erpcd won't compile on Debian?
G'day :) I'm trying to install erpcd on debian to control an annex 4000. I have never tried to do this before, so I might be barking up the wrong tree... When trying to build the software, it crashes with the following: Compiling the tools; output being saved in "Build.out" *** Building libannex *** *** Building netadm *** *** Building na *** *** Building erpcd *** ** The compilation of the host tools FAILED. See file "Build.out". ** Last few lines of Build.out... /usr/bin/cc -g -DUSE_FLOCK -m486 -O2 -DHASSNPRINTF -DSPT_TYPE=SPT_REUSEARGV -DHAS_CTRL_NOT_ACC -DLINUX -I../inc -DBFS$ tms.c:193: warning: static declaration for `tms_request' follows non-static /usr/bin/cc -g -DUSE_FLOCK -m486 -O2 -DHASSNPRINTF -DSPT_TYPE=SPT_REUSEARGV -DHAS_CTRL_NOT_ACC -DLINUX -I../inc -DBFS$ /usr/bin/cc -g -DUSE_FLOCK -m486 -O2 -DHASSNPRINTF -DSPT_TYPE=SPT_REUSEARGV -DHAS_CTRL_NOT_ACC -DLINUX -I../inc -DBFS$ /usr/bin/cc -g -DUSE_FLOCK -m486 -O2 -DHASSNPRINTF -DSPT_TYPE=SPT_REUSEARGV -DHAS_CTRL_NOT_ACC -DLINUX -I../inc -DBFS$ /usr/bin/cc -g -DUSE_FLOCK -m486 -O2 -DHASSNPRINTF -DSPT_TYPE=SPT_REUSEARGV -DHAS_CTRL_NOT_ACC -DLINUX -I../inc -DBFS$ session_dbunx.c: In function `sesdb_init_db': session_dbunx.c:293: invalid use of undefined type `union semun' session_dbunx.c:294: `ctlinit' has an incomplete type session_dbunx.c: In function `sesdb_close_db': session_dbunx.c:942: warning: passing arg 1 of `strlen' from incompatible pointer type session_dbunx.c:942: warning: passing arg 1 of `strlen' from incompatible pointer type session_dbunx.c:942: warning: passing arg 1 of `strcmp' from incompatible pointer type session_dbunx.c: At top level: session_dbunx.c:120: storage size of `ctlinit' isn't known make[2]: *** [session_dbunx.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/annex/ra_X9.0.2/src/erpcd' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/annex/ra_X9.0.2/src/erpcd' make: *** [erpcd.local] Error 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL and debian3.0
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:07, Dave Smith wrote: > so, do I need the speedmgmt program? Yes, it loads some firmware into the modem. > Q1a) Where? (In which section should I look?) CONFIG_USB_SPEEDTOUCH under USB. > Thanks for all the help, is there a document I could be looking at which > describes this process? No. -- If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADSL and debian3.0
> -Original Message- > From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > The point of my patch is that you don't need any other kernel module. Sounds like a good reason to me :) > > next, I plugged in the ADSL modem (USB) and ran "speedmgmt &". Then > > repeatedly ran dmesg to view the kernel messages. > > Plug in the ADSL modem before you turn the machine on. Keep the > ADSL modem > plugged in until you have halted the machine. Do anything that involves > changing the state of the ADSL hardware while the machine is running and > expect a kernel panic. so, do I need the speedmgmt program? > > 4 time-out messages occur. 2 in the Bulk and 2 in the Control. Is this > > normal? > > It's normal. > > > Q1, is there a new option in the "make menuconfig" for the modem? > > Yes. Q1a) Where? (In which section should I look?) Thanks for all the help, is there a document I could be looking at which describes this process? Dave Smith -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL and debian3.0
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 20:10, Dave Smith wrote: > re-compiled speedtouch module that came from linux-usb website, hmmm, > perhaps I shouldn't have done that... Anyway, please confirm if I shouldn't > have done that as I don't have access to the machine (it is at work, and I > am not), and then ran modprobe speedtch. The point of my patch is that you don't need any other kernel module. > next, I plugged in the ADSL modem (USB) and ran "speedmgmt &". Then > repeatedly ran dmesg to view the kernel messages. Plug in the ADSL modem before you turn the machine on. Keep the ADSL modem plugged in until you have halted the machine. Do anything that involves changing the state of the ADSL hardware while the machine is running and expect a kernel panic. > 4 time-out messages occur. 2 in the Bulk and 2 in the Control. Is this > normal? It's normal. > Q1, is there a new option in the "make menuconfig" for the modem? Yes. > Q2, should I have re-installed that other speedtouch kernel module? No. -- If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what the heck is this ? Syslog: meminfo
Hi, in one machine with kerlnel 2.2.19 with cipe modules, the syslog is showing this Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Mem-info: Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Free pages: 109752kB Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: ( Free: 27438 (254 508 762) Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: NonDMA: 10*4kB 8*8kB 7*16kB 3*32kB 2*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 46*2048kB = 96312kB) Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: DMA: 2*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 2*32kB 2*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 6*2048kB = 13440kB) Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Swap cache: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0 Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Free swap: 128484kB Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: 32512 pages of RAM Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: 715 reserved pages Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: 2181 pages shared Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: 0 pages swap cached Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: 2327 pages in file cache Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: 2327 pages in page cache Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: 16 pages in page table cache Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Buffer memory: 2128kB Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Buffer heads: 1232 Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Buffer blocks: 1201 Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Buffer hashed: 1200 Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: CLEAN: 1200 buffers, 74 used (last=1152), 0 locked, 0 protected, 0 dirty Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Networking buffers in use : 64 Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Total network buffer allocations : 3743407 Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: Total failed network buffer allocs : 0 Mar 20 17:10:26 atila kernel: IP fragment buffer size: 0 This is happenning just about two weeks ago, but no after that. Could somebody enlight me ? Thanx. -- __ Felipe Alvarez Harnecker. QlSoftware. Tels. 204.56.21 - 09.874.60.17 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qlsoft.cl/ http://ql.cl/ __ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADSL and debian3.0
> -Original Message- > From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:50, Dave Smith wrote: > No, the patch I manage (I didn't write it ) is in unstable as > kernel-patch-2.4-speedtouch, I've also got a > kernel-patch-2.4-pppoatm for if > you use an older kernel. Ok, I have found the kernel-patch-2.4-speedtouch, installed it, and run the apply script with no errors. I then proceeded to run "make-kpkg kernel_image" which resulted in a ../kernel-image...deb. I then installed that. Dpkg -i kernel Checked LILO was correct, and rebooted. re-compiled speedtouch module that came from linux-usb website, hmmm, perhaps I shouldn't have done that... Anyway, please confirm if I shouldn't have done that as I don't have access to the machine (it is at work, and I am not), and then ran modprobe speedtch. next, I plugged in the ADSL modem (USB) and ran "speedmgmt &". Then repeatedly ran dmesg to view the kernel messages. 4 time-out messages occur. 2 in the Bulk and 2 in the Control. Is this normal? Then the message saying that the link was established at 576 kbits download, 288 upload. Then came the illegal instruction. This all happens before I even touch ppp. This is a pretty complete account of my steps. Do not assume I did something unless I have said that I did. Q1, is there a new option in the "make menuconfig" for the modem? Q2, should I have re-installed that other speedtouch kernel module? Dave Smith -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAID starter
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 08:00, Angus D Madden wrote: > Russel, would you recommend software RAID with a production system? > Have you tried it? Curious. I wonder as well if anyone has tried the > new IDE-RAID controllers. I installed a system with a Promise Fasttrack IDE-RAID controller a few weeks ago and after compiling a fresh 2.4.17 kernel it worked just fine. Though I wouldn't recommend it for a production system as the RAID has to be resynced at BIOS-stage as soon as a disk fails. So if you use a pair of 100GB drives it will take some hours to get the system up again... mfg Markus -- Markus Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \ Unix and Network Administration Graz, AUSTRIA \ High Availability / Cluster Mobile: +43 676 6485415 || +43 664 4865125 \ System Consulting Fax:+43 316 428896 \ Web Development -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where I Can Find OpenSSH+OpenLDAP Documents?
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:53, axacheng wrote: > Does Anyone Know where i can find the OpenSSH+OpenLDAP implement > > documents in the internet?? Just use the PAM LDAP support and configure /etc/pam.d/ssh appropriately. But first try nss-ldap as it's slightly easier to setup and has all the same config file formats etc. -- If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where I Can Find OpenSSH+OpenLDAP Documents?
Hell List : Does Anyone Know where i can find the OpenSSH+OpenLDAP implement documents in the internet?? i was already used Google's search engine to search about this reference(OPENSSH+OPENLDAP) BUT..might be it has stolen by alien @_@ thanks -- Trust & Unique ... axacheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: possible attack?
On 21 Mar 2002 at 13:41, Joerg Wendland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 08:51:49AM -, Chris Evans wrote: > > unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 1123334 /dev/log > > Look at the protocol, it has nothing to do with the network, it is connected > through a UNIX socket. Thanks. I was clearly in mode! Apologies all! I went and read more of the documentation on syslog-ng after sending that and was happy that the syslog-ng.conf was only allowing information to it from the server through local sockets as you say. What I need now is a pointer to an introduction to UNIX sockets and to how I work out why my server is suddenly exceeding the syslog-ng connection limit. I think it was about a slightly higher than usual rate of activity in postfix but I'm not sure as I'm surprised it could have triggered that. I think if I got my head around syslog- ng.conf rather better and set up routes and filters that really made more sense of the logged data, I'd be in a better position to understand all this. Does anyone have a conf file they'd share with me? Ideally for a single server with SMTP, POP3, SSH, NTP, APCUPSD and very little else, though I guess more complex set ups would be even more informative. Thanks Joerg and TIA to anyone who can point me on further. Chris PSYCTC: Psychotherapy, Psychology, Psychiatry, Counselling and Therapeutic Communities; practice, research, teaching and consultancy. Chris Evans & Jo-anne Carlyle http://psyctc.org/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAID starter
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:00, Angus D Madden wrote: > Russell Coker, Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 08:41:41PM +0100: > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:25, Angus D Madden wrote: > > > When you have completed the configuration the disks will have to be > > > "scrubbed". This could take several hours. Needless to say, you can't > > > add RAID to a production server, it has to be set up with it in the > > > beginning. > > > > For software RAID you can resize the file system to be 96K smaller and > > then add a second disk as RAID-1. > > Russel, would you recommend software RAID with a production system? Yes. I'm running it on 5 servers at 3 sites. > Have you tried it? Curious. I wonder as well if anyone has tried the > new IDE-RAID controllers. Of course I've tried it. I wouldn't be recommending hacks like the resize by 96K to add RAID to an existing system trick unless I'd tested it thoroughly. -- If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL and debian3.0
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:50, Dave Smith wrote: > Is your kernel-patch page at linux-usb.sf.net? > I have used the speedtouch 1.5 released on August 2001, which seems a > *very* long time ago No, the patch I manage (I didn't write it ) is in unstable as kernel-patch-2.4-speedtouch, I've also got a kernel-patch-2.4-pppoatm for if you use an older kernel. > > > Could it be the libc version I have? I am using the debian3 version > > > (2.2...) and the mgmt.o file is compiled with 2.1.92(?) > > > > It's all working fine for me with the latest Debian unstable setup and > > 2.4.18. Now we just need to work out what's different between > > your system > > and mine. > > ok. Do you get the warnings about libc versions when you compile the > alcatel mgmt program? Yes, this is what I get. It works anyway. Warning: Object was compiled with egcs-2.91.66, not 2.95.4. Warning: Object was compiled with libc-2.1.92, you APPEAR to be using libc-2.2.5 -- If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OT] Re: "Theft" of data and providing the impossible
Hi, On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, J.B. Nicholson-Owens wrote: > Also, I think it's a valid point to distinguish between theft and > copyright infringement--unauthorized duplication is not theft. They > are two completely different things, regardless of how many people use > the term "theft" incorrectly. I agree, however my point was that the mere act of copying (i.c. storing a streamed broadcast) is not even copyright infringement. Even for that, you need to redistribute the work as well. IANAL, of course. Of course people have the right to try and stop me, but they have no right to prosecute. In other words, I'm legally entitled to try and do with the content whatever, with whatever tools, written by whoever, as long as I don't redistribute the work itself or anything derived thereof. That sounds fair, doesn't it? To bad the DMCA breaks all that. Luckily I'm not affected by it, at least not directly, not yet. That is, until people start to believe it's indeed "wrong" to use content in other ways than the producer intended. IMNSHO, it's not, and I've never seen a *good* reason (taking society as a whole into account, not just a single company's "right" to make a profit, conveniently leaving out that it's actually a right to *try* to make a profit) why it would be. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
possible attack?
Logcheck has just reported 29 lines like these: Mar 21 07:54:51 www syslog-ng[137]: Error accepting AF_UNIX connection, opened connections: 100, max: 100 Mar 21 07:54:51 www syslog-ng[137]: Error accepting AF_UNIX connection, opened connections: 100, max: 100 and netstat -a shows a lot of connections: unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 1123334 /dev/log unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 1116966 /dev/log unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 1116962 /dev/log unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 1116959 unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 1116958 unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 1116955 ... and 20 to 40 or so more like that then: unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 1116901 /dev/log unix 0 [ ] STREAM 924323 unix 1 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 235/dev/log My sense is that someone is attacking the system possibly accidentally and it's about people trying to establish syslog-ng connections to my (solitary) box ... but I have to recognise that I'm out of my depth here. Man syslog-ng didn't throw much light on things for me. Anyone any advice? TIA, Chris PSYCTC: Psychotherapy, Psychology, Psychiatry, Counselling and Therapeutic Communities; practice, research, teaching and consultancy. Chris Evans & Jo-anne Carlyle http://psyctc.org/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADSL and debian3.0
> -Original Message- > From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:44, Lin Smith wrote: > > I have been attempting to get the Alcatel modem to operate on Debian 3.0 > > for a while now. I am using the 2.4.18 kernel as that apparently doesn't > > need patching to obtain ppp over atm. I am using the patched > tar.gz which > > includes the pppoatm.so file which is needed for ppp to operate over an > > ADSL link. I have the latest opensource kernel module, and the > alcatel mgmt > > stuff. > > Is that kernel module taken from my kernel-patch package? Is your kernel-patch page at linux-usb.sf.net? I have used the speedtouch 1.5 released on August 2001, which seems a *very* long time ago > > Could it be the libc version I have? I am using the debian3 version > > (2.2...) and the mgmt.o file is compiled with 2.1.92(?) > > It's all working fine for me with the latest Debian unstable setup and > 2.4.18. Now we just need to work out what's different between > your system > and mine. ok. Do you get the warnings about libc versions when you compile the alcatel mgmt program? Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:14:43PM +0100, alexis bory wrote: > So yesterday I tried to : >apt-get install less on a woody > (to fetch dpkg -l whith up and down arrows) and I have been gratified whith > a : >debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed That is not an error, so don't panic. All it's saying is that debconf isn't going to do its trick of asking configuration questions for some packages before they're installed (because apt-utils isn't present). Instead, it will fall back to asking those questions after the packages have been unpacked. Just continue as normal - nothing has gone wrong. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
