Re: Exim from source
Craig wrote: I have compiled the exim 4.20 from source and would like to install it on my deb box, however it already has the version that comes with woody installed and I cannot remove it because of dependancy problems. One way to do it is to use the equivs package, which is basically a fake package that lies to dpkg and satisfies dependencies. The APT HOWTO at http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-helpers.en.html describes how to use it, and even uses an MTA as the example case. Note, however, that the package information page at http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/equivs.html uses language like "crude hack" to describe itself. If there's Debian packaging information for 4.20, I'd strongly recommend just building a new Debian package file and installing /it/ instead. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: iptables default
Glenn Hocking wrote: Is there a default rule table somewhere? Or do I need to just execute the commands from a script on startup? iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 1494 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.2.110 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 1604 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.2.110 The "ipmasq" package seems to do a pretty fair job of it. Copy one of the rule files that live in /etc/ipmasq/rules to just the right place -- I85application.rul appears to work -- and stick your port forwarding rules in there. Let's see... I'd attach mine if I knew the list rules would let me. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: iptables default
Glenn Hocking wrote: Is there a default rule table somewhere? Or do I need to just execute the commands from a script on startup? iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 1494 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.2.110 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 1604 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.2.110 The "ipmasq" package seems to do a pretty fair job of it. Copy one of the rule files that live in /etc/ipmasq/rules to just the right place -- I85application.rul appears to work -- and stick your port forwarding rules in there. Let's see... I'd attach mine if I knew the list rules would let me. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail server
That's exactly what I needed to hear. I appreciate the prompt replies. Thank you. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail server
That's exactly what I needed to hear. I appreciate the prompt replies. Thank you. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail server
Can anyone give me any figures on how much machine I need to serve as a mail server for N users? I appreciate that every server is unique, but I can't judge these things for the life of me, and if I had baseline numbers I could modify them to suit. \: I'm looking at a thousand users, but anything would help. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMAP / POP... permissions?
Simon McCartney wrote: I think I missed the start of this thread, but under Cyrus, using IMAP to access a mailbox, you have the following ACLs: l Look up the name of the mailbox but not it's contents r Read the contents of the mailbox w change status flags i insert a message d delete a message among other, from this you could give some one rwi, so that message status is preserved (i.e. seen, reply etc) but they can't delete the message. Wonderful wonderful wonderful! That's exactly what I needed. THANK you. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMAP / POP... permissions?
Jason Lim wrote: I need to teach a mailbox how to implement permissions. Specifically, how to deny a client's deletion commands. Do you mean make it "read-only"? Mostly. But I know that IMAP stores things like lastread locally, and I don't want to interfere with that. So not... completely read-only. But yes, that's the general idea. Everything I've read so far tells me that it's gonna be nigh-on impossible without brittle permission tricks or source hacking. I'm really hoping someone has a better answer. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMAP / POP... permissions?
I need to teach a mailbox how to implement permissions. Specifically, how to deny a client's deletion commands. Is this possible without source hacking? I'll do even that if I must, but I really don't want to. POP or IMAP, I'll use whatever works, but there oughta be a way. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FTP Proxy
Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS and active FTP to work well together, so I've always needed PASV, and I'm encountering problems with misconfigured sites that can't use passive connections. Any help would be appreciated. Please CC replies to me. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com
FTP Proxy
Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS and active FTP to work well together, so I've always needed PASV, and I'm encountering problems with misconfigured sites that can't use passive connections. Any help would be appreciated. Please CC replies to me. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mail
Thanks for all your suggestions. Qmail and vpopper I was sort of familiar with... looking (much) harder I see that's what I need. Thanks a million. (: -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Mail
Thanks for all your suggestions. Qmail and vpopper I was sort of familiar with... looking (much) harder I see that's what I need. Thanks a million. (: -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the slightest clue how to host mail for multiple domains such that every domain has a unique namespace? Thinking about the matter, I realized I don't quite know how to accomplish this. The smallest pointer will be appreciated -- I can figure it out, I think, once I know where to look. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Does anyone have the slightest clue how to host mail for multiple domains such that every domain has a unique namespace? Thinking about the matter, I realized I don't quite know how to accomplish this. The smallest pointer will be appreciated -- I can figure it out, I think, once I know where to look. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SOCKS
What're my options for forcing a program to use SOCKS when it doesn't expecially want to? I've installed a SOCKS proxy on a machine that's local to another link to draw off the worst of our -- err -- non-administrative activities; firing everyone (myself included) would be somewhat embarassing, so I need a technical solution. It's helping already, since many Win32 programs support SOCKS, but it could do more yet. Techniques that'd work in Linux and/or FreeBSD would be appreciated. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SOCKS
What're my options for forcing a program to use SOCKS when it doesn't expecially want to? I've installed a SOCKS proxy on a machine that's local to another link to draw off the worst of our -- err -- non-administrative activities; firing everyone (myself included) would be somewhat embarassing, so I need a technical solution. It's helping already, since many Win32 programs support SOCKS, but it could do more yet. Techniques that'd work in Linux and/or FreeBSD would be appreciated. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: webalizer
At 03:15 PM 10/8/01 -0500, Cameron Moore wrote: >I'm seeing the exact same problem (same version of webalizer but newer >apache). Nothing was changed on the box -- it just stopped working. >Plenty of resources (disk, memory, etc). Seems like a webalizer bug. >First one to figure out the problem speak up. :-) Back up all the webalizer.* files, then cut the log file up into pieces and figure out which one is giving webalizer such a headache? If there's a particular malformed line involved, Perl might be able to make the logchunk more palatable for it. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: webalizer
At 03:15 PM 10/8/01 -0500, Cameron Moore wrote: >I'm seeing the exact same problem (same version of webalizer but newer >apache). Nothing was changed on the box -- it just stopped working. >Plenty of resources (disk, memory, etc). Seems like a webalizer bug. >First one to figure out the problem speak up. :-) Back up all the webalizer.* files, then cut the log file up into pieces and figure out which one is giving webalizer such a headache? If there's a particular malformed line involved, Perl might be able to make the logchunk more palatable for it. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ./debian directorys in packages
At 01:51 PM 8/10/01 +1200, Simon Allard wrote: >Does anyone know how/if we can actually get the ./debian directory that is >used to make the packages? Does debian include them with the source >packages? Check the source directory on a Debian CD/FTP. Grab the -orig tarball and the -diff. Unpck the source, apply the .diff, and that's the ./debian directory with all the rulesets you're looking for. Be cautioned, you're gonna have to read that patch line by line; many apps are patched to meet the LSB, and the build process depends on those patches having been implemented. -- Asher Densmore-Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]