Chrooted apache package for Debian?
Is there any official or non-official .deb package with a chrooted apache distro? Any related project? Thanks. Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chrooted apache package for Debian?
Is there any official or non-official .deb package with a chrooted apache distro? Any related project? Thanks. Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ]
Re: Strange problem with NIC
mta-mad:~# mii-tool eth0: negotiated 100baseT4 flow-control, link ok Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:31:07 +0800, you wrote: Run mii-tool and see what speed your card is using first. - Original Message - From: Roman Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 05:49 PM Subject: Strange problem with NIC Hi, I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine with 1 10/100 Ethernet NIC where its upstream speed is reasonable (2 or 3 Mbytes per second) but its downstream speed is awful (35 kbytes per second ). All experiments are made in a LAN, so I cannot explain the 35 kbytes/s extremely low speed. Any idea? TIA
Strange problem with NIC
Hi, I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine with 1 10/100 Ethernet NIC where its upstream speed is reasonable (2 or 3 Mbytes per second) but its downstream speed is awful (35 kbytes per second ). All experiments are made in a LAN, so I cannot explain the 35 kbytes/s extremely low speed. Any idea? TIA Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange problem with NIC
Hi, I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine with 1 10/100 Ethernet NIC where its upstream speed is reasonable (2 or 3 Mbytes per second) but its downstream speed is awful (35 kbytes per second ). All experiments are made in a LAN, so I cannot explain the 35 kbytes/s extremely low speed. Any idea? TIA Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ]
Re: Sugesstions building a rather big mail system.
On 09 Oct 2003 10:31:25 +0200, you wrote: Am Don, 2003-10-09 um 02.50 schrieb Donovan Baarda: Using snapshots to do an incremental backup would be no different to doing any other type of backup using snapshots. It's the same as a normal incremental backup, just with the added guarantee that the filesystem is not changing underneath you as you do it. I agree with that comment. Also somebody asked how to get it with Linux. Tip: use LVM + dump. - LVM will provide snapshot capability - avoids files changing when backing up (as told by Donovan) - Dump is the tool used for taking backups (complete or incremental) Say the first snapshot is created at 05:00 AM with 10TB data on the filer and the second one one hour later at 06:00 AM the incremental snapshot would backup only those blocks/files/whatever that have changed since then (maybe just a few GB). This allows much faster backups/restores with guaranteed consistency. At 5AM you should: - create a LVM snapshot (this is very fast, since LVM doesn't really need to copy data from the real fs to the snapshot fs). - dump fs completely - destroy LVM snapshot At 6AM you should: - create a new LVM snapshot - dump fs partially (incremental mode) - destroy LVM snapshot Is anyone on the list you uses this features and can tell what they really do or how good they work? Well, I haven't tested enough and I really don't have big and loaded systems as the one you want to use, but all my tests have been very successful. Read the following thread that I started a few weeks ago: http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2003/debian-isp-200309/msg00330.html Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best way to update perl on Woody Stable ?
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:49:56 +1000, you wrote: another method is to use apt's pinning features where you can tell it to upgrade certain packages from one distribution (e.g. unstable) and the rest from another (e.g. stable). Could you post an /etc/apt/sources.list which demonstrates this option, please? (for instance, how to use latest postfix packages whilest keeping all the rest of packages from woody). TIA. Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hot-backup a complete Debian install
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:05:50 +0200, you wrote: we're using a similar setup for some hosts and I have the best results so far with dump/restore on ext2/ext3 partitions. Also using snapshots with dump/restore? Do you have any script which I could have a look? I've even successfully recreated a database server with mysql and postgresql servers running and using dump as a backup tool. My idea is generate a different backup for databases, using especific MySQLco tools. I don't think a backup of a live filesystem containing database data could be reliable.. what happens if MySQL has some data in memory (still not flushed to disk)? Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Services in a multihomed machine
Hello, Let's suppose a server using ip-aliasing, with two public IPs (on the same subnet): ip1 and ip2. The server runs two services: - MTA (postfix) on ip1 - WWW (apache) on ip2 (I mean, each service is bound to only one ip, not 0.0.0.0). According to the routing table, default gateway is reached through ip2. This means that when the server acts as a client machine it will use always ip2. Now let's suppose that somebody is using your MTA to send an email. The server reads the email through ip1, and then will initiate a new connection to a second MTA (for delivering purposes), according to the MX record of the destination domain. Well, the problem is that this new connection is originated from ip2 (the one used for client purposes as well as WWW server). I'd like that all MTA related tasks were launched always from ip1. Do you know any way of getting this to work? I haven't already tried it but if I'm not wrong there is a way to create iptables rules based on system proccesses. So I had thought in creating such a rule to mangle packets with ip2 (wrong ip) when they are generated from postfix. Do you think it is a good idea? Would it cause an overload in CPU time? Which other solutions do you know to solve the problem? Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FSCKFIX=yes
Hi, I administer some machines remotely so I don't have the chance to manually fsck them when an error occurs. I use ext3 and LVM. 1) I've found the following at Debian 3.0 and turned to yes: # Set FSCKFIX to yes if you want to add -y to the fsck at startup. FSCKFIX=yes Would you recommend this? Does it work as expected? 2) Pros Disadvant.? 3) Is it still possible that the system doesn't get started automagically? (well, the response should be yes, but which chance of failure should I expect?). Thanks. Saludos, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generic Control Pannel
Hello, I'm managing some kind of ISP services but I don't have any control pannel service to offer to my customers. The idea is that my customers could manage their own mailboxes (create, delete, change passwds, etc), ftp accounts, dns zone, etc. I've thought of developping my own application for that purpose, based on PHP and MySQL. I don't see it difficult but I don't have much time and I'm not a good graphic/website designer, so I'd prefer to use any free control pannel available, after modifying its code to fit my machine needs (for instance, my database structure, harddisk directory tree, etc). The idea is not having to design the web style of the administration tool, authentication (login window), and things like that. Which already-existing (and free) control pannel would you recommend to me for this purpose? I'd prefer one based on PHP, but it would not be a problem if it is based on other options (Perl, C, ...). I'm using Apache on Debian Linux (of course). Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, --Roman -- PGP Fingerprint: 09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB 29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742 [Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
