ITP TagSoup - library or application.
Hi, I am attempting to package[1] TagSoup[2] and have a question. TagSoup is primarily a library JAR, but it _does_ have a main method and can be used as a standalone program. My question is: should I package it as a library Jar, or as a library Jar + application? a) From the author's documentation, I think the "normal" case is to use the Jar as a library from within another program; running it directly as a command seems to be a less-important use. b) The author's documentation describes starting it as a program by using "java -jar tagsoup.jar". c) The author has supplied a tagsoup(1) manpage, but again this uses the "java -jar" syntax. All of this suggests to me that I should simply install the Jar, and not create a "/usr/bin/tagsoup" script; is this right? Thanks, Paul [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359170 [2] http://home.ccil.org/~cowan/XML/tagsoup/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#227587: plan leave
5157843 5215107 530181 4 4471107 2403813 5 8 0 363 68 4 0 7 2 7 0 06 2 0 2 7 1 6 5 4 1 648864 8 0 8 3 0276881 6 6 5 7 0 728363214 8 2 0 4 5 4 3 4 7 6 2 544 5 3 1 2 6 8082340 76 6 7 870 4076280 6521781 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#227594: XP Intel MacBook
4343865 7260833 380123 2 6424871 1583807 7 0 4 128 51 6 0 0 0 4 1 60 7 0 4 4 6 2 1 2 3 601238 7 6 3 8 1847832 4 5 2 8 3 656353322 5 0 8 6 0 1 4 1 0 3 4 331 7 3 2 1 8 8362007 07 6 4 820 3127256 834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AngelCriss Angel
4520856 6202456 771486 8 5056058 3117583 5 0 4 004 03 0 0 7 4 5 4 30 5 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 625237 8 8 6 2 1333247 8 6 8 0 6 418552585 4 6 5 4 7 6 6 0 0 1 5 884 0 6 0 6 7 7705255 21 1 2 117 3156465 2277330 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RFC-DRAFT] Debian-Java point of view about JDK under the GPL
Matthias Klose writes: > Arnaud Vandyck writes: > > Hi debian-java team, > > > > I'd like us to write a common position statement about the jdk under > > the gpl. I think these points should be mentioned: > > > > o This is really a good thing for us because it is now really the GPL > > (+Classpath exception), not a MPL like license; > > > > o Sun worked hard to have the jdk in Debian for some time now. (My > > POV: not the right way, but they did it, thanks ;-)); > > > > o Let be patient. There is still a lot of work for everything to be > > integrated; > > o Debian currently supports java compatible infrastructure on more > archs than the sun jdk supports. I would like to pick up the ideas > from the Oldenburg meeting last year for arch dependent packages > default-jre and default-jdk. Yeah. It would be nice to try to figure out where Java run-times for the various architectures are going to come from. What architectures do you support with the Sun JRE? Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
