Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3 [RC]
"W. van den Akker" writes: > > > I hope to finish it this weekend so it can be uploaded to > unstable. > > > Just have to look for a sponsor to do so. I have also contact > with Felix Natter, he is > > > advising me and > > > I am working on his last suggestions. > > > > Unfortunately I think there is quite a bit to do, among others to > use > > 'gbp import-orig' to put the source in the git repo, see my mail > > (again, tell me if you need help with this). > > > > Yes already done that. > > You haven't done this ;-) > > If you dont see it wont mean it isnt there ;) > It is not yet uploaded to the git. Ah, couldn't anticipate that ;-) [1] [1] especially since you wrote: "[...] tips from Felix for further enhancement of the package. But not necessary to hold an upload." Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hacv1tmr@bitburger.home.felix
Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3 [RC] - [UPLOADED]
On 10/05/2013 08:40 AM, tony mancill wrote: > Concerns with moving forward with an upload of Markus's fixes? Uploaded and tagged after a private email ACK from Willem. tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: javax.persistence/2.1.0.v201304241213-1 - [UPLOADED]
On 10/05/2013 03:38 AM, Andrew Ross wrote: > > Hi Emmanuel, > > Thanks for the review. The maintenance was an oversight, which I've now > fixed. I've also added the debug flag to the javac task. I like your > suggested package naming, so I've renamed the source package to > eclipselink-jpa-2.1-spec and the binary to libjpa-2.1-spec-java. > > The git repository is now at: > > Vcs-Browser: > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/eclipselink-jpa-2.1-spec.git > Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/eclipselink-jpa-2.1-spec.git > > Once Geronimo releases a 2.1 spec then we can probably swap to that I guess. Uploaded and tagged. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3 [RC]
On 10/05/2013 04:12 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi Willem, > > On 04.10.2013 23:45, W. van den Akker wrote: > [...] >> Yes I am almost finishing rc5 also. I must make some last changes before >> it can be uploaded. >> I hope to finish it this weekend so it can be uploaded to unstable. >> Just have to look for a sponsor to do so. I have also contact with Felix >> Natter, he is advising me and >> I am working on his last suggestions. >> I am sure want to join the Java Team, although Java isn't my first >> programming language ;) > > I've had some good experiences with debian-java and if you are looking > for advice or a sponsor it surely is a good place to start. > > I don't know what kind of difficulties you are facing with the latest > upstream version at the moment but you might also want to consider to > upload just a fix for #713144 et al. In fact Freemind is currently > pretty broken due to the changes of libjgoodies-forms-java 1.6 and this > upload would quickly resolve the most pressing issues. > > After that you can continue to work on further improving Freemind 1.0. I like the course of action that Markus proposes - that we go ahead and upload the fixed 0.9.0 package to address the FTBFS issues and the ticking clock for freemind's removal of testing. Concerns with moving forward with an upload of Markus's fixes? Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3 [RC]
"W. van den Akker" writes: hello Willem, > On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 11:16 +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > > "W. van den Akker" writes: > > > On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > > On 04.10.2013 19:07, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > > > I haven't seen any progress on this since we talked about > freemind on > > > IRC several weeks ago, so I thought a limited fix for the most > urgent > > > issues would be OK. > > > > Whoops, obviously you had already uploaded a new package to mentors. > > Sorry, I completely missed it. Since you have packaged the latest > > upstream release, I think it might make more sense to upload this > > package to unstable. Interested in joining the Java Team? What do > you think? > > > > Regards, > > > > Markus > > > > Hi Markus, > > > > Yes I am almost finishing rc5 also. I must make some last changes > before it can be > > uploaded. > > hi Willem, > > Andrew Harvey and I are almost finished with the jmapviewer package > (http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-osm/jmapviewer.git). > I fixed all lintians and it works fine with Freeplane. > => You should try whether jmapviewer-1.0+dfsg1-1 works (builds+runs) > with FreeMind too, and I think you can already use it in your package. > > Ok, will give it a try :) Good. > > I hope to finish it this weekend so it can be uploaded to unstable. > > Just have to look for a sponsor to do so. I have also contact with > Felix Natter, he is > > advising me and > > I am working on his last suggestions. > > Unfortunately I think there is quite a bit to do, among others to use > 'gbp import-orig' to put the source in the git repo, see my mail > (again, tell me if you need help with this). > > Yes already done that. You haven't done this ;-) http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/freemind.git;a=tree => there is only a debian/ directory. Best practice within debian(-java) mandates that you put the complete source (snapshot) into the Debian git repo, like this: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/JavaGit#Import_upstream (http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.NEW.UPSTREAM) You want to use --pristine-tar and --filter: gbp import-orig \ --filter "*.jar" --filter "*.exe" ... --filter-pristine-tar \ --pristine-tar -u1.0.0~rc5+dfsg ../freemind-src-1.0.0_RC_5.tar.gz [you might need more filters...] Once you have imported the sources, tested the build with gbp buildpackage -us -uc pushed the three branches (upstream, pristine-tar, master) and pushed the tags (git push --tags) I can test-build+run your package. > IMHO you should use the time until 1.0.0 is released to fix these > things, get some patches included upstream etc. :-) > > Not sure about that. 0.9.0 is on the removal hint list. It will be removed > within 10 > days or so. I think it'll be removed from unstable, so you have 10+ days until it's removed from testing, which can be delayed? Also there is Markus' package on mentors (http://mentors.debian.net/package/freemind) that can be used in the mean time :-) I just don't know whether you'll find a sponsor that quick with this mixture of svn/git version control, lintian warnings (last time I checked, cannot check right now), ... See my mail [1], it looks like nothing changed since then in the git repo (http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/freemind.git) => do you even want my help on this? > > I am sure want to join the Java Team, although Java isn't my first > programming > > language ;) > > That's not a requirement :-) > > :) > > I use the jortho library from freeplane. Ortho is now a part of freeplane > (also in the > name). Perhaps it is usefull > to make it a shared package? Freeplane uses a modified version of JOrtho. You probably want to use an unmodified version from http://jortho.sourceforge.net/. If you need the modified version from Freeplane, that will require some work [2], also from you. Remember, I already fixed jmapviewer ;-) [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/08/msg00252.html [2] Should be easy to package using http://packages.debian.org/de/sid/javahelper (but maybe you can just use the libjortho-freeplane-java/libjortho-java package without changes to the freeplane source package?) Good Luck and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vc1b7muv@bitburger.home.felix
Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3 [RC]
Hi Willem, On 04.10.2013 23:45, W. van den Akker wrote: [...] > Yes I am almost finishing rc5 also. I must make some last changes before > it can be uploaded. > I hope to finish it this weekend so it can be uploaded to unstable. > Just have to look for a sponsor to do so. I have also contact with Felix > Natter, he is advising me and > I am working on his last suggestions. > I am sure want to join the Java Team, although Java isn't my first > programming language ;) I've had some good experiences with debian-java and if you are looking for advice or a sponsor it surely is a good place to start. I don't know what kind of difficulties you are facing with the latest upstream version at the moment but you might also want to consider to upload just a fix for #713144 et al. In fact Freemind is currently pretty broken due to the changes of libjgoodies-forms-java 1.6 and this upload would quickly resolve the most pressing issues. After that you can continue to work on further improving Freemind 1.0. Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: javax.persistence/2.1.0.v201304241213-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Emmanuel, Thanks for the review. The maintenance was an oversight, which I've now fixed. I've also added the debug flag to the javac task. I like your suggested package naming, so I've renamed the source package to eclipselink-jpa-2.1-spec and the binary to libjpa-2.1-spec-java. The git repository is now at: Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/eclipselink-jpa-2.1-spec.git Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/eclipselink-jpa-2.1-spec.git Once Geronimo releases a 2.1 spec then we can probably swap to that I guess. Thanks, Andy On 04/10/13 21:49, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I reviewed the package and it looks good. > > One minor detail, since you used javahelper the debug symbols are not > included by default in the compiled classes as required by the Java > policy (we really need a lintian check to detect this). That's not > critical for JPA since it mostly consists in interfaces. > > The maintenance isn't assigned to the Debian Java Maintainers, is this > intentional? > > Regarding the name of the package, maybe something like libjpa2.1-java > or jpa-2.1-spec would be more in line with the other JEE spec packages > already in Debian (like libservlet3.0-java or portlet-api-2.0-spec). > > >> I looked at packaging the Geronimo spec for JPA2.1 but it seems they >> haven't released one, so this is the spec which needs to be used I think. > > It seems it will be included in the next release of Geronimo: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6451 > > There is a a patch attached that adds the JPA 2.1 methods. > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJST+wYAAoJEJ0xLSYlIEOZiVcP/1auD++rZHaFORT8TKP4W7US Y/Kt/jG9o/y/vSrLvcOe2mg8gooNCXwBodoQWAVWhc7yGczaMo0ZSHS2pEj50EsR 3+UzwNBzGQKy1udWNhboffNp01JscH3j5qBK1E0x4ITAGNRp19pbsLTr5fdcnLxd 95tONtAYD5Xu7b590VBefJnB3DI+1yJ4AT7jOtTmYPeUnVh/epC7JxnxaNAcMlKk ERjLR51mXMUmkQzVbOEk0fgQNpnDfiyjT2aGVD/x9o2hLnt84MJ0s0y8qe8qK5GX 3aEb2JXUOo9Z38hmEtJpBq+s94I4ptvIqTFnKnj1G0x+4L0krS9Ji0wtctugLS1t h37cfyzbBAK7QGaIk2SJCQb+gu2iXfZEjb7iRJx3JlkSD8TDO76hPXR4MVBws+Ai dvhm8FOjKGenjZ4wsFZdXkpyeMSGb5dwnNeSI4Pv0TpNgE8hTtSjoleh2dt2DNHh I5ew604YtbcOuVp0vV8euLR7SI69x0DD3OW2vPmbK5fvIfWFW9B5iNJKHGIuhXES JvFfFDPMI4u0zesFyG1suR/vvvFMIckCi4Yo0Am8Bd66m0RmfchxGXyx0wC/qyiy vJloITLEXaLbY0qxjGillyLm5N1Z2f63gx+aSs0cVbITdyWZ9jFoef3R0As2M8YN LA4rX3uMh1X4y/W1ofGq =q4md -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524fec18.4050...@rossfamily.co.uk
Re: RFS: freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3 [RC]
"W. van den Akker" writes: > On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > On 04.10.2013 19:07, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > I haven't seen any progress on this since we talked about freemind on > > IRC several weeks ago, so I thought a limited fix for the most urgent > > issues would be OK. > > Whoops, obviously you had already uploaded a new package to mentors. > Sorry, I completely missed it. Since you have packaged the latest > upstream release, I think it might make more sense to upload this > package to unstable. Interested in joining the Java Team? What do you > think? > > Regards, > > Markus > > Hi Markus, > > Yes I am almost finishing rc5 also. I must make some last changes before it > can be > uploaded. hi Willem, Andrew Harvey and I are almost finished with the jmapviewer package (http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-osm/jmapviewer.git). I fixed all lintians and it works fine with Freeplane. => You should try whether jmapviewer-1.0+dfsg1-1 works (builds+runs) with FreeMind too, and I think you can already use it in your package. > I hope to finish it this weekend so it can be uploaded to unstable. > Just have to look for a sponsor to do so. I have also contact with Felix > Natter, he is > advising me and > I am working on his last suggestions. Unfortunately I think there is quite a bit to do, among others to use 'gbp import-orig' to put the source in the git repo, see my mail (again, tell me if you need help with this). IMHO you should use the time until 1.0.0 is released to fix these things, get some patches included upstream etc. :-) > I am sure want to join the Java Team, although Java isn't my first programming > language ;) That's not a requirement :-) Cheers and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4c0f57k@bitburger.home.felix
Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
On 09/20/2013 08:48 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 20/09/2013 08:50, Florian Weimer a écrit : > >> Is this a bug in Netbeans or OpenJDK 6? If the latter, has it been >> fixed upstream? > > This is an OpenJDK 6 bug. It has been reported upstream and promptly > closed as 'Won't Fix'. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021890 I reopened the bug. I still don't understand what the bug actually is, though. Antonín Nebuželský seems to have analysed it, but I can't find an analysis anywhere. Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524fc9e5.8090...@redhat.com
