Re: (Spamcop) [listadmin@jtsterlings.com: J.T. Sterlings DailySpecial

2002-03-26 Thread Emile van Bergen

Hi,

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Jason Lim wrote:

> As for abuse by USA spammers, its not easy for me to explain to you.
> I'm half Asian... one of my parents are Asian. I grew up in Asia. I
> spend half my time in Asia. And I can really say there are 2 things I
> can see. 1) software mainly written in english... yes, this is a real
> problem. Not for me... but I have seen my fellow workers and clients
> struggle with the terminology, etc. trying to understand english
> manuals. 2) Asian culture tends to be "permissive", as in you are
> allowed to do virtually anything you want unless you do something bad.

1) is indeed a real problem. I'd consider 2) actually a virtue. :)

> This is one very good reason why, in Asia, people talk more about the
> "spirit" of the law, rather than the actual law itself. In the long run,
> probably every country will end up being forced to have very convoluted
> and extremely large/long USA-style law detailing every little single
> possible occurance of anything.

Ha. We face the similar troubles here in Europe -- people here tend to
be wary of the claim culture with all it's associated legal nonsense.

> Asian people believe in giving "face", and that means not limiting or
> stepping on people's toes if at all possible. Thus many ISPs do not
> like to or want to force their clients to change mail settings, or cut
> them off if they run insecure mail servers.

But in your line of reasoning, if people tend to have a good feel for
the unwritten rules of society, and what it means to be a good member of
a community, then it shouldn't be hard for ISPs to get the message
across to their customers that running open relays just isn't good
Internet citizenship. In a polite way, without force.

> I sincerely doubt that Asian companies nor people like to or want to have
> their things abused by foreigners. Think about it... China VS USA... and
> you'll understand what I mean. Thus there is no malicious intent by
> Chinese sysadmins for leaving open relays, but there IS malicious intent
> by USA spammers to abuse Asia.

Of course these companies don't want that. I'm also not arguing it's
malicious intent, but it feels a bit like negligence to the Internet
community. Which is indeed strange considering that people in Asia as
far as I know tend to be careful NOT to neglect the needs of society / a
community as a whole.

On the other hand, I also doubt that the USA spammers actually have any
intents whatsoever for any open relay owner. They just take advantage of
him, without considering anything or anybody, as far as I can see.

Cheers,


Emile.

--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153|   http://www.e-advies.info


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: (Spamcop) [listadmin@jtsterlings.com: J.T. Sterlings DailySpecial

2002-03-25 Thread Emile van Bergen

Hi,

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Jason Lim wrote:

> Spamcop is the only spam prevention system we can use as a company,
> because many of those other blocklists include Asian mail servers (abused
> by USA spammers 99.999% of the time... but that is another issue).

But in 99.999% of those cases, the abuse by the USA spammer was only
possible because the Asian server was an open relay. There's *no* excuse
for that. Whatsoever.

I'm also against blocking whole netblocks, however seed.net.tw is one of
those ISPs that apparently keeps on selling new small blocks to the same
bunch of criminals without responding to any complaints.

Then what to do? Personally, I can get away by blocking all of Seednet,
I won't loose any business. But what would *you* advise in such a case?


Cheers,

Emile.

--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153|   http://www.e-advies.info


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]