Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
> On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote:
>
>> You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days).
>>
>>> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing
>>> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when
>>> usually I note throtting on my downloads.
>
> Didn't catch where you are but bandwidth in the way of a T-1 or a couple
> of
> t-1's can be had for close to $1000 a month, divide that by 96 dwellers
> and
> you are at $10-20 a month. You can place a debian ran firewall, filter
> mail
> and manage mail all in one box, as well as possibly throttle in/out
> traffic
> and maybe even offer filtered content from the web.
hell you could split it up into 3 - 4 boxes.

2 routers (not so much routers but used to throutle it.)
1 Mail Box (maybe a backup) use
postfix,amavisd-ew,sa(razor,dcc),clamav,squirrellmail courier-imap/pop.
and then maybe a web box to do personal web hosting for the residents. or
put that on the same box as the mail stuff. just depending on how many per
house. i could even help you do the filter/throtle stuff. i got some good
scripts for it. and how to limit certain ppl to so much bw and such.



--jeremy



> --
> Thanks!!
> David Thurman
> List Only at Web Presence Group Net
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

2004-04-12 Thread Dave's List Addy
On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote:

> You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days).
> 
>> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing
>> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when
>> usually I note throtting on my downloads.

Didn't catch where you are but bandwidth in the way of a T-1 or a couple of
t-1's can be had for close to $1000 a month, divide that by 96 dwellers and
you are at $10-20 a month. You can place a debian ran firewall, filter mail
and manage mail all in one box, as well as possibly throttle in/out traffic
and maybe even offer filtered content from the web.
-- 
Thanks!!
David Thurman
List Only at Web Presence Group Net





Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
> On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote:
>
>> You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days).
>>
>>> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing
>>> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when
>>> usually I note throtting on my downloads.
>
> Didn't catch where you are but bandwidth in the way of a T-1 or a couple
> of
> t-1's can be had for close to $1000 a month, divide that by 96 dwellers
> and
> you are at $10-20 a month. You can place a debian ran firewall, filter
> mail
> and manage mail all in one box, as well as possibly throttle in/out
> traffic
> and maybe even offer filtered content from the web.
hell you could split it up into 3 - 4 boxes.

2 routers (not so much routers but used to throutle it.)
1 Mail Box (maybe a backup) use
postfix,amavisd-ew,sa(razor,dcc),clamav,squirrellmail courier-imap/pop.
and then maybe a web box to do personal web hosting for the residents. or
put that on the same box as the mail stuff. just depending on how many per
house. i could even help you do the filter/throtle stuff. i got some good
scripts for it. and how to limit certain ppl to so much bw and such.



--jeremy



> --
> Thanks!!
> David Thurman
> List Only at Web Presence Group Net
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

2004-04-12 Thread Dave's List Addy
On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote:

> You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days).
> 
>> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing
>> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when
>> usually I note throtting on my downloads.

Didn't catch where you are but bandwidth in the way of a T-1 or a couple of
t-1's can be had for close to $1000 a month, divide that by 96 dwellers and
you are at $10-20 a month. You can place a debian ran firewall, filter mail
and manage mail all in one box, as well as possibly throttle in/out traffic
and maybe even offer filtered content from the web.
-- 
Thanks!!
David Thurman
List Only at Web Presence Group Net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Christofer Algotsson

You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). 

> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing
> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when
> usually I note throtting on my downloads.  
> 
> --
> Carlos






Re: Sendmail, LDAP, and authinfo

2004-04-12 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Christian Storch said:
> I would suggest to use 'pam_ldap.so' from 'libpam-ldap' via sasl.
> How to do it with sendmail:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html

I was trying to stay away from pam-ldap - was thinking it might make more
sense to do direct queries, instead of the abstraction - but if that's
what there is, it looks easy enough.

Thanks,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgpKub2w8rM6M.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Sendmail, LDAP, and authinfo

2004-04-12 Thread Christian Storch
I would suggest to use 'pam_ldap.so' from 'libpam-ldap' via sasl.
How to do it with sendmail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html

Christian

- Original Message - 
From: "Stephen Gran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-isp" 
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 7:08 PM
Subject: Sendmail, LDAP, and authinfo

Hello all,

Does anyone know if sendmail can do authentication against an LDAP
server?  We are getting ready to change which box is being used for
outgoing mail, and since outgoing mail is only allowed either from the
client's subnet or via auth, it would be nice if we could authenticate
against an already setup LDAP server.  I have seen plenty of stuff about
mailertable, access, aliases, etc, but nothing about authinfo. 

ATM, we're using sasl on the box it's on, and my feeling was that
migrating the setup to LDAP would be easier and more maintainable in the
long run, especially since LDAP is already in place.  It's easier to
maintain one database than two.

TIA,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.  Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'   Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -





RE: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Christofer Algotsson

You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). 

> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing
> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when
> usually I note throtting on my downloads.  
> 
> --
> Carlos




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sendmail, LDAP, and authinfo

2004-04-12 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Christian Storch said:
> I would suggest to use 'pam_ldap.so' from 'libpam-ldap' via sasl.
> How to do it with sendmail:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html

I was trying to stay away from pam-ldap - was thinking it might make more
sense to do direct queries, instead of the abstraction - but if that's
what there is, it looks easy enough.

Thanks,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Sendmail, LDAP, and authinfo

2004-04-12 Thread Christian Storch
I would suggest to use 'pam_ldap.so' from 'libpam-ldap' via sasl.
How to do it with sendmail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html

Christian

- Original Message - 
From: "Stephen Gran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-isp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 7:08 PM
Subject: Sendmail, LDAP, and authinfo

Hello all,

Does anyone know if sendmail can do authentication against an LDAP
server?  We are getting ready to change which box is being used for
outgoing mail, and since outgoing mail is only allowed either from the
client's subnet or via auth, it would be nice if we could authenticate
against an already setup LDAP server.  I have seen plenty of stuff about
mailertable, access, aliases, etc, but nothing about authinfo. 

ATM, we're using sasl on the box it's on, and my feeling was that
migrating the setup to LDAP would be easier and more maintainable in the
long run, especially since LDAP is already in place.  It's easier to
maintain one database than two.

TIA,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.  Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'   Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Sendmail, LDAP, and authinfo

2004-04-12 Thread Stephen Gran
Hello all,

Does anyone know if sendmail can do authentication against an LDAP
server?  We are getting ready to change which box is being used for
outgoing mail, and since outgoing mail is only allowed either from the
client's subnet or via auth, it would be nice if we could authenticate
against an already setup LDAP server.  I have seen plenty of stuff about
mailertable, access, aliases, etc, but nothing about authinfo. 

ATM, we're using sasl on the box it's on, and my feeling was that
migrating the setup to LDAP would be easier and more maintainable in the
long run, especially since LDAP is already in place.  It's easier to
maintain one database than two.

TIA,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgp1HStdyNhOZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Sendmail, LDAP, and authinfo

2004-04-12 Thread Stephen Gran
Hello all,

Does anyone know if sendmail can do authentication against an LDAP
server?  We are getting ready to change which box is being used for
outgoing mail, and since outgoing mail is only allowed either from the
client's subnet or via auth, it would be nice if we could authenticate
against an already setup LDAP server.  I have seen plenty of stuff about
mailertable, access, aliases, etc, but nothing about authinfo. 

ATM, we're using sasl on the box it's on, and my feeling was that
migrating the setup to LDAP would be easier and more maintainable in the
long run, especially since LDAP is already in place.  It's easier to
maintain one database than two.

TIA,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Andreas John
Hi!
Wooohhh ... I assume 100Meg is the peak due to 100BaseTX cableing.
Here in Germany you would have to differenciate between the local loop 
and the traffic. The loop itself often more expensive than the traffic.
If you divide the price of a e3/t3 by 100 (users) you would probably go 
cheaper with *DSL of your local Telco per user, even if you "forget" 
about the price of t3 linecards/router.

If there is not much (no?) peer to peer i would have said 2 Meg are a 
little less, but 2*2 Meg bundeled _could_ be enough for "surfing". If 
you have some internet radio listeners and some file up/download go up 
to 10 Megbit. If your telco offers 10 Meg local loop (most times 
crippled e3's), I would tend to take  that "flat", or if money is a big 
concern check for adsl 8meg/2meg.

Rgds,
Andreas
Jeremy D. May wrote:
personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would
say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer
to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you run
a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price.
--jeremy

Hi,
I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a LAN.
We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet with a
radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know the new
contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new locally
administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct link
to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth sharing
machine.
My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local
backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a
reasonable internet access service?
Thanks,
--
Carlos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Andreas John
net-lab GmbH
Luisenstrasse 30b
63067 Offenbach
Tel: +49 69 85700331
http://www.net-lab.net



Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
i know of places here in the US (apartment complexes where they charge the
same rate as DSL and pipe 2 gige lines into their main complex and devide
it up from there. so for me it is not the price. i look at the bw that
could possibly be used and go from there.


--jeremy

> Hi!
>
> Wooohhh ... I assume 100Meg is the peak due to 100BaseTX cableing.
> Here in Germany you would have to differenciate between the local loop
> and the traffic. The loop itself often more expensive than the traffic.
> If you divide the price of a e3/t3 by 100 (users) you would probably go
> cheaper with *DSL of your local Telco per user, even if you "forget"
> about the price of t3 linecards/router.
>
> If there is not much (no?) peer to peer i would have said 2 Meg are a
> little less, but 2*2 Meg bundeled _could_ be enough for "surfing". If
> you have some internet radio listeners and some file up/download go up
> to 10 Megbit. If your telco offers 10 Meg local loop (most times
> crippled e3's), I would tend to take  that "flat", or if money is a big
> concern check for adsl 8meg/2meg.
>
>
> Rgds,
> Andreas
>
>
> Jeremy D. May wrote:
>> personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would
>> say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer
>> to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you
>> run
>> a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price.
>>
>> --jeremy
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a
>>> LAN.
>>>We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet with a
>>>radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know the new
>>>contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new locally
>>>administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct link
>>>to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth sharing
>>>machine.
>>>My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local
>>>backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a
>>>reasonable internet access service?
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>--
>>>Carlos
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Andreas John
> net-lab GmbH
> Luisenstrasse 30b
> 63067 Offenbach
> Tel: +49 69 85700331
>
> http://www.net-lab.net
>




Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Leonardo Boselli
Il 12 Apr 2004 alle 11:19 Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes immise in rete
> usually I note throtting on my downloads.

so: presently what is the rate available at off-peak and on-peak (just try 
) ?
Are they satisfied ???
(I would say: 1 MBit ... if usage is low , if all people uses the net i would 
double at least) anless they steam video, in whiuch case you go high ...

--
Leonardo Boselli
Nucleo Informatico e Telematico del Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile
Universita` di Firenze , V. S. Marta 3 - I-50139 Firenze
tel +39 0554796431 cell +39 3488605348 fax +39 055495333
http://www.dicea.unifi.it/~leo




Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would
say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer
to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you run
a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price.

--jeremy

> Hi,
> I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a LAN.
> We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet with a
> radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know the new
> contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new locally
> administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct link
> to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth sharing
> machine.
> My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local
> backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a
> reasonable internet access service?
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Carlos
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes
* Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-04-2004 11:03]:
> What kind of traffic ? what kind of usage pattern ? Is allowable to throttle 
> on peaks ? 
> since there is now a link you should be able to know what is current 
As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing
and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when
usually I note throtting on my downloads.

-- 
Carlos 




Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Leonardo Boselli
What kind of traffic ? what kind of usage pattern ? Is allowable to throttle 
on peaks ? 
since there is now a link you should be able to know what is current 
usage

Il 12 Apr 2004 alle 10:57 Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes immise in rete
> I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a
> LAN. We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet
> with a radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know
> the new contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new
> locally administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct
> link to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth
> sharing machine. My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for
> with my local backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home
> computers with a reasonable internet access service? Thanks,
--
Leonardo Boselli
Nucleo Informatico e Telematico del Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile
Universita` di Firenze , V. S. Marta 3 - I-50139 Firenze
tel +39 0554796431 cell +39 3488605348 fax +39 055495333
http://www.dicea.unifi.it/~leo




bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes
Hi,
I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a LAN.
We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet with a
radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know the new
contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new locally
administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct link 
to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth sharing
machine.
My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local
backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a
reasonable internet access service?
Thanks,

-- 
Carlos 




Share thoughts on DeTeWe careers, help job seekers

2004-04-12 Thread Vault - The Most Trusted Name in Career Information
To unsubscribe: http://209.10.50.154/util/unsubscribe.cfm

Dear Debian, 

I invite you to take a minute to share some thoughts on corporate culture,
recruiting, salary, and career outlook at DeTeWe (or another current/former 
employer) by filling out this brief anonymous online survey:
http://www.vault.com/surveys/employeesurvey.jsp?referer=2 

By filling out the survey you will help thousands of professional job seekers
make informed career decisions, and become eligible to win the Vault Survey of
the Month $250 cash prize (plus four runner-up awards, icluding free one-year
Vault Gold Membership (online access to employee surveys on 1,900+ major
companies with salary figures and other insider career information). Reading
thousands of corporate professionals speak their minds is both informative and
fascinating!

All survey contributors receive free one-week access to all surveys on three
companies of their choice: please respond with your choice to the
thank-you email message you will receive after submitting a survey. 

Thank you in advance for your comments!

Sincerely,

Val Hadjiyski
Vault Inc. -- The Most Trusted Name in Career Information
150 W. 22nd Street
New York, NY 10011
212-366-4212 voice
www.vault.com

--
The Wall Street Journal named Vault its "top choice" for expert resume makeovers
in its "Cranky Consumer" column.
-- The Wall Street Journal, November 11, 2003. 

We found you contact information on the web. To unsubscribe from future Vault
mailings, please click http://209.10.50.154/util/unsubscribe.cfm




Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Andreas John
Hi!

Wooohhh ... I assume 100Meg is the peak due to 100BaseTX cableing.
Here in Germany you would have to differenciate between the local loop 
and the traffic. The loop itself often more expensive than the traffic.
If you divide the price of a e3/t3 by 100 (users) you would probably go 
cheaper with *DSL of your local Telco per user, even if you "forget" 
about the price of t3 linecards/router.

If there is not much (no?) peer to peer i would have said 2 Meg are a 
little less, but 2*2 Meg bundeled _could_ be enough for "surfing". If 
you have some internet radio listeners and some file up/download go up 
to 10 Megbit. If your telco offers 10 Meg local loop (most times 
crippled e3's), I would tend to take  that "flat", or if money is a big 
concern check for adsl 8meg/2meg.

Rgds,
Andreas
Jeremy D. May wrote:
personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would
say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer
to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you run
a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price.
--jeremy


Hi,
I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a LAN.
We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet with a
radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know the new
contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new locally
administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct link
to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth sharing
machine.
My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local
backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a
reasonable internet access service?
Thanks,
--
Carlos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
Andreas John
net-lab GmbH
Luisenstrasse 30b
63067 Offenbach
Tel: +49 69 85700331
http://www.net-lab.net

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
i know of places here in the US (apartment complexes where they charge the
same rate as DSL and pipe 2 gige lines into their main complex and devide
it up from there. so for me it is not the price. i look at the bw that
could possibly be used and go from there.


--jeremy

> Hi!
>
> Wooohhh ... I assume 100Meg is the peak due to 100BaseTX cableing.
> Here in Germany you would have to differenciate between the local loop
> and the traffic. The loop itself often more expensive than the traffic.
> If you divide the price of a e3/t3 by 100 (users) you would probably go
> cheaper with *DSL of your local Telco per user, even if you "forget"
> about the price of t3 linecards/router.
>
> If there is not much (no?) peer to peer i would have said 2 Meg are a
> little less, but 2*2 Meg bundeled _could_ be enough for "surfing". If
> you have some internet radio listeners and some file up/download go up
> to 10 Megbit. If your telco offers 10 Meg local loop (most times
> crippled e3's), I would tend to take  that "flat", or if money is a big
> concern check for adsl 8meg/2meg.
>
>
> Rgds,
> Andreas
>
>
> Jeremy D. May wrote:
>> personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would
>> say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer
>> to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you
>> run
>> a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price.
>>
>> --jeremy
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a
>>> LAN.
>>>We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet with a
>>>radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know the new
>>>contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new locally
>>>administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct link
>>>to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth sharing
>>>machine.
>>>My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local
>>>backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a
>>>reasonable internet access service?
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>--
>>>Carlos
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Andreas John
> net-lab GmbH
> Luisenstrasse 30b
> 63067 Offenbach
> Tel: +49 69 85700331
>
> http://www.net-lab.net
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Leonardo Boselli
Il 12 Apr 2004 alle 11:19 Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes immise in rete
> usually I note throtting on my downloads.

so: presently what is the rate available at off-peak and on-peak (just try 
) ?
Are they satisfied ???
(I would say: 1 MBit ... if usage is low , if all people uses the net i would 
double at least) anless they steam video, in whiuch case you go high ...

--
Leonardo Boselli
Nucleo Informatico e Telematico del Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile
Universita` di Firenze , V. S. Marta 3 - I-50139 Firenze
tel +39 0554796431 cell +39 3488605348 fax +39 055495333
http://www.dicea.unifi.it/~leo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would
say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer
to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you run
a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price.

--jeremy

> Hi,
> I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a LAN.
> We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet with a
> radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know the new
> contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new locally
> administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct link
> to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth sharing
> machine.
> My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local
> backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a
> reasonable internet access service?
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Carlos
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes
* Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-04-2004 11:03]:
> What kind of traffic ? what kind of usage pattern ? Is allowable to throttle 
> on peaks ? 
> since there is now a link you should be able to know what is current 
As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing
and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when
usually I note throtting on my downloads.

-- 
Carlos 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Leonardo Boselli
What kind of traffic ? what kind of usage pattern ? Is allowable to throttle 
on peaks ? 
since there is now a link you should be able to know what is current 
usage

Il 12 Apr 2004 alle 10:57 Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes immise in rete
> I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a
> LAN. We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet
> with a radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know
> the new contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new
> locally administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct
> link to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth
> sharing machine. My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for
> with my local backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home
> computers with a reasonable internet access service? Thanks,
--
Leonardo Boselli
Nucleo Informatico e Telematico del Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile
Universita` di Firenze , V. S. Marta 3 - I-50139 Firenze
tel +39 0554796431 cell +39 3488605348 fax +39 055495333
http://www.dicea.unifi.it/~leo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes
Hi,
I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wired in a LAN.
We have contracted an isp that connects our LAN to the internet with a
radio link. As our contract is going to expire soon, and I know the new
contract will be with higher prices, I'll try to propose a new locally
administered solution to my neighbours, that will be a direct link 
to a local backbone, with our own local firewall/bandwidth sharing
machine.
My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local
backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a
reasonable internet access service?
Thanks,

-- 
Carlos 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Share thoughts on DeTeWe careers, help job seekers

2004-04-12 Thread Vault - The Most Trusted Name in Career Information
To unsubscribe: http://209.10.50.154/util/unsubscribe.cfm

Dear Debian, 

I invite you to take a minute to share some thoughts on corporate culture,
recruiting, salary, and career outlook at DeTeWe (or another current/former 
employer) by filling out this brief anonymous online survey:
http://www.vault.com/surveys/employeesurvey.jsp?referer=2 

By filling out the survey you will help thousands of professional job seekers
make informed career decisions, and become eligible to win the Vault Survey of
the Month $250 cash prize (plus four runner-up awards, icluding free one-year
Vault Gold Membership (online access to employee surveys on 1,900+ major
companies with salary figures and other insider career information). Reading
thousands of corporate professionals speak their minds is both informative and
fascinating!

All survey contributors receive free one-week access to all surveys on three
companies of their choice: please respond with your choice to the
thank-you email message you will receive after submitting a survey. 

Thank you in advance for your comments!

Sincerely,

Val Hadjiyski
Vault Inc. -- The Most Trusted Name in Career Information
150 W. 22nd Street
New York, NY 10011
212-366-4212 voice
www.vault.com

--
The Wall Street Journal named Vault its "top choice" for expert resume makeovers
in its "Cranky Consumer" column.
-- The Wall Street Journal, November 11, 2003. 

We found you contact information on the web. To unsubscribe from future Vault
mailings, please click http://209.10.50.154/util/unsubscribe.cfm


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fantastic News 8004

2004-04-12 Thread Top Pharmacy Store

Message loading..

Image not loading? View  message 
here.Discon awLke/zNsAY.vhshl/jwRF.03WevH.A6G8V/mMPR2/csARe.
zrccwz ohcjf, byo, umbbf . bxqf jifi hmy, dopfx, lbvb . rqgu
jyuz qinvtn, fnlib, qbzdc . fjq rmsa mcpem, bfsg, itxl . pmxtqt
zjx yrt, fvakh, lpzr . hkbvi hfky mzm, skcluh, utr . hgba
knmfv ncpneb, qmiaq, xzdr . vtcdwc gpc mfb, wqv, elln . bilao
vlx otac, reo, lpw . frglft twl xziuk, syd, ddn . rtvi
enhnb gbh, mlen, yxesy . mbnamg jrlo tdhhl, pqxc, lav . gni
cldcy xhcl, jeasno, eebj . ojwy jji unpu, pcdab, gegvs . cyn
zdwx ohmyuj, mdmd, rfjh . npifbk oxft cxk, lliwww, kzhdg . ktf
dkboq nxn, zkwn, hvu . rwqsev wgt iwq, mgdafr, fdhu . qpyw
uoc jczrx, ztvn, eqk . jvqnfk vbq lnhppt, qmqvok, buvree . bxsghk
jdx qhm, cdyo, tcgmd . hxgoa luqueu htazao, ethtpc, xpbzya . ocpzwf
czb udl, rubl, uaesyv . xtvf zuj zfzajl, mzr, vtr . prfjpa
pvbud qpx, wxrf, lujfy . aper jbalh gllklb, jsxi, fswzcd . jdonxw
ywj npsybg, crtc, chrb . vef kvtht hsao, shgt, hwgbyf . fygnun
axrue nlc, bki, qbzzx . cxmiel rhd hcedip, vthxdp, vsjvqq . pdhu
anxfb ihkqy, osklxb, vtfsl . rbb xrbkog uqxgjv, xpvkpy, ksoef . vipwf
xsygh yeb, cmgr, qiizu . pyi uquq cqqay, wwez, gmmzw . ieecht
ryxhsp uhzwfz, cduij, ukgzs . fxtac ybw qdmad, hcfjh, tsho . ppxbv
xvyjw fmpl, rojzso, zpety . vnj pgome xal, odopwe, vyrgzh . sfgnv
ikayyg vgya, dqmcu, xueftn . nvbdqv avjabw jxwfcm, ejiefn, bcfoxg . nbcpyo
bmlk jsox, sgwyol, pnp . nvvaxz