Newsletter - Aktivierungslink

2003-12-16 Thread eurohans
Hallo,

Wenn sie diesen Newsletter erhalten wollen klicken sie bitte auf die Internet-Adresse.
Falls sie diesen Newsletter nicht wollen löschen sie einfach diese E-Mail.

Aktivierungslink: http://www.0800news.de/cgi-bin/newsletter.cgi?id=tom643[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]key=MQjiGuBAt/Qaction=aktiv

Mit freundlichen Grüssen Newsletter-Team


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Newsletter: Vielen dank für ihre Anmeldung!

2003-12-16 Thread eurohans
Hallo,

Ihre E-Mailadresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wurde in den Newsletterverteiler hinzugefügt.

URL: http://www.0800news.de/cgi-bin/newsletter.cgi?id=tom643

Mit freundlichen Grüssen Ihr Newsletter-Team


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim
Hi All...

Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyperthreading (eg.
on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
average to jump to over 200?

Here is the log line:

Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
given threshold 200 150 100!

(then it reboots)

This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
kernel, and it has the same problem.

When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can see
CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.

Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or perhaps
HyperThreading processors?

Thanks in advance.

Sincerely,
Jas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Newsletter: Ihre E-Mailadresse wurde ausgetragen.

2003-12-16 Thread eurohans
Hallo,

Ihre E-Mailadresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wurde aus dem Verteiler entfernt.

URL: http://www.0800news.de/cgi-bin/newsletter.cgi?id=tom643

Mit freundlichen Grüssen Ihr Newsletter-Team


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread C. R. Oldham
Jason,

 Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel 
 Hyperthreading (eg.

Check your ACPI settings in your BIOS and in your kernel.  I messed with
ours on a couple of servers, I don't remember where I landed, but I
think the only thing that worked reliably was just compiling the kernel
to do processor enumeration via ACPI only.  Or shut off ACPI in your
BIOS altogether and the kernel should do the right thing regardless of
the compile time options.

This is a shot in the dark, not sure if it will help you at all.

This also might be related to the High Memory Kernels and buffer
bouncing thread on this list from 4 December.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2003/debian-isp-200312/msg00053.html

--cro


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim

Just noticed one more thing... it appears to be Apache causing the super
high load (among other programs running) when SMP is compiled into the
kernel, and with a bunch of errors in syslog:

[Wed Dec 17 02:27:37 2003] [notice] child pid xx exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)

(and a whole bunch of these errors, like 50 lines)

I did a search and someone said it has to do with Apache requesting memory
that it doesn't own or something:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2002/debian-apache-200207/msg5.html

but that doesn't really help in this case, unless you guys can think of a
different angle on this?


- Original Message - 
From: Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?


 Hi All...

 Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyperthreading (eg.
 on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
 average to jump to over 200?

 Here is the log line:

 Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
 given threshold 200 150 100!

 (then it reboots)

 This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
 kernel, and it has the same problem.

 When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
 and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
 compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can
see
 CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
 before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
 woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.

 Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
 look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
perhaps
 HyperThreading processors?

 Thanks in advance.

 Sincerely,
 Jas


 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Sendmail Queuing?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason McMullen
Anyone seen any odd queuing by Sendmail (or the ability to change how it
queues)?

Say the primary MX for a host is down and we attempt to send mail to a
domain that it handles mail for.  For example:

;; ANSWER SECTION:
necinc.com. 19h32m42s IN MX  100 mail.wam.net.
necinc.com. 19h32m42s IN MX  200 mail2.wam.net.
necinc.com. 19h32m42s IN MX  10 mailgate.necinc.com.

Now, if i force sendmail to run a queue for this host: 

sendmail -v -qRnecinc.com

I receive this:

Running /var/spool/mqueue/h7KKJwrA001233 (sequence 1 of 1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Connecting to mailgate.necinc.com. via esmtp...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Deferred: Operation timed out with
mailgate.necinc.com.

It dumps that back message back into the queue.  It'll keep that up
for 6-8 hours THEN attempt to deliver to the higher weighted MX hosts
which are up and accept.  Shouldn't sendmail realize that the one host
is down on the initial delivery attempt and try the next highest?  I
could see if we couldn't reach all three hosts, but if just one is
down, there is no reason sendmail should queue the message for 8 hours
before attempting another host.

-Jason


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Alex Borges
El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 12:39, Jason Lim escribió:
 Just noticed one more thing... it appears to be Apache causing the super
 high load (among other programs running) when SMP is compiled into the
 kernel, and with a bunch of errors in syslog:
 
 [Wed Dec 17 02:27:37 2003] [notice] child pid xx exit signal
 Segmentation fault (11)
 
 (and a whole bunch of these errors, like 50 lines)
 
 I did a search and someone said it has to do with Apache requesting memory
 that it doesn't own or something:
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2002/debian-apache-200207/msg5.html
 

Mhm... i dont want to be hasty, but it seems im looking at exactly this
problem for a very memory hungry php application

 but that doesn't really help in this case, unless you guys can think of a
 different angle on this?
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:23 PM
 Subject: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?
 
 
  Hi All...
 
  Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyperthreading (eg.
  on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
  average to jump to over 200?
 
  Here is the log line:
 
  Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
  given threshold 200 150 100!
 
  (then it reboots)
 
  This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
  kernel, and it has the same problem.
 
  When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
  and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
  compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can
 see
  CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
  before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
  woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
 
  Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
  look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
 perhaps
  HyperThreading processors?
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Sincerely,
  Jas
 
 
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



UML Patch uad 2.4.22Kernel

2003-12-16 Thread Daniel Holze
Hello debian-isp,

  i was tried to install a kernel (2.4.22) with UML patch.
  I cant install it.
  So, here are my work Steps:

  patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
  make menuconfig
  make modules
  make modules_install
  make bzImage

  when it is compiling the kernel image i get a error:

gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.22/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-
trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=
2 -march=i686   -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=sys_i386  -c -o
 sys_i386.o sys_i386.c
sys_i386.c: In function `do_mmap2':
sys_i386.c:59: warning: passing arg 1 of `do_mmap_pgoff' from incompatible point
er type
sys_i386.c:59: warning: passing arg 2 of `do_mmap_pgoff' makes pointer from inte
ger without a cast
sys_i386.c:59: too few arguments to function `do_mmap_pgoff'
make[1]: *** [sys_i386.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.22/arch/i386/kernel'
make: *** [_dir_arch/i386/kernel] Error 2

Anyone know what`s wrong?

-- 
Best wishes,

DWL-Deutsche Webleasing oHG
Daniel Holze
Technical Director
Hanauer Landstrasse 320
D-60314 Frankfurt

Telefon: +49 (0)69 403 57 990
Telefax: +49 (0)69 403 57 991

http://www.dwleasing.de
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: UML Patch uad 2.4.22Kernel

2003-12-16 Thread Micah Anderson
Daniel Holze schrieb am Wednesday, den 17. December 2003:

 Hello debian-isp,
 
   i was tried to install a kernel (2.4.22) with UML patch.
   I cant install it.
   So, here are my work Steps:
 
   patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
   make menuconfig
   make modules
   make modules_install
   make bzImage

Here is what I would do at this stage. Copy your .config file out of
your linux kernel source directory. Remove your linux kernel source
directory, untar a fresh version. Copy your .config into the new
source dir:

patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
make oldconfig
make clean
make dep
make bzImage
make modules
make modules_install

This will more than likely make your problem go away. Consider
your risks with the recent local root exploit in 2.4.22 before you go
further.

Micah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Theodore Knab
I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading 
Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
initially.

I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)

Do you have high memory support compiled in ? 
High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.

If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
memory support is not enabled.

Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open

My system:

Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
GNU/Linux

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 15
model   : 1
model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 1495.172
cache size  : 256 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips: 2981.88

The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being recognized.

On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
 Hi All...
 
 Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading (eg.
 on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
 average to jump to over 200?
 
 Here is the log line:
 
 Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
 given threshold 200 150 100!
 
 (then it reboots)
 
 This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
 kernel, and it has the same problem.
 
 When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
 and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
 compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can see
 CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
 before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
 woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
 
 Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
 look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or perhaps
 Hyper-Threading processors?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Sincerely,
 Jas
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
--
Ted Knab
Chester, MD 21619
--
35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
4797e2a0


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re[2]: UML Patch uad 2.4.22Kernel

2003-12-16 Thread Daniel Holze
Hello

MA patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
MA make oldconfig
MA make clean
MA make dep
MA make bzImage
MA make modules
MA make modules_install

didn`t work :-(
Its the same error.



-- 
Best wishes,

Daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim
Hi,

Interesting info... especially the part:

 Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
 High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.

 If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
 memory support is not enabled.

The server has 1.5Gb RAM. I compiled it to have High Memory support (4Gb)
because I don't know how much more RAM it may have added in the future. I
suppose I could try going back as you suggested, but the Kernel info
suggests that the 4Gb RAM High memory support *should* work for RAM less
than that too :-/

Most frustrating. I will try re-compiling with your suggestion a bit later
today, and let you know how it turns out.


- Original Message - 
From: Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?


 I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading
 Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
 initially.

 I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)

 Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
 High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.

 If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
 memory support is not enabled.

 Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
 Auto-detect modes might cause problems.

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open

 My system:

 Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
 GNU/Linux

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo
 processor   : 0
 vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
 cpu family  : 15
 model   : 1
 model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
 stepping: 2
 cpu MHz : 1495.172
 cache size  : 256 KB
 fdiv_bug: no
 hlt_bug : no
 f00f_bug: no
 coma_bug: no
 fpu : yes
 fpu_exception   : yes
 cpuid level : 2
 wp  : yes
 flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
 mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
 bogomips: 2981.88

 The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
recognized.

 On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
  Hi All...
 
  Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading
(eg.
  on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
  average to jump to over 200?
 
  Here is the log line:
 
  Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than
the
  given threshold 200 150 100!
 
  (then it reboots)
 
  This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
  kernel, and it has the same problem.
 
  When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works
fine,
  and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
  compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can
see
  CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
  before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
  woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
 
  Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
  look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
perhaps
  Hyper-Threading processors?
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Sincerely,
  Jas
 
 
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 -- 
 --
 Ted Knab
 Chester, MD 21619
 --
 35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
 02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
 4797e2a0


 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim

 El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 12:39, Jason Lim escribió:
  Just noticed one more thing... it appears to be Apache causing the
super
  high load (among other programs running) when SMP is compiled into the
  kernel, and with a bunch of errors in syslog:
 
  [Wed Dec 17 02:27:37 2003] [notice] child pid xx exit signal
  Segmentation fault (11)
 
  (and a whole bunch of these errors, like 50 lines)
 
  I did a search and someone said it has to do with Apache requesting
memory
  that it doesn't own or something:
 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2002/debian-apache-200207/msg5.html
 

 Mhm... i dont want to be hasty, but it seems im looking at exactly this
 problem for a very memory hungry php application


Except in my case, this error ONLY appears if SMP support is compiled into
the kernel, otherwise, it runs smooth with very high load. Apache doesn't
immediately have the problem with SMP compiled in tho... it takes maybe an
hour or two before the problem appears.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Alex Borges
Well, its not that the kernel does not detect the ht, it does and quite
fine (shows lots of processors in the box and all).

The problem is that apache is crashing under high load with a segfault.
Now, as i understand it, this can be a faulty hardware problem (bad
memory=segfault) or an actual software problem. 

Im not shure, but im having this problem as well with an HT server and
have not been able to rule out the possibility of a faulty hardware
thing. Nonetheless, this can also be, for example, an ugly module in
woodies php4 which are particluarly edgy (xslt for example) under high
load due to them being in beta stage by the time woody froze.

El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 20:07, Theodore Knab escribió:
 I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading 
 Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
 initially.
 
 I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)
 
 Do you have high memory support compiled in ? 
 High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
 
 If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
 memory support is not enabled.
 
 Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
 Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
 http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open
 
 My system:
 
 Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
 GNU/Linux
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo 
 processor   : 0
 vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
 cpu family  : 15
 model   : 1
 model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
 stepping: 2
 cpu MHz : 1495.172
 cache size  : 256 KB
 fdiv_bug: no
 hlt_bug : no
 f00f_bug: no
 coma_bug: no
 fpu : yes
 fpu_exception   : yes
 cpuid level : 2
 wp  : yes
 flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
 mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
 bogomips: 2981.88
 
 The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being recognized.
 
 On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
  Hi All...
  
  Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading (eg.
  on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
  average to jump to over 200?
  
  Here is the log line:
  
  Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
  given threshold 200 150 100!
  
  (then it reboots)
  
  This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
  kernel, and it has the same problem.
  
  When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
  and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
  compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can see
  CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
  before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
  woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
  
  Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
  look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or perhaps
  Hyper-Threading processors?
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  Sincerely,
  Jas
  
  
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 -- 
 --
 Ted Knab
 Chester, MD 21619
 --
 35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
 02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
 4797e2a0
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim

I was also considering the possibility of hardware error, but if it works
100% reliably without HT/SMP, but virtually crashes at high load with
Apache, that would pretty much rule out hardware error, unless the CPU's
HT is buggy (highly unlikely).



 Well, its not that the kernel does not detect the ht, it does and quite
 fine (shows lots of processors in the box and all).

 The problem is that apache is crashing under high load with a segfault.
 Now, as i understand it, this can be a faulty hardware problem (bad
 memory=segfault) or an actual software problem.

 Im not shure, but im having this problem as well with an HT server and
 have not been able to rule out the possibility of a faulty hardware
 thing. Nonetheless, this can also be, for example, an ugly module in
 woodies php4 which are particluarly edgy (xslt for example) under high
 load due to them being in beta stage by the time woody froze.

 El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 20:07, Theodore Knab escribió:
  I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading
  Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
  initially.
 
  I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)
 
  Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
  High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
 
  If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
  memory support is not enabled.
 
  Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
  Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
 
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open
 
  My system:
 
  Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
  GNU/Linux
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo
  processor   : 0
  vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
  cpu family  : 15
  model   : 1
  model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
  stepping: 2
  cpu MHz : 1495.172
  cache size  : 256 KB
  fdiv_bug: no
  hlt_bug : no
  f00f_bug: no
  coma_bug: no
  fpu : yes
  fpu_exception   : yes
  cpuid level : 2
  wp  : yes
  flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
  mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
  bogomips: 2981.88
 
  The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
recognized.
 
  On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
   Hi All...
  
   Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading
(eg.
   on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
   average to jump to over 200?
  
   Here is the log line:
  
   Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than
the
   given threshold 200 150 100!
  
   (then it reboots)
  
   This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the
2.4.23
   kernel, and it has the same problem.
  
   When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works
fine,
   and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP
is
   compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top
can see
   CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
   before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with
Debian
   woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
  
   Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I
should
   look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
perhaps
   Hyper-Threading processors?
  
   Thanks in advance.
  
   Sincerely,
   Jas
  
  
   -- 
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  -- 
  --
  Ted Knab
  Chester, MD 21619
  --
  35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
  02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
  4797e2a0
 


 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim
I just checked the kernel info for the memory support part:


 Hi,

 Interesting info... especially the part:

  Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
  High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
 
  If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
  memory support is not enabled.

 The server has 1.5Gb RAM. I compiled it to have High Memory support
(4Gb)
 because I don't know how much more RAM it may have added in the future.
I
 suppose I could try going back as you suggested, but the Kernel info
 suggests that the 4Gb RAM High memory support *should* work for RAM less
 than that too :-/

 Most frustrating. I will try re-compiling with your suggestion a bit
later
 today, and let you know how it turns out.


 - Original Message - 
 From: Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:07 AM
 Subject: Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?


  I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading
  Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
  initially.
 
  I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)
 
  Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
  High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
 
  If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
  memory support is not enabled.
 
  Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
  Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
 

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open
 
  My system:
 
  Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
  GNU/Linux
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo
  processor   : 0
  vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
  cpu family  : 15
  model   : 1
  model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
  stepping: 2
  cpu MHz : 1495.172
  cache size  : 256 KB
  fdiv_bug: no
  hlt_bug : no
  f00f_bug: no
  coma_bug: no
  fpu : yes
  fpu_exception   : yes
  cpuid level : 2
  wp  : yes
  flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
  mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
  bogomips: 2981.88
 
  The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
 recognized.
 
  On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
   Hi All...
  
   Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading
 (eg.
   on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
   average to jump to over 200?
  
   Here is the log line:
  
   Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than
 the
   given threshold 200 150 100!
  
   (then it reboots)
  
   This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the
2.4.23
   kernel, and it has the same problem.
  
   When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works
 fine,
   and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP
is
   compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top
can
 see
   CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
   before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with
Debian
   woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
  
   Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I
should
   look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
 perhaps
   Hyper-Threading processors?
  
   Thanks in advance.
  
   Sincerely,
   Jas
  
  
   -- 
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  -- 
  --
  Ted Knab
  Chester, MD 21619
  --
  35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
  02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
  4797e2a0
 
 
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim
Hi,


 I just checked the kernel info for the memory support part:

 If you are compiling a kernel which will never run on a machine with

   more than 960 megabytes of total physical RAM, answer off here
(defau 
   choice and suitable for most users). This will result in a 3GB/1GB

   split: 3GB are mapped so that each process sees a 3GB virtual memory

   space and the remaining part of the 4GB virtual memory space is used

   by the kernel to permanently map as much physical memory as

   possible.

  

   If the machine has between 1 and 4 Gigabytes physical RAM, then

   answer 4GB here.

  

I guess with 1.5Gb RAM you need to go with the 4Gb option... so that won't
work :-( and having just 960M RAM wouldn't work either...



  Hi,
 
  Interesting info... especially the part:
 
   Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
   High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
  
   If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that
High
   memory support is not enabled.
 
  The server has 1.5Gb RAM. I compiled it to have High Memory support
 (4Gb)
  because I don't know how much more RAM it may have added in the
future.
 I
  suppose I could try going back as you suggested, but the Kernel info
  suggests that the 4Gb RAM High memory support *should* work for RAM
less
  than that too :-/
 
  Most frustrating. I will try re-compiling with your suggestion a bit
 later
  today, and let you know how it turns out.
 
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:07 AM
  Subject: Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?
 
 
   I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading
   Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
   initially.
  
   I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)
  
   Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
   High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
  
   If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that
High
   memory support is not enabled.
  
   Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
   Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
  
 

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open
  
   My system:
  
   Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
   GNU/Linux
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo
   processor   : 0
   vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
   cpu family  : 15
   model   : 1
   model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
   stepping: 2
   cpu MHz : 1495.172
   cache size  : 256 KB
   fdiv_bug: no
   hlt_bug : no
   f00f_bug: no
   coma_bug: no
   fpu : yes
   fpu_exception   : yes
   cpuid level : 2
   wp  : yes
   flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
pge
   mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
   bogomips: 2981.88
  
   The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
  recognized.
  
   On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
Hi All...
   
Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel
Hyper-threading
  (eg.
on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the
load
average to jump to over 200?
   
Here is the log line:
   
Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher
than
  the
given threshold 200 150 100!
   
(then it reboots)
   
This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the
 2.4.23
kernel, and it has the same problem.
   
When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works
  fine,
and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when
SMP
 is
compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top
 can
  see
CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of
operation
before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with
 Debian
woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
   
Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I
 should
look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
  perhaps
Hyper-Threading processors?
   
Thanks in advance.
   
Sincerely,
Jas
   
   
-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
   -- 
   --
   Ted Knab
   Chester, MD 21619
   --
   35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
   02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
   4797e2a0
  
  
   -- 
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



-- 

Re: Re[2]: UML Patch uad 2.4.22Kernel

2003-12-16 Thread Micah Anderson
Sounds like it is a problem with the UML patch then, I would contact
those folks to see if they know of the problem. Or look for a newer
version of the patch.

micah

Daniel Holze schrieb am Wednesday, den 17. December 2003:

 Hello
 
 MA patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
 MA make oldconfig
 MA make clean
 MA make dep
 MA make bzImage
 MA make modules
 MA make modules_install
 
 didn`t work :-(
 Its the same error.
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best wishes,
 
 Daniel
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Newsletter - Aktivierungslink

2003-12-16 Thread eurohans
Hallo,

Wenn sie diesen Newsletter erhalten wollen klicken sie bitte auf die 
Internet-Adresse.
Falls sie diesen Newsletter nicht wollen löschen sie einfach diese E-Mail.

Aktivierungslink: 
http://www.0800news.de/cgi-bin/newsletter.cgi?id=tom643[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]key=MQjiGuBAt/Qaction=aktiv

Mit freundlichen Grüssen Newsletter-Team




Newsletter: Vielen dank für ihre Anmeldung!

2003-12-16 Thread eurohans
Hallo,

Ihre E-Mailadresse debian-isp@lists.debian.org wurde in den 
Newsletterverteiler hinzugefügt.

URL: http://www.0800news.de/cgi-bin/newsletter.cgi?id=tom643

Mit freundlichen Grüssen Ihr Newsletter-Team




Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim
Hi All...

Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyperthreading (eg.
on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
average to jump to over 200?

Here is the log line:

Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
given threshold 200 150 100!

(then it reboots)

This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
kernel, and it has the same problem.

When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can see
CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.

Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or perhaps
HyperThreading processors?

Thanks in advance.

Sincerely,
Jas




Newsletter: Ihre E-Mailadresse wurde ausgetragen.

2003-12-16 Thread eurohans
Hallo,

Ihre E-Mailadresse debian-isp@lists.debian.org wurde aus dem Verteiler 
entfernt.

URL: http://www.0800news.de/cgi-bin/newsletter.cgi?id=tom643

Mit freundlichen Grüssen Ihr Newsletter-Team




Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim

Just noticed one more thing... it appears to be Apache causing the super
high load (among other programs running) when SMP is compiled into the
kernel, and with a bunch of errors in syslog:

[Wed Dec 17 02:27:37 2003] [notice] child pid xx exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)

(and a whole bunch of these errors, like 50 lines)

I did a search and someone said it has to do with Apache requesting memory
that it doesn't own or something:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2002/debian-apache-200207/msg5.html

but that doesn't really help in this case, unless you guys can think of a
different angle on this?


- Original Message - 
From: Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?


 Hi All...

 Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyperthreading (eg.
 on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
 average to jump to over 200?

 Here is the log line:

 Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
 given threshold 200 150 100!

 (then it reboots)

 This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
 kernel, and it has the same problem.

 When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
 and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
 compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can
see
 CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
 before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
 woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.

 Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
 look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
perhaps
 HyperThreading processors?

 Thanks in advance.

 Sincerely,
 Jas


 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Sendmail Queuing?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason McMullen
Anyone seen any odd queuing by Sendmail (or the ability to change how it
queues)?

Say the primary MX for a host is down and we attempt to send mail to a
domain that it handles mail for.  For example:

;; ANSWER SECTION:
necinc.com. 19h32m42s IN MX  100 mail.wam.net.
necinc.com. 19h32m42s IN MX  200 mail2.wam.net.
necinc.com. 19h32m42s IN MX  10 mailgate.necinc.com.

Now, if i force sendmail to run a queue for this host: 

sendmail -v -qRnecinc.com

I receive this:

Running /var/spool/mqueue/h7KKJwrA001233 (sequence 1 of 1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Connecting to mailgate.necinc.com. via esmtp...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Deferred: Operation timed out with
mailgate.necinc.com.

It dumps that back message back into the queue.  It'll keep that up
for 6-8 hours THEN attempt to deliver to the higher weighted MX hosts
which are up and accept.  Shouldn't sendmail realize that the one host
is down on the initial delivery attempt and try the next highest?  I
could see if we couldn't reach all three hosts, but if just one is
down, there is no reason sendmail should queue the message for 8 hours
before attempting another host.

-Jason




Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Alex Borges
El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 12:39, Jason Lim escribió:
 Just noticed one more thing... it appears to be Apache causing the super
 high load (among other programs running) when SMP is compiled into the
 kernel, and with a bunch of errors in syslog:
 
 [Wed Dec 17 02:27:37 2003] [notice] child pid xx exit signal
 Segmentation fault (11)
 
 (and a whole bunch of these errors, like 50 lines)
 
 I did a search and someone said it has to do with Apache requesting memory
 that it doesn't own or something:
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2002/debian-apache-200207/msg5.html
 

Mhm... i dont want to be hasty, but it seems im looking at exactly this
problem for a very memory hungry php application

 but that doesn't really help in this case, unless you guys can think of a
 different angle on this?
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
 Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:23 PM
 Subject: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?
 
 
  Hi All...
 
  Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyperthreading (eg.
  on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
  average to jump to over 200?
 
  Here is the log line:
 
  Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
  given threshold 200 150 100!
 
  (then it reboots)
 
  This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
  kernel, and it has the same problem.
 
  When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
  and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
  compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can
 see
  CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
  before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
  woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
 
  Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
  look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
 perhaps
  HyperThreading processors?
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Sincerely,
  Jas
 
 
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 




UML Patch uad 2.4.22Kernel

2003-12-16 Thread Daniel Holze
Hello debian-isp,

  i was tried to install a kernel (2.4.22) with UML patch.
  I cant install it.
  So, here are my work Steps:

  patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
  make menuconfig
  make modules
  make modules_install
  make bzImage

  when it is compiling the kernel image i get a error:

gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.22/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-
trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=
2 -march=i686   -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=sys_i386  -c -o
 sys_i386.o sys_i386.c
sys_i386.c: In function `do_mmap2':
sys_i386.c:59: warning: passing arg 1 of `do_mmap_pgoff' from incompatible point
er type
sys_i386.c:59: warning: passing arg 2 of `do_mmap_pgoff' makes pointer from inte
ger without a cast
sys_i386.c:59: too few arguments to function `do_mmap_pgoff'
make[1]: *** [sys_i386.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.22/arch/i386/kernel'
make: *** [_dir_arch/i386/kernel] Error 2

Anyone know what`s wrong?

-- 
Best wishes,

DWL-Deutsche Webleasing oHG
Daniel Holze
Technical Director
Hanauer Landstrasse 320
D-60314 Frankfurt

Telefon: +49 (0)69 403 57 990
Telefax: +49 (0)69 403 57 991

http://www.dwleasing.de
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re[2]: UML Patch uad 2.4.22Kernel

2003-12-16 Thread Daniel Holze
Hello

MA patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
MA make oldconfig
MA make clean
MA make dep
MA make bzImage
MA make modules
MA make modules_install

didn`t work :-(
Its the same error.



-- 
Best wishes,

Daniel




Re: UML Patch uad 2.4.22Kernel

2003-12-16 Thread Micah Anderson
Daniel Holze schrieb am Wednesday, den 17. December 2003:

 Hello debian-isp,
 
   i was tried to install a kernel (2.4.22) with UML patch.
   I cant install it.
   So, here are my work Steps:
 
   patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
   make menuconfig
   make modules
   make modules_install
   make bzImage

Here is what I would do at this stage. Copy your .config file out of
your linux kernel source directory. Remove your linux kernel source
directory, untar a fresh version. Copy your .config into the new
source dir:

patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
make oldconfig
make clean
make dep
make bzImage
make modules
make modules_install

This will more than likely make your problem go away. Consider
your risks with the recent local root exploit in 2.4.22 before you go
further.

Micah




Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim

 El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 12:39, Jason Lim escribió:
  Just noticed one more thing... it appears to be Apache causing the
super
  high load (among other programs running) when SMP is compiled into the
  kernel, and with a bunch of errors in syslog:
 
  [Wed Dec 17 02:27:37 2003] [notice] child pid xx exit signal
  Segmentation fault (11)
 
  (and a whole bunch of these errors, like 50 lines)
 
  I did a search and someone said it has to do with Apache requesting
memory
  that it doesn't own or something:
 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2002/debian-apache-200207/msg5.html
 

 Mhm... i dont want to be hasty, but it seems im looking at exactly this
 problem for a very memory hungry php application


Except in my case, this error ONLY appears if SMP support is compiled into
the kernel, otherwise, it runs smooth with very high load. Apache doesn't
immediately have the problem with SMP compiled in tho... it takes maybe an
hour or two before the problem appears.




Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Alex Borges
Well, its not that the kernel does not detect the ht, it does and quite
fine (shows lots of processors in the box and all).

The problem is that apache is crashing under high load with a segfault.
Now, as i understand it, this can be a faulty hardware problem (bad
memory=segfault) or an actual software problem. 

Im not shure, but im having this problem as well with an HT server and
have not been able to rule out the possibility of a faulty hardware
thing. Nonetheless, this can also be, for example, an ugly module in
woodies php4 which are particluarly edgy (xslt for example) under high
load due to them being in beta stage by the time woody froze.

El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 20:07, Theodore Knab escribió:
 I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading 
 Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
 initially.
 
 I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)
 
 Do you have high memory support compiled in ? 
 High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
 
 If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
 memory support is not enabled.
 
 Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
 Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
 http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open
 
 My system:
 
 Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
 GNU/Linux
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo 
 processor   : 0
 vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
 cpu family  : 15
 model   : 1
 model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
 stepping: 2
 cpu MHz : 1495.172
 cache size  : 256 KB
 fdiv_bug: no
 hlt_bug : no
 f00f_bug: no
 coma_bug: no
 fpu : yes
 fpu_exception   : yes
 cpuid level : 2
 wp  : yes
 flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
 mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
 bogomips: 2981.88
 
 The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being recognized.
 
 On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
  Hi All...
  
  Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading (eg.
  on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
  average to jump to over 200?
  
  Here is the log line:
  
  Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
  given threshold 200 150 100!
  
  (then it reboots)
  
  This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
  kernel, and it has the same problem.
  
  When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
  and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
  compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can see
  CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
  before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
  woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
  
  Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
  look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or perhaps
  Hyper-Threading processors?
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  Sincerely,
  Jas
  
  
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 -- 
 --
 Ted Knab
 Chester, MD 21619
 --
 35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
 02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
 4797e2a0
 




Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim
Hi,

Interesting info... especially the part:

 Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
 High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.

 If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
 memory support is not enabled.

The server has 1.5Gb RAM. I compiled it to have High Memory support (4Gb)
because I don't know how much more RAM it may have added in the future. I
suppose I could try going back as you suggested, but the Kernel info
suggests that the 4Gb RAM High memory support *should* work for RAM less
than that too :-/

Most frustrating. I will try re-compiling with your suggestion a bit later
today, and let you know how it turns out.


- Original Message - 
From: Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?


 I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading
 Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
 initially.

 I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)

 Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
 High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.

 If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
 memory support is not enabled.

 Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
 Auto-detect modes might cause problems.

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open

 My system:

 Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
 GNU/Linux

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo
 processor   : 0
 vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
 cpu family  : 15
 model   : 1
 model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
 stepping: 2
 cpu MHz : 1495.172
 cache size  : 256 KB
 fdiv_bug: no
 hlt_bug : no
 f00f_bug: no
 coma_bug: no
 fpu : yes
 fpu_exception   : yes
 cpuid level : 2
 wp  : yes
 flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
 mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
 bogomips: 2981.88

 The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
recognized.

 On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
  Hi All...
 
  Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading
(eg.
  on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
  average to jump to over 200?
 
  Here is the log line:
 
  Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than
the
  given threshold 200 150 100!
 
  (then it reboots)
 
  This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
  kernel, and it has the same problem.
 
  When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works
fine,
  and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
  compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can
see
  CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
  before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
  woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
 
  Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
  look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
perhaps
  Hyper-Threading processors?
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Sincerely,
  Jas
 
 
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 -- 
 --
 Ted Knab
 Chester, MD 21619
 --
 35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
 02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
 4797e2a0


 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim

I was also considering the possibility of hardware error, but if it works
100% reliably without HT/SMP, but virtually crashes at high load with
Apache, that would pretty much rule out hardware error, unless the CPU's
HT is buggy (highly unlikely).



 Well, its not that the kernel does not detect the ht, it does and quite
 fine (shows lots of processors in the box and all).

 The problem is that apache is crashing under high load with a segfault.
 Now, as i understand it, this can be a faulty hardware problem (bad
 memory=segfault) or an actual software problem.

 Im not shure, but im having this problem as well with an HT server and
 have not been able to rule out the possibility of a faulty hardware
 thing. Nonetheless, this can also be, for example, an ugly module in
 woodies php4 which are particluarly edgy (xslt for example) under high
 load due to them being in beta stage by the time woody froze.

 El mar, 16-12-2003 a las 20:07, Theodore Knab escribió:
  I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading
  Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
  initially.
 
  I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)
 
  Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
  High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
 
  If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
  memory support is not enabled.
 
  Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
  Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
 
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open
 
  My system:
 
  Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
  GNU/Linux
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo
  processor   : 0
  vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
  cpu family  : 15
  model   : 1
  model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
  stepping: 2
  cpu MHz : 1495.172
  cache size  : 256 KB
  fdiv_bug: no
  hlt_bug : no
  f00f_bug: no
  coma_bug: no
  fpu : yes
  fpu_exception   : yes
  cpuid level : 2
  wp  : yes
  flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
  mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
  bogomips: 2981.88
 
  The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
recognized.
 
  On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
   Hi All...
  
   Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading
(eg.
   on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
   average to jump to over 200?
  
   Here is the log line:
  
   Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than
the
   given threshold 200 150 100!
  
   (then it reboots)
  
   This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the
2.4.23
   kernel, and it has the same problem.
  
   When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works
fine,
   and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP
is
   compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top
can see
   CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
   before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with
Debian
   woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
  
   Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I
should
   look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
perhaps
   Hyper-Threading processors?
  
   Thanks in advance.
  
   Sincerely,
   Jas
  
  
   -- 
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  -- 
  --
  Ted Knab
  Chester, MD 21619
  --
  35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
  02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
  4797e2a0
 


 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Theodore Knab
I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading 
Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
initially.

I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)

Do you have high memory support compiled in ? 
High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.

If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
memory support is not enabled.

Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open

My system:

Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
GNU/Linux

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 15
model   : 1
model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 1495.172
cache size  : 256 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips: 2981.88

The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being recognized.

On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
 Hi All...
 
 Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading (eg.
 on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
 average to jump to over 200?
 
 Here is the log line:
 
 Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than the
 given threshold 200 150 100!
 
 (then it reboots)
 
 This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the 2.4.23
 kernel, and it has the same problem.
 
 When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works fine,
 and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP is
 compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top can see
 CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
 before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with Debian
 woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
 
 Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I should
 look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or perhaps
 Hyper-Threading processors?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Sincerely,
 Jas
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
--
Ted Knab
Chester, MD 21619
--
35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
4797e2a0




Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim
I just checked the kernel info for the memory support part:


 Hi,

 Interesting info... especially the part:

  Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
  High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
 
  If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
  memory support is not enabled.

 The server has 1.5Gb RAM. I compiled it to have High Memory support
(4Gb)
 because I don't know how much more RAM it may have added in the future.
I
 suppose I could try going back as you suggested, but the Kernel info
 suggests that the 4Gb RAM High memory support *should* work for RAM less
 than that too :-/

 Most frustrating. I will try re-compiling with your suggestion a bit
later
 today, and let you know how it turns out.


 - Original Message - 
 From: Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:07 AM
 Subject: Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?


  I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading
  Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
  initially.
 
  I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)
 
  Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
  High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
 
  If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that High
  memory support is not enabled.
 
  Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
  Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
 

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open
 
  My system:
 
  Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
  GNU/Linux
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo
  processor   : 0
  vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
  cpu family  : 15
  model   : 1
  model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
  stepping: 2
  cpu MHz : 1495.172
  cache size  : 256 KB
  fdiv_bug: no
  hlt_bug : no
  f00f_bug: no
  coma_bug: no
  fpu : yes
  fpu_exception   : yes
  cpuid level : 2
  wp  : yes
  flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
  mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
  bogomips: 2981.88
 
  The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
 recognized.
 
  On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
   Hi All...
  
   Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel Hyper-threading
 (eg.
   on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the load
   average to jump to over 200?
  
   Here is the log line:
  
   Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher than
 the
   given threshold 200 150 100!
  
   (then it reboots)
  
   This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the
2.4.23
   kernel, and it has the same problem.
  
   When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works
 fine,
   and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when SMP
is
   compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top
can
 see
   CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of operation
   before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with
Debian
   woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
  
   Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I
should
   look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
 perhaps
   Hyper-Threading processors?
  
   Thanks in advance.
  
   Sincerely,
   Jas
  
  
   -- 
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  -- 
  --
  Ted Knab
  Chester, MD 21619
  --
  35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
  02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
  4797e2a0
 
 
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lim
Hi,


 I just checked the kernel info for the memory support part:

 If you are compiling a kernel which will never run on a machine with

   more than 960 megabytes of total physical RAM, answer off here
(defau 
   choice and suitable for most users). This will result in a 3GB/1GB

   split: 3GB are mapped so that each process sees a 3GB virtual memory

   space and the remaining part of the 4GB virtual memory space is used

   by the kernel to permanently map as much physical memory as

   possible.

  

   If the machine has between 1 and 4 Gigabytes physical RAM, then

   answer 4GB here.

  

I guess with 1.5Gb RAM you need to go with the 4Gb option... so that won't
work :-( and having just 960M RAM wouldn't work either...



  Hi,
 
  Interesting info... especially the part:
 
   Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
   High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
  
   If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that
High
   memory support is not enabled.
 
  The server has 1.5Gb RAM. I compiled it to have High Memory support
 (4Gb)
  because I don't know how much more RAM it may have added in the
future.
 I
  suppose I could try going back as you suggested, but the Kernel info
  suggests that the 4Gb RAM High memory support *should* work for RAM
less
  than that too :-/
 
  Most frustrating. I will try re-compiling with your suggestion a bit
 later
  today, and let you know how it turns out.
 
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
  Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:07 AM
  Subject: Re: Intel Hyperthreading problem on server?
 
 
   I am using the 2.4.20 kernel with SMP support on a Hyper-threading
   Intel. I remember having problems getting it work with SMP support
   initially.
  
   I think the kernel has to be perfect. ;-)
  
   Do you have high memory support compiled in ?
   High memory support above 4GB might cause problems.
  
   If you do not have more than 2GB of RAM you should make sure that
High
   memory support is not enabled.
  
   Also did you enable hyper-threading in BIOS ?
   Auto-detect modes might cause problems.
  
 

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0175.html?Open
  
   My system:
  
   Linux tedsdesk 2.4.20 #22 SMP Mon Jul 21 14:53:07 EDT 2003 i686
   GNU/Linux
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:cat /proc/cpuinfo
   processor   : 0
   vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
   cpu family  : 15
   model   : 1
   model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.50GHz
   stepping: 2
   cpu MHz : 1495.172
   cache size  : 256 KB
   fdiv_bug: no
   hlt_bug : no
   f00f_bug: no
   coma_bug: no
   fpu : yes
   fpu_exception   : yes
   cpuid level : 2
   wp  : yes
   flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
pge
   mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
   bogomips: 2981.88
  
   The ht in the flags section tells me hyper threading is being
  recognized.
  
   On 16/12/03 23:23 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
Hi All...
   
Do you guys know anything about a problem with Intel
Hyper-threading
  (eg.
on the Intel 2.4Ghz HT-enabled processor) that would cause the
load
average to jump to over 200?
   
Here is the log line:
   
Dec 16 22:48:17 be watchdog[250]: loadavg 203 101 40 is higher
than
  the
given threshold 200 150 100!
   
(then it reboots)
   
This happened on the 2.4.22 kernel, and now I tried it with the
 2.4.23
kernel, and it has the same problem.
   
When the kernel is compiled WITHOUT SMP support, the kernel works
  fine,
and it can have uptimes of months without any problem. But when
SMP
 is
compiled in, and the HT processor is correctly identified (and top
 can
  see
CPU0 and CPU1), then it only takes about an hour or two of
operation
before the load average jumps like that. Note that this is with
 Debian
woody/stable, and with a clean kernel.org kernel.
   
Do you guys know anything about this, or have any ideas where I
 should
look? Is there something in Woody that isn't friendly with SMP or
  perhaps
Hyper-Threading processors?
   
Thanks in advance.
   
Sincerely,
Jas
   
   
-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
   -- 
   --
   Ted Knab
   Chester, MD 21619
   --
   35570707f6274702478656021626f6c6964796f6e602f66602478656
   02e6164796f6e60237471647560216e6460276c6f62616c60257e696
   4797e2a0
  
  
   -- 
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 
  -- 
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Re: Re[2]: UML Patch uad 2.4.22Kernel

2003-12-16 Thread Micah Anderson
Sounds like it is a problem with the UML patch then, I would contact
those folks to see if they know of the problem. Or look for a newer
version of the patch.

micah

Daniel Holze schrieb am Wednesday, den 17. December 2003:

 Hello
 
 MA patch -p1 uml-patch-2.4.22-7
 MA make oldconfig
 MA make clean
 MA make dep
 MA make bzImage
 MA make modules
 MA make modules_install
 
 didn`t work :-(
 Its the same error.
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best wishes,
 
 Daniel