customized sources.list
Hello list, I have a couple of machines to install woody, so I install the first machine manually from zero. After that, I'd like to make the 1st machine as the installation source medium, put all .deb files on the 1st machine(http or ftp) and then make others to install from the 1st one. It seems all .deb will locate at /var/cache/apt/archive/ after apt-get. Therefore, I cd /var/cache/apt/archive/ and then dpkg-scansources . /dev/null > Packages; gzip -9 Packages Hence I get my Packages.gz. Then I put Packages.gz and all .deb to a public readable html directory, and add deb http://hostname.domain.com/path/to/dir/ ./ Everything seems ok. But some deb package filenames have "%3" string, which makes apt-get confused and returns error. Is there any remedy to that? Is there any good method to replicate multiple woody? I know there is a "replicator" tool in Debian, but I don't want to use NFS. Idea? -- Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
customized sources.list
Hello list, I have a couple of machines to install woody, so I install the first machine manually from zero. After that, I'd like to make the 1st machine as the installation source medium, put all .deb files on the 1st machine(http or ftp) and then make others to install from the 1st one. It seems all .deb will locate at /var/cache/apt/archive/ after apt-get. Therefore, I cd /var/cache/apt/archive/ and then dpkg-scansources . /dev/null > Packages; gzip -9 Packages Hence I get my Packages.gz. Then I put Packages.gz and all .deb to a public readable html directory, and add deb http://hostname.domain.com/path/to/dir/ ./ Everything seems ok. But some deb package filenames have "%3" string, which makes apt-get confused and returns error. Is there any remedy to that? Is there any good method to replicate multiple woody? I know there is a "replicator" tool in Debian, but I don't want to use NFS. Idea? -- Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pslave] compiling on Debian/potato
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:39, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > On 16-Dec-2001 Russell Coker wrote: > > I've uploaded a new version which compiled with callback support > > (haven't tested it though). It's uploaded to woody (but not with > > CB). > > > > I've put it on http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ as well as a diff > > file for making a potato package. Let me know how it goes. > > I've downloaded portslave_2001.12.16.tar.gz, patched it with > woody-potato.diff and added --enable-callback in debian/rules. > It compiles but I've seen many warnings during compiling. > I don't have time (these days) to test does callback actually works but > I will test it next week (I hope). The warnings about the zero length array are due to bad headers in libc6-dev. The warnings about unused parameters don't matter. Any other warnings? -- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Re: procmail
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:52:41PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:46:33AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > PS: there's no such thing as a BCC header in incoming mail. it is > > stripped either by the user-agent when sending a message or, at the > > latest, by the MTA when it receives the message. it can't be used to > > sort mail because it doesn't exist. > > That's wrong according the the specs[1], although I've never seen an SMTP > MUA/MTA that did actually show the Bcc receipients to each other. possibly true in theorybut not in practice. > [1] rfc822 > 4.5.3. BCC / RESENT-BCC >Some systems may choose to include the text of the > "Bcc" field only in the author(s)'s copy, that would be up to the MUA if/when it saves a copy of the sent message. > while others may also include it in the text sent to all those > indicated in the "Bcc" list. and that's so obviously broken that i doubt if anyone has ever implemented it - even for an MS mail program. craig -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fabricati Diem, PVNC. -- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
Re: [pslave] compiling on Debian/potato
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:39, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > On 16-Dec-2001 Russell Coker wrote: > > I've uploaded a new version which compiled with callback support > > (haven't tested it though). It's uploaded to woody (but not with > > CB). > > > > I've put it on http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ as well as a diff > > file for making a potato package. Let me know how it goes. > > I've downloaded portslave_2001.12.16.tar.gz, patched it with > woody-potato.diff and added --enable-callback in debian/rules. > It compiles but I've seen many warnings during compiling. > I don't have time (these days) to test does callback actually works but > I will test it next week (I hope). The warnings about the zero length array are due to bad headers in libc6-dev. The warnings about unused parameters don't matter. Any other warnings? -- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MicroATX Motherboard with 1.5-2GB Ram?
Hi, Does anyone know of a good MicroATX motherboard that supports 1.5-2GB of RAM? MicroATX motherboards make nice servers (small form factor, and support nearly everything conventional ATX motherboards have), but they SEEM to usually only have 2 DIMM slots (512Mx2=1024M max). Have you over come across one that has 3 DIMM slots... or some way to get to 1.5-2Gb RAM? Sincerely, Jason
Ever used mod_throttle in Debian Aapache?
Did you get it working? I never could. Always spits the dummy. I already filed a bug with it. But if you got it working, let me know. I mean out of the package... not recompiling it yourself. TIA Sincerely, Jason
Re: procmail
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:52:41PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:46:33AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > PS: there's no such thing as a BCC header in incoming mail. it is > > stripped either by the user-agent when sending a message or, at the > > latest, by the MTA when it receives the message. it can't be used to > > sort mail because it doesn't exist. > > That's wrong according the the specs[1], although I've never seen an SMTP > MUA/MTA that did actually show the Bcc receipients to each other. possibly true in theorybut not in practice. > [1] rfc822 > 4.5.3. BCC / RESENT-BCC >Some systems may choose to include the text of the > "Bcc" field only in the author(s)'s copy, that would be up to the MUA if/when it saves a copy of the sent message. > while others may also include it in the text sent to all those > indicated in the "Bcc" list. and that's so obviously broken that i doubt if anyone has ever implemented it - even for an MS mail program. craig -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fabricati Diem, PVNC. -- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: procmail
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:46:33AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > PS: there's no such thing as a BCC header in incoming mail. it is > stripped either by the user-agent when sending a message or, at the > latest, by the MTA when it receives the message. it can't be used to > sort mail because it doesn't exist. That's wrong according the the specs[1], although I've never seen an SMTP MUA/MTA that did actually show the Bcc receipients to each other. bye, -christian- [1] rfc822 4.5.3. BCC / RESENT-BCC Some systems may choose to include the text of the "Bcc" field only in the author(s)'s copy, while others may also include it in the text sent to all those indicated in the "Bcc" list. -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you?
MicroATX Motherboard with 1.5-2GB Ram?
Hi, Does anyone know of a good MicroATX motherboard that supports 1.5-2GB of RAM? MicroATX motherboards make nice servers (small form factor, and support nearly everything conventional ATX motherboards have), but they SEEM to usually only have 2 DIMM slots (512Mx2=1024M max). Have you over come across one that has 3 DIMM slots... or some way to get to 1.5-2Gb RAM? Sincerely, Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ever used mod_throttle in Debian Aapache?
Did you get it working? I never could. Always spits the dummy. I already filed a bug with it. But if you got it working, let me know. I mean out of the package... not recompiling it yourself. TIA Sincerely, Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: procmail
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:46:33AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > PS: there's no such thing as a BCC header in incoming mail. it is > stripped either by the user-agent when sending a message or, at the > latest, by the MTA when it receives the message. it can't be used to > sort mail because it doesn't exist. That's wrong according the the specs[1], although I've never seen an SMTP MUA/MTA that did actually show the Bcc receipients to each other. bye, -christian- [1] rfc822 4.5.3. BCC / RESENT-BCC Some systems may choose to include the text of the "Bcc" field only in the author(s)'s copy, while others may also include it in the text sent to all those indicated in the "Bcc" list. -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pslave] compiling on Debian/potato
On 16-Dec-2001 Russell Coker wrote: > I've uploaded a new version which compiled with callback support > (haven't tested it though). It's uploaded to woody (but not with > CB). > > I've put it on http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ as well as a diff > file for making a potato package. Let me know how it goes. I've downloaded portslave_2001.12.16.tar.gz, patched it with woody-potato.diff and added --enable-callback in debian/rules. It compiles but I've seen many warnings during compiling. I don't have time (these days) to test does callback actually works but I will test it next week (I hope). Milan
Unidentified subject!
I`m havin a problem with icecast ,does anybody knows if lieice have any problem running ? I have already configured my soundboard and icecast does make streams of no-live ice with shout. but liveice simple does not send anything to the server. I`ll thank a lot if anyone can help me. -- Rodrigo Cesar Herefeld Analista de Sistemas Consultoria de Informatica Cathedral [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Gnome PGP version 0.4 owJ4nDsdWcJg/fn6pqD8lKLM9HwF59TixCIFj9Si1LTUnBReriKIeIZDTmZeaUVSkV5yfq5eUhEvly5BAADsyBus=Ng6+ -END PGP MESSAGE-
Re: [pslave] compiling on Debian/potato
On 16-Dec-2001 Russell Coker wrote: > I've uploaded a new version which compiled with callback support > (haven't tested it though). It's uploaded to woody (but not with > CB). > > I've put it on http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ as well as a diff > file for making a potato package. Let me know how it goes. I've downloaded portslave_2001.12.16.tar.gz, patched it with woody-potato.diff and added --enable-callback in debian/rules. It compiles but I've seen many warnings during compiling. I don't have time (these days) to test does callback actually works but I will test it next week (I hope). Milan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
I`m havin a problem with icecast ,does anybody knows if lieice have any problem running ? I have already configured my soundboard and icecast does make streams of no-live ice with shout. but liveice simple does not send anything to the server. I`ll thank a lot if anyone can help me. -- Rodrigo Cesar Herefeld Analista de Sistemas Consultoria de Informatica Cathedral [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Gnome PGP version 0.4 owJ4nDsdWcJg/fn6pqD8lKLM9HwF59TixCIFj9Si1LTUnBReriKIeIZDTmZeaUVSkV5yfq5eUhEvly5BAADsyBus=Ng6+ -END PGP MESSAGE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSH & Debian Woody
in /etc/ssh/ssh_config you can change the used Protokoll. By default SSH uses 2. But with machines which can only speak protokoll 1 you can't authenticate. you must comment out the Host * and Protocol parts. Thorsten On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 04:32, Chuck Peters wrote: > > /etc/ssh/sshd_config has PasswordAuthenication no > set it to yes. > > Chuck > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, James Mclean wrote: > > > > > > > All, > > > > I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the > > latest .deb of OpenSSH... > > > > Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a > > login from the same machine's command line it also fails. > > > > This is the message from the command line... > > # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > Neighbour Table Overflow > > ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space > > > > I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to > > authenticate and continues to ask for the password... > > I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. > > > > # ssh -V > > OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f > > > > I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? > > > > Regards, > > > > James Mclean > > > > "Windows didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of > > careful development." > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --
Re: SSH & Debian Woody
in /etc/ssh/ssh_config you can change the used Protokoll. By default SSH uses 2. But with machines which can only speak protokoll 1 you can't authenticate. you must comment out the Host * and Protocol parts. Thorsten On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 04:32, Chuck Peters wrote: > > /etc/ssh/sshd_config has PasswordAuthenication no > set it to yes. > > Chuck > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, James Mclean wrote: > > > > > > > All, > > > > I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the > > latest .deb of OpenSSH... > > > > Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a > > login from the same machine's command line it also fails. > > > > This is the message from the command line... > > # ssh -l jamesmc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > Neighbour Table Overflow > > ssh: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 22. No Buffer Space > > > > I recieve no errors when attempting to login remotely, but fails to > > authenticate and continues to ask for the password... > > I cannot see anything the messages or syslog logfiles. > > > > # ssh -V > > OpenSSH_3.0.1p1, SSH Protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f > > > > I am tempted to install from source next. Any Ideas? > > > > Regards, > > > > James Mclean > > > > "Windows didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of > > careful development." > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
