Re: Fixed (hardisk) device names?

2004-04-01 Thread Arnd Vehling
Jose Alberto Guzman wrote:
Craig Sanders wrote:
and there are no raw devices on linux AFAIK.
>>
/dev/hd? ARE the raw devices.  
craig

 In the bsdish slang, raw devices are character devices, so /dev/hd? are 
not exactly raw devices, but block devices.
Not only in "bsdish" slang. Most other Unix boxes i know (HPUX, AIX, SOLARIS)
define the char device "/dev/r" as the raw device. Linux is the 
only Unix OS i know which only has a block device available and i really 
wonder why.

There's support for accessing harddisks as character devices, see:
http://www.linuxdocs.org/HOWTOs/SCSI-2.4-HOWTO/rawdev.html
Great, ill look into that!
best regards,
  :: Arnd ::



Re: Fixed (hardisk) device names?

2004-04-01 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hi,
first: thanx to everyone who answered!
Craig Sanders wrote:
>> Arnd Vehling wrote
Another question. How can i copy two identical discs _including_ the boot
block? "dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb" doesnt do it 

don't use dd for that.  set up a raid-1 mirror instead.  it's easy to do, only
about 5 minutes work.
ok, i will look into that.
and there are no raw devices on linux AFAIK.
/dev/hd? ARE the raw devices.   
And why doesnt the bootblock get copied when using identical discs and
making a dd if=/dev/had of=/dev/hdb?
On other machines, like HP, Sun, freebsd etc. you have /dev/rdsk 
which is the raw device and a /dev/dsk which is the block device.
AFAIK you dont have this on linux, do you?

  :: Arnd ::



Re: Fixed (hardisk) device names?

2004-03-31 Thread Arnd Vehling
Jose Alberto Guzman wrote:
Craig Sanders wrote:
and there are no raw devices on linux AFAIK.
>>
/dev/hd? ARE the raw devices.  
craig

 In the bsdish slang, raw devices are character devices, so /dev/hd? are 
not exactly raw devices, but block devices.
Not only in "bsdish" slang. Most other Unix boxes i know (HPUX, AIX, SOLARIS)
define the char device "/dev/r" as the raw device. Linux is the 
only Unix OS i know which only has a block device available and i really 
wonder why.

There's support for accessing harddisks as character devices, see:
http://www.linuxdocs.org/HOWTOs/SCSI-2.4-HOWTO/rawdev.html
Great, ill look into that!

best regards,

  :: Arnd ::



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fixed (hardisk) device names?

2004-03-31 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hi,

first: thanx to everyone who answered!

Craig Sanders wrote:
>> Arnd Vehling wrote
Another question. How can i copy two identical discs _including_ the boot
block? "dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb" doesnt do it 


don't use dd for that.  set up a raid-1 mirror instead.  it's easy to do, only
about 5 minutes work.
ok, i will look into that.

and there are no raw devices on linux AFAIK.
/dev/hd? ARE the raw devices.   
And why doesnt the bootblock get copied when using identical discs and
making a dd if=/dev/had of=/dev/hdb?
On other machines, like HP, Sun, freebsd etc. you have /dev/rdsk 
which is the raw device and a /dev/dsk which is the block device.
AFAIK you dont have this on linux, do you?

  :: Arnd ::



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fixed (hardisk) device names?

2004-03-30 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hello,
does anyone know how to fix the device name on a debian linux
system? For example. If i have two IDE hardisks, the devices will
be named like this.
/dev/hda
/dev/hdb
If i now must remove the first harddisk (/dev/hda) the second (/dev/hdb)
will be renamed to (/dev/hda) after the reboot. As i want /dev/hdb to be
a mirror of /dev/hda and used as failover disk _without_ opening the
case and tampering with the IDE bus setup, i want linux to keep the name
/dev/hdb for the drive no matter what happens.
Is this possible?
Another question. How can i copy two identical discs _including_ the boot
block? "dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb" doesnt do it and there are no raw
devices on linux AFAIK.
thx,
  Arnd



Fixed (hardisk) device names?

2004-03-30 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hello,

does anyone know how to fix the device name on a debian linux
system? For example. If i have two IDE hardisks, the devices will
be named like this.
/dev/hda
/dev/hdb
If i now must remove the first harddisk (/dev/hda) the second (/dev/hdb)
will be renamed to (/dev/hda) after the reboot. As i want /dev/hdb to be
a mirror of /dev/hda and used as failover disk _without_ opening the
case and tampering with the IDE bus setup, i want linux to keep the name
/dev/hdb for the drive no matter what happens.
Is this possible?

Another question. How can i copy two identical discs _including_ the boot
block? "dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb" doesnt do it and there are no raw
devices on linux AFAIK.
thx,

  Arnd



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found

2004-02-20 Thread Arnd Vehling
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Friday 20 February 2004 07.36, Arnd Vehling wrote:
Can anyone clue me in on how to get those two forsaken libs cleanly
installed on a debian stable system so this damn binary will run?
 
Is it an option to run that app in a chroot?
Sure. I though about but i am not sure how to exactly
create a complete, working environment for that app in a chroot jail.
I did setup chrooted named daemons but thats somewhat different
from setting up a more or less complete system which is own
libgcc-base / linker and loads of libs basicly coming from
debian-unstable.
I mean, this is close to having an unstable dist running chrooted
inside of debian stable. Isnt it?
regards,

  Arnd



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


version `GLIBC_2.3' not found

2004-02-19 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hi,

ok, this is somewhat OT but anyway..

I have a binary (payware, no source) i need to run which needs bleeding 
edge libs which are only available in debian testing. As the prog needs 
to run on a production system i dont want to upgrade to the testing
distribution.

The libs in question are: libc.so.6 + libstdc++.so.5
I grabbed those, and some more libs from the unstable
distribution, installed (or extracted) them in a separate
dir tree but when i (LD_LIB_PATH set correctly) start the
prog i only get the following error message:
lib/ld-linux.so.2: version `GLIBC_PRIVATE' not found (required by 
/usr/local/lib/libdl.so.2)

And some more similiar messages.

Can anyone clue me in on how to get those two forsaken libs cleanly
installed on a debian stable system so this damn binary will run?
thanx,

  Arnd

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Compiling BIND 8.2.3 statically

2001-05-16 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hi,

i know is is not the 100% fitting mailing-list but perhaps
someone knows the answer anyway...

I am trying to setup and new DNS box with chrooted named 8.2.3.

When compiling with "-O -static" i get the following error message:

/usr/lib/libc.a(res_init.o): In function `__res_randomid':
res_init.o(.text+0x634): multiple definition of `__res_randomid'
../../lib/libbind.a(res_init.o)(.text+0xb2c): first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `__res_randomid' changed from 42 to 46 in
res_init.o

Any ideas?

regards,

   Arnd
-- 
NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln  Fax  : +49 221 8809212




Compiling BIND 8.2.3 statically

2001-05-16 Thread Arnd Vehling

Hi,

i know is is not the 100% fitting mailing-list but perhaps
someone knows the answer anyway...

I am trying to setup and new DNS box with chrooted named 8.2.3.

When compiling with "-O -static" i get the following error message:

/usr/lib/libc.a(res_init.o): In function `__res_randomid':
res_init.o(.text+0x634): multiple definition of `__res_randomid'
../../lib/libbind.a(res_init.o)(.text+0xb2c): first defined here
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `__res_randomid' changed from 42 to 46 in
res_init.o

Any ideas?

regards,

   Arnd
-- 
NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln  Fax  : +49 221 8809212


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: ANNOUNCE: Freeside 1.3.0 released

2001-05-11 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hi,

"Jeremy C. Reed" wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, ivan wrote:
> 
> > I'm happy to announce the release of Freeside 1.3.0.
> 
> debian-isp is for "[d]iscussion about issues and problems specific to
> Internet Service Providers (ISPs for short) that use Debian." (This is a
> little vague.)
> 
> Anyways, I believe debian-isp is the wrong forum for announcing
> non-Debian-specific software releases. Please consider, for example, using
> LinuxApps and freshmeat.

IMHO the list is quite appropriate for announcing isp-related software.

Plase continue the announcements.

regards,

   Arnd
-- 

NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Cologne, Germany  Fax  : +49 221 8809212




Re: ANNOUNCE: Freeside 1.3.0 released

2001-05-11 Thread Arnd Vehling

Hi,

"Jeremy C. Reed" wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, ivan wrote:
> 
> > I'm happy to announce the release of Freeside 1.3.0.
> 
> debian-isp is for "[d]iscussion about issues and problems specific to
> Internet Service Providers (ISPs for short) that use Debian." (This is a
> little vague.)
> 
> Anyways, I believe debian-isp is the wrong forum for announcing
> non-Debian-specific software releases. Please consider, for example, using
> LinuxApps and freshmeat.

IMHO the list is quite appropriate for announcing isp-related software.

Plase continue the announcements.

regards,

   Arnd
-- 

NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Cologne, Germany  Fax  : +49 221 8809212


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Virtual Domain Users

2001-04-02 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hi,

want u want is homedir-mailboxes or maildirs.

Nearly every mailer is able to do this. I suggest
looking at qmail or exim.

With this mailers you r independant of /etc/passwd too.

You can manage users via LDAP (which i would recommend 
for a large-scale setup) or ascii-files or sql or...

regards,

 Arnd 
-- 
NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln  Fax  : +49 221 8809212




Re: Virtual Domain Users

2001-04-02 Thread Arnd Vehling

Hi,

want u want is homedir-mailboxes or maildirs.

Nearly every mailer is able to do this. I suggest
looking at qmail or exim.

With this mailers you r independant of /etc/passwd too.

You can manage users via LDAP (which i would recommend 
for a large-scale setup) or ascii-files or sql or...

regards,

 Arnd 
-- 
NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln  Fax  : +49 221 8809212


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Web-Based DNS Frontend

2001-03-22 Thread Arnd Vehling
Hello,

can anyone recommend a commercial or free web-based
frontend to manage DNS-Servers?

regards,

  Arnd
-- 

NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Cologne   Fax  : +49 221 8809212




Web-Based DNS Frontend

2001-03-22 Thread Arnd Vehling

Hello,

can anyone recommend a commercial or free web-based
frontend to manage DNS-Servers?

regards,

  Arnd
-- 

NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Cologne   Fax  : +49 221 8809212


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: syslogd & cisco logs

2000-12-30 Thread Arnd Vehling

Hi,

Debian Ghost wrote:
> I'm just studying up on cisco equipment and IOS configuration. I was
> wondering what steps are necessary to get a debian syslogd to accept logs
> from routers. 

Thats in the syslogd man-page: 


  -r This  option  will  enable  the facility to receive
 message from the network using an  internet  domain
 socket  with  the syslog service (see services(5)).
 The default is to not receive any messages from the
 network.


On da Cisco do a:


service timestamps log datetime
..
logging trap 
logging source-interface 
logging 
logging 


and next time plz RTFM.

regards,

  Arnd
-- 

NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln  Fax  : +49 221 8809212


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Kernel >= 2.2.17 or 2.4.* for FW/Proxy

2000-12-08 Thread Arnd Vehling

Hi,

i just wanted to say thanx for the replys!

-- Arnd


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Route annoncement on web

2000-12-06 Thread Arnd Vehling

Adrian Nims wrote:
> 
> Does anybody know a web site where I can see route announcement ? I
> want to see from outside if my routes are announced correctly or not.

http://nitrous.digex.net/

regards,

  Arnd 
-- 

NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln  Fax  : +49 221 8809212


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Kernel >= 2.2.17 or 2.4.* for FW/Proxy

2000-12-06 Thread Arnd Vehling

Hi,

which kernel would you suggest for a _stable_ and secure
Debian based Firewall? 

I am currently setting up a system based on 2.2.17 and i am
not sure if i should go for 2.4.* with the new filtering-code.

Any advice appreciated.

regards,

  Arnd Vehling
-- 

NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln  Fax  : +49 221 8809212


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Minimal installation for FW

2000-12-02 Thread Arnd Vehling

Hello,

has anybody a suggestion how to build a minimal debian
installation for a firewall-setup? Any hints to debian specific 
hardening-scripts or procedures would be greatly appreciated too!

thanx,

  Arnd Vehling
-- 

NetHead Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gummersbacherstr. 27Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln  Fax  : +49 221 8809212


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]