java-common 0.32 MIGRATED to testing

2009-07-01 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the java-common source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.31
  Current version:  0.32

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: libswt and eclipse

2009-07-01 Thread Adrian Perez
Sorry about not posting earlier. 
I got contact with sjackman and he is willing to review/sponsor the
package I've finished already, so I'm working on it. 
Anyway, since I've uploaded the package to debian-mentors and since
every comment is welcome, I could use as many reviews as I can get ;). 

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swt-gtk

-- 
Best regards, 

Adrian Perez 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: openjdk-6 6b14-4 built but not uploaded

2009-07-01 Thread Andrew Haley
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Luk Claes schrieb:
>> Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> According to the buildd logs the openjdk-6 6b14-4 build for mipsel did 
>>> finish on
>>> Jun 20, but was not uploaded until now.  Is there any interest within the 
>>> mips
>>> porters on openjdk-6 on mips*, or should we just remove it from the archive 
>>> and
>>> drop openjdk support on mips?
>> Scheduled for upload now. Do you think the failure on hppa was temporary
>> or is there a bug to be filed?
> 
> thanks! No, it needs porting work (the implementation makes the assumption 
> that
> the stack always grows downwards; unknown if there are other issues). Andrew
> Haley did look at it. For now nobody was interested in working on the port.

That's right.  It may be that the memory allocation is actually the only
problem, and everything else will work just fine, but PA-RISC is, as far as
I'm aware, only for legacy systems now.

Andrew.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: openjdk-6 6b14-4 built but not uploaded

2009-07-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Luk Claes schrieb:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>> According to the buildd logs the openjdk-6 6b14-4 build for mipsel did 
>> finish on
>> Jun 20, but was not uploaded until now.  Is there any interest within the 
>> mips
>> porters on openjdk-6 on mips*, or should we just remove it from the archive 
>> and
>> drop openjdk support on mips?
> 
> Scheduled for upload now. Do you think the failure on hppa was temporary
> or is there a bug to be filed?

thanks! No, it needs porting work (the implementation makes the assumption that
the stack always grows downwards; unknown if there are other issues). Andrew
Haley did look at it. For now nobody was interested in working on the port.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org