Re: mailserver solutions
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The problem is that there are not much users per domain but a lot of >domains. I think this version is only suitable if you have to handle 1000 >or more Acconts for only one domain. And especially with only one >administrator. > >I think the Communigate Pro is exactly what I need. It's a solution of >stalker (www.stalker.com). I didn't found a comparable product yet, does >anybody know ? There is a Dutch ISP service called "24 Hours Net" which is a free ISP (in Europe local phone calls are time charged and the ISP receives a portion of the phone call costs which covers all costs of running the ISP). It is aimed at business customers and gives each customer 1 free .nl domain. It is all based around the Netscape mail, web, and SMTP servers. It supports web based administration etc and works reasonably well. My personal estimation is that the current setup is likely to experience performance problems when it exceeds 10,000 domains, and will certainly have problems with 30,000 domains. But there is plenty of time to upgrade and/or reconfigure before then. I believe that the entire range of software employed on 24hoursnet servers is available for Linux. Russell Coker Disclaimer: I am not representing 24hoursnet or Versatel in this message. I am merely providing technical information that I believe may be of interest to people here.
Re: mailserver solutions
Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Web-based administration is silly, IMHO. Sure, folks have good > uses for it, I don't. Though that is what they asked for. >From the admin point of view, yes. But from the client point of view, NO. My clients are very happy beacause they can manage themselves their pop accounts, forwards, etc. -- Francois Deppierraz student http://www.ctrlaltdel.ch ICQ: 176 770 09
Re: mailserver solutions
> Web-based administration is silly, IMHO. Sure, folks have good > uses for it, I don't. Though that is what they asked for. Sure, I don't think that Web-based administration is the best solution, but if you have to handle a few customers want to create or delete their account for their domain themselfs and this over a comfortable WebInterface ... I haven't found a better solution yet. > Far easier is to have a database backend for it, then use a > web-based thingy (if you have to) to update the DB with users. The problem is that there are not much users per domain but a lot of domains. I think this version is only suitable if you have to handle 1000 or more Acconts for only one domain. And especially with only one administrator. I think the Communigate Pro is exactly what I need. It's a solution of stalker (www.stalker.com). I didn't found a comparable product yet, does anybody know ? > > > ... and for the per web administration ? > > > > > > I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine. > > > > ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and > > the vpopmail package has been flawless. Is there also a web administration availible for exim ? kind regards, achim hendriks mediagenic services
Re: mailserver solutions
Web-based administration is silly, IMHO. Sure, folks have good uses for it, I don't. Though that is what they asked for. Far easier is to have a database backend for it, then use a web-based thingy (if you have to) to update the DB with users. B.C.J.O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12 Apr 2000, Francois Deppierraz wrote: > > > Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Postfix+Courier+IMP. > > > > ... and for the per web administration ? > > > > I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine. > > ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and > the vpopmail package has been flawless. > > Brian > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ |Aaron Dewell ===>[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |http://www.woods.net/~acd http://www.woods.net/ | |PGP keyid 0x0D12A6B9 available from http://keys.pgp.com/ | ~~~
Re: mailserver solutions
On 12 Apr 2000, Francois Deppierraz wrote: > Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Postfix+Courier+IMP. > > ... and for the per web administration ? > > I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine. ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and the vpopmail package has been flawless. Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] How often I found where I should be going only by setting out for somewhere else.. -- R. Buckminster Fuller
Re: mailserver solutions
Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Postfix+Courier+IMP. ... and for the per web administration ? I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine. -- Francois Deppierraz student http://www.ctrlaltdel.ch ICQ: 176 770 09
Re: mailserver solutions
Postfix+Courier+IMP. [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > does anybody know about some great mailserver solutions for ISP use. Some > features it has to know is VirtualHost support, a WebMail interface, > administration per web, etc. > > kind regards, > achim hendriks > mediagenic services ___ |Aaron Dewell ===>[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |http://www.woods.net/~acd http://www.woods.net/ | |PGP keyid 0x0D12A6B9 available from http://keys.pgp.com/ | ~~~