sendmail authentication
Hi all I need to let sendmail authenticate from a different passwd file, let me explain. Sendmail currently authenticates from /etc/passwd I would like it to use /etc/mailpass as step one and then to authenticate from berkleydb later on when I have verified that evereything works. Qpopper also needs to be moved to alternative authentication. Tnx Mozzi Scanned by @lantic IS Virus Control Service This message was scanned for viruses and dangerous content. @lantic Internet Services (Pty) Ltd. - http://www.lantic.net eScan for Windows-based PCs - http://www.escan.co.za If you have received a message marked in the subject line as [SPAM] please note that according to our MailScanner, this message has all the attributes of Unsolicited Commercial Email (UCE). If the message has however been marked incorrectly, please send a query to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Protect Folder in Proftpd
Hi! I'm trying to protect the directory ~/wwwroot from being changed or deleted. But the user must be able to do everything (Create,Update,Delete..) in this directory. Has anybody some hints to do this configuration? We use ProFTPD Version 1.2.5rc1 Thanks kradi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sendmail authentication
The follwowing was tested in stable and unstable with sendmail: For plain text (in an internal sense not - what you would see over the network!) you'll need the package libsasl-modules-plain Then append ESASL_PATH=/usr/lib/sasl to 'sendmail.mc'. Create '/usr/lib/sasl/Sendmail.conf' and put in the line pwcheck_method: PAM Then you could decide by '/etc/pam.d/smtp' how to authenticate. E.g. with 'pam_userdb.so'. There you could use Berkeley DB Version 3. I hope this helps! Christian -Original Message- From: Mozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 9:28 AM To: Debian ISP Subject: sendmail authentication Hi all I need to let sendmail authenticate from a different passwd file, let me explain. Sendmail currently authenticates from /etc/passwd I would like it to use /etc/mailpass as step one and then to authenticate from berkleydb later on when I have verified that evereything works. Qpopper also needs to be moved to alternative authentication. Tnx Mozzi Scanned by @lantic IS Virus Control Service This message was scanned for viruses and dangerous content. @lantic Internet Services (Pty) Ltd. - http://www.lantic.net eScan for Windows-based PCs - http://www.escan.co.za If you have received a message marked in the subject line as [SPAM] please note that according to our MailScanner, this message has all the attributes of Unsolicited Commercial Email (UCE). If the message has however been marked incorrectly, please send a query to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Protect Folder in Proftpd
i have found a solution that fit my needs: PathDenyFilter ^wwwroot$ Cheers kradi -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Daniel Kradolfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Februar 2004 11:30 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Protect Folder in Proftpd Hi! I'm trying to protect the directory ~/wwwroot from being changed or deleted. But the user must be able to do everything (Create,Update,Delete..) in this directory. Has anybody some hints to do this configuration? We use ProFTPD Version 1.2.5rc1 Thanks kradi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: off subject - ip bandwidth management
On Feb 26, 2004, at 6:08 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote: ...and set a policy first, then police it. ;-)\ That is the best advice I've seen yet in the entire thread. Buy-in from EVERYONE in the organization about the rules is more important and difficult than the application software used to get there. (If you see a customer abusing bandwidth, what's your boss going to let you DO about it? If you unplug your highest-profile customer's connection due to a DDoS attack that's affecting the whole network, will your boss back up that decision? Things like this or a formal process set up specifically to come to a conclusion/decision/consensus QUICKLY are very important to have ahead of time.) Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:29:04PM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote: - Original Message - From: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote: 4. the configuration is truly bizarre.bernstein has his own non-standard directory structures, and a liking for many little files. many of these files are 'magical' - the contents are irrelevant, mere existence of them alters behaviour of the program, and even causes programs to be run automagically. this makes it impossible to experiment by temporarily commenting out particular lines - you have to delete a file, and then hope you can remember what it was called if you need to re-enable that feature. I deseagree on that. I've found qmail's config file a lot more efficient than one stupid unic file, fine. you have every right to be wrong. Can someone write here an easy understandable configuration for Postfix with virtual domains ? After some call for help here, none of you that know Posfix did it... sorry, but it's not our problem if YOU can't understand clear and simple instructions or concepts. virtual domains are a well-documented part of postfix, and have been for years. 5. bernstein likes to reinvent the wheel. he does this (and does it badly) without regard to whether the wheel actually needs to be reinvented or not (e.g. ucspi-tcp). this is compounded by the fact that it is a complete PITA to use any of his programs without using all of his programs. I deseagree a lot on that also. Bernstein has coded ucspi-tcp as a replacement for the standard tcp program. the program you are thinking of is called inetd (or xinetd - another version with resource limitation controls built in). He has the rights to do so, and you have the rights not to use it if you like inetd... of course he has the right to do so. that is beyond question. it was just unneccesary and stupid of him to do so. more to the point, if he's going to reinvent the wheel he should at least try to do a good job - a square wheel isn't any use to anyone. that focus on staying on unix style, you couldn't be more wrong on this point. his programs implement BERNSTEIN-style, not traditional unix style. his programs are about as different from unix style as it's possible for software to be and still run on unix systems. craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
