Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-14 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that there are not much users per domain but a lot of
domains. I think this version is only suitable if you have to handle 1000
or more Acconts for only one domain. And especially with only one
administrator.

I think the Communigate Pro is exactly what I need. It's a solution of
stalker (www.stalker.com). I didn't found a comparable product yet, does
anybody know ?

There is a Dutch ISP service called 24 Hours Net which is a free ISP (in
Europe local phone calls are time charged and the ISP receives a portion of
the phone call costs which covers all costs of running the ISP).  It is aimed
at business customers and gives each customer 1 free .nl domain.  It is all
based around the Netscape mail, web, and SMTP servers.  It supports web based
administration etc and works reasonably well.

My personal estimation is that the current setup is likely to experience
performance problems when it exceeds 10,000 domains, and will certainly have
problems with 30,000 domains.  But there is plenty of time to upgrade and/or
reconfigure before then.

I believe that the entire range of software employed on 24hoursnet servers is
available for Linux.


Russell Coker

Disclaimer:  I am not representing 24hoursnet or Versatel in this message.  I
am merely providing technical information that I believe may be of interest
to people here.



more mailserver solutions

2000-04-14 Thread Allen Ahoffman
look at atdot.org also



Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-13 Thread Aaron Dewell

Web-based administration is silly, IMHO.  Sure, folks have good
uses for it, I don't.  Though that is what they asked for.

Far easier is to have a database backend for it, then use a
web-based thingy (if you have to) to update the DB with users.  

B.C.J.O [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 12 Apr 2000, Francois Deppierraz wrote:
  
   Aaron Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
Postfix+Courier+IMP.
   
   ... and for the per web administration ?
   
   I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine.
  
  ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and
  the vpopmail package has been flawless.
  
  Brian
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
|Aaron Dewell   ===[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|http://www.woods.net/~acd  http://www.woods.net/ |
|PGP keyid 0x0D12A6B9 available from http://keys.pgp.com/ |
~~~



Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-13 Thread hendriks

 Web-based administration is silly, IMHO.  Sure, folks have good
 uses for it, I don't.  Though that is what they asked for.

Sure, I don't think that Web-based administration is the best solution,
but if you have to handle a few customers want to create or delete their
account for their domain themselfs and this over a comfortable
WebInterface ... I haven't found a better solution yet.

 Far easier is to have a database backend for it, then use a
 web-based thingy (if you have to) to update the DB with users.  

The problem is that there are not much users per domain but a lot of
domains. I think this version is only suitable if you have to handle 1000
or more Acconts for only one domain. And especially with only one
administrator.

I think the Communigate Pro is exactly what I need. It's a solution of
stalker (www.stalker.com). I didn't found a comparable product yet, does
anybody know ?

... and for the per web administration ?

I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine.
   
   ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and
   the vpopmail package has been flawless.
Is there also a web administration availible for exim ?


kind regards,
achim hendriks
mediagenic services



Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-13 Thread Francois Deppierraz
Aaron Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Web-based administration is silly, IMHO.  Sure, folks have good
 uses for it, I don't.  Though that is what they asked for.

From the admin point of view, yes. But from the client point of view,
NO.

My clients are very happy beacause they can manage themselves their pop
accounts, forwards, etc.

-- 

Francois Deppierraz  student
http://www.ctrlaltdel.ch
ICQ: 176 770 09



mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread hendriks

Hi,

does anybody know about some great mailserver solutions for ISP use. Some
features it has to know is VirtualHost support, a WebMail interface,
administration per web, etc.

kind regards,
achim hendriks
mediagenic services






Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread Aaron Dewell

Postfix+Courier+IMP.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
  
  does anybody know about some great mailserver solutions for ISP use. Some
  features it has to know is VirtualHost support, a WebMail interface,
  administration per web, etc.
  
  kind regards,
  achim hendriks
  mediagenic services

___
|Aaron Dewell   ===[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|http://www.woods.net/~acd  http://www.woods.net/ |
|PGP keyid 0x0D12A6B9 available from http://keys.pgp.com/ |
~~~



Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread Francois Deppierraz
Aaron Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Postfix+Courier+IMP.

... and for the per web administration ?

I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine.

-- 

Francois Deppierraz  student
http://www.ctrlaltdel.ch
ICQ: 176 770 09



Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread B.C.J.O
On 12 Apr 2000, Francois Deppierraz wrote:

 Aaron Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Postfix+Courier+IMP.
 
 ... and for the per web administration ?
 
 I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine.

ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and
the vpopmail package has been flawless.

Brian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

How often I found where I should be going only by setting out for
somewhere else..
   -- R. Buckminster Fuller