NFSv3 Problem
hi I have a problem with NFSv3, I have correctly installed kernel 2.2.18 with the NFSv3 support and util-linux2-10s. I have put in /etc/fstab 192.168.10.10:/vol/vol0/home /mnt nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,nfsvers=3,nolock,timeo=14,intr,bg 0 0 and all it works normally, but it does not write file greater than 2Gb. ulimit -a core file size (blocks) 0 data seg size (kbytes) unlimited file size (blocks) unlimited max locked memory (kbytes) unlimited max memory size (kbytes)unlimited why? thank's m. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get upgrade installs unnecessary users / Cobalt RaQ 3i
hi list, 1) i switched recently from redhat to debian for an internet server installation i deleted unnecessary users and groups like games, audio etc., but they were reinstalled when doing the first apt-get upgrade. could anyone point me please to some ressources concerning default users/groups, which of them are necessary and how to avoid their reinstallation ? 2) another server we run is a cobalt raq 3i. does anyone run it under debian, or did anyone at least try to install it ? thx -- H. P. Stroebel, Germany -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get upgrade installs unnecessary users / Cobalt RaQ 3i
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:16:02PM +0100, H.P. Stroebel wrote: hi list, 1) i switched recently from redhat to debian for an internet server installation A very good move. MUCH easier to maintain. i deleted unnecessary users and groups like games, audio etc., but they were reinstalled when doing the first apt-get upgrade. could anyone point me please to some ressources concerning default users/groups, which of them are necessary and how to avoid their reinstallation ? Just ignore them. A group with no members doesn't hurt anything. (They are there as placeholders.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing Question
Im setting a broadband Internet connection on a Debian box, I have the sat interface installed and working and can see the icmp packets coming in from a ping on the sat interface using tcpdump so im confident that side of things is working. I am having a bit of trouble with the dialup. Lets say our network is 203.66.77.0, border gateway is 203.66.77.1 and have a Cisco access server on the 203.66.77.11 and radius server on 203.66.77.2. Now if I assign a static ip from a dialup pool on our network, say 203.66.77.55 I can ping out from the dialup no problems, but the static needs to be that of the ip address that is attached to the mac ID of the sat card so when I change the static to 203.173.176.99, it connects to our network, authenticates ok but cannot ping any machine except for the access server 203.66.77.11. I know I must just be missing a route somewhere, and I was assuming on the access server, but when I also setup a NT server with the same setup it seem to work fine, any ideas what I am doing wrong? thanks Nathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian vs. freeBSD
BTW, The hardware for this system will be a compaq DL380 series server. It has 5 ultra2 scsi 9.1 gig drives. I did not know if ultra2 scsi presented any advantage when considering freebsd or Debian or not. Any info on this is appriciated! http://www5.compaq.com/products/servers/proliantdl380/description.html#keyfeat Thanks, Ashby Gochenour NTELOS NOC *BSD is quite good. I use it whene forced to. Debian has the advantage of having *great* support via IRC and lists, and Linux supports most every piece of hardware out there! In my 'real' job, I do the computer security for bnl.gov. We are using Debian for just about anything in our perimeter. The proxies, smtp gateway, Kerberos, DNS, DHCP. The machines perform well on minimal hardware, and you can lock them down *tight* with LIDS, so much that you can't touch them remotely, even if you are root. Tim -- Tim Sailer (at home) Coastal Internet, Inc. Network and Systems Operations PO Box 671 http://www.buoy.comRidge, NY 11961 [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] (631) 476-3031 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Managing a mail/web server without Unix accounts
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: I am looking for a documentation, as much detailed as possible, on the setup of an Internet server (mail, several domains, POP and IMAP, a Web server with FTP and DAV upload by customers, may be Zope), *without* Unix accounts. The actual database should be a DBMS (possibly with three-tier architectures). I want free software, as much as possible, and I prefer it already packaged. (I *can* patch Qpopper and Zope but I prefer something which will not force me to manage a fork.) Apparently, there are many parts of the complete solution: PAM http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/index.html (any list of PAMified apps in Debian?), LDAP http://www.openldap.org/, but no comprehensive documentation discussing pros and cons, practical problems, lists of applications which support it, etc. I use exim and courier-imap/pop3 for the mailserver. Neither of these needs patching. For webhosting I use caudium (http://caudium.net) with a few custom modules that I wrote. The backend database is mysql (could be postgres too). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Made *.mp3 parsed like *.php with apache+php
Hi! I put in srm.conf: AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .mp3 But I can't use the POST method to call this kind of file. I wan to parse files with extension .mp3 or .ps like .php TIA David
Re: Made *.mp3 parsed like *.php with apache+php
Instead of putting it in your srm.conf, add it to your apache mime.times file or in a .htaccess file, in the root directory, of where the files are. Thank You, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://neobeach.com Who is J0hn GalT? David Charro Ripa wrote: Hi! I put in srm.conf: AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .mp3 But I can't use the POST method to call this kind of file. I wan to parse files with extension .mp3 or .ps like .php TIA David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
NFSv3 Problem
hi I have a problem with NFSv3, I have correctly installed kernel 2.2.18 with the NFSv3 support and util-linux2-10s. I have put in /etc/fstab 192.168.10.10:/vol/vol0/home /mnt nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,nfsvers=3,nolock,timeo=14,intr,bg 0 0 and all it works normally, but it does not write file greater than 2Gb. ulimit -a core file size (blocks) 0 data seg size (kbytes) unlimited file size (blocks) unlimited max locked memory (kbytes) unlimited max memory size (kbytes)unlimited why? thank's m. --
Re: NFSv3 Problem
Hi, Not sure, but i think your problem is not with the NFS but with the ext2fs filesystem, which cannot handle files larger than 2gb. I think i read it in a howto. Does anyone has a reference ? On Monday 05 February 2001 18:33, Massimiliano Mannozzi wrote: hi I have a problem with NFSv3, I have correctly installed kernel 2.2.18 with the NFSv3 support and util-linux2-10s. I have put in /etc/fstab 192.168.10.10:/vol/vol0/home /mnt nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,nfsvers=3,nolock,timeo=14,intr,bg 0 0 and all it works normally, but it does not write file greater than 2Gb. ulimit -a core file size (blocks) 0 data seg size (kbytes) unlimited file size (blocks) unlimited max locked memory (kbytes) unlimited max memory size (kbytes)unlimited why? thank's m. -- -- Francis Dexter Gois- mailto : [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Network Administrator - Tiscali Belgium NV/SA Keep the Internet Free with Tiscalinet - phone: +3224000839 http://www.tiscalinet.be/- fax: +3224000899
Re: apt-get upgrade installs unnecessary users / Cobalt RaQ 3i
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:16:02PM +0100, H.P. Stroebel wrote: hi list, 1) i switched recently from redhat to debian for an internet server installation A very good move. MUCH easier to maintain. i deleted unnecessary users and groups like games, audio etc., but they were reinstalled when doing the first apt-get upgrade. could anyone point me please to some ressources concerning default users/groups, which of them are necessary and how to avoid their reinstallation ? Just ignore them. A group with no members doesn't hurt anything. (They are there as placeholders.)
Routing Question
Im setting a broadband Internet connection on a Debian box, I have the sat interface installed and working and can see the icmp packets coming in from a ping on the sat interface using tcpdump so im confident that side of things is working. I am having a bit of trouble with the dialup. Lets say our network is 203.66.77.0, border gateway is 203.66.77.1 and have a Cisco access server on the 203.66.77.11 and radius server on 203.66.77.2. Now if I assign a static ip from a dialup pool on our network, say 203.66.77.55 I can ping out from the dialup no problems, but the static needs to be that of the ip address that is attached to the mac ID of the sat card so when I change the static to 203.173.176.99, it connects to our network, authenticates ok but cannot ping any machine except for the access server 203.66.77.11. I know I must just be missing a route somewhere, and I was assuming on the access server, but when I also setup a NT server with the same setup it seem to work fine, any ideas what I am doing wrong? thanks Nathan
Re: intel 815 lan drivers
I have been using eepro100 drivers for some time now on the intel 815 for some time now. I have yet to have a problem with them. I have used 3c905b and others and have found no problems with them. I run the intel cards/mb on production servers and have yet to see any sort of screw up. I run them as modules under 2.2.18 and 2.4.1. Brian At 03:59 PM 2/2/01 -0500, Allen Ahoffman wrote: do the eepro100 drivers work for the intel 815 motherboard? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian vs. freeBSD
BTW, The hardware for this system will be a compaq DL380 series server. It has 5 ultra2 scsi 9.1 gig drives. I did not know if ultra2 scsi presented any advantage when considering freebsd or Debian or not. Any info on this is appriciated! http://www5.compaq.com/products/servers/proliantdl380/description.html#keyfeat Thanks, Ashby Gochenour NTELOS NOC *BSD is quite good. I use it whene forced to. Debian has the advantage of having *great* support via IRC and lists, and Linux supports most every piece of hardware out there! In my 'real' job, I do the computer security for bnl.gov. We are using Debian for just about anything in our perimeter. The proxies, smtp gateway, Kerberos, DNS, DHCP. The machines perform well on minimal hardware, and you can lock them down *tight* with LIDS, so much that you can't touch them remotely, even if you are root. Tim -- Tim Sailer (at home) Coastal Internet, Inc. Network and Systems Operations PO Box 671 http://www.buoy.comRidge, NY 11961 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (631) 476-3031
Re: NFSv3 Problem
Francis 'Dexter' Gois [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Not sure, but i think your problem is not with the NFS but with the ext2fs filesystem, which cannot handle files larger than 2gb. Yes, ext2's maximum file size is 1 byte less than 2 GB (2147483647 bytes. If the remote filesystem is ext2 then this is definitely the problem. The 2.4 kernel gets around this problem at least with some filesystems (perhaps still not with ext2 though) ... if you really need to create files 2GB then you should upgrade your kernel. I've been running woody with 2.4 kernels (test and stable) for months without any problems, YMMV. Fraser
