Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:31:46AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le sam. 13 avril 2019 00:11:15 +0200, a ecrit: > > Joerg Jaspert, le ven. 12 avril 2019 23:30:31 +0200, a ecrit: > > > It seems to exist there, so probably someone who can upload there and > > > is interested in hurd-i386 goes and uploads stuff. > > Within a two-week timeframe only? > (while everybody is supposed to be busy fixing RC bugs) would 6 weeks work be better for you? I can see how the ftpteam doesnt want to delay this *after* the Buster release, but maybe they can agree on giving you a bit more time, so you can a.) still do the move and b.) not neglect polishing buster for https://wiki.debian.org/accessibility -- tschau, Holger --- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > A minority? Yes. But a sizable one. It doesn't matter how many people use it, if noone is willing to maintain it. *If* people are maintaining it, it also doesnt matter how many people are using it :) *Someone* needs to do the work. We are all volunteers. Be the change you want to see in the world. -- cheers, Holger --- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 06:01:43AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Has policy changed regarding support for multiple inits, or is it just that > > no one is maintaining the shim and sysvinit-core? > > The latter. systemd-shim has been orphaned for over 2 years, and has > RC bugs. sysvinit currently has two maintainers, but they've only > ever made one upload (over a year ago). It seems that these facts are either largely ignored or unknown and I wonder if some noise should be made so that interested people can pick up the work now and not only complain later. Please reply to debian-devel@lists.d.o if you have to, but probably replying to those RC bugs is more effective. Also please avoid cc:ing me. -- cheers, Holger --- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
thanks to everyone explaining arch:any to me :) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > ppc64: > > This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have > over > 11.000 packages installed [...] > sparc64: > We are close to 11.000 installed packages. I'm not sure whether you are talking about source or binary packages but sid/amd64 has over 24000 source packages and over 5 binary packages, so I would call the above "on par". Or what am I missing? -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#824834: outdated info on www: Debian GNU/hurd probably not planned for wheezy anymore…
package: www.debian.org x-debbugs-cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, https://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/ contains the following: "We hope to be able to release Debian GNU/Hurd for wheezy." As you might be aware, wheezy has been released and so has jessie, so you might want to update the text on this page :-) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Failure: g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/78
On Freitag, 21. November 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: I'm fixing it by uploading a build of perl without the couple of failing tests. Thanks Holger and Gabriele for having worked on this, it is indeed very useful to quickly catch installability issues. nice! :-) thanks for the feedback! (+happy to add more tests...) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: jenkins kfreebsd jobs (Re: Plan B for kfreebsd)
Hi Steven, On Donnerstag, 13. November 2014, Steven Chamberlain wrote: I think we're missing some data from the end of the serial.log; probably due to some buffering, and qemu being sent SIGKILL. Please consider this change to use SIGINT for up to 10 seconds, then SIGKILL only if it's still running after that: https://git.steven.hosting.pyro.eu.org/jenkins.debian.net.git/?h=894584fca2 66789c8f40b4c0cad60b7909385523 did you make this never returns false? The script will immidiatly end in that case, iirc... cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: jenkins kfreebsd jobs (Re: Plan B for kfreebsd)
Hi, On Freitag, 14. November 2014, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Are you thinking of -e (exit on error)? yes g-i-installation.sh doesn't seem to run in that mode, actually it ignores some failing commands already during cleanup steps. yes, but during cleanup +e is explicitly set, I think. Oh, well, I suppose I should either merge and see how it fails or read the code myself before merging... ;-) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: jenkins kfreebsd jobs (Re: Plan B for kfreebsd)
Hi Steven, On Freitag, 14. November 2014, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Aha yes it does set +e inside that function. But code before and after it does ignore + have to handle fatal errors itself. The code I added shouldn't return false, except maybe a race between 'ps' and 'kill' (if the process goes away in that time); but seems unlikely with the 'sleep 1' after each iteration. ok, cool, thanks for checking! +merged+pushed+deployed+job triggered :) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: jenkins kfreebsd jobs (Re: Plan B for kfreebsd)
Hi Steven, On Freitag, 14. November 2014, Steven Chamberlain wrote: After I started at the error message long enough, it finally hit me, and it's kind of amusing. If you could please fix my silly mistake: hehe, I know that feeling... :-) merged + triggered etc.. - thanks! cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: tasksel desktop preseed issues (was: Re: Failure: g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/71)
On Freitag, 14. November 2014, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Firstly could someone please tell me what display manager this is? https://jenkins.debian.net/view/g-i-installation/job/g-i-installation_debia n_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/70/artifact/results//snapshot_008244.png xdm signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: tasksel desktop preseed issues (was: Re: Failure: g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/71)
Hi, On Samstag, 15. November 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: See the preseed file: we force the use of xdm, I guess because lightdm doesn't work yet. do git blame on that line, it's an ancient choice... probably better now to not force any specific dm and just choose a de. Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: jenkins kfreebsd jobs (Re: Plan B for kfreebsd)
Hi, On Mittwoch, 12. November 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: Maybe hurd also could redirect syslog there to help debug the issue you're seeing. Indeed. actually, all installs can probably benefit from this :) There is: console=com0, it'd only redirect the kernel messages though (which can however be useful to get the out of the vga console output, and in a safe place) [...] Yes, it'd be com0 for GNU/Hurd. patches, please. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: jenkins kfreebsd jobs (Re: Plan B for kfreebsd)
Hi, On Mittwoch, 12. November 2014, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Holger Levsen wrote: in the video there is no IP address to be seen. em0 gets a link, but thats all. Later 'network autoconfiguration succeeded', so DHCP probably worked; the IP address isn't usually mentioned within the GUI installer, but the d-i syslog will probably explain what the problem is. ok, cool. Okay I've tried to log serial console output as an artifact, if you could pull again please: https://git.steven.hosting.pyro.eu.org/jenkins.debian.net.git/?h=adc905d26d 93381495a47ece2259207009f0da5e merged+pushed, thanks. Will trigger new builds once jenkins.d.n is up again, there are currently some disturbances in the cloud... cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: jenkins kfreebsd jobs (Re: Plan B for kfreebsd)
Hi, https://jenkins.debian.net/view/g-i-installation/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_kfreebsd/432/artifact/results/serial.log is there now and it shows how the right IP is received. I don't understand why getting the preseed file then fails... cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)
Hi, On Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013, Stewart Smith wrote: Jenkins can have slaves on remote hosts, via SSH. It runs a small java app there, so as long as the arch has a JVM then you're pretty right. that JVM is not even needed, just schedule jobs via ssh and be done. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Architecture qualification
Hi, On Montag, 4. Juni 2012, Svante Signell wrote: One issue is how to encourage more people trying Hurd out, when it is not in testing. I honestly don't think that's the main blocker trying out hurd. Lack of SATA, and USB support are the blocker, I think. And probably also missing meaningful graphics output puts many people off. Having SATA (or whatever feature) in the works is also meaningless, as hurd is in the works for years. cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206041323.08900.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: Architecture qualification
On Montag, 4. Juni 2012, Svante Signell wrote: Do you mean gnome3 and KDE4/5 here, or maybe DRM? DRM No, this time the work is based on the DDE framework, recently successfully implemented for network drivers. Ask Samuel Thibault for more details if interested, he is the person in charge. BTW: USB support might also be possible within the DDE framework. show me the code in unstable aka sid, please... (or exp. is fine as well...) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206041537.15479.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: hurd-i386 qualification for Wheezy
Hi Samuel, On Samstag, 19. Mai 2012, Samuel Thibault wrote: Concerning hardware support, Linux 2.6.32 network drivers are now included and will be used by default in the coming days. That provides a fairly good coverage of not too-new hardware. We are working on integrating the linux AHCI driver to support SATA HDDs. Concerning X.org, drivers which do not require drm should be working. At worse, the vesa driver should work. There is no USB support, no sound support. On a (very) personal note, the apparent lack of HW support is making it look very bad… Which lack, more precisely? no usb = no keyboard (+other things, obviously) no sata = pretty bad in 2012 no drm xorg drivers + no sound = also pretty bad. cheers, Holger, I am excited to see the hurd come alive, finally! but... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205211044.40297.hol...@layer-acht.org
