Re: Re[2]: LDAP + quotas

2001-07-31 Thread Russell Coker

On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:35, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
 On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:43:47AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
   Thanks for the reply.  This system could work.  But I think the real
   solution would be to devise a way to have system quotas read directly
   from LDAP.  Oh well.  C'est la vie.
 
  No way!  You want the kernel to issue something that results in an LDAP
  read on every file access?

 something like NSS for quota lookups would be nice, and to have a
 caching daemon (like nscd) to store the data for later lookups.

nscd is only ever called by user-land code such as login, su, ls, etc.  Quota 
is handled by the kernel.  Having the kernel call back to an application for 
this isn't what you want.  What happens if/when that application needs to 
create a file?

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/   Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Re[2]: LDAP + quotas

2001-07-31 Thread Sami Haahtinen

On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 02:52:55PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
  something like NSS for quota lookups would be nice, and to have a
  caching daemon (like nscd) to store the data for later lookups.
 
 nscd is only ever called by user-land code such as login, su, ls, etc.  Quota 
 is handled by the kernel.  Having the kernel call back to an application for 
 this isn't what you want.  What happens if/when that application needs to 
 create a file?

what i ment was something alike, a daemon that would monitor the
activity in quota related system calls and update the quota file by
itself..

i was not completely serious about the solution but it would be a nice
idea, i know that quotas can not rely on any daemon as such, but a
helper daemon would 'help' in many cases.

Sami

-- 
  - Sami Haahtinen -
  -[ Is it still a bug, if we have learned to live with it? ]-
- 2209 3C53 D0FB 041C F7B1  F908 A9B6 F730 B83D 761C -


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




LDAP + quotas

2001-07-31 Thread Jeff S Wheeler

To compare to a database concept, if the LDAP daemon had `triggers' and
could execute code that made quotactl(2) calls on the relavent filesystems,
on the relavent machines, when the quota values in the LDAP database changed
that would be effective.  To determine current usage the LDAP daemon would
also have to use quotactl(2) to query the VFS though, unless current usage
simply was not provided as part of your LDAP schema.

- jsw


-Original Message-
From: Sami Haahtinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: LDAP + quotas


On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 02:52:55PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
  something like NSS for quota lookups would be nice, and to have a
  caching daemon (like nscd) to store the data for later lookups.

 nscd is only ever called by user-land code such as login, su, ls, etc.
Quota
 is handled by the kernel.  Having the kernel call back to an application
for
 this isn't what you want.  What happens if/when that application needs to
 create a file?

what i ment was something alike, a daemon that would monitor the
activity in quota related system calls and update the quota file by
itself..

i was not completely serious about the solution but it would be a nice
idea, i know that quotas can not rely on any daemon as such, but a
helper daemon would 'help' in many cases.

Sami

--
  - Sami Haahtinen -
  -[ Is it still a bug, if we have learned to live with it? ]-
- 2209 3C53 D0FB 041C F7B1  F908 A9B6 F730 B83D 761C -


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Re[2]: LDAP + quotas

2001-07-28 Thread Sami Haahtinen

On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:43:47AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
  Thanks for the reply.  This system could work.  But I think the real
  solution would be to devise a way to have system quotas read directly from
  LDAP.  Oh well.  C'est la vie.
 
 No way!  You want the kernel to issue something that results in an LDAP read 
 on every file access?

something like NSS for quota lookups would be nice, and to have a
caching daemon (like nscd) to store the data for later lookups.

although it HAS TO HAVE an option to create a standard quota file on the
fly..

Sami

-- 
  - Sami Haahtinen -
  -[ Is it still a bug, if we have learned to live with it? ]-
- 2209 3C53 D0FB 041C F7B1  F908 A9B6 F730 B83D 761C -


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Re[2]: LDAP + quotas

2001-07-27 Thread Russell Coker

On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 21:04, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
  What I ideally want to be able to do is assign each virtual host a
  group, and set that quota of that group to whatever their max
  allowed disk space is (for instance, 50 MB), and then have their web
  folder and all user mailboxes in that group be restricted to that 50 MB
  limit.
 
  Anyone know if this is possible?  And if so, how to do it?

 RC I suggest using two unix groups, one for web and the other for mail.

 Any particular reason why? :)  I only suggested on group because I wanted
 the 50MB restriction imposed for mail + web combined.  And if I do two
 groups in LDAP, am I gonna notice any slow downs worth noting?  (I don't

No!  I suggested two groups because having separate limits for web and mail 
makes more sense to me.  But if you want a single limit that's your choice.

 RC Then store the quota in some suitable LDAP attribute (NB the standard
 RC schemas don't have a suitable attribute).

 Recommend anyone in particular?  RoomNumber might work :-P  Or do you have
 some sort of schema you use on your own?  I ended up using your services
 schema within my own OID since there isn't an official debian one yet :-P

I think that some type of quota attribute is needed.  I suggest that you hack 
one yourself in the short term.  Hopefully we'll have an official Debian 
schema that will satisfy your requirements before woody is released...

 RC Eventually I think I'll develop a debian package of scripts for doing
 this RC type of stuff, so if you write such a cron job then make sure you
 send me a RC copy.  ;)

 Sure can do.  How often do you figure such a cron job should run?  I mean,
 my quota values really don't change often.  Actually, once they're set,
 that's usually about it.  So, a cron job of once a day could maybe suffice,
 but if I'm creating a new virtual domain, and it doesn't have quotas til
 the end of the day, that might not be cool :-/

It's your decision.  For the type of things I do 30 minutes would be the 
largest amount of time that I'd want to wait.

 RC I've got user names much longer than 8 characters without any problems.
 RC After 31 characters the names can't be represented in utmp properly
 (which RC can cause some minor hassles for login accounts and will stuff
 up Portslave RC amoung other programs).  But there's no problems for other
 things.

 RC I've done tests with user-names around 60 characters long in LDAP and
 my RC (admittedly basic) tests worked fine.

 Hmm . . . and they appear in ls fine?  Maybe the period i'm using in the
 uid as user.domain.com is being interpretted as a group or something?

Not on 80 column displays!!!

 Thanks for the reply.  This system could work.  But I think the real
 solution would be to devise a way to have system quotas read directly from
 LDAP.  Oh well.  C'est la vie.

No way!  You want the kernel to issue something that results in an LDAP read 
on every file access?

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/   Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




LDAP + quotas

2001-07-25 Thread Kevin J. Menard, Jr.

Hey guys,

Well, I think this was talked about a little before in the past, but I
can't get the archive search to work.  So, if it was, sorry for asking
again.  If not, I'd like to see some nice responses :)

I'm trying to build a complete web hosting solution.  All accounts are
stored in LDAP.  I just set up NSS LDAP today figuring I might need that
(apt-get install libnss-ldap didn't give me the problems most people
building by source were having ;)).  All mailboxes are created in cyrus
imapd 2.0.15-HIERSEP, with lookups done through SASL through LDAP.  Now,
I know cyrus-imapd has a system for mailbox quotas, but I want a
system-wide policy.

What I ideally want to be able to do is assign each virtual host a
group, and set that quota of that group to whatever their max allowed
disk space is (for instance, 50 MB), and then have their web folder and
all user mailboxes in that group be restricted to that 50 MB limit.

Anyone know if this is possible?  And if so, how to do it?

Also, anyway to get ls to output the full username?  I think it
truncates at 8 characters by default, which is sort of a pain, since all
my uids are of the form user.domain.com.  I mean, it's not that bad,
because the users are restricted to their web folder, so only seeing the
first 8 characters is usually good enough, but ideally, the other way
would be best.  Or perhaps I have to roll my own with perl or something?

Thanks.

-- 
 Kevin


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]