Re: Catchall for Exim 3.35
This one time, at band camp, Adam Dawes said: > Hi all, > > I'm doing some spam research and need to configure my exim so that it > accepts all incoming mail and shunts those with invalid addresses into a > catchall address. Basically, I want to mimick how Exchange servers > accept everything. I believe the following will do it for Exim 4, but > when I try it with my 3.35 installation, it chokes on all incoming > messages. I was hoping someone might have a snippet that I could use in > my exim.conf that would do the trick. > > catchall: > driver = smartuser > new_address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > thanks, > Adam Change the lsearch to an lsearch* for the /etc/aliases lookup, and do this in /etc/aliases: *: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that will work (can't remember if lsearch* is in exim3 or not, though) -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgpPZD3lj2igz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: e-mail for multiple domains
This one time, at band camp, Rod Rodolico said: > Ok, I've researched the exim stuff and I think I see how to do it via > aliases, but I want to see if anyone has a better solution. > > We're really an IPP. We host several domains, with a few users for > each. It is getting to the point where name conflict is an issue, ie I > need [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be two separate users. I see > how > to set up Exim to make them resolve to separate users, ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] > could be resolved to joe1 and [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be resolved to joe2. > > However, I'd like to make it more seamless for the client. Seems like > making them log in with joe1 and joe2 is more of a hassle than they > need. I think what you want is something like mail delivered to /home/$domain/$user/Maildir/ ? Exim can do that - somethin like this: virtual_maildir_home: debug_print = "T: virtual_maildir_home for [EMAIL PROTECTED]" driver = appendfile directory = /home/$domain/$local_part/Maildir delivery_date_add envelope_to_add return_path_add maildir_format mode = 0600 mode_fail_narrower = false I don't think that courier can handle the pop retrieval of that, however. I have heard that cyrus does a better job with these sort fo things, so that may be something worth looking into. > Is there another way of doing this? I currently have all my users as > real users on the server, simply setting /bin/false for the shell on > those who do not need to update their web sites. LDAP would also be good, so that there is no tie between mail and loggin in at all, but your way works - it's just that managing a large passwd file is harder to do once you have to spread it out over several machines. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgp6wrtvrGZjK.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: que pez
Disculpe mi estimado señor que no le haya contestado a la brevedad pero vivo muy ocupado desde que he regresado al casi 100% de mi vida anterior, actualmernte estoy trabajando de contratista en Danone en Irapuato y me la paso toda la semana allá. Les estoy instalando el sistema de detección de incendios y obviamente se necesita de mi presencia como "inge" en la planta. Te cuento que los pinches franchutes no te regalan ni un pinche yogurt y si te cachan con alguno te corren de la planta. Toda la tecnología viene de las galias y son instaladas por los mismos. No hay casi mexicanos en las cuestiones técnicas. Todo el equipo que tienen es Siemens. En esta planta sacan yogurt como pa aventar pa'arriba. Ya tenemos chambeando ahí desde principios de febrero y la idea es seguir un buen rato. Saludos y espero pronto poder ir al boliche con Ud. Ing. Armando Blanco Pérez ING Ingenierías Soporte Técnico Av. de los Angeles #113 Cd. Granja Zapopan, Jal. Mexico 45050 (33) 36275059 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ingenlinea.com -Mensaje original- De: José Guzmán [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Domingo, 18 de Abril de 2004 11:43 p.m. Para: Armando Blanco Asunto: que pez Qué pedo, pinche armando. Cuándo vamos al boliche? José ---
Re: Catchall for Exim 3.35
This one time, at band camp, Adam Dawes said: > Hi all, > > I'm doing some spam research and need to configure my exim so that it > accepts all incoming mail and shunts those with invalid addresses into a > catchall address. Basically, I want to mimick how Exchange servers > accept everything. I believe the following will do it for Exim 4, but > when I try it with my 3.35 installation, it chokes on all incoming > messages. I was hoping someone might have a snippet that I could use in > my exim.conf that would do the trick. > > catchall: > driver = smartuser > new_address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > thanks, > Adam Change the lsearch to an lsearch* for the /etc/aliases lookup, and do this in /etc/aliases: *: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that will work (can't remember if lsearch* is in exim3 or not, though) -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: e-mail for multiple domains
This one time, at band camp, Rod Rodolico said: > Ok, I've researched the exim stuff and I think I see how to do it via > aliases, but I want to see if anyone has a better solution. > > We're really an IPP. We host several domains, with a few users for > each. It is getting to the point where name conflict is an issue, ie I > need [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be two separate users. I see how > to set up Exim to make them resolve to separate users, ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] > could be resolved to joe1 and [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be resolved to joe2. > > However, I'd like to make it more seamless for the client. Seems like > making them log in with joe1 and joe2 is more of a hassle than they > need. I think what you want is something like mail delivered to /home/$domain/$user/Maildir/ ? Exim can do that - somethin like this: virtual_maildir_home: debug_print = "T: virtual_maildir_home for [EMAIL PROTECTED]" driver = appendfile directory = /home/$domain/$local_part/Maildir delivery_date_add envelope_to_add return_path_add maildir_format mode = 0600 mode_fail_narrower = false I don't think that courier can handle the pop retrieval of that, however. I have heard that cyrus does a better job with these sort fo things, so that may be something worth looking into. > Is there another way of doing this? I currently have all my users as > real users on the server, simply setting /bin/false for the shell on > those who do not need to update their web sites. LDAP would also be good, so that there is no tie between mail and loggin in at all, but your way works - it's just that managing a large passwd file is harder to do once you have to spread it out over several machines. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: que pez
Disculpe mi estimado señor que no le haya contestado a la brevedad pero vivo muy ocupado desde que he regresado al casi 100% de mi vida anterior, actualmernte estoy trabajando de contratista en Danone en Irapuato y me la paso toda la semana allá. Les estoy instalando el sistema de detección de incendios y obviamente se necesita de mi presencia como "inge" en la planta. Te cuento que los pinches franchutes no te regalan ni un pinche yogurt y si te cachan con alguno te corren de la planta. Toda la tecnología viene de las galias y son instaladas por los mismos. No hay casi mexicanos en las cuestiones técnicas. Todo el equipo que tienen es Siemens. En esta planta sacan yogurt como pa aventar pa'arriba. Ya tenemos chambeando ahí desde principios de febrero y la idea es seguir un buen rato. Saludos y espero pronto poder ir al boliche con Ud. Ing. Armando Blanco Pérez ING Ingenierías Soporte Técnico Av. de los Angeles #113 Cd. Granja Zapopan, Jal. Mexico 45050 (33) 36275059 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ingenlinea.com -Mensaje original- De: José Guzmán [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Domingo, 18 de Abril de 2004 11:43 p.m. Para: Armando Blanco Asunto: que pez Qué pedo, pinche armando. Cuándo vamos al boliche? José --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sparc64 bridging
On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 12:17, Axel Scheepers wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if I should post it here, if it's not appropiate please excuse > me for doing so. > I'm currently looking into alternatives for solaris to put some ultrasparc > hardware in use at our isp. We mainly use freebsd, but I'm having major > problems running the latest releases on this hardware. > Anyway, I just installed debian on a sparc64 machine and upgraded it to > testing to be able to run the 2.6.5 kernel. I wanted to use this machine as > a bridging firewall for some cobalt machines we run, but I can't create a > bridge. > I have the bridge module loaded, and 'brctl addbr br0' doesn't give an error > nor error exit code. When I run 'brctl show' it doesn't show my newly > created bridge, and I can't create any further configs with it or delete it, > it just isn't there. > > I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong here, as far as I can tell the commands I > used are correct. Was it a bad idea to upgrade to 2.6.5? (I really like some > features of it which imho brings it way closer to a bsd kernel) > Since I needed to recompile the kernel anyway it seemed like a good choice > to build 2.6.5, I never tried it with a 2.4.24 kernel. > > To be sure about things I've already tried to > - enable ip forwarding > - build it into the kernel instead of a module > - ifconfig'd ethN promisc up all interfaces > but all have no effect. > > I'm not (yet) subscribed to this list, could you please cc me in a response? > > Thanks, > Kind regards, > > Axel Scheepers Have you already tried these: http://www.phunnypharm.org/pub/for/sparc-folks/ Ref: http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/debian-sparc-200402/msg00220.html What hardware are you running on that freebsd isn't compatible with? Seeing as how it doesn't, it'd be nice of you to post it to the freebsd list, so others know what's up. Dan Vande More
Re: sparc64 bridging
On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 12:17, Axel Scheepers wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if I should post it here, if it's not appropiate please excuse > me for doing so. > I'm currently looking into alternatives for solaris to put some ultrasparc > hardware in use at our isp. We mainly use freebsd, but I'm having major > problems running the latest releases on this hardware. > Anyway, I just installed debian on a sparc64 machine and upgraded it to > testing to be able to run the 2.6.5 kernel. I wanted to use this machine as > a bridging firewall for some cobalt machines we run, but I can't create a > bridge. > I have the bridge module loaded, and 'brctl addbr br0' doesn't give an error > nor error exit code. When I run 'brctl show' it doesn't show my newly > created bridge, and I can't create any further configs with it or delete it, > it just isn't there. > > I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong here, as far as I can tell the commands I > used are correct. Was it a bad idea to upgrade to 2.6.5? (I really like some > features of it which imho brings it way closer to a bsd kernel) > Since I needed to recompile the kernel anyway it seemed like a good choice > to build 2.6.5, I never tried it with a 2.4.24 kernel. > > To be sure about things I've already tried to > - enable ip forwarding > - build it into the kernel instead of a module > - ifconfig'd ethN promisc up all interfaces > but all have no effect. > > I'm not (yet) subscribed to this list, could you please cc me in a response? > > Thanks, > Kind regards, > > Axel Scheepers Have you already tried these: http://www.phunnypharm.org/pub/for/sparc-folks/ Ref: http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/debian-sparc-200402/msg00220.html What hardware are you running on that freebsd isn't compatible with? Seeing as how it doesn't, it'd be nice of you to post it to the freebsd list, so others know what's up. Dan Vande More -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sparc64 bridging
Hi, I'm not sure if I should post it here, if it's not appropiate please excuse me for doing so. I'm currently looking into alternatives for solaris to put some ultrasparc hardware in use at our isp. We mainly use freebsd, but I'm having major problems running the latest releases on this hardware. Anyway, I just installed debian on a sparc64 machine and upgraded it to testing to be able to run the 2.6.5 kernel. I wanted to use this machine as a bridging firewall for some cobalt machines we run, but I can't create a bridge. I have the bridge module loaded, and 'brctl addbr br0' doesn't give an error nor error exit code. When I run 'brctl show' it doesn't show my newly created bridge, and I can't create any further configs with it or delete it, it just isn't there. I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong here, as far as I can tell the commands I used are correct. Was it a bad idea to upgrade to 2.6.5? (I really like some features of it which imho brings it way closer to a bsd kernel) Since I needed to recompile the kernel anyway it seemed like a good choice to build 2.6.5, I never tried it with a 2.4.24 kernel. To be sure about things I've already tried to - enable ip forwarding - build it into the kernel instead of a module - ifconfig'd ethN promisc up all interfaces but all have no effect. I'm not (yet) subscribed to this list, could you please cc me in a response? Thanks, Kind regards, Axel Scheepers
Re: Your archive
Your document is attached. --- Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (主機：higp7.gatelock.com.tw) ** 中毒檔案 your_archive.pif 已刪除。 Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (主機：higp7.gatelock.com.tw) ** 在檔案 your_archive.pif 中發現病毒 WORM_NETSKY.J。 無法清除病毒，中毒檔案已刪除。 -
sparc64 bridging
Hi, I'm not sure if I should post it here, if it's not appropiate please excuse me for doing so. I'm currently looking into alternatives for solaris to put some ultrasparc hardware in use at our isp. We mainly use freebsd, but I'm having major problems running the latest releases on this hardware. Anyway, I just installed debian on a sparc64 machine and upgraded it to testing to be able to run the 2.6.5 kernel. I wanted to use this machine as a bridging firewall for some cobalt machines we run, but I can't create a bridge. I have the bridge module loaded, and 'brctl addbr br0' doesn't give an error nor error exit code. When I run 'brctl show' it doesn't show my newly created bridge, and I can't create any further configs with it or delete it, it just isn't there. I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong here, as far as I can tell the commands I used are correct. Was it a bad idea to upgrade to 2.6.5? (I really like some features of it which imho brings it way closer to a bsd kernel) Since I needed to recompile the kernel anyway it seemed like a good choice to build 2.6.5, I never tried it with a 2.4.24 kernel. To be sure about things I've already tried to - enable ip forwarding - build it into the kernel instead of a module - ifconfig'd ethN promisc up all interfaces but all have no effect. I'm not (yet) subscribed to this list, could you please cc me in a response? Thanks, Kind regards, Axel Scheepers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Your archive
Your document is attached. --- Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (主機：higp7.gatelock.com.tw) ** 中毒檔案 your_archive.pif 已刪除。 Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (主機：higp7.gatelock.com.tw) ** 在檔案 your_archive.pif 中發現病毒 WORM_NETSKY.J。 無法清除病毒，中毒檔案已刪除。 -
Please help me get to Internet on Debian
Hi! I'ce just installed Debian with a help of my friend. He fixed the Gateway number in etc/network ... file. But I stil do not have access to Net. Please help me. Yours, Grega Leskov'sek --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.670 / Virus Database: 432 - Release Date: 28.4.2004
TCP attribute/error monitoring solutions
Debian-ISP Group, I operate an ISP and make it my main focus to operate a network with stable and reliable connectivity. I've looked/tested several network monitoring packages but am coming up dry for great solutions. I am seeking a reliable method of passively monitoring my network (via span-port or similar) to watch bidirectional TCP session traffic attributes such as; response time, retransmits, unsuccessful handshakes, and unusual window-size decreases, inconstant TTLs, session drops, unanswered requests, etc. Monitoring these type of attributes gives a reliable metric for what peers/ASNs/transit paths/end points/etc are having specific problems opposed to the unreliable ping response and daemon monitoring techniques commonly used in the industry. Does anyone have any comments/experience/recommendations regarding a solution to polling this type of data, and a displaying it in a central presentation interface (similar to what ntop/openview/concord/ciscoworks have). My only request is that the software is open source, displays tcp attrib's per ASN/network or similar, and runs on debian :p So far the best resource I've found for this subject is the tools listed at http://www.caida.org/tools/ but I'm not completely satisfied with what I've found. Thanks for your assistance in advance, -Matt
Please help me get to Internet on Debian
Hi! I'ce just installed Debian with a help of my friend. He fixed the Gateway number in etc/network ... file. But I stil do not have access to Net. Please help me. Yours, Grega Leskov'sek --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.670 / Virus Database: 432 - Release Date: 28.4.2004 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCP attribute/error monitoring solutions
Debian-ISP Group, I operate an ISP and make it my main focus to operate a network with stable and reliable connectivity. I've looked/tested several network monitoring packages but am coming up dry for great solutions. I am seeking a reliable method of passively monitoring my network (via span-port or similar) to watch bidirectional TCP session traffic attributes such as; response time, retransmits, unsuccessful handshakes, and unusual window-size decreases, inconstant TTLs, session drops, unanswered requests, etc. Monitoring these type of attributes gives a reliable metric for what peers/ASNs/transit paths/end points/etc are having specific problems opposed to the unreliable ping response and daemon monitoring techniques commonly used in the industry. Does anyone have any comments/experience/recommendations regarding a solution to polling this type of data, and a displaying it in a central presentation interface (similar to what ntop/openview/concord/ciscoworks have). My only request is that the software is open source, displays tcp attrib's per ASN/network or similar, and runs on debian :p So far the best resource I've found for this subject is the tools listed at http://www.caida.org/tools/ but I'm not completely satisfied with what I've found. Thanks for your assistance in advance, -Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
