Re: openjdk-8 package available for review
Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org writes: Hi all, I have completed the first steps to package OpenJDK 8 and it's now possible to play with the package. I have uploaded amd64 binaries for those interested in testing this quickly: http://87.98.165.193/debian The source package is available on alioth, instructions to download the upstream tarball are in debian/README.source: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/openjdk-8.git hi Emmanuel, I am having a small issue with the current git version: If I download via debian/rules get-orig-source, and then dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc I get: Extracting the sources... tar -xf jdk8u-*.tar.xz tar: jdk8u-*.tar.xz: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now make: *** [stamps/unpack] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 When using uscan --download-current-version or uscan --download-current-version --repack, I still don't get ../jdk8u-*.tar.xz. Another question: Is it sufficient to point update-java-alternatives to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and run subsequent packages (that build-depend on default-jdk and depend on default-jre)? Thanks and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87mwf1sbug@bitburger.home.felix
Re: openjdk-8 package available for review
Hi Felix, Thank you for giving a try. Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit : I am having a small issue with the current git version: If I download via debian/rules get-orig-source, and then dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc I get: Extracting the sources... tar -xf jdk8u-*.tar.xz tar: jdk8u-*.tar.xz: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now make: *** [stamps/unpack] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 I think you forgot to extract the upstream tarball in the current directory. Another question: Is it sufficient to point update-java-alternatives to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and run subsequent packages (that build-depend on default-jdk and depend on default-jre)? To build with Java 8 you have to change the JAVA_HOME variable. It's defined in every debian/rules file and usually points to /usr/lib/jvm/default-java. update-java-alternatives doesn't change the VM linked to this path, you have to change debian/rules or install a modified version of default-jdk: http://87.98.165.193/debian/java-common/ Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53627ec3.10...@apache.org
Re: RFS: tomcat8/8.0.5-1
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:15:24PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:32:36AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Hi all, I updated the tomcat8 package to the latest upstream release and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. I'll take care of it. Done. Uploaded. -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9 Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: openjdk-8 package available for review
On 05/01/2014 10:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit : Another question: Is it sufficient to point update-java-alternatives to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and run subsequent packages (that build-depend on default-jdk and depend on default-jre)? To build with Java 8 you have to change the JAVA_HOME variable. It's defined in every debian/rules file and usually points to /usr/lib/jvm/default-java. update-java-alternatives doesn't change the VM linked to this path, you have to change debian/rules or install a modified version of default-jdk: http://87.98.165.193/debian/java-common/ Given that we're 6 months from the freeze, and just 4 months from the deadline for any new transitions [1], is it reasonable to target uploading a new java-common to experimental that depends on openjdk-8 in the next month or so? Cheers, tony [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/05/msg0.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
