Re: Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users
also sprach Ben Vinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.05.1018 +0200]: How can I get a Postfix/Spamassassin server to also scan mails that it is relaying (transporting) to other mail servers? At the moment it is only scanning mails for local users. use amavisd-new or spampd. The latter seems to be better than amavisd-new. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users
--Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:36:33 +0200 martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]: use amavisd-new or spampd. The latter seems to be better than amavisd-new. What does better mean? Faster? More flexible? Easier to use/extend? Just curious. Cheers, Marcel pgpxHxlg5OIQM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users
also sprach Marcel Hicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.05.1123 +0200]: What does better mean? Faster? More flexible? Easier to use/extend? Just curious. Having talked to Sven Mueller about this, he said that one reason why I prefer spampd over amavisd-new is the better header tagging spampd provides. Amavisd-new is still used, but only for virus scanning. I am not sure what he means, nor have I tried spampd. However, if you do, I am sure many here would be interested to hear your impressions. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users
--Tuesday, October 05, 2004 14:02:17 +0200 martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]: also sprach Marcel Hicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.05.1123 +0200]: What does better mean? Faster? More flexible? Easier to use/extend? Just curious. Having talked to Sven Mueller about this, he said that one reason why I prefer spampd over amavisd-new is the better header tagging spampd provides. Amavisd-new is still used, but only for virus scanning. I am not sure what he means, nor have I tried spampd. However, if you do, I am sure many here would be interested to hear your impressions. Although we are constantly tuning our mail systems this would somewhat introduce a major change and requires proper planing of a test suite etc. Currently schedule is tight (has it ever been relaxed? ;-) but when we get to it I'll be happry to report some results. Cheers, Marcel pgpLiKjJflSIb.pgp Description: PGP signature
