Re: Cyrus / Sieve

2004-06-09 Thread Michael Kreilmeier
Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
We are using postfix/cyrus here where postfix is delivering mail locally
via lmtp and cyrus authenticates Users using saslauthd/pam. In a testing
environment we are experimenting with LDAP at the moment and it works
quite nicely.
I got to setup a postfix/cyrus-system in a few weeks too. I already 
installed a testsystem and had no problems. Since both postfix and cyrus 
do have a sasl-mysql-plugin, I chose this solution over saslauthd/pam.
But the more I read about cyrus, be it on a mailinglist or elsewhere, it 
seems to me that everybody uses cyrus in combination with saslauthd/pam.
Is there some good reason not to use the mysql-plugins? (AFAIK it's the 
same with LDAP.)

Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which SATA RAID controller?

2004-03-23 Thread Michael Kreilmeier
Hi!

What would be the disadvantage of a ICH5-R based RAID (ships with many
mainboards) over a Promise pseudo-hardware-RAID?

Does anybody know wether you can hot-swap with a ICH5-R/Promise-System
or even Linux-Software-RAID, or not?

Regards,

Michael Kreilmeier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Which SATA RAID controller?

2004-03-23 Thread Michael Kreilmeier
Hi!

What would be the disadvantage of a ICH5-R based RAID (ships with many
mainboards) over a Promise pseudo-hardware-RAID?

Does anybody know wether you can hot-swap with a ICH5-R/Promise-System
or even Linux-Software-RAID, or not?

Regards,

Michael Kreilmeier




Re: Moving Sites

2003-10-21 Thread Michael Kreilmeier
 Stupid Question: I have about 50 web sites and a few hundred e-mail
accounts to move to a new
 server. New IP address, etc... Web sites are no problem, but I do not want
my clients to
 notice any problems with e-mail. They have IMAP available, so many of the
clients store their
 e-mail on the server.

 Any ideas on how to move the e-mail accounts seamlessly. I have all their
MX records pointing
 to one address: mail.dailydata.net.

 I have rsync'd all the files over, and can do it again whenever, but that
won't work as they
 will be checking their mail on one machine while, I assume, some might be
delivered to the
 other, older server (I was planning on keeping the old server up a few
days in case I screw
 up).

 Guess is boils down to this. When I update the address of
mail.dailydata.net, it can take up
 to 72 hours for that change to perculate throughout the net, so I'm
assuming some places will
 still try to send to the old IP and, if I leave that box on, be delivered
to it. If I turn the
 other box off, I'm assuming they will bounce.

You could set the refresh-, retry-, expire- and minimum-values in your
dns-zone-file to low values (at least 72 hours before you change the
mx-entry).
When you choose an expire-value of 2h, your changes will take effect
throughout the net within 2 hours.
I never tried this out, but it works in theory:)

Michael Kreilmeier.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Moving Sites

2003-10-21 Thread Michael Kreilmeier
 Stupid Question: I have about 50 web sites and a few hundred e-mail
accounts to move to a new
 server. New IP address, etc... Web sites are no problem, but I do not want
my clients to
 notice any problems with e-mail. They have IMAP available, so many of the
clients store their
 e-mail on the server.

 Any ideas on how to move the e-mail accounts seamlessly. I have all their
MX records pointing
 to one address: mail.dailydata.net.

 I have rsync'd all the files over, and can do it again whenever, but that
won't work as they
 will be checking their mail on one machine while, I assume, some might be
delivered to the
 other, older server (I was planning on keeping the old server up a few
days in case I screw
 up).

 Guess is boils down to this. When I update the address of
mail.dailydata.net, it can take up
 to 72 hours for that change to perculate throughout the net, so I'm
assuming some places will
 still try to send to the old IP and, if I leave that box on, be delivered
to it. If I turn the
 other box off, I'm assuming they will bounce.

You could set the refresh-, retry-, expire- and minimum-values in your
dns-zone-file to low values (at least 72 hours before you change the
mx-entry).
When you choose an expire-value of 2h, your changes will take effect
throughout the net within 2 hours.
I never tried this out, but it works in theory:)

Michael Kreilmeier.