Re: Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-23 Thread Jernej Horvat
Thursday 23 October 2003 06:12, Lauchlin Wilkinson >

> What are other people doing?

sticking to RFCs. O:-)

i would not lower it under 3daysjust in case the remote mail server brakes 
on weekend.

-- 
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown




Re: Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-23 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 15:12:55 +1100, Lauchlin Wilkinson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the 
> mail queue?  Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that 
> seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning 
> back to 30 minutes and the delivery failure back to 12 hours.  My logic 
> is that most people these days expect e-mail to be pretty instant so to 
> have mail sitting in a queue for 7 days and not getting a warning for 
> several hours seems a bit old fashioned.   So far 12 hours and 30 
> minutes seems to be working well.  What are other people doing?
> 

Just a note: I have noticed that sending warnings about messages waiting
in the queue causes problems with e.g. mailing lists - users get removed
from mailing lists by list manager programs which treat warnings as
errors.

-- 
 Tomasz Papszun   SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland  | And it's only
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/   | ones and zeros.




Re: Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-23 Thread Jernej Horvat
Thursday 23 October 2003 06:12, Lauchlin Wilkinson >

> What are other people doing?

sticking to RFCs. O:-)

i would not lower it under 3daysjust in case the remote mail server brakes 
on weekend.

-- 
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-23 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 15:12:55 +1100, Lauchlin Wilkinson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the 
> mail queue?  Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that 
> seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning 
> back to 30 minutes and the delivery failure back to 12 hours.  My logic 
> is that most people these days expect e-mail to be pretty instant so to 
> have mail sitting in a queue for 7 days and not getting a warning for 
> several hours seems a bit old fashioned.   So far 12 hours and 30 
> minutes seems to be working well.  What are other people doing?
> 

Just a note: I have noticed that sending warnings about messages waiting
in the queue causes problems with e.g. mailing lists - users get removed
from mailing lists by list manager programs which treat warnings as
errors.

-- 
 Tomasz Papszun   SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland  | And it's only
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/   | ones and zeros.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-22 Thread Lauchlin Wilkinson
Hi,
what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the 
mail queue?  Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that 
seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning 
back to 30 minutes and the delivery failure back to 12 hours.  My logic 
is that most people these days expect e-mail to be pretty instant so to 
have mail sitting in a queue for 7 days and not getting a warning for 
several hours seems a bit old fashioned.   So far 12 hours and 30 
minutes seems to be working well.  What are other people doing?

Cheers,
Lauchlin Wilkinson
Internet Tasmania Pty. Ltd.



Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-22 Thread Lauchlin Wilkinson
Hi,

what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the 
mail queue?  Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that 
seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning 
back to 30 minutes and the delivery failure back to 12 hours.  My logic 
is that most people these days expect e-mail to be pretty instant so to 
have mail sitting in a queue for 7 days and not getting a warning for 
several hours seems a bit old fashioned.   So far 12 hours and 30 
minutes seems to be working well.  What are other people doing?

Cheers,

Lauchlin Wilkinson
Internet Tasmania Pty. Ltd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]