Re: NETWORK ROUTES

2002-10-25 Thread Ángel Carrasco
My problem with the both of routers is that I cannot configure it. If I
would be able to configure, I would not have problems


- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Francois Dive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ángel Carrasco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ángel Carrasco"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian ISP List"

Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: NETWORK ROUTES


> 2 possibilities
>
> remove the from statement to match all traffic and so make the route
> to the outside available.
>
> Simply (and i bet this is the best solution), use a default route pointing
> to .240.241., and use 16.16.1 as default gateway on your office router..
>
> JeF
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:23:55PM +0200, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
> >  Ok:
> >
> >  My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1.
> >  My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1
> >  My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1
> >  My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242.
> >
> >  The public router is 213.250.143.241 (and only works with the range
> >  213.250.143.240/28)
> >  The office router is 172.16.16.254 (and only works with the range
> >  172.16.16.0/24)
> >
> >  The static default route is 172.16.16.254
> >
> >  This is my route -n
> >  Kernel IP routing table
> >  Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> >  Iface
> >  213.250.143.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00
> >  eth0 172.16.4.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
> >  0 eth1 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
> >   0 eth3 172.16.8.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
> >0 eth2 0.0.0.0 172.16.16.254   0.0.0.0 UG0  0
> > 0 eth3
> >
> >  And my dinamic route to using the public network is:
> >  ip rule add from 213.250.143.242 table publica
> >  ip route add from default via 213.250.143.241 dev eth0 table publica
> >  ip route flush cache
> >
> >
> >  And the problem is when I try to use 213.250.143.242 in my internals
> >  networks doesnt run because the information goes by 213.250.143.241 and
> > not
> >  in the normal routes.
> >
> > -Mensaje original-
> > De: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Enviado el: jueves, 24 de octubre de 2002 19:01
> > Para: Ángel Carrasco
> > CC: Debian ISP List
> > Asunto: Re: NETWORK ROUTES
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
> >
> > > All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first
card
> > in
> > > my internals networks
> > > doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals
networks, it
> > > goes by the big network.
> >
> > Show us your interface setup and your routes.
> >
> > ifconfig -a
> >
> > route
> >
> >
> >   Jeremy C. Reed
> > 
> >  BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
> >  http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
>
> -> Jean-Francois Dive
> --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>   There is no such thing as randomness.  Only order of infinite
>   complexity.  - _The Holographic Universe_, Michael Talbot
>




Re: NETWORK ROUTES

2002-10-24 Thread Ángel Carrasco
My problem with the both of routers is that I cannot configure it. If I
would be able to configure, I would not have problems


- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Francois Dive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ángel Carrasco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ángel Carrasco"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian ISP List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: NETWORK ROUTES


> 2 possibilities
>
> remove the from statement to match all traffic and so make the route
> to the outside available.
>
> Simply (and i bet this is the best solution), use a default route pointing
> to .240.241., and use 16.16.1 as default gateway on your office router..
>
> JeF
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:23:55PM +0200, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
> >  Ok:
> >
> >  My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1.
> >  My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1
> >  My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1
> >  My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242.
> >
> >  The public router is 213.250.143.241 (and only works with the range
> >  213.250.143.240/28)
> >  The office router is 172.16.16.254 (and only works with the range
> >  172.16.16.0/24)
> >
> >  The static default route is 172.16.16.254
> >
> >  This is my route -n
> >  Kernel IP routing table
> >  Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> >  Iface
> >  213.250.143.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00
> >  eth0 172.16.4.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
> >  0 eth1 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
> >   0 eth3 172.16.8.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
> >0 eth2 0.0.0.0 172.16.16.254   0.0.0.0 UG0  0
> > 0 eth3
> >
> >  And my dinamic route to using the public network is:
> >  ip rule add from 213.250.143.242 table publica
> >  ip route add from default via 213.250.143.241 dev eth0 table publica
> >  ip route flush cache
> >
> >
> >  And the problem is when I try to use 213.250.143.242 in my internals
> >  networks doesnt run because the information goes by 213.250.143.241 and
> > not
> >  in the normal routes.
> >
> > -Mensaje original-
> > De: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:reed@;wcug.wwu.edu]
> > Enviado el: jueves, 24 de octubre de 2002 19:01
> > Para: Ángel Carrasco
> > CC: Debian ISP List
> > Asunto: Re: NETWORK ROUTES
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
> >
> > > All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first
card
> > in
> > > my internals networks
> > > doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals
networks, it
> > > goes by the big network.
> >
> > Show us your interface setup and your routes.
> >
> > ifconfig -a
> >
> > route
> >
> >
> >   Jeremy C. Reed
> > 
> >  BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
> >  http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
>
> -> Jean-Francois Dive
> --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>   There is no such thing as randomness.  Only order of infinite
>   complexity.  - _The Holographic Universe_, Michael Talbot
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: NETWORK ROUTES

2002-10-24 Thread Jean-Francois Dive
2 possibilities

remove the from statement to match all traffic and so make the route
to the outside available.

Simply (and i bet this is the best solution), use a default route pointing
to .240.241., and use 16.16.1 as default gateway on your office router..

JeF
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:23:55PM +0200, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
>  Ok:
> 
>  My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1.
>  My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1
>  My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1
>  My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242.
> 
>  The public router is 213.250.143.241 (and only works with the range
>  213.250.143.240/28)
>  The office router is 172.16.16.254 (and only works with the range
>  172.16.16.0/24)
> 
>  The static default route is 172.16.16.254
> 
>  This is my route -n
>  Kernel IP routing table
>  Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
>  Iface
>  213.250.143.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00
>  eth0 172.16.4.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
>  0 eth1 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
>   0 eth3 172.16.8.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
>0 eth2 0.0.0.0 172.16.16.254   0.0.0.0 UG0  0
> 0 eth3
> 
>  And my dinamic route to using the public network is:
>  ip rule add from 213.250.143.242 table publica
>  ip route add from default via 213.250.143.241 dev eth0 table publica
>  ip route flush cache
> 
> 
>  And the problem is when I try to use 213.250.143.242 in my internals
>  networks doesnt run because the information goes by 213.250.143.241 and
> not
>  in the normal routes.
> 
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 24 de octubre de 2002 19:01
> Para: Ángel Carrasco
> CC: Debian ISP List
> Asunto: Re: NETWORK ROUTES
> 
> 
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
> 
> > All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first card
> in
> > my internals networks
> > doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals networks, it
> > goes by the big network.
> 
> Show us your interface setup and your routes.
> 
> ifconfig -a
> 
> route
> 
> 
>   Jeremy C. Reed
> 
>  BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
>  http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
> 
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

-> Jean-Francois Dive
--> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  There is no such thing as randomness.  Only order of infinite
  complexity.  - _The Holographic Universe_, Michael Talbot




Re: NETWORK ROUTES

2002-10-24 Thread Jean-Francois Dive
2 possibilities

remove the from statement to match all traffic and so make the route
to the outside available.

Simply (and i bet this is the best solution), use a default route pointing
to .240.241., and use 16.16.1 as default gateway on your office router..

JeF
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:23:55PM +0200, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
>  Ok:
> 
>  My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1.
>  My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1
>  My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1
>  My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242.
> 
>  The public router is 213.250.143.241 (and only works with the range
>  213.250.143.240/28)
>  The office router is 172.16.16.254 (and only works with the range
>  172.16.16.0/24)
> 
>  The static default route is 172.16.16.254
> 
>  This is my route -n
>  Kernel IP routing table
>  Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
>  Iface
>  213.250.143.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00
>  eth0 172.16.4.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
>  0 eth1 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
>   0 eth3 172.16.8.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
>0 eth2 0.0.0.0 172.16.16.254   0.0.0.0 UG0  0
> 0 eth3
> 
>  And my dinamic route to using the public network is:
>  ip rule add from 213.250.143.242 table publica
>  ip route add from default via 213.250.143.241 dev eth0 table publica
>  ip route flush cache
> 
> 
>  And the problem is when I try to use 213.250.143.242 in my internals
>  networks doesnt run because the information goes by 213.250.143.241 and
> not
>  in the normal routes.
> 
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:reed@;wcug.wwu.edu]
> Enviado el: jueves, 24 de octubre de 2002 19:01
> Para: Ángel Carrasco
> CC: Debian ISP List
> Asunto: Re: NETWORK ROUTES
> 
> 
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ángel Carrasco wrote:
> 
> > All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first card
> in
> > my internals networks
> > doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals networks, it
> > goes by the big network.
> 
> Show us your interface setup and your routes.
> 
> ifconfig -a
> 
> route
> 
> 
>   Jeremy C. Reed
> 
>  BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
>  http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
> 
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

-> Jean-Francois Dive
--> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  There is no such thing as randomness.  Only order of infinite
  complexity.  - _The Holographic Universe_, Michael Talbot


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: NETWORK ROUTES

2002-10-24 Thread Ángel Carrasco
 Ok:

 My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1.
 My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1
 My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1
 My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242.

 The public router is 213.250.143.241 (and only works with the range
 213.250.143.240/28)
 The office router is 172.16.16.254 (and only works with the range
 172.16.16.0/24)

 The static default route is 172.16.16.254

 This is my route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
 Iface
 213.250.143.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00
 eth0 172.16.4.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
 0 eth1 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
  0 eth3 172.16.8.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
   0 eth2 0.0.0.0 172.16.16.254   0.0.0.0 UG0  0
0 eth3

 And my dinamic route to using the public network is:
 ip rule add from 213.250.143.242 table publica
 ip route add from default via 213.250.143.241 dev eth0 table publica
 ip route flush cache


 And the problem is when I try to use 213.250.143.242 in my internals
 networks doesnt run because the information goes by 213.250.143.241 and
not
 in the normal routes.

-Mensaje original-
De: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: jueves, 24 de octubre de 2002 19:01
Para: Ángel Carrasco
CC: Debian ISP List
Asunto: Re: NETWORK ROUTES


On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ángel Carrasco wrote:

> All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first card
in
> my internals networks
> doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals networks, it
> goes by the big network.

Show us your interface setup and your routes.

ifconfig -a

route


  Jeremy C. Reed

 BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
 http://bsd.reedmedia.net/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: NETWORK ROUTES

2002-10-24 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ángel Carrasco wrote:

> All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first card in
> my internals networks
> doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals networks, it
> goes by the big network.

Show us your interface setup and your routes.

ifconfig -a

route


  Jeremy C. Reed

 BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
 http://bsd.reedmedia.net/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: NETWORK ROUTES

2002-10-24 Thread Ángel Carrasco
 Ok:

 My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1.
 My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1
 My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1
 My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242.

 The public router is 213.250.143.241 (and only works with the range
 213.250.143.240/28)
 The office router is 172.16.16.254 (and only works with the range
 172.16.16.0/24)

 The static default route is 172.16.16.254

 This is my route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
 Iface
 213.250.143.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0  00
 eth0 172.16.4.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
 0 eth1 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
  0 eth3 172.16.8.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
   0 eth2 0.0.0.0 172.16.16.254   0.0.0.0 UG0  0
0 eth3

 And my dinamic route to using the public network is:
 ip rule add from 213.250.143.242 table publica
 ip route add from default via 213.250.143.241 dev eth0 table publica
 ip route flush cache


 And the problem is when I try to use 213.250.143.242 in my internals
 networks doesnt run because the information goes by 213.250.143.241 and
not
 in the normal routes.

-Mensaje original-
De: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:reed@;wcug.wwu.edu]
Enviado el: jueves, 24 de octubre de 2002 19:01
Para: Ángel Carrasco
CC: Debian ISP List
Asunto: Re: NETWORK ROUTES


On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ángel Carrasco wrote:

> All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first card
in
> my internals networks
> doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals networks, it
> goes by the big network.

Show us your interface setup and your routes.

ifconfig -a

route


  Jeremy C. Reed

 BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
 http://bsd.reedmedia.net/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: NETWORK ROUTES

2002-10-24 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ángel Carrasco wrote:

> All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first card in
> my internals networks
> doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals networks, it
> goes by the big network.

Show us your interface setup and your routes.

ifconfig -a

route


  Jeremy C. Reed

 BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
 http://bsd.reedmedia.net/