Re: Someone working on ws-jaxme?
Hi Eric, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > > for jibx packaging (well, actually, xsd2jibx), I would need ws-jaxme as a > dependency (I'm currently using the jar jaxme-js-0.3, which is part of the > jibx sources). > I vaguely remember that someone said, he would work on jaxme. Is this > still correct? If yes, what would be the timeline? If not, I could package > it... Its already package and will be uploaded to the archive soon. For now: http://www.home.uos.de/wbaer/downloads/ForUpload/ PS: 0.5.1 has not the freemind issue fixed. Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone working on ws-jaxme?
Hi, for jibx packaging (well, actually, xsd2jibx), I would need ws-jaxme as a dependency (I'm currently using the jar jaxme-js-0.3, which is part of the jibx sources). I vaguely remember that someone said, he would work on jaxme. Is this still correct? If yes, what would be the timeline? If not, I could package it... Thanks, Eric -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
Mladen Adamovic writes: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > > > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 > > > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely > > > useless. Shame on them. > > > > Excuse me while I go behind the outhouse and shoot myself. > > > I hope you are kidding about that shooting! > Don't find me wrong, I really appreciate all effort (your guys from) > Red Hat and others are giving in gcj. > > I see that there are few Red Hat employees working full time for gcj and > there are more people also, and hopefully gcj > one day will be as stable as Sun's Java and I really think it would make > big positive influence on Linux and big negative influence on Vista. I > really believe that gcj could be really really important. It could break > MS domination on the market. > > But sometimes gcj used to make bad impressions and I think that Red Hat > should avoid making those bad impressions, when possible. So do I. I regret the fact that you had a bad experience. > I will see what Fedora 5 have to offer this week (waiting to FTP final > release) and take better look inside new gcj. Thank you for displaying a slightly more reasonable attitude this time around. We make the best decisions we can, based on the information that we have. I cannot guarantee that we will always make the same decisions that you would have made, but, despite whatever you may think, we do test things and we are not cavalier about stability. If we believed that Eclipse was as unstable as you say it was, we would not have included it. > > > http://www.froola.com > > > > "The site is temporary down. We are sorry about this inconvenience." :-) > > > > > :) Nobody is perfect. No kidding. Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
Andrew Haley wrote: > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely > useless. Shame on them. Excuse me while I go behind the outhouse and shoot myself. I hope you are kidding about that shooting! Don't find me wrong, I really appreciate all effort (your guys from) Red Hat and others are giving in gcj. I see that there are few Red Hat employees working full time for gcj and there are more people also, and hopefully gcj one day will be as stable as Sun's Java and I really think it would make big positive influence on Linux and big negative influence on Vista. I really believe that gcj could be really really important. It could break MS domination on the market. But sometimes gcj used to make bad impressions and I think that Red Hat should avoid making those bad impressions, when possible. I will see what Fedora 5 have to offer this week (waiting to FTP final release) and take better look inside new gcj. > http://www.froola.com "The site is temporary down. We are sorry about this inconvenience." :-) :) Nobody is perfect. -- Mladen Adamovic http://home.blic.net/adamm http://www.shortopedia.com http://www.froola.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
Mladen Adamovic writes: > robin putters wrote: > > How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, > > while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely > useless. Shame on them. Excuse me while I go behind the outhouse and shoot myself. > Mladen Adamovic > http://home.blic.net/adamm > http://www.shortopedia.com > http://www.froola.com "The site is temporary down. We are sorry about this inconvenience." :-) Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
robin putters wrote: How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely useless. Shame on them. -- Mladen Adamovic http://home.blic.net/adamm http://www.shortopedia.com http://www.froola.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Re: struked with logic:iterate
Hi, "Mohan Raj Varadharajan, ISDC Chennai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I have a row with text box and a add(submit) button. when a user clicks that > button a row has to be added. i tried with but couldn't.can u > suggest me. below is my coding which includes jsp,action, form and bean. If you want to display all persons, you sould use some kind of table. I think the displaytag taglib is very usefull therefor. http://displaytag.sf.net I'm working on an struts webapp for usermanagement. Displaying users works ;-). You can find the sourcecode in the cvs repository. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/aoc/ Jan-David Salchow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#350399: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
[Robin Putters] > How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to > experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? Does it only work with gij? What about the latest classpath release and jamvm or cocoa? If it work with those, it can to into unstable directly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JBoss Packages?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:57:59AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > Guido Guenther wrote: > > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 07:30:20PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > > > >>For a) It would be helpful if you could provide a list of the needed > >>3rd party jars. Then if someone finds time could package one without > >>having to look through the jboss stuff. I would like to see a wiki > >>page for dependencies of the interested packages (not only for jboss > >>but also for other programs) > > > > Which Wiki would be appropriate? > > http://wiki.debian.org/Java/ > > I would say open a new page under "Free J. Coordination" like > JBossPackaging or something like that. I added the thridparty jars with homepage and version, I'd be glad if someone could help with the columns "debian package" and "debian version". Cheers, -- Guido signature.asc Description: Digital signature
