Re: On SMP, getting: Message from watchdog: The system will be rebooted because of error -3!
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:09, Jason Lim wrote: > Recently got SMP working, but now keep getting: > Message from watchdog: The system will be rebooted because of error -3! Check /var/log/daemon.log for the real reason, a transient load spike is a likely cause. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On SMP, getting: Message from watchdog: The system will be rebooted because of error -3!
Hi all, Recently got SMP working, but now keep getting: Message from watchdog: The system will be rebooted because of error -3! (note this isn't really SMP, it's intel hyperthreading...) The system auto reboots because of this. Not sure why... doesn't appear to be the load or anything (no conditions met from /etc/watchdog.conf) Any idea what this might be? Sincerely, Jas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:43:33PM +1000, Rudi Starcevic wrote: > > Sendmail or Qmail ? That is my question. > Well Rudi, You have heard from most camps of users who prefer MTA's for various reasons. Interesting enough, Debian ships exim default, and uses Mailman for it's Debian hosted lists, SuSE ships Postfix, oh yea but they use qmail for the MTA of choice and ezmlm for all the SuSE hosted lists, and the so on and so on. Opinions abound on which is better but I have found after running them all, that I personally like one over the other. Personal convictions because of personal experience. In other words, "only the experienced walk with a limp". I trust that regardless of what your MTA of choice is, you have fun and learn, which is more important than which MTA. Warm Regards, Dee -- W.D.McKinney (Dee) - CEO & President Alaska Wireless Systems Direct (907)349-4308 -=- Mobile (907)230-5048 http://www.akwireless.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:14:09PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:58, Eric Sproul wrote: > > First, scale is a consideration. Once we began to grow our customer > > base, our email volume began to increase dramatically. Qmail queues > > everything to disk, so the more mail you do, the more pressure you put > > on your disk I/O. The server running Qmail was always blocking while it > > I was under the impression that Sendmail also queues everything to disk. by default, it doesn't. > How does it's queue operate then? although it can be configured otherwise (either in the config file or in command line options when calling /usr/sbin/sendmail), sendmail will first attempt to deliver a message submitted to it, and will only fall back to queuing it if the initial delivery fails. this is a performance disaster because it makes resource limiting/rationing impossible, and is probably the primary reason why a sendmail server will fall over and crash under a heavy load that other MTAs (that implement a "queue everything first, deliver out of the queue" approach) handle without breaking a sweat. BTW, this is also one of the reasons why sendmail is slow with most list managers - most of them do not call /usr/sbin/sendmail with '-O DeliveryMode=q' craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:54:55AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > - qmail has a good integration with one of the fastest mailing list > servers, ezmlm. ezmlm is probably the best thing about qmail. however, it's also an example of the technology trap that i referred to in a previous message in this thread. fortunately, courier-mlm has all of the features of ezmlm and works with any standard unix MTA including courier-mta, sendmail, exim, and postfix. ezmlm only works with qmail. btw, mailing list speed has a lot more to do with MTA speed than the list software itself. take any mailing list and try running it with different list managers and different MTAs - several things will become apparent: 1. sendmail is slow with any list manager, even if you pre-sort the recipient list. 2. sendmail's performance varies greatly depending on how you tweak it, and depending on which list manager you use (and how it sends the mail). no matter how well you tweak it, though, it will not even begin to come close to postfix's performance. 3. postfix is extremely fast with any list manager, regardless of whether you pre-sort the recipient list or not and regardless of whether you use VERP[1] features or not. 4. qmail comes close to postfix's speed ONLY if there aren't many recipients at the same domain *OR* if you are using VERP. if there are many recipients at the same domain (e.g. a few hundred at hotmail.com, a few hundred more at yahoo.com etc) and you don't need VERP then delivery by qmail will be much slower. [1] another good idea from djb that was implemented better by others. IMO & IME, he's good at ideas, bad at implementation and absolutely lousy at systems administration. craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:47:14AM -0400, Dale E Martin wrote: > > It doesnt at all Not to ellaborate, but the subject says it > > all...even then. I hate exim too. > > Has it been covered before on this list? I for one would be interested in > elaboration, if there is something technically inferior about exim or > postfix to qmail or sendmail? Or politically, I suppose, since much of > people's dislike about qmail has more to due with "political" than > technical reasons. there are technical and "political" reasons to avoid qmail. the political reasons have been discussed many times on many lists, so i'll ignore them here. like all of djb's software, qmail has extremely weird configuration. not difficult to learn, just a PITA and completely unlike any other unix tools, and completely unlike anything else on your system - djb (wrongly) believes that it is far more important for his programs to be consistent with each other no matter what system they're running on than it is for them to be consistent with everything else on the system. amongst many other problems (including the unneccessary bizarre re-invention of existing tools that work perfectly well) he makes extensive use of "magic" file and directory names, mere existence of a file can trigger events and radically change the behaviour of a program. this is so fucked up that it's hard to believe he thinks it's a good idea (but he does!). craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:43:33PM +1000, Rudi Starcevic wrote: > Sendmail or Qmail ? That is my question. neither. postfix is the answer. postfix is backwards compatible with sendmail (meaning minimal disruption during the migration) with better security, speed, and features than qmail (and sendmail too, but that goes without sayiing). > Currently we use Sendmail. It's worked fine, well actually problem free so > better than fine - I've got the Sendmail book and all. However we will be > setting up some new email servers soon and I'm considering Qmail. if you're used to sendmail, you will find postfix to be much easier to understand and configure. > At this stage I'm leaning towards sticking with Sendmail but something inside > wants to know more about Qmail. try setting up two experimental boxes, just to play with. install qmail on one and postfix on the other.you'll need to do this anyway, you really shouldn't migrate mail servers based ONLY on advice from a mailing list - you need to have hands on experience yourself. qmail is certainly worth learning, if only because it has some interesting ideas - but those ideas are implemented far better in postfix. > If you *had* to pick one of these two which would it be ? if i really had no other choice, i'd very reluctantly pick sendmail. not because it's better than qmail (it certainly isn't) but because it isn't a dead-end trap like qmail. qmail is so different to sendmail, exim, postfix, and just about every other unix MTA that migrating to it is a major PITA. migrating away from it is at least as bad. qmail has some very nice features, and is much faster and far more secure than sendmail but it's a technology trap as bad as any proprietary MTA. craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple ppp connections
Róbert, You can force the ppp interface number by using the "unit" option in your pppd configuration file. So, following the standard debian ppp setup, if you have: /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider1 and /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider2 You can set "unit 1" in the first to force it into using ppp1, and "unit 2" in the second to make it come up as ppp2. These options also work as command line arguments, but that gets messy. Once the ppp interfaces are predictable, your iptables rules should be a lot simpler to set up. Cheers, -- Martin Foster Mobile: +61 4 0584 6359 Systems Engineer P A C I F I CPhone: +61 3 9674 7659 Pacific Internet (Australia) I N T E R N E T Fax: +61 3 9699 8693 http://www.pacific.net.au/ NASDAQ: PCNTF On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 22:24, Szőts Róbert wrote: > Does anyone know how can I put iptables firewall script onto a firewall where is > more ppp connectoins? > Expl. > > There is a firewall with two dsl connection the first is ppp0 the 2nd is the ppp1. > It's clear. > > How can I build firewall If I do not know which dsl connection wil be the ppp0 or > the ppp1? > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > Robert > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CBQ/HBQ and other QoS algorithms
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 22:07:22 +0200, Clément Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I'd like some information on HBQ in particular and QoS in general. > > Does anyone knows where I can find useful information (I only found > the Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control HOWTO so far, must-read > but lacks informations about HBQ) ? > > I'd be really grateful if anyone could provide some links, and > especially I'd like to know what are the differences between the > existing algorithms. > > Also, If there is some "shaper-like" scripts with other method than > CBQ, i'd like to know them. ..http://fmb.no/ipcop/setup-cbq-0.0.4.tar.bz2, I'm open for ideas on setup-xbq-0.0.5, and it could use a web interface. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CBQ/HBQ and other QoS algorithms
Hi, I'd like some information on HBQ in particular and QoS in general. Does anyone knows where I can find useful information (I only found the Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control HOWTO so far, must-read but lacks informations about HBQ) ? I'd be really grateful if anyone could provide some links, and especially I'd like to know what are the differences between the existing algorithms. Also, If there is some "shaper-like" scripts with other method than CBQ, i'd like to know them. Best regards, -- Clément Hermann Network and System Administrator/administrateur systèmes et réseaux Business & Decision.Eolas http://www.eolas.fr - (+33) (0) 476 44 50 50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ..fixing ext3 fs going read-only, was : Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 00:20:12 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 00:17, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..I have had a few cases of ext3fs'es, even on raid-1, going > > read-only on errors, what do you guys use to bring them back > > into service? > > What happens on error conditions can be set through tune2fs or as a > mount option. Having it remount read-only is probably better than > panicing the kernel. ..yeah, except in /var/log, /var/spool et al, I also lean towards panic in /home. > When it happens a reboot may be a good idea, in which case a fsck to > fix the problem should occur automatically. ..should, agrrrRRRrrreed. IME (RH73 - RH9 and woody) it does not. ..what happens is the journaling dies, leaving a good fs intact, on rebooting, the dead journal will "repair" the fs wiping good data off the fs. ..compare 'df -h' and 'cat /proc/mounts' on such a system. ..the errors=remount,ro fstab option remounts the fs ro but fails to tell the system, so the system merrily "logs" data and "accepts" mail etc 'till Dooms Day, and especially on raid-1 disks I sort of expected redundancy, like in "autofeather the bad prop and trim out the yaw" and "autopatch that holed fuel tank", and "auto-sync the props", I mean, this was done _60_years_ ago in aviation to help win WWII, and ext3 on raid-1 floats around USS Yorktown-style??? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Postfix! [WAS: Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..]
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:54:28AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote: > > Hear hear! Nationality doesn't matter. We're talking about technical merit > of things here. Let's keep race, creed, religion, colour out of this. If we gave that impression, that was not the idea. If someone has that feeling, my apologies. > Don't mention SPEWS. SPEWS is famous for blocking large non-USA ISPs at > the drop of a hat, while large USA spam-support ISPs get away with murder. > Why? Because Spews is either run by someone in the USA or knows that if > they started applying the same principals to everyone, more and more large > USA ISPs will be blocked completely, and less and less people will use > SPEWS. Thus SPEWS has double-standards in this regard. Not only SPEWS has that problem :( > I prefer ones that have the same standard, regardless of what country you > are in. Many many block lists are available... www.spamcop.net... or just > check out one of the best Block List comparisons yourself at: > http://www.declude.com/JunkMail/Support/ip4r.htm We currently only use rbl's based on spamtraps and I must say it stops a great number of spammessages. That mostly its automated and no one has to submit anything except spammers that use open-proxies, agents, faulty mailservers, etc. > Don't tell SPEWS and NANAE that... from the way they talk and act, every > spammer must be in China, Korea, Taiwan, and everywhere else EXCEPT the > USA. I know and its a shame :( > In the above block list comparison webpage, I believe it is listed there? No, they're not and they shouldn't be listed there. Spamikaze is just software so everyone can make there own personal rbl and Spamvrij.nl is just a foundation that tries to make emailmarketing acceptable by education of companies and marketiers. It also lists companies on there website that send `spam', but also lists companies that have changed there policy about emailmarketing.. -- Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Postfix! [WAS: Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..]
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 03:48:42PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: Content-Description: signed data > Hans, > > Glad to hear the situation is getting better in .nl. Having been hit by > several 10s of spam from some dutch provider the other day just didn't imply > this :-) I have one advice when sending abuse doesn't help, post[1] the spam in nl.internet.misbruik.spam-signalering with a follow-up to nl.internet.misbruik. Most ISP's in the Netherlands are lurking there and/or posting there like Easynet and Chello. Don't expect results directly, but they will come. > > What is the connection between the nationality of Wietse Venema and > > people who sent spam? This is a very strange argument and more fitted > > for a discussion between kids. > > You *did* see my original mail on that subject? You *did* look at the list of > other more or less silly reasons that were posted already alongside some of > the more serious ones? My-mailer-is-better-than-yours discussions are equal > with my-OS-is-better-than-yours discussions or my-editor-is-better-than-yours > flamefests. Those discussions will always (i) be very long and (ii) turn > silly. I was hoping to avoid (i) by accelerating (ii). Those my-wheel-is-rounder-then-your-wheel-discussions are always silly ;-) [1] Limit you post to onder 10KB max. -- Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ip aliasing and second default gw in /etc/network/interfaces
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:54PM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:23:58AM -0700, Peter Nome wrote: > > I'm hoping some smart soul can help me with this. After experimenting > > a bit, I discovered that I could add a second ip address by issuing > > > > ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.1.92 up > > So far so good.. > > > Once that's in pace, I found I could add a second default gatway by > > issuing > > > > route add default gw 192.168.1.1 > > Wrong, the problem with linux routing tables is that linux is capable of > having only one default gateway, so your idea would never work, you > would need to poll the connection and change the gateway if the other > route goes down.. Wrong; check my main routing table (trimmed a bit to make it simpler); 203.12.236.227 dev ippp0 scope link 210.15.254.253 dev ppp5 scope link [...] 192.188.107.0/24 dev ippp0 scope link 198.142.76.0/24 dev ppp5 scope link [...] 203.113.192.0/18 dev ppp5 scope link unreachable 192.168.0.0/16 scope host unreachable 172.16.0.0/12 scope host unreachable 10.0.0.0/8 scope host default nexthop via 203.12.236.227 dev ippp0 weight 1 nexthop via 203.17.101.66 dev ppp5 weight 4 Of course, if one goes down, you still want it to dispear as a "nexthop" default route, otherwise you end up with strange intermittant behaviour. As in my case I have ppp and ippp links, I don't put stuff in /etc/network/interfaces but in /etc/ppp/ip-(up|down).d/* I see no reason why you couldn't use ip route stuff to do the same sort of suff in /etc/network/interfaces though (it would probably be easier). Search for the Advanced Linux Routing HOWTO... it has much good info. The other place to look is /usr/share/doc/iproute/ip-cref.ps.gz (why the hell couldn't they provide this doco in html) after intalling iproute. -- Donovan Baardahttp://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ..fixing ext3 fs going read-only, was : Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 00:17, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..I have had a few cases of ext3fs'es, even on raid-1, going > read-only on errors, what do you guys use to bring them back > into service? What happens on error conditions can be set through tune2fs or as a mount option. Having it remount read-only is probably better than panicing the kernel. When it happens a reboot may be a good idea, in which case a fsck to fix the problem should occur automatically. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..fixing ext3 fs going read-only, was : Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 12:34:45 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Also I believe that in Ext3 if you write data to a file and then > unlink the file before the data is committed to disk then the data > will never be written. So there seems no loss as long as the file > isn't opened with O_SYNC and you don't call fsync() (and no-one calls > sync()). > ..I have had a few cases of ext3fs'es, even on raid-1, going read-only on errors, what do you guys use to bring them back into service? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Postfix! [WAS: Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..]
On Sunday 07 September 2003 15:48, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: Apologies - missing attribution. This was Brian: > > What is the connection between the nationality of Wietse Venema and > > people who sent spam? This is a very strange argument and more fitted > > for a discussion between kids. > > You *did* see my original mail on that subject? You *did* look at the list > of other more or less silly reasons that were posted already alongside some > of the more serious ones? My-mailer-is-better-than-yours discussions are > equal with my-OS-is-better-than-yours discussions or > my-editor-is-better-than-yours flamefests. Those discussions will always > (i) be very long and (ii) turn silly. I was hoping to avoid (i) by > accelerating (ii). > > Well. It didn't work. Surprise. > -- vbi -- I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it. -- Mae West pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: Postfix! [WAS: Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..]
Hans, Glad to hear the situation is getting better in .nl. Having been hit by several 10s of spam from some dutch provider the other day just didn't imply this :-) > What is the connection between the nationality of Wietse Venema and > people who sent spam? This is a very strange argument and more fitted > for a discussion between kids. You *did* see my original mail on that subject? You *did* look at the list of other more or less silly reasons that were posted already alongside some of the more serious ones? My-mailer-is-better-than-yours discussions are equal with my-OS-is-better-than-yours discussions or my-editor-is-better-than-yours flamefests. Those discussions will always (i) be very long and (ii) turn silly. I was hoping to avoid (i) by accelerating (ii). Well. It didn't work. Surprise. -- vbi -- All power corrupts, but we need electricity. pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
also sprach Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.05.1414 +0200]: > Complete ACK. I'm also willing to give support, as I use > postfix+mysql+sasl at a couple of clients. did you ever get sasl to work with mozilla clients in any but the non-plaintext forms? i'd really appreciate help here! -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
also sprach Nathan Eric Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.05.2025 +0200]: > News flash: the FHS specifies how distributions should (or should not) > lay out filesystems. The FHS does not prohibit end users from > creating new root-level directories. executables alongside configuration files in /var is just wrong. the user does not have a choice. that's the last thing i'll say about this. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: SMP on Debian server with Hyperthreading
Sincerely, - Original Message - From: "Guus Houtzager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, 06 September, 2003 6:07 PM Subject: Re: SMP on Debian server with Hyperthreading > Hi, > > On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 09:31, Jason Lim wrote: > > Hi Guus, > > > > Yes, BIOS setting is enabled. The ONLY thing that I haven't done is edit > > lilo to include the acpismp=force setting. Did you set that to make it > > work? Does it work without it (ie. SMP enabled WITHOUT modifying lilo)? > > Haven't modified lilo for this to work. > I looked again at your dmesg output and compared it to mine. With me > it's ACPI doing the detection of the cpu's. Did you enable ACPI? Ah... did NOT have ACPI enabled. Did not know it had to be, for SMP to work! I enabled it, compiled the kernel, and /proc/cpuinfo sees 2 CPUs, but top doesn't. After spending ages trying to figure it out, I found the version of top that comes with Debian 3.0 does NOT have SMP support. So I downloaded the backported version from: http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/backported/procps/ and after top launches, press 1 (or set the appropriate cmd line parameter) and it works great. I did ACPI a little different than you though... I have: > # CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY is not set set as y/1 (and therefore everything else set as n/0), as I don't need all the "acpi_power" and other stuff, just want SMP to work. So it's working now. Thanks for your help! > Part of my dmesg: > Linux version 2.4.22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 20030831 (Debian > prerelease)) #1 SMP Tue Sep 2 11:37:18 CEST 2003 > BIOS-provided physical RAM map: > BIOS-e820: - 000a (usable) > BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved) > BIOS-e820: 0010 - 2fff (usable) > BIOS-e820: 2fff - 2fff3000 (ACPI NVS) > BIOS-e820: 2fff3000 - 3000 (ACPI data) > BIOS-e820: fec0 - 0001 (reserved) > 767MB LOWMEM available. > ACPI: have wakeup address 0xc0002000 > found SMP MP-table at 000f51c0 > hm, page 000f5000 reserved twice. > hm, page 000f6000 reserved twice. > hm, page 000f reserved twice. > hm, page 000f1000 reserved twice. > On node 0 totalpages: 196592 > zone(0): 4096 pages. > zone(1): 192496 pages. > zone(2): 0 pages. > ACPI: RSDP (v000 IntelR) @ > 0x000f6c50 > ACPI: RSDT (v001 IntelR AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ > 0x2fff3000 > ACPI: FADT (v001 IntelR AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ > 0x2fff3040 > ACPI: MADT (v001 IntelR AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ > 0x2fff6700 > ACPI: DSDT (v001 INTELR AWRDACPI 0x1000 MSFT 0x010d) @ > 0x > ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0 > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) > Processor #0 Pentium 4(tm) XEON(tm) APIC version 16 > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] enabled) > Processor #1 Pentium 4(tm) XEON(tm) APIC version 16 > ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] polarity[0x1] trigger[0x1] lint[0x1]) > ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] polarity[0x1] trigger[0x1] lint[0x1]) > ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] global_irq_base[0x0]) > IOAPIC[0]: Assigned apic_id 2 > IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec0, IRQ 0-23 > ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus[0] irq[0x0] global_irq[0x2] polarity[0x0] > trigger[0x0]) > ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus[0] irq[0x9] global_irq[0x9] polarity[0x1] > trigger[0x3]) > Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information > Kernel command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=Linux ro root=303 hdc=scsi > > and so on... > > ACPI part of my config: > > # > # ACPI Support > # > CONFIG_ACPI=y > # CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY is not set > CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT=y > CONFIG_ACPI_BUS=y > CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER=y > CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y > CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y > CONFIG_ACPI_PCI=y > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y > CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y > # CONFIG_ACPI_AC is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY is not set > CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=y > CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=y > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y > # CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set > # CONFIG_ACPI_RELAXED_AML is not set > > > > Thanks. > > I hope this helps. > > -- > Guus Houtzager Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PGP fingerprint = 5E E6 96 35 F0 64 34 14 CC 03 2B 36 71 FB 4B 5D > "A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer." > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
