Re: Bug #449176: azureus: Downloads very slowly with GIJ

2007-11-22 Thread Shaun Jackman
On Nov 22, 2007 3:57 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice to find out what the problem really is, but I can't
> think of a way to find out.  At least, a way that doesn't involve
> punching a hole in my firewall and allowing God Only Knows what
> peer-to-peer traffic through.

Hehe. If you can bring yourself to punch that hole in your firewall, I
consider pushing bits an Ubuntu or ISO of your choice around the globe
to be a effective and humanitarian test case.

Cheers,
Shaun


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug #449176: azureus: Downloads very slowly with GIJ

2007-11-22 Thread Andrew Haley
Anthony Green writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > OK, so you're not picking up the precompiled classes for some reason.
 > > Not good, but the fact that the CPU is only at 5% indicates that isn't
 > > the core problem.
 > >
 > >   
 > 
 > I believe that the problem lies in our NIO implementation.  I don't know 
 > exactly what the problem is.  It has been discussed a few times on some 
 > of our mailing lists (GNU Classpath, [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 > 
 > FWIW, there have been many bug reports against azureus in Fedora about 
 > this.  Now that we have IcedTea I've closed all of these bug reports 
 > just asking people to not use gcj.  IcedTea runs azureus just fine.

It would be nice to find out what the problem really is, but I can't
think of a way to find out.  At least, a way that doesn't involve
punching a hole in my firewall and allowing God Only Knows what
peer-to-peer traffic through.

Andrew.

-- 
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 
1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]