Re: ingress shaping?

2003-11-04 Thread R.M. Evers
hi clement  luca, thanks for your responses.

i did include ingress shaping as a module, and it's automagically loaded
when i try to use it.

as luca said, the LARTC-howto states we can only 'shape data we
transmit', but it was my believe that ingress shaping was there to solve
this shortcoming simply just by dropping packets. i've read about
working configs on the web (mainly for use with syn-flood protection),
though none in a bridge-config. maybe my understanding of ingress is way
off.. :-)

regards,
-rodi.


On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 19:21, Clement Hermann wrote:
 R.M. Evers wrote:
 
 hi everyone,
 
 thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
 get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
 newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
 now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get it to
 work: nothing gets shaped. it seems as if the ingress qdisc just isn't
 there.. 
 
 snip...
 
 did you include ingress qdisc support in the kernel ? it's not enabled 
 by default. And if you did configure it as a module, did you insert the 
 module in the kernel ? (modprobe sch_ingress I guess)
 
 -- 
 Clément nodens Hermann


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ingress shaping?

2003-11-04 Thread R.M. Evers
hi clement  luca, thanks for your responses.

i did include ingress shaping as a module, and it's automagically loaded
when i try to use it.

as luca said, the LARTC-howto states we can only 'shape data we
transmit', but it was my believe that ingress shaping was there to solve
this shortcoming simply just by dropping packets. i've read about
working configs on the web (mainly for use with syn-flood protection),
though none in a bridge-config. maybe my understanding of ingress is way
off.. :-)

regards,
-rodi.


On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 19:21, Clement Hermann wrote:
 R.M. Evers wrote:
 
 hi everyone,
 
 thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
 get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
 newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
 now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get it to
 work: nothing gets shaped. it seems as if the ingress qdisc just isn't
 there.. 
 
 snip...
 
 did you include ingress qdisc support in the kernel ? it's not enabled 
 by default. And if you did configure it as a module, did you insert the 
 module in the kernel ? (modprobe sch_ingress I guess)
 
 -- 
 Clément nodens Hermann




Re: ingress shaping?

2003-11-03 Thread Clement Hermann
R.M. Evers wrote:

hi everyone,

thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get it to
work: nothing gets shaped. it seems as if the ingress qdisc just isn't
there.. 

snip...

did you include ingress qdisc support in the kernel ? it's not enabled 
by default. And if you did configure it as a module, did you insert the 
module in the kernel ? (modprobe sch_ingress I guess)

--
Clément nodens Hermann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ingress shaping?

2003-11-03 Thread Clement Hermann
R.M. Evers wrote:
hi everyone,
thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get it to
work: nothing gets shaped. it seems as if the ingress qdisc just isn't
there.. 

snip...
did you include ingress qdisc support in the kernel ? it's not enabled 
by default. And if you did configure it as a module, did you insert the 
module in the kernel ? (modprobe sch_ingress I guess)

--
Clément nodens Hermann