How to not trigger auto-responders?
Hi, Autoresponders that I have setup before were based on procmail, they used the FROM_DAEMON check to not send responses to lists plus as a safety measure they'd only send one email to each sender per day. I host a club's website that has about 5,000 members, there are mailings to members done through the site and unfortunately the members love autoresponders. The site actually sends emails one-by-one to people and there are no headers to indicate that the email essentially from a mailing list. I am thinking of adding a "Precedence: list" or "Precedence: bulk" header to the emails in the hope that at least some of these autoresponders have some smarts. I know I can just send from an address that is aliased to /dev/null but I'd really like the emails to continue being sent from functional email addresses so that bounces and replies can be handled properly. Looking at the headers from the autoresponders, some identify themselves, many do not. I found "Internet Mail Service", Microsoft Exchange, OSM Client, and SMTP 32 vX. How have you guys gotten around the autoresponder problem in the past? Is there hope? -- Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wehave.net/ Halton Hills, Ontario, Canada Debian GNU/Linux
How to not trigger auto-responders?
Hi, Autoresponders that I have setup before were based on procmail, they used the FROM_DAEMON check to not send responses to lists plus as a safety measure they'd only send one email to each sender per day. I host a club's website that has about 5,000 members, there are mailings to members done through the site and unfortunately the members love autoresponders. The site actually sends emails one-by-one to people and there are no headers to indicate that the email essentially from a mailing list. I am thinking of adding a "Precedence: list" or "Precedence: bulk" header to the emails in the hope that at least some of these autoresponders have some smarts. I know I can just send from an address that is aliased to /dev/null but I'd really like the emails to continue being sent from functional email addresses so that bounces and replies can be handled properly. Looking at the headers from the autoresponders, some identify themselves, many do not. I found "Internet Mail Service", Microsoft Exchange, OSM Client, and SMTP 32 vX. How have you guys gotten around the autoresponder problem in the past? Is there hope? -- Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wehave.net/ Halton Hills, Ontario, Canada Debian GNU/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailserver and seperately Listserver in one Network with IP-Masq
Hello, Currently I have no problems but maybe if I get my ADSL with fixed IP and IP-Masquerading. Following: I have a local network with a virtual Web-Server which serves the domain linux4michelle.net and has additional for each host (woody, potato, slink, dof) a Mailinglist. Then there is a Mailserver mail.michelle-is.de (exim 4.14) in my network. Generaly it handles the full mail-delivery in my Network and catch the Messages from 56 external Mail-Accounts like this one. Question: If I get my my ADSL with fixed IP, can there be a problem with the two Servers ? If yes, how must I configure my Servers that it works ??? I have seen, that others use the MAIN Mail-Server as the Server which connect to the outside of the Network and all traffic must pass it. Also the Listserver traffic. How can I do it ? Thanks Michelle
courier-imap und fprot
Hello, because I will get in arround 2-4 month my ADSL-Line with fixed IP-Address I like to install the whole courier-imap server (with webmail, pop3, mta... and fetchmail) Now I do not know, how to intergrate fprot or McAffee in my Server. (I have no experience with courier-imap) Note: The Mailserver must server one domain and catch mails from 56 foreign Mail-Accounts (and put it into different User- Boxes). So can anyone help me ??? Thanks Michelle
Re: Sharing ppp conections without chanel bundling
You may want to read the adv-routing HOWTO @ http://lartc.org/howto I. Forbes ha scritto: Hi All I am looking that the posibility sharing traffic through two pppoe conections without chanel bundling. I want to use a linux box as a NAT router, but the outgoing ip's must be shared in "round-robin" fashion between two ppp interfaces. Obviously each tcp connection will be linked to one outgoing ppp interface (eg ppp0). But the next one should pickup the next ppp interface (ppp1) etc. Thus each ppp conection should provide a default route. Can Linux kernel + iptables handle something like this? Thanks Ian - Ian Forbes ZSD http://www.zsd.co.za Office: +27 21 683-1388 Fax: +27 21 674-1106 Snail Mail: P.O. Box 46827, Glosderry, 7702, South Africa -
Sharing ppp conections without chanel bundling
Hi All I am looking that the posibility sharing traffic through two pppoe conections without chanel bundling. I want to use a linux box as a NAT router, but the outgoing ip's must be shared in "round-robin" fashion between two ppp interfaces. Obviously each tcp connection will be linked to one outgoing ppp interface (eg ppp0). But the next one should pickup the next ppp interface (ppp1) etc. Thus each ppp conection should provide a default route. Can Linux kernel + iptables handle something like this? Thanks Ian - Ian Forbes ZSD http://www.zsd.co.za Office: +27 21 683-1388 Fax: +27 21 674-1106 Snail Mail: P.O. Box 46827, Glosderry, 7702, South Africa -
Mailserver and seperately Listserver in one Network with IP-Masq
Hello, Currently I have no problems but maybe if I get my ADSL with fixed IP and IP-Masquerading. Following: I have a local network with a virtual Web-Server which serves the domain linux4michelle.net and has additional for each host (woody, potato, slink, dof) a Mailinglist. Then there is a Mailserver mail.michelle-is.de (exim 4.14) in my network. Generaly it handles the full mail-delivery in my Network and catch the Messages from 56 external Mail-Accounts like this one. Question: If I get my my ADSL with fixed IP, can there be a problem with the two Servers ? If yes, how must I configure my Servers that it works ??? I have seen, that others use the MAIN Mail-Server as the Server which connect to the outside of the Network and all traffic must pass it. Also the Listserver traffic. How can I do it ? Thanks Michelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
courier-imap und fprot
Hello, because I will get in arround 2-4 month my ADSL-Line with fixed IP-Address I like to install the whole courier-imap server (with webmail, pop3, mta... and fetchmail) Now I do not know, how to intergrate fprot or McAffee in my Server. (I have no experience with courier-imap) Note: The Mailserver must server one domain and catch mails from 56 foreign Mail-Accounts (and put it into different User- Boxes). So can anyone help me ??? Thanks Michelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sharing ppp conections without chanel bundling
You may want to read the adv-routing HOWTO @ http://lartc.org/howto I. Forbes ha scritto: Hi All I am looking that the posibility sharing traffic through two pppoe conections without chanel bundling. I want to use a linux box as a NAT router, but the outgoing ip's must be shared in "round-robin" fashion between two ppp interfaces. Obviously each tcp connection will be linked to one outgoing ppp interface (eg ppp0). But the next one should pickup the next ppp interface (ppp1) etc. Thus each ppp conection should provide a default route. Can Linux kernel + iptables handle something like this? Thanks Ian - Ian Forbes ZSD http://www.zsd.co.za Office: +27 21 683-1388 Fax: +27 21 674-1106 Snail Mail: P.O. Box 46827, Glosderry, 7702, South Africa - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharing ppp conections without chanel bundling
Hi All I am looking that the posibility sharing traffic through two pppoe conections without chanel bundling. I want to use a linux box as a NAT router, but the outgoing ip's must be shared in "round-robin" fashion between two ppp interfaces. Obviously each tcp connection will be linked to one outgoing ppp interface (eg ppp0). But the next one should pickup the next ppp interface (ppp1) etc. Thus each ppp conection should provide a default route. Can Linux kernel + iptables handle something like this? Thanks Ian - Ian Forbes ZSD http://www.zsd.co.za Office: +27 21 683-1388 Fax: +27 21 674-1106 Snail Mail: P.O. Box 46827, Glosderry, 7702, South Africa - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sin of sins Compile errors on red hat ..
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Last I looked, I was sure this was a debian-isp list, not redhat-support list :-) Regards, Brad Lay ( brad /at/ coombabah.net ) P) (07) 55 311177 W) http://coombabah.net/
Sin of sins Compile errors on red hat ..
I need a list of libraries for exim , and which are needed of wich config options in the make.. the current error is " make[2]: Leaving directory ' /greg/exim-4.14/build-Linux-athlon/auths' make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'lookups/lookups.a', needed by 'exim'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory ' /greg/exim-4.14/build-Linux-athlon/auths' make: *** [go] Error 2 Many Thanks Gregory Machin
Re: Sin of sins Compile errors on red hat ..
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Last I looked, I was sure this was a debian-isp list, not redhat-support list :-) Regards, Brad Lay ( brad /at/ coombabah.net ) P) (07) 55 311177 W) http://coombabah.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sin of sins Compile errors on red hat ..
I need a list of libraries for exim , and which are needed of wich config options in the make.. the current error is " make[2]: Leaving directory ' /greg/exim-4.14/build-Linux-athlon/auths' make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'lookups/lookups.a', needed by 'exim'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory ' /greg/exim-4.14/build-Linux-athlon/auths' make: *** [go] Error 2 Many Thanks Gregory Machin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: {G} Exiscan ??
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Gregory Machin wrote: > > I have exiscan up and running on problem. it sends the sender of the > viruse infected email an error message saying the email ,is infected and > wont be tarnsmitted. > > How to i configure exiscan to tell the recipient that thay were protected > from a virus , customer like to see this stuff ... > > Many Thanks > Gregory Machin It's on by default. in /etc/exiscan/exiscan.conf look for $rcpt_notification = 1; and also, to edit the message displayed, see $rcpt_notification_text This will only notify them _IF_ the mail had a virus, not every message even if its not [which would be rude, leave it up to AVG and the like to do that.] Regards, Brad Lay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) P) (07) 55 311177 W) http://coombabah.net/
[Help...Help] LDAP + Proftpd ....
Hello All : i've tried configure my ProFTPd to support LDAP authentication on Debian woody But...i got some troubles so that i CAN NOT let it working -___- My Question is : 0. Does anyone can share document or howto about this issue? 1. Should i configure /etc/pam.d/proftpd that support "pam_ldap.so"? 2. What's directive mean that "LDAPDoAuth"? its mean BASE DN? 3. Should i set directive that "LDAPUseTLS off" in /etc/proftpd.conf ? -- Trust & Unique ... axacheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: {G} Exiscan ??
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Gregory Machin wrote: > > I have exiscan up and running on problem. it sends the sender of the > viruse infected email an error message saying the email ,is infected and > wont be tarnsmitted. > > How to i configure exiscan to tell the recipient that thay were protected > from a virus , customer like to see this stuff ... > > Many Thanks > Gregory Machin It's on by default. in /etc/exiscan/exiscan.conf look for $rcpt_notification = 1; and also, to edit the message displayed, see $rcpt_notification_text This will only notify them _IF_ the mail had a virus, not every message even if its not [which would be rude, leave it up to AVG and the like to do that.] Regards, Brad Lay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) P) (07) 55 311177 W) http://coombabah.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Help...Help] LDAP + Proftpd ....
Hello All : i've tried configure my ProFTPd to support LDAP authentication on Debian woody But...i got some troubles so that i CAN NOT let it working -___- My Question is : 0. Does anyone can share document or howto about this issue? 1. Should i configure /etc/pam.d/proftpd that support "pam_ldap.so"? 2. What's directive mean that "LDAPDoAuth"? its mean BASE DN? 3. Should i set directive that "LDAPUseTLS off" in /etc/proftpd.conf ? -- Trust & Unique ... axacheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
