Re: Bug#639517: Riddling absence of /usr/lib/libattr.la

2011-08-29 Thread Luk Claes
On 08/29/2011 11:01 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
 Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
 This idea must come from libacl-dev.
 And really in
   /lib/libacl.la
 i read
   dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
 
 Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because
 libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be fixed by a newer build
 of the acl package, but unfortunately it FTBFS ATM (PATH_MAX, #636512).
 
 libisofs not building was becoming more and more a problem, so I patched
 the libacl.la file by hand (yes, a bad thing).

A porter binNMU of the old days ;-)

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5bb7de.3050...@debian.org



Release architecture requalification

2007-09-29 Thread Luk Claes
Hi porters

To make sure we deliver quality for all the architectures we support, we
want to start the architecture requalification process from scratch
again. Therefor we invite people to create and fill in the respective wiki
pages. Please only add yourself to the wiki page when you are an active
developer on the architecture. A wiki template can be found at [1], please name
the wiki page archLennyReleaseRecertification.

Don't hesitate to contact me or the release team when having questions.

Cheers,
Luk

Footnotes:
[1]   http://wiki.debian.org/LennyReleaseRecertificationTemplate


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]