Re: Re: yahoo problems please help
Thank you for your message "yahoo problems please help" This is an automatic reply to let you know that the Debian ISP List has received your message. Your message is very important to us and we will respond as soon as is possible. Thank you for your patience and continued support. The Debian/Yahoo Support Project Team Quoting hughena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Does Yahoo ever supply technical help or is it always an auto generated > reply?
Re: Re: yahoo problems please help
Does Yahoo ever supply technical help or is it always an auto generated reply? ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 2/13/2004
Re: Re: yahoo problems please help
Thank you for your message "yahoo problems please help" This is an automatic reply to let you know that the Debian ISP List has received your message. Your message is very important to us and we will respond as soon as is possible. Thank you for your patience and continued support. The Debian/Yahoo Support Project Team Quoting hughena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Does Yahoo ever supply technical help or is it always an auto generated > reply? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: yahoo problems please help
Does Yahoo ever supply technical help or is it always an auto generated reply? ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 2/13/2004
Re: Netgear FA311 and natsemi issue
What I've found is that with those cards is that you must use the 2.4 kernel. The drivers in 2.2 kernel, neither the natsemi nor the -scyld variants work. 2.4 everything is fine. --On Friday, February 13, 2004 19:21 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, First, some basic info: OS: Debian 3.0R2 stable PC: Old Pentium Pro box with Intel 440FX chipset Kernel: 2.4.18 (standard Debian kernel with natsemi support builtin) natsemi driver: came with Debian dist (1.14 IIRC) Now the issue: When the PC is first turned on I can see the link light on the switch, however, the link light mysteriously goes away just before the natsemi driver is loaded. The driver, however, seems to find the card just fine at IRQ 10. ifconfig -a shows eth0 with the MAC address and other details listed. Machine is able to ping itself but nothing else (not surprising since the link light on the hub never comes back on). lspci command shows the 'National Semiconductor card" at IRQ 10 I'm at a loss specially since everything worked fine under RedHat 7.3 a week ago. If there's any output of a command that you would like me to post pls let me know (I can redirect output to a floppy and then cut-n-paste from a different machine that has a network connection). Any help or pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated. I posted this on scyld.com mailing list but didn't get a response. I'm hoping someone here might have heard of this before. Thank you. __ New! Unlimited Netscape Internet Service. Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Act now to get a personalized email address! Netscape. Just the Net You Need. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Michael Loftis Modwest Sr. Systems Administrator Powerful, Affordable Web Hosting GPG/PGP --> 0xE736BD7E 5144 6A2D 977A 6651 DFBE 1462 E351 88B9 E736 BD7E
Re: Netgear FA311 and natsemi issue
On Saturday 14 February 2004 00:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm afraid I can't offer any insights into why your card isn't working with the natsemi module in 2.4.18, but may I suggest you use a more recent backported kernel for woody available at: http://www.backports.org/debian/dists/woody/kernel-image-2.4.24-i386/binary-i386/ Software from backports.org is about as 'official' as you're going to get for woody before sarge is released. Cheers, Gavin.
Netgear FA311 and natsemi issue
Hi, First, some basic info: OS: Debian 3.0R2 stable PC: Old Pentium Pro box with Intel 440FX chipset Kernel: 2.4.18 (standard Debian kernel with natsemi support builtin) natsemi driver: came with Debian dist (1.14 IIRC) Now the issue: When the PC is first turned on I can see the link light on the switch, however, the link light mysteriously goes away just before the natsemi driver is loaded. The driver, however, seems to find the card just fine at IRQ 10. ifconfig -a shows eth0 with the MAC address and other details listed. Machine is able to ping itself but nothing else (not surprising since the link light on the hub never comes back on). lspci command shows the 'National Semiconductor card" at IRQ 10 I'm at a loss specially since everything worked fine under RedHat 7.3 a week ago. If there's any output of a command that you would like me to post pls let me know (I can redirect output to a floppy and then cut-n-paste from a different machine that has a network connection). Any help or pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated. I posted this on scyld.com mailing list but didn't get a response. I'm hoping someone here might have heard of this before. Thank you. __ New! Unlimited Netscape Internet Service. Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Act now to get a personalized email address! Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
Re: Imap && imap-ssl && pop3-ssl
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 07:16:26PM -0600, Jose Alberto Guzman wrote: > Jonathan Matthews wrote: [...] > >I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be > >localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible. > > > >My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap with Exim 4 > >backported to stable so I can interface with ClamAV, but feel free to > >point out something important that I've missed. > > > >Do I need to have a different instance of the server running for each > >protocol? i.e. one listening on each port that the three services use > >as standard? > > > >Is there a server that would do the job with just one instance listening > >on all three ports? Would there be any advantages or disadvantages to > >this? I'm thinking locking/concurrency/that-sorta-thing. [...] > What we run here, is standard uw-imap and popa3d, with stunnel. Works > like a charm. I use postfix+uw-imap+ipopd from "testing" which supports ssl directly. We then use shorewall firewalling to limit access to the non-ssl ports. This uses inetd for the pop and imap servers, and mbox mailboxes. It works fine, and seems to be the "best" set up for mbox mailboxes. On another machine I use postfix+courier-imap-ssl+courier-pop-ssl+procmail. Procmail is used with a global /etc/procmailrc to make postfix deliver into Maildir mailboxes. Courier uses a heap of it's own daemons for everything, which I didn't like, but it seems to work OK. This seems to be the "best" setup for Maildir (flame suit on), with the possible exception of using something else instead of procmail for delivery. The big problem I found with Maildir is everything else seems to assume mbox (including the "you have mail" notification at the command line), and it's hard work to find and configure everything for it. I documented this stuff ages ago on the debian wiki last time I went through this; http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?EmailConfiguration http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?MaildirConfiguration Feel free to update these as you go :-) -- Donovan Baardahttp://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/
Re: Netgear FA311 and natsemi issue
What I've found is that with those cards is that you must use the 2.4 kernel. The drivers in 2.2 kernel, neither the natsemi nor the -scyld variants work. 2.4 everything is fine. --On Friday, February 13, 2004 19:21 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, First, some basic info: OS: Debian 3.0R2 stable PC: Old Pentium Pro box with Intel 440FX chipset Kernel: 2.4.18 (standard Debian kernel with natsemi support builtin) natsemi driver: came with Debian dist (1.14 IIRC) Now the issue: When the PC is first turned on I can see the link light on the switch, however, the link light mysteriously goes away just before the natsemi driver is loaded. The driver, however, seems to find the card just fine at IRQ 10. ifconfig -a shows eth0 with the MAC address and other details listed. Machine is able to ping itself but nothing else (not surprising since the link light on the hub never comes back on). lspci command shows the 'National Semiconductor card" at IRQ 10 I'm at a loss specially since everything worked fine under RedHat 7.3 a week ago. If there's any output of a command that you would like me to post pls let me know (I can redirect output to a floppy and then cut-n-paste from a different machine that has a network connection). Any help or pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated. I posted this on scyld.com mailing list but didn't get a response. I'm hoping someone here might have heard of this before. Thank you. __ New! Unlimited Netscape Internet Service. Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Act now to get a personalized email address! Netscape. Just the Net You Need. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Michael Loftis Modwest Sr. Systems Administrator Powerful, Affordable Web Hosting GPG/PGP --> 0xE736BD7E 5144 6A2D 977A 6651 DFBE 1462 E351 88B9 E736 BD7E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netgear FA311 and natsemi issue
On Saturday 14 February 2004 00:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm afraid I can't offer any insights into why your card isn't working with the natsemi module in 2.4.18, but may I suggest you use a more recent backported kernel for woody available at: http://www.backports.org/debian/dists/woody/kernel-image-2.4.24-i386/binary-i386/ Software from backports.org is about as 'official' as you're going to get for woody before sarge is released. Cheers, Gavin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netgear FA311 and natsemi issue
Hi, First, some basic info: OS: Debian 3.0R2 stable PC: Old Pentium Pro box with Intel 440FX chipset Kernel: 2.4.18 (standard Debian kernel with natsemi support builtin) natsemi driver: came with Debian dist (1.14 IIRC) Now the issue: When the PC is first turned on I can see the link light on the switch, however, the link light mysteriously goes away just before the natsemi driver is loaded. The driver, however, seems to find the card just fine at IRQ 10. ifconfig -a shows eth0 with the MAC address and other details listed. Machine is able to ping itself but nothing else (not surprising since the link light on the hub never comes back on). lspci command shows the 'National Semiconductor card" at IRQ 10 I'm at a loss specially since everything worked fine under RedHat 7.3 a week ago. If there's any output of a command that you would like me to post pls let me know (I can redirect output to a floppy and then cut-n-paste from a different machine that has a network connection). Any help or pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated. I posted this on scyld.com mailing list but didn't get a response. I'm hoping someone here might have heard of this before. Thank you. __ New! Unlimited Netscape Internet Service. Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Act now to get a personalized email address! Netscape. Just the Net You Need. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Imap && imap-ssl && pop3-ssl
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 07:16:26PM -0600, Jose Alberto Guzman wrote: > Jonathan Matthews wrote: [...] > >I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be > >localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible. > > > >My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap with Exim 4 > >backported to stable so I can interface with ClamAV, but feel free to > >point out something important that I've missed. > > > >Do I need to have a different instance of the server running for each > >protocol? i.e. one listening on each port that the three services use > >as standard? > > > >Is there a server that would do the job with just one instance listening > >on all three ports? Would there be any advantages or disadvantages to > >this? I'm thinking locking/concurrency/that-sorta-thing. [...] > What we run here, is standard uw-imap and popa3d, with stunnel. Works > like a charm. I use postfix+uw-imap+ipopd from "testing" which supports ssl directly. We then use shorewall firewalling to limit access to the non-ssl ports. This uses inetd for the pop and imap servers, and mbox mailboxes. It works fine, and seems to be the "best" set up for mbox mailboxes. On another machine I use postfix+courier-imap-ssl+courier-pop-ssl+procmail. Procmail is used with a global /etc/procmailrc to make postfix deliver into Maildir mailboxes. Courier uses a heap of it's own daemons for everything, which I didn't like, but it seems to work OK. This seems to be the "best" setup for Maildir (flame suit on), with the possible exception of using something else instead of procmail for delivery. The big problem I found with Maildir is everything else seems to assume mbox (including the "you have mail" notification at the command line), and it's hard work to find and configure everything for it. I documented this stuff ages ago on the debian wiki last time I went through this; http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?EmailConfiguration http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?MaildirConfiguration Feel free to update these as you go :-) -- Donovan Baardahttp://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FTP-TLS
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:57:26AM +0200, Michael Wood wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 05:58:05PM +0100, Adam ENDRODI wrote: > > I've got a site running proftpd that only serves files through > > FTP-TLS. The setup works correctly for most cases, with two > > notable exceptions: > > > > -- a collegue of mine has complained that he cannot login > > if the Kerio net-sharing tool is active. He claimed > > that no filtering rule was in effect. OS: W2k > > No idea about this one, unless this net-sharing tool does some sort of > NAT and he's behind the box that's doing the sharing. Never heard of > "Kerio net-sharing tool." Kerio WinRoute is an all-in-one suite which is capable of filtering, network address translating and can act as a proxy for various protocols. (No ad intended) "net-sharing tool" is the term the collague applied to it. > I'm not sure why it aborts before the authentication, but even if that > worked, I don't see how anything that requires an ftp-data connection > could work through a NAT box. I have never used FTP-TLS and have not > read any RFCs related to it, but unless it works more like HTTP than > FTP, it's not going to work through NAT. It does. One of my test boxen is a Windows 98 and is behind two firewalls and three levels of NAT (actually, masquerading). It works the same way as "Firewall-friendly" (i.e. passive) FTP, though not under any circumstances it seems, to my despair :( > For normal FTP, the NAT box watches the FTP command channel and when it > notices the PORT command or a reply from the PASV command, it sets up a > rule for the data connection. When the command channel is encrypted it > cannot do this. The firewall does not need to watch the PASV commmand unless the *server* is behind the NAT. For the client, it is unnecessary because there is nothing in the PASV line to translate. > It might be possible to install an FTP proxy on the NAT box and get the > clients to connect to that, but they would have to find one that > supports TLS. Yes, there is a program called tlsweap which can do that exactly (we've needed previously as we hadn't find any graphical FTP client for linux which is capable of doing FTP-TLS :-F). Perhaps we get them to install it on their NAT box. Thanks for sharing your thoughs. bit, adam -- Am I a cleric? | 1024D/37B8D989 Or maybe a sinner? | 954B 998A E5F5 BA2A 3622 Unbeliever?| 82DD 54C2 843D 37B8 D989 Renegade? | http://sks.dnsalias.net
Re: FTP-TLS
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:57:26AM +0200, Michael Wood wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 05:58:05PM +0100, Adam ENDRODI wrote: > > I've got a site running proftpd that only serves files through > > FTP-TLS. The setup works correctly for most cases, with two > > notable exceptions: > > > > -- a collegue of mine has complained that he cannot login > > if the Kerio net-sharing tool is active. He claimed > > that no filtering rule was in effect. OS: W2k > > No idea about this one, unless this net-sharing tool does some sort of > NAT and he's behind the box that's doing the sharing. Never heard of > "Kerio net-sharing tool." Kerio WinRoute is an all-in-one suite which is capable of filtering, network address translating and can act as a proxy for various protocols. (No ad intended) "net-sharing tool" is the term the collague applied to it. > I'm not sure why it aborts before the authentication, but even if that > worked, I don't see how anything that requires an ftp-data connection > could work through a NAT box. I have never used FTP-TLS and have not > read any RFCs related to it, but unless it works more like HTTP than > FTP, it's not going to work through NAT. It does. One of my test boxen is a Windows 98 and is behind two firewalls and three levels of NAT (actually, masquerading). It works the same way as "Firewall-friendly" (i.e. passive) FTP, though not under any circumstances it seems, to my despair :( > For normal FTP, the NAT box watches the FTP command channel and when it > notices the PORT command or a reply from the PASV command, it sets up a > rule for the data connection. When the command channel is encrypted it > cannot do this. The firewall does not need to watch the PASV commmand unless the *server* is behind the NAT. For the client, it is unnecessary because there is nothing in the PASV line to translate. > It might be possible to install an FTP proxy on the NAT box and get the > clients to connect to that, but they would have to find one that > supports TLS. Yes, there is a program called tlsweap which can do that exactly (we've needed previously as we hadn't find any graphical FTP client for linux which is capable of doing FTP-TLS :-F). Perhaps we get them to install it on their NAT box. Thanks for sharing your thoughs. bit, adam -- Am I a cleric? | 1024D/37B8D989 Or maybe a sinner? | 954B 998A E5F5 BA2A 3622 Unbeliever?| 82DD 54C2 843D 37B8 D989 Renegade? | http://sks.dnsalias.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IE bug
Hi, Afert last fixes of SSL issues in IE new problems arised. Microsoft realesed fix fro the fixes :-) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?amp;amp;displaylang=en&familyid=254EB128-5053-48A7-8526-BD38215C74B2&displaylang=en -- Overview This is an update to Internet Explorer for computers which are running Security Patch q832894 and are receiving a 500 Server Internal Error message after submitting data to a Web site. Security Patch q832894 included a fix to make Internet Explorer work better with Web servers that reset http connections when requesting authentication credentials from the client computer during a POST request. However, Web servers that reset an http connection with Internet Explorer for other reasons may experience errors when Internet Explorer attempts to reset the connection to the server. This update resolves the issue with Security Patch q832894. In order for this update to take effect, you may need to restart your computer after you install the patch. --- Howver is it posisble to tune up apache so it will alolow user that has NOT put that patch to work ? Thanks in advance, Peter
Re: Debian and SAN support
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:22:46 +0100, J.J. van Gorkum wrote: >Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing... > >A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in >the NFS world). So when the software (even the disk driver) reports that >the data is written to the disk there is a possibilitiy that this is not >true I haven't really looked into it yet, but the main plan is to only have the content delivered to web front ends over NFS. So most transactions will be read transactions. Logs for the servers will be stored on the local disks. But it's good to know that this is a problem that might show up ofcourse, will help with the farm design. :) --- RW. Vley F/X Services
IE bug
Hi, Afert last fixes of SSL issues in IE new problems arised. Microsoft realesed fix fro the fixes :-) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?amp;amp;displaylang=en&familyid=254EB128-5053-48A7-8526-BD38215C74B2&displaylang=en -- Overview This is an update to Internet Explorer for computers which are running Security Patch q832894 and are receiving a 500 Server Internal Error message after submitting data to a Web site. Security Patch q832894 included a fix to make Internet Explorer work better with Web servers that reset http connections when requesting authentication credentials from the client computer during a POST request. However, Web servers that reset an http connection with Internet Explorer for other reasons may experience errors when Internet Explorer attempts to reset the connection to the server. This update resolves the issue with Security Patch q832894. In order for this update to take effect, you may need to restart your computer after you install the patch. --- Howver is it posisble to tune up apache so it will alolow user that has NOT put that patch to work ? Thanks in advance, Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian and SAN support
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:22:46 +0100, J.J. van Gorkum wrote: >Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing... > >A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in >the NFS world). So when the software (even the disk driver) reports that >the data is written to the disk there is a possibilitiy that this is not >true I haven't really looked into it yet, but the main plan is to only have the content delivered to web front ends over NFS. So most transactions will be read transactions. Logs for the servers will be stored on the local disks. But it's good to know that this is a problem that might show up ofcourse, will help with the farm design. :) --- RW. Vley F/X Services -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Imap && imap-ssl && pop3-ssl
Hello, Have a look at SSLwrap. It enables SSL for the outside world but locally no encryption is used. Brian > [Sorry for the cross-post - I think it's applicable to both -isp and > -user.] > > I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be > localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible. > > My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap with Exim 4 > backported to stable so I can interface with ClamAV, but feel free to > point out something important that I've missed. > > Do I need to have a different instance of the server running for each > protocol? i.e. one listening on each port that the three services use > as standard? > > Is there a server that would do the job with just one instance listening > on all three ports? Would there be any advantages or disadvantages to > this? I'm thinking locking/concurrency/that-sorta-thing. > > How do you deal with this situation? Are there any gotchas I need to > know about? I'm guessing that using Maildirs will alleviate many of the > problems that mboxes would create ... > > Any pointers/suggestions/cluebats appreciated! > > jc > > -- > Have a nice cup of tea and a biscuit. Fifty-five million Britons can't > be wrong. Ooo - jammy dodgers!! > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Imap && imap-ssl && pop3-ssl
Hello, Have a look at SSLwrap. It enables SSL for the outside world but locally no encryption is used. Brian > [Sorry for the cross-post - I think it's applicable to both -isp and > -user.] > > I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be > localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible. > > My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap with Exim 4 > backported to stable so I can interface with ClamAV, but feel free to > point out something important that I've missed. > > Do I need to have a different instance of the server running for each > protocol? i.e. one listening on each port that the three services use > as standard? > > Is there a server that would do the job with just one instance listening > on all three ports? Would there be any advantages or disadvantages to > this? I'm thinking locking/concurrency/that-sorta-thing. > > How do you deal with this situation? Are there any gotchas I need to > know about? I'm guessing that using Maildirs will alleviate many of the > problems that mboxes would create ... > > Any pointers/suggestions/cluebats appreciated! > > jc > > -- > Have a nice cup of tea and a biscuit. Fifty-five million Britons can't > be wrong. Ooo - jammy dodgers!! > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
