome-icon-theme gnome-icon-theme-symbolic gnome-pkg-tools
| gnome-session gnome-session-bin gnome-session-common gnome-settings-daemon
| gnome-shell gnome-shell-common gnome-themes-standard
| gnome-themes-standard-data
| [...]
| 0 upgraded, 490 newly installed, 1 to remove and 24 not upgraded.
| Need to get 163 MB/163 MB of archives.
| After this operation, 578 MB of additional disk space will be used.

 Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-terminal actually work without gnome-shell? 
 Is
 this setup properly tested and supported by upstream?

popcon.d.o shows 69295 gnome-terminal users but only 56045 with
gnome-shell, so this question wasn't only relevant to kfreebsd.

I'm assuming gnome-terminal will still run okay, or otherwise some
Linux user can follow up on this.

Thanks Pino for the patch.  (Disabling the feature on kfreebsd/hurd is
an acceptable shortcut;  splitting the build dependencies out of
gnome-shell also would have fixed it, but we won't need this feature
at run-time on kfreebsd/hurd).

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140601115004.ga1...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org



Re: Re: Bug#749685: morse-simulator: FTBFS on Kfreebsd - Blocking python3.4 as default python3

2014-06-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/06/14 12:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
 On 2014-05-29 00:55:09, Scott Kitterman wrote:
 Source: morse-simulator
 Version: 1.2-2
 Severity: serious
 Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the 
 past)

 FTBFS on both Kfreebsd i386 and amd64.  The end of the build log looks like:

 reading sources... [ 12%] media
 reading sources... [ 12%] morse
 reading sources... [ 13%] multinode
 reading sources... [ 13%] pymorse
 [error] install python-concurrent.futures
 make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/doc] Error 1
 CMakeFiles/doc.dir/build.make:52: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/doc' failed
 make[3]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i486-kfreebsd-gnu'
 CMakeFiles/Makefile2:967: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/doc.dir/all' failed
 make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/doc.dir/all] Error 2
 make[2]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i486-kfreebsd-gnu'
 make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
 Makefile:126: recipe for target 'all' failed
 make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i486-kfreebsd-gnu'
 dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
 make: *** [build-arch] Error 2
 debian/rules:8: recipe for target 'build-arch' failed
 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2

 While this is not new (it's three months old), it's now blocking getting
 packages rebuilt for python3.4 as default python3 (See #746709).
 
 The issue here is that importing concurrent.futures fails.
 morse-simulator tries to import ThreadPoolExectur and Future from
 concurrent.futures. On falla, this fails with
 
 % python3 -c from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, Future
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File string, line 1, in module
   File /usr/lib/python3.4/concurrent/futures/__init__.py, line 17, in 
 module
 from concurrent.futures.process import ProcessPoolExecutor
   File /usr/lib/python3.4/concurrent/futures/process.py, line 55, in 
 module
 from multiprocessing.connection import wait
   File /usr/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/connection.py, line 21, in 
 module
 import _multiprocessing
 ImportError: No module named '_multiprocessing'
 
 Adding python-concurrent.futures to Build-Depends didn't help because
 it is the backport of concurrent.futures for Python 2. Python = 3.2 (I
 think, or maybe = 3.3) provides concurrent.futures in the standard lib.
 
 This looks like a python3.4 bug to me, but someone with more knowledge
 of concurrent.futures needs to decide that.

I think the problem (or at least one of them) is this:

(sid_kfreebsd-amd64-dchroot)pochu@falla:~$ dpkg -L libpython3.3-stdlib | grep
multiprocessing.cpython
/usr/lib/python3.3/lib-dynload/_multiprocessing.cpython-33m-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu.so
(sid_kfreebsd-amd64-dchroot)pochu@falla:~$ dpkg -L libpython3.4-stdlib | grep
multiprocessing.cpython
(sid_kfreebsd-amd64-dchroot)pochu@falla:~$

That's why importing _multiprocessing fails with python3.4.

That is not shipped because of this: (from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python3.4arch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=3.4.1-1stamp=1400800890
)

*** WARNING: renaming _multiprocessing since importing it failed:
build/lib.gnukfreebsd-9.0-2-amd64-x86_64-3.4/_multiprocessing.cpython-34m.so:
undefined symbol: _PyMp_sem_unlink
[...]
find debian/tmp/usr/lib/python3.4 -name '*_failed*.so'
debian/tmp/usr/lib/python3.4/lib-dynload/_multiprocessing.cpython-34m_failed.so


_PyMp_sem_unlink is defined in semaphore.c. setup.py has:

if host_platform == 'win32':
multiprocessing_srcs = [ '_multiprocessing/multiprocessing.c',
 '_multiprocessing/semaphore.c',
   ]

else:
multiprocessing_srcs = [ '_multiprocessing/multiprocessing.c',
   ]
if (sysconfig.get_config_var('HAVE_SEM_OPEN') and not
sysconfig.get_config_var('POSIX_SEMAPHORES_NOT_ENABLED')):
multiprocessing_srcs.append('_multiprocessing/semaphore.c')

But the kfreebsd-amd64 build log has:

/* Define to 1 if you have the `sem_open' function. */
#define HAVE_SEM_OPEN 1
[...]
/* Define if POSIX semaphores aren't enabled on your system */
#define POSIX_SEMAPHORES_NOT_ENABLED 1

Thus semaphore.c is not built (as can be verified by looking for semaphore.c
in the log), and we get that undefined symbol.

(The same thing happens on hurd).

I'm not sure if the file should be built on kfreebsd/hurd, or if it shouldn't
but there should be some fallback code in python3.4. Adding the python
maintainer, and the bsd and hurd porters to Cc.

Regards,
Emilio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/538b54c1.7050...@debian.org



out of date summary

2014-06-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello,

I have modified this page

http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/out_of_date.txt

to reflect all packages which are out of date, the wanna-build reason
why, etc.  It doesn't include packages which also fail on i386 or amd64.
It is thus a complete summary of what packages we should either fix, or
remove from the archive.  Note: some of the packages have a bug number
in the comments.  It's just a hint: no bug report number does not mean
that nobody submitted any.

Notably, perhaps something that people have not noticed is that quite a
few packages simply have a few testcase not working in their testsuite.
It's usually worth having a look at these, since they are potentially a
corner case to fix in our own code.

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140601163510.gp7...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr



Hello

2014-06-01 Thread Marcelo Lacerda

I joined this mailing list to help with the development of debian/hurd.


I can patch, help with debbuging and bug triaging.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/538b78b4.50...@gmail.com