Re: Returned mail: User unknown (fwd)

2000-06-07 Thread Larry Morrow
If you are trying to run FULL DUPLEX 100BaseT make sure of your cables
and switch port settings.  Also I am not sure the CISCO router will run
FULL Duplex.

Larry

At 12:14 PM 6/7/00 -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
>Return-Path: 
>Received: from localhost (localhost)
>   by announce.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with internal id MAB25116;
>   Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400
>Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
>   boundary="MAB25116.960394461/announce.com"
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>
>The original message was received at Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400
>from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>   - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
>debian-isp.lists.debian.org
>
>   - Transcript of session follows -
>550 debian-isp.lists.debian.org... User unknown
>Reporting-MTA: dns; announce.com
>Arrival-Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400
>
>Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Action: failed
>Status: 5.1.1
>Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400
>Return-Path: 
>Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>   by announce.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA25116
>   for debian-isp.lists.debian.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400
>From: Allen Ahoffman 
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: icmp losses
>To: debian-isp.lists.debian.org
>Date: Wed, 7 Jun 100 12:14:21 -0400 (EDT)
>X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>question:
>we have a cisco 7206, and a Samsung 10/100 managed switch.
>the 7026 has a fastethernet 100MBPS port.
>we are seeing losses of 1 to 8% when pinging the router.
>I can't find errors in the router configs, its set to full duplex 100mbps.
>the switch  however doesn't show a full duplex light,
>shoudl I change the switch port and tell it to be full duplex?
>I can ping cleanly thru the switch from host to host but host to router.
>If I move the port for the router the losses follow
>we see input errors and crc errors on the fastethernet0/0 port.
>some giants also.
>
>




Returned mail: User unknown (fwd)

2000-06-07 Thread Allen Ahoffman
--- Begin Message ---
The original message was received at Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400
from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
debian-isp.lists.debian.org

   - Transcript of session follows -
550 debian-isp.lists.debian.org... User unknown
Reporting-MTA: dns; announce.com
Arrival-Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400

Final-Recipient: RFC822; debian-isp.lists.debian.org@announce.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:14:21 -0400
--- Begin Message ---
question:
we have a cisco 7206, and a Samsung 10/100 managed switch.
the 7026 has a fastethernet 100MBPS port.
we are seeing losses of 1 to 8% when pinging the router.
I can't find errors in the router configs, its set to full duplex 100mbps.
the switch  however doesn't show a full duplex light,
shoudl I change the switch port and tell it to be full duplex?
I can ping cleanly thru the switch from host to host but host to router.
If I move the port for the router the losses follow
we see input errors and crc errors on the fastethernet0/0 port.
some giants also.

--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---