RE: Load Ballancing
Excellent info, I will likely then just have some on one line and some clients on another and just watch the line loads. I have used ntop like I use top for sampling the bandwidth usage. Is there something better that I can use? I don't have any routers or hubs in place, just dsl into the network card. I find that the ntop segmentfaults very often so it's ok for guestamating but that's about it. (running v.1.2a7 of ntop by the way) Thanks again. Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 > -Original Message- > From: pete [mailto:pete]On Behalf Of Pete Billson > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 3:00 PM > To: Scott Thompson > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Load Ballancing > > > Scott Thompson wrote: > > > > I have a small server on a DSL line. We have grown to the point > that it's > > not quite enough to handle the peak traffic time nicely. I > would like to add > > another DSL line to my network and be able to have it load > balance between > > the two. Is this something that is possible, or do I just try > to divide the > > clients through the 2 lines and just be as aware as I can to > the needs of > > both lines? > > Scott, > Check out the how-to from the Linux Router Project > > http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net/dox/monkeynoodle/LRP-Load-Balancing-HOWTO.txt > > Pete Billson > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Load Ballancing
I have a small server on a DSL line. We have grown to the point that it's not quite enough to handle the peak traffic time nicely. I would like to add another DSL line to my network and be able to have it load balance between the two. Is this something that is possible, or do I just try to divide the clients through the 2 lines and just be as aware as I can to the needs of both lines? Thanks in advance. Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Correction Re: Talking to a pop server
Uhhh, I ment to say Neomail 1.14 not newmail. Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Talking to a pop server
Thank you for all the speedy replys. After investegating a lot of options. I have installed Newmail 1.14. It's a very nice looking/working package! Thanks again all! Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Talking to a POP server.
Hello once again list. I am currently writing an online mail service similar to hotmail or yahoo mail. I have all the elements in place except for one. In C, how do I talk to a POP server? Is there something like 'sendmail' that I use to easily send all my mail messages, but for receiving mail from a pop server? Thanks in advance! Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Attachments Solved.
Sorry, I did get it figured out now :-)
Email Attachment addendum
I probably should have worded it better. I would like to send an email it had been using an ANCI C program. I frequently use sendmail from within these programs. I just need to know how to attach a binary file to a message if necessary, wrong within the software that we write. Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843
Email Attachments.
We use sendmail all the time to send messages from CGI applications. We would now like to be able to send binary file attachments. I realize that we will have to encode the files before we can attach them, two questions, first how do I get sendmail to actually 'attach' the encoded file to the message, and secondly, one is the recommended format to encode the binary file in? Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843
Email Attachments Solved.
Sorry, I did get it figured out now :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Attachment addendum
I probably should have worded it better. I would like to send an email it had been using an ANCI C program. I frequently use sendmail from within these programs. I just need to know how to attach a binary file to a message if necessary, wrong within the software that we write. Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Attachments.
We use sendmail all the time to send messages from CGI applications. We would now like to be able to send binary file attachments. I realize that we will have to encode the files before we can attach them, two questions, first how do I get sendmail to actually 'attach' the encoded file to the message, and secondly, one is the recommended format to encode the binary file in? Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple 'timed' Autoresponders
I have a need for a service, and am quite prepated to write a little C to take care of it. My Linux administrator suggested that it would be about the only way that he is aware of doing what I need. I just wanted to put forth my requirements and see if someone had done, or has an idea for me. I would like to have the ability to send out multiple timed autoresponses. I.E. 1) When a message is received, immediately send out a 'I got this message' response 2) 5 Days later send out another autoresponder 3) 14 Days later send out a follow up autoresponse... etc. Some clients want more, some want less and the day interval needs to be different from user to user. Also, keep in mind that each autoresponse is a different message. I relize that I will likely have to build a web interface to manage these responses, I was just hoping that I wouldn't have to code the actual mailing and managment of the times. Thanks! Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843
Multiple 'timed' Autoresponders
I have a need for a service, and am quite prepated to write a little C to take care of it. My Linux administrator suggested that it would be about the only way that he is aware of doing what I need. I just wanted to put forth my requirements and see if someone had done, or has an idea for me. I would like to have the ability to send out multiple timed autoresponses. I.E. 1) When a message is received, immediately send out a 'I got this message' response 2) 5 Days later send out another autoresponder 3) 14 Days later send out a follow up autoresponse... etc. Some clients want more, some want less and the day interval needs to be different from user to user. Also, keep in mind that each autoresponse is a different message. I relize that I will likely have to build a web interface to manage these responses, I was just hoping that I wouldn't have to code the actual mailing and managment of the times. Thanks! Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MySQL vs. Postgres
you can find the perl software i use (free) at www.awsd.com :-) -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 1:05 AM To: Scott Thompson Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: MySQL vs. Postgres >On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Scott Thompson wrote: > > > Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. > > > > Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month > >8,891,404 58,798,965,869 211,007 1,528,073 Jun 2000 > > 10,853,047 57,775,413,897 224,862 1,375,197 Jul 2000 > >9,121,259 53,851,857,460 210,680 1,421,053 Aug 2000 Off topic: How did you generate this table? How are you defining Visits and Page Views? Thanks -- Ghane
RE: MySQL vs. Postgres
you can find the perl software i use (free) at www.awsd.com :-) -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 1:05 AM To: Scott Thompson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MySQL vs. Postgres >On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Scott Thompson wrote: > > > Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. > > > > Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month > >8,891,404 58,798,965,869 211,007 1,528,073 Jun 2000 > > 10,853,047 57,775,413,897 224,862 1,375,197 Jul 2000 > >9,121,259 53,851,857,460 210,680 1,421,053 Aug 2000 Off topic: How did you generate this table? How are you defining Visits and Page Views? Thanks -- Ghane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MySQL vs. Postgres
Yes it was compiled into the Apache server, as well as we were using the C api for mysql. On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Scott Thompson wrote: > > > Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. > > Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month >8,891,404 58,798,965,869 211,007 1,528,073 Jun 2000 > 10,853,047 57,775,413,897 224,862 1,375,197 Jul 2000 >9,121,259 53,851,857,460 210,680 1,421,053 Aug 2000 > > Granted we have other clients, but I would guess that 60-80% of the > consumers are 'real estate interested'. > > > > We run mySQL here and created an application with PHP3/4 to interface with > > the SQL engine. I will tell you now, that we re-wrote all the php pages > into > > ANSI C as the performance was PATHETIC. (p2 350 with 256 megs of ram) The > > performance was 10 times faster than php. Another thing that I notice > about Was PHP installed as a server module or as a CGI app? CGI PHP vs. CGI C of course the former is slower. I'd like to compare modphp vs CGI C in your setup. Best way of course would be to write your own dedicated server module in C. Best for performance, of course... .TM. -- / / / / / / Marco Colombo ___/ ___ / / Technical Manager / / / ESI s.r.l. _/ _/ _/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MySQL vs. Postgres
Yes it was compiled into the Apache server, as well as we were using the C api for mysql. On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Scott Thompson wrote: > > > Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. > > Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month >8,891,404 58,798,965,869 211,007 1,528,073 Jun 2000 > 10,853,047 57,775,413,897 224,862 1,375,197 Jul 2000 >9,121,259 53,851,857,460 210,680 1,421,053 Aug 2000 > > Granted we have other clients, but I would guess that 60-80% of the > consumers are 'real estate interested'. > > > > We run mySQL here and created an application with PHP3/4 to interface with > > the SQL engine. I will tell you now, that we re-wrote all the php pages > into > > ANSI C as the performance was PATHETIC. (p2 350 with 256 megs of ram) The > > performance was 10 times faster than php. Another thing that I notice > about Was PHP installed as a server module or as a CGI app? CGI PHP vs. CGI C of course the former is slower. I'd like to compare modphp vs CGI C in your setup. Best way of course would be to write your own dedicated server module in C. Best for performance, of course... .TM. -- / / / / / / Marco Colombo ___/ ___ / / Technical Manager / / / ESI s.r.l. _/ _/ _/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MySQL vs. Postgres
Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month 8,891,404 58,798,965,869 211,007 1,528,073 Jun 2000 10,853,047 57,775,413,897 224,862 1,375,197 Jul 2000 9,121,259 53,851,857,460 210,680 1,421,053 Aug 2000 Granted we have other clients, but I would guess that 60-80% of the consumers are 'real estate interested'. > We run mySQL here and created an application with PHP3/4 to interface with > the SQL engine. I will tell you now, that we re-wrote all the php pages into > ANSI C as the performance was PATHETIC. (p2 350 with 256 megs of ram) The > performance was 10 times faster than php. Another thing that I notice about Rather surprised by that, wonder what the hit rate was. On the web server I run which has been pretty busy at times (1GB served less than a week, daily access logs of 60-70MB), the php and apache usage was virtually undectable, p3 650 256MB. Basically DB access and network download times, swamped out anything that the PHP interpreter does. > mySQL is that it's load can get rather high if you have a large database. > (we have 5k records in a realestate database so there's a pile of fields too > that we have broken into 50 different tables to optimize the searches). > > If you plan on running a dynamic website, we aware of the following issues. > 1) You will need more horsepower that you likely think. (true in my > experience with this solution) > 2) Search engines will NOT index php pages or asp pages and the like nearly > as well as static pages. This is a big deal if you are looking for traffic > to this site. > 3) If you decided to go this way, offload the mySQL to a box on it's own, > you will see marked improvement. We moved ours to a 700 with 512 megs of ram > and it's almost acceptable. (we get a few searches a minute, not a lot, but > definately busy)
RE: MySQL vs. Postgres
Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month 8,891,404 58,798,965,869 211,007 1,528,073 Jun 2000 10,853,047 57,775,413,897 224,862 1,375,197 Jul 2000 9,121,259 53,851,857,460 210,680 1,421,053 Aug 2000 Granted we have other clients, but I would guess that 60-80% of the consumers are 'real estate interested'. > We run mySQL here and created an application with PHP3/4 to interface with > the SQL engine. I will tell you now, that we re-wrote all the php pages into > ANSI C as the performance was PATHETIC. (p2 350 with 256 megs of ram) The > performance was 10 times faster than php. Another thing that I notice about Rather surprised by that, wonder what the hit rate was. On the web server I run which has been pretty busy at times (1GB served less than a week, daily access logs of 60-70MB), the php and apache usage was virtually undectable, p3 650 256MB. Basically DB access and network download times, swamped out anything that the PHP interpreter does. > mySQL is that it's load can get rather high if you have a large database. > (we have 5k records in a realestate database so there's a pile of fields too > that we have broken into 50 different tables to optimize the searches). > > If you plan on running a dynamic website, we aware of the following issues. > 1) You will need more horsepower that you likely think. (true in my > experience with this solution) > 2) Search engines will NOT index php pages or asp pages and the like nearly > as well as static pages. This is a big deal if you are looking for traffic > to this site. > 3) If you decided to go this way, offload the mySQL to a box on it's own, > you will see marked improvement. We moved ours to a 700 with 512 megs of ram > and it's almost acceptable. (we get a few searches a minute, not a lot, but > definately busy) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MySQL vs. Postgres
We run mySQL here and created an application with PHP3/4 to interface with the SQL engine. I will tell you now, that we re-wrote all the php pages into ANSI C as the performance was PATHETIC. (p2 350 with 256 megs of ram) The performance was 10 times faster than php. Another thing that I notice about mySQL is that it's load can get rather high if you have a large database. (we have 5k records in a realestate database so there's a pile of fields too that we have broken into 50 different tables to optimize the searches). If you plan on running a dynamic website, we aware of the following issues. 1) You will need more horsepower that you likely think. (true in my experience with this solution) 2) Search engines will NOT index php pages or asp pages and the like nearly as well as static pages. This is a big deal if you are looking for traffic to this site. 3) If you decided to go this way, offload the mySQL to a box on it's own, you will see marked improvement. We moved ours to a 700 with 512 megs of ram and it's almost acceptable. (we get a few searches a minute, not a lot, but definately busy) My 2 and a half cents Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -Original Message- From: Arno Vije [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:35 AM To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: MySQL vs. Postgres Hi, where setting up some servers for a small ISP, they want to have a SQL database, but i`m in doubt. Which one would you recommend, mysql or postgres? The SQL database will be used in combination with PHP3 (or 4) to generate dynamic websites. greets, ::: (o 0) +|||_o_|||-+ | Arno Vije| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | www.linuxinfo.nl | +--v---v---+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MySQL vs. Postgres
We run mySQL here and created an application with PHP3/4 to interface with the SQL engine. I will tell you now, that we re-wrote all the php pages into ANSI C as the performance was PATHETIC. (p2 350 with 256 megs of ram) The performance was 10 times faster than php. Another thing that I notice about mySQL is that it's load can get rather high if you have a large database. (we have 5k records in a realestate database so there's a pile of fields too that we have broken into 50 different tables to optimize the searches). If you plan on running a dynamic website, we aware of the following issues. 1) You will need more horsepower that you likely think. (true in my experience with this solution) 2) Search engines will NOT index php pages or asp pages and the like nearly as well as static pages. This is a big deal if you are looking for traffic to this site. 3) If you decided to go this way, offload the mySQL to a box on it's own, you will see marked improvement. We moved ours to a 700 with 512 megs of ram and it's almost acceptable. (we get a few searches a minute, not a lot, but definately busy) My 2 and a half cents Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -Original Message- From: Arno Vije [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MySQL vs. Postgres Hi, where setting up some servers for a small ISP, they want to have a SQL database, but i`m in doubt. Which one would you recommend, mysql or postgres? The SQL database will be used in combination with PHP3 (or 4) to generate dynamic websites. greets, ::: (o 0) +|||_o_|||-+ | Arno Vije| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | www.linuxinfo.nl | +--v---v---+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sort of a load balancing question
We do that here. But the difference is it's not totally automated. If the primary server goes down for whatever reason, our admin's pager will go off, he lives 6 minutes from the office and 7 minutes from the backup server in another building. Simply he goes and get's the backup server, restarts it and at the lilo prompt he types 'clone' and we are back up and running. Granted this puts us down for about 15 minutes, but it's there! Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -Original Message- From: Shao Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shao Zhang Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:30 PM To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: sort of a load balancing question Hi, This is not a really load balancing question, but similar sort of thing. We are an isp here and we would like to set up two webservers that are completely tranparent(rsync daily). We will only be using one webserver to server all the pages, but if it goes down, we would like the second webserver to take over without any downtime. Is there any programs out there that does this? Thanks. Shao. -- Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _ Department of Communications/ __| |_ __ _ ___ |_ / |_ __ _ _ _ __ _ University of New South Wales \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \ / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` | Sydney, Australia |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |___/ _ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sort of a load balancing question
We do that here. But the difference is it's not totally automated. If the primary server goes down for whatever reason, our admin's pager will go off, he lives 6 minutes from the office and 7 minutes from the backup server in another building. Simply he goes and get's the backup server, restarts it and at the lilo prompt he types 'clone' and we are back up and running. Granted this puts us down for about 15 minutes, but it's there! Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -Original Message- From: Shao Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shao Zhang Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sort of a load balancing question Hi, This is not a really load balancing question, but similar sort of thing. We are an isp here and we would like to set up two webservers that are completely tranparent(rsync daily). We will only be using one webserver to server all the pages, but if it goes down, we would like the second webserver to take over without any downtime. Is there any programs out there that does this? Thanks. Shao. -- Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _ Department of Communications/ __| |_ __ _ ___ |_ / |_ __ _ _ _ __ _ University of New South Wales \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \ / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` | Sydney, Australia |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |___/ _ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: e-commerce
http://www.merchantcommerce.net Very easy to get started with these people. They also have a cart solution that requires no software to speak of. Check it out, they will set you up with a merchant account too if need be. -Original Message- From: Helber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 11:03 AM To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: e-commerce Does anyone know a "good" free e-commerce program? or a good solution to implement a virtual store? Thank you in advance. Helber
RE: e-commerce
http://www.merchantcommerce.net Very easy to get started with these people. They also have a cart solution that requires no software to speak of. Check it out, they will set you up with a merchant account too if need be. -Original Message- From: Helber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 11:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: e-commerce Does anyone know a "good" free e-commerce program? or a good solution to implement a virtual store? Thank you in advance. Helber -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Webmail service addition
I would prefer not to have to run *SQL etc. I ultimatly would like the service to simply plug into my existing service. I do run mySQL but I really don't want to pound that kind of overhead (on installation and maintenance as well as sql server load). Thanks again Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843
webmail service.
Hello all. I am looking for information or links to a webmail program. I am running Debian 2.0.38 with apache. My linux administrator is quite firm about 'debian released packages' so if there are any that fit into that category, that would be best, if not, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated from any of you that have installed and maintain a service like this. My needs are low as well, I have about 350 active domains with about 1200 email accounts. I can't really see more that 25% of the users wanting the service, but as you all know, in this day and age, it's the service and features that make or break us! Many Thanks Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843
Webmail service addition
I would prefer not to have to run *SQL etc. I ultimatly would like the service to simply plug into my existing service. I do run mySQL but I really don't want to pound that kind of overhead (on installation and maintenance as well as sql server load). Thanks again Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webmail service.
Hello all. I am looking for information or links to a webmail program. I am running Debian 2.0.38 with apache. My linux administrator is quite firm about 'debian released packages' so if there are any that fit into that category, that would be best, if not, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated from any of you that have installed and maintain a service like this. My needs are low as well, I have about 350 active domains with about 1200 email accounts. I can't really see more that 25% of the users wanting the service, but as you all know, in this day and age, it's the service and features that make or break us! Many Thanks Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IDE or SCSI ??
I agree, I have about 340 active domains, and my stats for may's webserver traffic was hits: 9,498,039 Outgoing Bytes: 58,937,127,164 Visitors: 225,193 Page Views 1,401,266 My machine is a P2 350 with 250 megs of ram. I am RARELY over .75 load during the day (peak time for us). I also run quite a few cgi's (mostly ANSI C). Scott Thompson -Original Message- From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 1:20 AM To: Chris Wagner; [ Francho ] Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: IDE or SCSI ?? On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Chris Wagner wrote: >Ok, ok, I'm late as hell but I had to reply. :) You don't need SCSI unless >you're doing something fancy or insane. Giving Apache more RAM is *vastly* >better than giving it SCSI. The RAM lets you cache everything so the hard >disk becomes not very important for I/O. Max out your motherboard's RAM >capacity. One thing to consider is the amount of load. 300 domains * 300 visits / 86400 seconds in a day = 1.03 visits per second. For such a small load I doubt that you'll need much IO, memory, or CPU, unless it's all CGI-BIN stuff. Russell Coker > > >At 10:18 AM 6/13/00 +0200, Roger Abrahamsson wrote: >>On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, [ Francho ] wrote: >> >>> I have mount a new Internet Server whith (apache, mysql, bind and qmail). >It will be about 300 domains allocated (each domain will recibed about 300 >visits/day). >>> >>> What hardware do you recommend ??? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> -- >>> <<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> --- >>> >> >>SCSI!! I/O is your main concern.. Then lots of memory.. CPU comes only as >>the third factor. >> >> >>- >>Roger Abrahamsson, Senior Sys/Net Admin >>Obbit AB >>Radhusespl.17D, S-90328 Umea, Sweden >>Phone: (+46)(0)90 133310Fax:(+46)(0)90 133370 >>- >> >> >>-- >>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > >+---+ >|-=I T ' S P R I N C I P L E T H A T C O U N T S=- | >|=- -=ALAN KEYES FOR PRESIDENT=- -=| >| Balanced Budgets Personal Freedoms Morality Lower Tax | >|=-- http://www.Keyes2000.com. --=| >++ > >0100 > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- My current location - X marks the spot. X X X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IDE or SCSI ??
I agree, I have about 340 active domains, and my stats for may's webserver traffic was hits: 9,498,039 Outgoing Bytes: 58,937,127,164 Visitors: 225,193 Page Views 1,401,266 My machine is a P2 350 with 250 megs of ram. I am RARELY over .75 load during the day (peak time for us). I also run quite a few cgi's (mostly ANSI C). Scott Thompson -Original Message- From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 1:20 AM To: Chris Wagner; [ Francho ] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IDE or SCSI ?? On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Chris Wagner wrote: >Ok, ok, I'm late as hell but I had to reply. :) You don't need SCSI unless >you're doing something fancy or insane. Giving Apache more RAM is *vastly* >better than giving it SCSI. The RAM lets you cache everything so the hard >disk becomes not very important for I/O. Max out your motherboard's RAM >capacity. One thing to consider is the amount of load. 300 domains * 300 visits / 86400 seconds in a day = 1.03 visits per second. For such a small load I doubt that you'll need much IO, memory, or CPU, unless it's all CGI-BIN stuff. Russell Coker > > >At 10:18 AM 6/13/00 +0200, Roger Abrahamsson wrote: >>On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, [ Francho ] wrote: >> >>> I have mount a new Internet Server whith (apache, mysql, bind and qmail). >It will be about 300 domains allocated (each domain will recibed about 300 >visits/day). >>> >>> What hardware do you recommend ??? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> -- >>> <<< Net.Zaragoza@FchX >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> --- >>> >> >>SCSI!! I/O is your main concern.. Then lots of memory.. CPU comes only as >>the third factor. >> >> >>- >>Roger Abrahamsson, Senior Sys/Net Admin >>Obbit AB >>Radhusespl.17D, S-90328 Umea, Sweden >>Phone: (+46)(0)90 133310Fax:(+46)(0)90 133370 >>- >> >> >>-- >>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > >+---+ >|-=I T ' S P R I N C I P L E T H A T C O U N T S=- | >|=- -=ALAN KEYES FOR PRESIDENT=- -=| >| Balanced Budgets Personal Freedoms Morality Lower Tax | >|=-- http://www.Keyes2000.com. --=| >++ > >0100 > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- My current location - X marks the spot. X X X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Webserver stats for customers
I use weblog and logtools from www.awsd.com/scripts These are well written reports and create very nice reports. I does a decent job of tracking visits, page views and various top 10 lists and full details reports. Keyword, referer and agent reports as well. And its Free! Scott Thompson Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -Original Message- From: Jonathan McDowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:55 AM To: Debian Isp Subject: Re: Webserver stats for customers On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:00:35PM +0200, Jaume Teixi wrote: > Wich one do you recomend for use with apache and separate stats for > each domain ? Analog for text stats that you can email to people, Webalyzer for pretty graphical stats that you can put up on the web. We use both. J. -- A fool and his money are SYSOP| Black Cat Networks Ltd material. | http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ | UK Web, domain and email hosting -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
