Re: Problem with dlink DSL-Router
> I think that your problem is that you have some filter in your output chain > of you firewall configuration. > If you use iptable, you can view the filter with the command "iptables -L > OUTPUT -n -v" This is the output - seems to be completely open: iptables -L OUTPUT -n -v Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 553K 125M ACCEPT all -- * lo 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * eth00.0.0.0/0 255.255.255.255 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * irda0 0.0.0.0/0 255.255.255.255 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * vmnet8 0.0.0.0/0 255.255.255.255 4757 575K ACCEPT all -- * eth00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * irda0 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 2655 340K ACCEPT all -- * vmnet8 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.2.0/24 0 0 ACCEPT!tcp -- * eth00.0.0.0/0 224.0.0.0/4 0 0 ACCEPT!tcp -- * irda0 0.0.0.0/0 224.0.0.0/4 0 0 ACCEPT!tcp -- * vmnet8 0.0.0.0/0 224.0.0.0/4 0 0 LOGall -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 LOG flags 0 level 4 0 0 DROP all -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 0 0 LOGall -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 LOG flags 0 level 4 0 0 DROP all -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 0 0 LOGall -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.2.0/24 LOG flags 0 level 4 0 0 DROP all -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.2.0/24 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 255.255.255.255 1239K 1108M ACCEPT all -- * ppp0212.144.221.80.0.0.0/0 0 0 LOGall -- * * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 LOG flags 0 level 4 0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0
Re: email account and dns
Thank you for the reply. The dns zone problem has been fixed by removing the zone file, running rndc reload, recreating the zone file (exactly), and then running rndc reload again. It worked for some strange reason. I normally would use the real domains but the customer wanted to remain anonymous. Sorry I was not more descriptive with the other concern. It looks like someone completely removed two accounts. That's the only way I can explain it. I think it is an internal problem unless someone has heard of something like that before. I appreciate the concern though. Chet On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Debian User wrote: > > > > > his new domain user3.com. I changed the entry in his user1.com zone file > > to point to the new user3.com domain, which is up. I also up dated the > > Show us. > > Also what type of record (A, MX)? > > And it is helpful to use real hostnames, so we can help. > > > I also have had a few email accounts disappear and was wondering if anyone > > What does that mean? > > Did the users get removed from your passwd file? > > Or did the mailbox get removed? > > I am sure we can help, but we need more information. > > Jeremy C. Reed > ... > BSD software, documentation, resources, news... > http://bsd.reedmedia.net/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: Problem with dlink DSL-Router
> I think that your problem is that you have some filter in your output chain > of you firewall configuration. > If you use iptable, you can view the filter with the command "iptables -L > OUTPUT -n -v" This is the output - seems to be completely open: iptables -L OUTPUT -n -v Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 553K 125M ACCEPT all -- * lo 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * eth00.0.0.0/0 255.255.255.255 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * irda0 0.0.0.0/0 255.255.255.255 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * vmnet8 0.0.0.0/0 255.255.255.255 4757 575K ACCEPT all -- * eth00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * irda0 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 2655 340K ACCEPT all -- * vmnet8 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.2.0/24 0 0 ACCEPT!tcp -- * eth00.0.0.0/0 224.0.0.0/4 0 0 ACCEPT!tcp -- * irda0 0.0.0.0/0 224.0.0.0/4 0 0 ACCEPT!tcp -- * vmnet8 0.0.0.0/0 224.0.0.0/4 0 0 LOGall -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 LOG flags 0 level 4 0 0 DROP all -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 0 0 LOGall -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 LOG flags 0 level 4 0 0 DROP all -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 0 0 LOGall -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.2.0/24 LOG flags 0 level 4 0 0 DROP all -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 192.168.2.0/24 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * ppp00.0.0.0/0 255.255.255.255 1239K 1108M ACCEPT all -- * ppp0212.144.221.80.0.0.0/0 0 0 LOGall -- * * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 LOG flags 0 level 4 0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email account and dns
Thank you for the reply. The dns zone problem has been fixed by removing the zone file, running rndc reload, recreating the zone file (exactly), and then running rndc reload again. It worked for some strange reason. I normally would use the real domains but the customer wanted to remain anonymous. Sorry I was not more descriptive with the other concern. It looks like someone completely removed two accounts. That's the only way I can explain it. I think it is an internal problem unless someone has heard of something like that before. I appreciate the concern though. Chet On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Debian User wrote: > > > > > his new domain user3.com. I changed the entry in his user1.com zone file > > to point to the new user3.com domain, which is up. I also up dated the > > Show us. > > Also what type of record (A, MX)? > > And it is helpful to use real hostnames, so we can help. > > > I also have had a few email accounts disappear and was wondering if anyone > > What does that mean? > > Did the users get removed from your passwd file? > > Or did the mailbox get removed? > > I am sure we can help, but we need more information. > > Jeremy C. Reed > ... > BSD software, documentation, resources, news... > http://bsd.reedmedia.net/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian blog?
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:50:16PM -0800, Nate Campi wrote: > Users keep asking for blogs, but I haven't set anything up since I > didn't see anything for woody (other than zope, and I really don't want > to learn a whole new app server just for one app). Er, I meant to name the app (squishdot) not just the app server. -- Nate Campi http://www.campin.net The Imperial Vendor or Contractor probably told them that droid armies don't need redundant command centers, nor any kind of high availability ... you're supposed to buy several, and cluster them. Redundant Array of Inexpensive Droids? pgpEi2ObPKv0E.pgp Description: PGP signature
debian blog?
Users keep asking for blogs, but I haven't set anything up since I didn't see anything for woody (other than zope, and I really don't want to learn a whole new app server just for one app). How are people providing blogs at debian-based ISPs? -- Nate Campi http://www.campin.net ignorami: n: The BOFH art of folding problem lusers into representational shapes. pgppi17ZNKx65.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Correcting permissions on files
Your other messages seemed to indicate that you are renumbering the UIDs in the passwd files, for example moving from 100 up to 1000. If you do that, your ownerships will still be wrong (after you copy via rsync, ssh, rsh whatever and preserve this information). You can begin to fix it by using find to find files/directories owned by certain UIDs and have it chown them to new user. Just be sure to not overlap and have two users with same UID or it will become real confusing. It may be easy if the users only have files in their own home directories. Jeremy C. Reed ... BSD software, documentation, resources, news... http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
Re: email account and dns
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Debian User wrote: > > his new domain user3.com. I changed the entry in his user1.com zone file > to point to the new user3.com domain, which is up. I also up dated the Show us. Also what type of record (A, MX)? And it is helpful to use real hostnames, so we can help. > I also have had a few email accounts disappear and was wondering if anyone What does that mean? Did the users get removed from your passwd file? Or did the mailbox get removed? I am sure we can help, but we need more information. Jeremy C. Reed ... BSD software, documentation, resources, news... http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
Re: Postfix + SASL Authentication failed
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:57:46PM +0100, Davi Leal wrote: > Hi, > > The problem is I can not get authentication successful in my Postfix + SASL > server. I had the same problem on FreeBSD machine. If you use pwcheck method check whether postfix user has access to /var/pwcheck directory ( I just added postifx to cyrus group and everything works fine ) Cheers, PM
Re: Problem with dlink DSL-Router
Hi Markus, I think that your problem is that you have some filter in your output chain of you firewall configuration. If you use iptable, you can view the filter with the command "iptables -L OUTPUT -n -v" regards, Matias Lambert Markus Lechner wrote: > Hello, > > first, i'm not on this list, so please cc me if you think you know what my > problem is. > > I have a dlink DI-804 switch/DSL-Router and want to use it without it's > integrated DHCP funktionality. > > So i disabled DHCP. > > I can ping it, use it's web-interface to configure it or do this via it's > telnet-interface - no problem so far. > > 192.168.1.0 is my net. > 192.168.1.100 is the IP of my PC. > 192.168.1.254 is the IP of the dlink. > > I have no problem using the DSL-Modem via PPPOE directly - everything works > fine. > > But when i try to use the dlink between my PC and the modem - problems arise. > > The dlink immediately opens a DSL-connection - so this is ok. He has the IP > and an external gateway. > > But i just can't reach any websites - no matter what kind of address. > > ping www.debian.de > ping: unknown host www.debian.de > > ping 145.253.2.171 > PING 145.253.2.171 (145.253.2.171) from 192.168.1.100 : 56(84) bytes of data. > ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted > ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted > > --- 145.253.2.171 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% loss, time 1020ms > > These are my routes: > route > Kernel IP Routentabelle > ZielRouter Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface > 192.168.1.254 * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 > 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 vmnet8 > localnet* 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > localnet* 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 irda0 > default 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 > > My resolv.conf: > cat /etc/resolv.conf > nameserver 145.253.2.171 > nameserver 145.253.2.203 > > With resolv.conf, there is another interesting thing. I don't know what it > means. The nameserver addresses that i got from my provider are different. > When i insert them again, next time i use pppd they change to the ones i send > you now. I don't know if the dlink can do this, too. But it seems not to be > the problem, right? > > This is what my dlink says: > WAN MAC Address : 00-05-5D-DB-9B-32 > Current IP : 213.23.6.138 > Current IP Mask : 255.255.255.0 > Current Gateway : 145.253.1.223 > Current DNS1: 145.253.2.11 > Current DNS2: 145.253.2.75 > > LAN MAC Address : 00-05-5D-DB-9B-31 > Current IP : 192.168.1.254 > Current Subnet Mask : 255.255.255.0 > > DHCP: Disable > Starting IP Address : 192.168.0.100 > Number of IP Addresses : 100 > > Can you help me? > What am I doing wrong? > > Thanks, > > Markus Lechner > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian blog?
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:50:16PM -0800, Nate Campi wrote: > Users keep asking for blogs, but I haven't set anything up since I > didn't see anything for woody (other than zope, and I really don't want > to learn a whole new app server just for one app). Er, I meant to name the app (squishdot) not just the app server. -- Nate Campi http://www.campin.net The Imperial Vendor or Contractor probably told them that droid armies don't need redundant command centers, nor any kind of high availability ... you're supposed to buy several, and cluster them. Redundant Array of Inexpensive Droids? msg07114/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
debian blog?
Users keep asking for blogs, but I haven't set anything up since I didn't see anything for woody (other than zope, and I really don't want to learn a whole new app server just for one app). How are people providing blogs at debian-based ISPs? -- Nate Campi http://www.campin.net ignorami: n: The BOFH art of folding problem lusers into representational shapes. msg07113/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Correcting permissions on files
Your other messages seemed to indicate that you are renumbering the UIDs in the passwd files, for example moving from 100 up to 1000. If you do that, your ownerships will still be wrong (after you copy via rsync, ssh, rsh whatever and preserve this information). You can begin to fix it by using find to find files/directories owned by certain UIDs and have it chown them to new user. Just be sure to not overlap and have two users with same UID or it will become real confusing. It may be easy if the users only have files in their own home directories. Jeremy C. Reed ... BSD software, documentation, resources, news... http://bsd.reedmedia.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email account and dns
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Debian User wrote: > > his new domain user3.com. I changed the entry in his user1.com zone file > to point to the new user3.com domain, which is up. I also up dated the Show us. Also what type of record (A, MX)? And it is helpful to use real hostnames, so we can help. > I also have had a few email accounts disappear and was wondering if anyone What does that mean? Did the users get removed from your passwd file? Or did the mailbox get removed? I am sure we can help, but we need more information. Jeremy C. Reed ... BSD software, documentation, resources, news... http://bsd.reedmedia.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with dlink DSL-Router
> 192.168.1.0 is my net. > Starting IP Address : 192.168.0.100 Should this be the same? (Or show us your ifconfig.) Jeremy C. Reed ... BSD software, documentation, resources, news... http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
Re: Problem with dlink DSL-Router
> > 192.168.1.0 is my net. > > > > Starting IP Address : 192.168.0.100 > > Should this be the same? > > (Or show us your ifconfig.) > Ah, this is a relict from the original address of the router - it was 192.168.0.1. But this should not be a problem - DHCP is disabled, so the range is not a parameter of interest anymore. BTW - i subscribed to the list now. Anyway, my ifconfig: ifconfig eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:20:E0:6B:6A:64 inet Adresse:192.168.1.100 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Maske:255.255.255.0 inet6 Adresse: fe80::220:e0ff:fe6b:6a64/10 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2261036 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1 TX packets:1861802 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:2 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:100 RX bytes:1855772469 (1.7 GiB) TX bytes:1152573277 (1.0 GiB) Interrupt:10 Basisadresse:0xd000 irda0 Protokoll:IrLAP Hardware Adresse 3c:26:43:12 inet Adresse:192.168.1.101 Maske:255.255.255.0 UP RUNNING NOARP MTU:2048 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:78491 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:8 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:2490293 (2.3 MiB) Interrupt:3 Basisadresse:0x2f8 loProtokoll:Lokale Schleife inet Adresse:127.0.0.1 Maske:255.0.0.0 inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:428468 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:428468 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0 RX bytes:95725151 (91.2 MiB) TX bytes:95725151 (91.2 MiB)
Re: Problem with DSL-Router
BTW, i have the impression that the problem is related to routing in itself. If i use, just like now, the DSL-Modem direct and bring up a ppp connection like this... ppp0 Protokoll:Punkt-zu-Punkt Verbindung inet Adresse:212.144.221.8 P-z-P:145.253.1.223 Maske:255.255.255.255 UP PUNKTZUPUNKT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1492 Metric:1 RX packets:66116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:119159 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:3 RX bytes:16271781 (15.5 MiB) TX bytes:97094173 (92.5 MiB) ... everything works fine. Because the different net ranges are routed and handled by the ppp0 interface, right? But when i use the router it's different and i would need to include the outside net's net range in my routing table, right? I tried this, but to no avail. But then, should not be the dlink be the one deciding what to do with packets for the outside net?
CBQ.init
Hi Fellows Where do I put the CBQ.init file in Debian to initialize on startup ? ..Craig
Re: CBQ.init
Hi, On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:28:12AM +0200, Craig wrote: > Hi Fellows > > Where do I put the CBQ.init file in Debian to initialize > on startup ? No idea what that file is, but I assume a SysV-compatible init script. In that case, put it in /etc/init.d, and symlink to it from /etc/rc2.d/SxxCBQ and /etc/rc0.d/KyyCBQ, choosing numbers for xx and yy to reflect the desired place in the startup and shutdown procedures. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info pgpvJmHRza0bu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Correcting permissions on files
Hi gang, The Debian box has been a true blessing this week and I am ready to move our users off BSDi/Sendmail to our new Debian/Postfix box. I have the accounts in the system, but am curious if anyone has some tips on scripting a way to fix permissions on home directories and files once the accounts are on the new server. I am using ncftp to bring the user home directories over to the new server and need to fix the owner/permission on each home directory and then also do the same when I bring their email over. Any thoughts? Thanks, -Scott
Re: Correcting permissions on files
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:52, Scott St. John wrote: > Or tar + plain rsh, no need to encrypt all that with ssh. Takes ages. ssh1 is a faster protocol than ssh2. Blowfish is a faster encryption than triple DES (the default). Use ssh1 and Blowfish instead of ssh2 and triple DES and you can increase the speed by as much as a factor of 6 (depending on hardware). Also transfer gzip compressed data. Using the -z option of tar takes better advantage of SMP systems than the -C option of scp, and compression is a fast operation, if the data compresses reasonably well (EG email) then the reduction in size (and therefore encryption work) saves time). I've written cron jobs to transfer multiple gigabyte files every night... > Heh, I have been sitting here with Perl and Awk books all morning and it's > really this simple? You guys are going to have me off my Windows > desktop completely if this keeps up :) That's the aim. Have you tried out kde 3.1? A KDE system with some expect scripts and ssh-agent makes a really good management system for servers. I used to run about 40 Solaris servers in such a fashion. I had setup scripts to do tasks such as run commands or install packages on all servers at once. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Re: Correcting permissions on files
At 03:38 PM 11/1/2002 +0100, you wrote: Or tar + plain rsh, no need to encrypt all that with ssh. Takes ages. and the whole tree will be copied, permissions and all, even remapping uids if the usernames on the new machine use different ones. You do have to configure your old machine temporarily to trust newmachine enough to give people on it root access though, but that's all. Heh, I have been sitting here with Perl and Awk books all morning and it's really this simple? You guys are going to have me off my Windows desktop completely if this keeps up :) Thank you! -Scott
Re: Postfix + SASL Authentication failed
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:57:46PM +0100, Davi Leal wrote: > Hi, > > The problem is I can not get authentication successful in my Postfix + SASL > server. I had the same problem on FreeBSD machine. If you use pwcheck method check whether postfix user has access to /var/pwcheck directory ( I just added postifx to cyrus group and everything works fine ) Cheers, PM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with dlink DSL-Router
Hi Markus, I think that your problem is that you have some filter in your output chain of you firewall configuration. If you use iptable, you can view the filter with the command "iptables -L OUTPUT -n -v" regards, Matias Lambert Markus Lechner wrote: > Hello, > > first, i'm not on this list, so please cc me if you think you know what my > problem is. > > I have a dlink DI-804 switch/DSL-Router and want to use it without it's > integrated DHCP funktionality. > > So i disabled DHCP. > > I can ping it, use it's web-interface to configure it or do this via it's > telnet-interface - no problem so far. > > 192.168.1.0 is my net. > 192.168.1.100 is the IP of my PC. > 192.168.1.254 is the IP of the dlink. > > I have no problem using the DSL-Modem via PPPOE directly - everything works > fine. > > But when i try to use the dlink between my PC and the modem - problems arise. > > The dlink immediately opens a DSL-connection - so this is ok. He has the IP > and an external gateway. > > But i just can't reach any websites - no matter what kind of address. > > ping www.debian.de > ping: unknown host www.debian.de > > ping 145.253.2.171 > PING 145.253.2.171 (145.253.2.171) from 192.168.1.100 : 56(84) bytes of data. > ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted > ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted > > --- 145.253.2.171 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% loss, time 1020ms > > These are my routes: > route > Kernel IP Routentabelle > ZielRouter Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface > 192.168.1.254 * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0 > 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 vmnet8 > localnet* 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > localnet* 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 irda0 > default 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 > > My resolv.conf: > cat /etc/resolv.conf > nameserver 145.253.2.171 > nameserver 145.253.2.203 > > With resolv.conf, there is another interesting thing. I don't know what it > means. The nameserver addresses that i got from my provider are different. > When i insert them again, next time i use pppd they change to the ones i send > you now. I don't know if the dlink can do this, too. But it seems not to be > the problem, right? > > This is what my dlink says: > WAN MAC Address : 00-05-5D-DB-9B-32 > Current IP : 213.23.6.138 > Current IP Mask : 255.255.255.0 > Current Gateway : 145.253.1.223 > Current DNS1: 145.253.2.11 > Current DNS2: 145.253.2.75 > > LAN MAC Address : 00-05-5D-DB-9B-31 > Current IP : 192.168.1.254 > Current Subnet Mask : 255.255.255.0 > > DHCP: Disable > Starting IP Address : 192.168.0.100 > Number of IP Addresses : 100 > > Can you help me? > What am I doing wrong? > > Thanks, > > Markus Lechner > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CBQ.init
Craig wrote: Hi Fellows Where do I put the CBQ.init file in Debian to initialize on startup ? ..Craig CBQ.init is included in the shaper package, follow the instructions there Regards
Re: Correcting permissions on files
Hi, On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:26:14PM +0100, Maarten Vink wrote: > Scott St. John wrote: > > >I am using ncftp to bring the user home directories over to the new server > >and need to fix the owner/permission on each home directory and then > >also do the same when I bring their email over. > > 1) Don't use ftp; mount the drive via NFS. This won't cause permission > problems. > 2) If you need to use FTP, create a big tar(.gz/.bz2) file and copy that > file. This will also allow you to preserve permissions. If you don't > have enough diskspace to create this file, pipe it through an ssh-tunnel > so you won't need any additional diskspace. Or tar + plain rsh, no need to encrypt all that with ssh. Takes ages. newmachine:/# rsh oldmachine tar cf - home | tar xpf - and the whole tree will be copied, permissions and all, even remapping uids if the usernames on the new machine use different ones. You do have to configure your old machine temporarily to trust newmachine enough to give people on it root access though, but that's all. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info pgpIB3bxglmcW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Correcting permissions on files
Scott St. John wrote: Hi gang, The Debian box has been a true blessing this week and I am ready to move our users off BSDi/Sendmail to our new Debian/Postfix box. I have the accounts in the system, but am curious if anyone has some tips on scripting a way to fix permissions on home directories and files once the accounts are on the new server. I am using ncftp to bring the user home directories over to the new server and need to fix the owner/permission on each home directory and then also do the same when I bring their email over. Any thoughts? Thanks, -Scott 1) Don't use ftp; mount the drive via NFS. This won't cause permission problems. 2) If you need to use FTP, create a big tar(.gz/.bz2) file and copy that file. This will also allow you to preserve permissions. If you don't have enough diskspace to create this file, pipe it through an ssh-tunnel so you won't need any additional diskspace. If both are not possible, I'm afraid you'll have to script something yourself. Maarten Vink
email account and dns
Hi, I have a user that has one of his domains, user1.com, pointing his other domain, user2.com via the dns zone file. He asked me to redirect his user1.com domain to his new domain user3.com. I changed the entry in his user1.com zone file to point to the new user3.com domain, which is up. I also up dated the serial and then ran a rndc reload. I did this to both the primairy and secondary dns servers and user1.com still point to user2.com. I did a dig for the information and the ip address for user1.com still comes up as the ip of user2.com. I thought maybe it was cached information so I then ran a rndc flush and it still comes up wrong. I also have had a few email accounts disappear and was wondering if anyone had a similar issue. I did a search in the archive for dns redirect and accounts disappearing but could not find anything. Any input would be appreciated.
Re: CBQ.init
Craig wrote: Hi Fellows Where do I put the CBQ.init file in Debian to initialize on startup ? ..Craig CBQ.init is included in the shaper package, follow the instructions there Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
email account and dns
Hi, I have a user that has one of his domains, user1.com, pointing his other domain, user2.com via the dns zone file. He asked me to redirect his user1.com domain to his new domain user3.com. I changed the entry in his user1.com zone file to point to the new user3.com domain, which is up. I also up dated the serial and then ran a rndc reload. I did this to both the primairy and secondary dns servers and user1.com still point to user2.com. I did a dig for the information and the ip address for user1.com still comes up as the ip of user2.com. I thought maybe it was cached information so I then ran a rndc flush and it still comes up wrong. I also have had a few email accounts disappear and was wondering if anyone had a similar issue. I did a search in the archive for dns redirect and accounts disappearing but could not find anything. Any input would be appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Correcting permissions on files
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:52, Scott St. John wrote: > Or tar + plain rsh, no need to encrypt all that with ssh. Takes ages. ssh1 is a faster protocol than ssh2. Blowfish is a faster encryption than triple DES (the default). Use ssh1 and Blowfish instead of ssh2 and triple DES and you can increase the speed by as much as a factor of 6 (depending on hardware). Also transfer gzip compressed data. Using the -z option of tar takes better advantage of SMP systems than the -C option of scp, and compression is a fast operation, if the data compresses reasonably well (EG email) then the reduction in size (and therefore encryption work) saves time). I've written cron jobs to transfer multiple gigabyte files every night... > Heh, I have been sitting here with Perl and Awk books all morning and it's > really this simple? You guys are going to have me off my Windows > desktop completely if this keeps up :) That's the aim. Have you tried out kde 3.1? A KDE system with some expect scripts and ssh-agent makes a really good management system for servers. I used to run about 40 Solaris servers in such a fashion. I had setup scripts to do tasks such as run commands or install packages on all servers at once. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Correcting permissions on files
At 03:38 PM 11/1/2002 +0100, you wrote: Or tar + plain rsh, no need to encrypt all that with ssh. Takes ages. and the whole tree will be copied, permissions and all, even remapping uids if the usernames on the new machine use different ones. You do have to configure your old machine temporarily to trust newmachine enough to give people on it root access though, but that's all. Heh, I have been sitting here with Perl and Awk books all morning and it's really this simple? You guys are going to have me off my Windows desktop completely if this keeps up :) Thank you! -Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Correcting permissions on files
Hi, On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:26:14PM +0100, Maarten Vink wrote: > Scott St. John wrote: > > >I am using ncftp to bring the user home directories over to the new server > >and need to fix the owner/permission on each home directory and then > >also do the same when I bring their email over. > > 1) Don't use ftp; mount the drive via NFS. This won't cause permission > problems. > 2) If you need to use FTP, create a big tar(.gz/.bz2) file and copy that > file. This will also allow you to preserve permissions. If you don't > have enough diskspace to create this file, pipe it through an ssh-tunnel > so you won't need any additional diskspace. Or tar + plain rsh, no need to encrypt all that with ssh. Takes ages. newmachine:/# rsh oldmachine tar cf - home | tar xpf - and the whole tree will be copied, permissions and all, even remapping uids if the usernames on the new machine use different ones. You do have to configure your old machine temporarily to trust newmachine enough to give people on it root access though, but that's all. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info msg07104/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Correcting permissions on files
Scott St. John wrote: Hi gang, The Debian box has been a true blessing this week and I am ready to move our users off BSDi/Sendmail to our new Debian/Postfix box. I have the accounts in the system, but am curious if anyone has some tips on scripting a way to fix permissions on home directories and files once the accounts are on the new server. I am using ncftp to bring the user home directories over to the new server and need to fix the owner/permission on each home directory and then also do the same when I bring their email over. Any thoughts? Thanks, -Scott 1) Don't use ftp; mount the drive via NFS. This won't cause permission problems. 2) If you need to use FTP, create a big tar(.gz/.bz2) file and copy that file. This will also allow you to preserve permissions. If you don't have enough diskspace to create this file, pipe it through an ssh-tunnel so you won't need any additional diskspace. If both are not possible, I'm afraid you'll have to script something yourself. Maarten Vink -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Correcting permissions on files
Hi gang, The Debian box has been a true blessing this week and I am ready to move our users off BSDi/Sendmail to our new Debian/Postfix box. I have the accounts in the system, but am curious if anyone has some tips on scripting a way to fix permissions on home directories and files once the accounts are on the new server. I am using ncftp to bring the user home directories over to the new server and need to fix the owner/permission on each home directory and then also do the same when I bring their email over. Any thoughts? Thanks, -Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CBQ.init
Hi, On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:28:12AM +0200, Craig wrote: > Hi Fellows > > Where do I put the CBQ.init file in Debian to initialize > on startup ? No idea what that file is, but I assume a SysV-compatible init script. In that case, put it in /etc/init.d, and symlink to it from /etc/rc2.d/SxxCBQ and /etc/rc0.d/KyyCBQ, choosing numbers for xx and yy to reflect the desired place in the startup and shutdown procedures. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info msg07101/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
CBQ.init
Hi Fellows Where do I put the CBQ.init file in Debian to initialize on startup ? ..Craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
