Re: PPOP3 Webmail
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:08:46 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree! I have squirrelmail (which is still broken in Debian), ... What exactly is broken in squirrelmail? Works just fine here: ii cyrus-admin1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (administration tool) ii cyrus-common 1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (common files) ii cyrus-imapd1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (IMAP support) ii cyrus-pop3d1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (POP3 support) ii squirrelmail 1.2.2-1Webmail for nuts ii php4 4.0.3pl1-0pota A server-side, HTML-embedded scripting langu cheers, rw -- / Ing. Robert Waldner | Security Engineer | CoreTec IT-Security \ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | T +43 1 503 72 73 | F +43 1 503 72 73 x99 / msg04947/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Phantom routes in the Linux kernel, not replaced by Zebra
[I'm not sure of my choice of mailing lists, see the discussion at the end.] We use only Linux routers and, from time to time, we have phantom routes. I mean routes that once were legitimate (learned via BGP) but should have been suppressed when BGP info changed and were not. These routes are displayed by Zebra as kernel routes (the normal routes are displayed as ospf or bgp) and restarting Zebra does not make them disappear. I have to manually delete them. Rebooting, a la MS-Windows, solves everything. FreeBSD zealots keep bothering me that it is because Linux does not know RTF_STATIC ($KERNEL/include/linux/route.h), which prevents to pinpoint phantom routes. It seems true but this flag in nevertheless in GNU libc's headers (/usr/include/net/route.h). So, who is wrong, Linux, Zebra or me? What can I do to solve the problem? What can I do to workaround the problem? (Anyone has a Perl script which will telnet to the Zebra console and find all kernel routes?) Kernel 2.4.9 and 2.4.17. Zebra 0.92. PS: Regarding the choice of the mailing lists. The problem seems to be Linux-specific but I cannot find a good mailing list to discuss this sort of stuff (RTF_STATIC...). Don't tell me to subscribe to linux-kernel, I cannot swallow hundreds of messages relarted with the VM or with the device drivers. Feel free to reply in private (I'll summarize) or to reply only to the list you find suitable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPOP3 Webmail
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 05:14, Robert Waldner wrote: On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:08:46 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree! I have squirrelmail (which is still broken in Debian), ... What exactly is broken in squirrelmail? Works just fine here: I'm running unstable for a number of reasons, and for the last two uploaded versions, you can't even log in. Tim ii cyrus-admin1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (administration tool) ii cyrus-common 1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (common files) ii cyrus-imapd1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (IMAP support) ii cyrus-pop3d1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (POP3 support) ii squirrelmail 1.2.2-1Webmail for nuts ii php4 4.0.3pl1-0pota A server-side, HTML-embedded scripting langu cheers, rw -- / Ing. Robert Waldner | Security Engineer | CoreTec IT-Security \ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | T +43 1 503 72 73 | F +43 1 503 72 73 x99 / -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [zebra 11943] Phantom routes in the Linux kernel, not replaced by Zebra
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 01:29:26PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: These routes are displayed by Zebra as kernel routes (the normal routes are displayed as ospf or bgp) and restarting Zebra does not make them disappear. I have to manually delete them. Rebooting, a la MS-Windows, solves everything. FreeBSD zealots keep bothering me that it is because Linux does not know RTF_STATIC ($KERNEL/include/linux/route.h), which prevents to pinpoint phantom Actually, it looks like Zebra under BSD uses the RTF_PROTO1 flag instead to distinguish its own routes. It shows up as a 1 in the flags column in netstat. Under Linux, no such thing as RTF_PROTO1. Instead, from a quick glance at the code in zebra/rt_netlink.c, it looks like Zebra tries to use RTPROT_ZEBRA in Netlink messages. But this does not seem to be stored by the kernel in the routing table (at least this field is not shown by netstat or route). So back to square one: unless I'm mistaken (which is quite possible since I'm not a Linux guru), no way for Zebra under Linux to clean up its own routes when it restarts. -- Pierre Beyssac [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [zebra 11946] Re: Phantom routes in the Linux kernel, not replacedby Zebra
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote: So back to square one: unless I'm mistaken (which is quite possible since I'm not a Linux guru), no way for Zebra under Linux to clean up its own routes when it restarts. ip route flush proto zebra works for me. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
