[solved] Re: Trouble with Debian versioning for JAR/POM when upgrading jackson-core
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, tony mancill wrote: I think the difference lies with differences in the versions of maven-debian-helper and maven-repo-helper used, although I can't point No, I made sure to dist-upgrade my sid cowbuilder before starting and not in between, and, as I said, rebuilding the old package didn’t show the problem. I think mh_cleanpom (maven-repo-helper package) creates those .properties files. See its manpage, That was it! (Besides calling this… “thing”… a manpage, which is totally off the mark.) The upstream packaging changed, so the “jar” type did no longer match (I think… I’m not a Java™ coder). Applying the following patch to all three packages allowed me to build jackson-databind 2.3.3, too. From ca144ae4fd8ac7a24f0b1c05c1fa768ff9dd6855 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:55:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fix version mangling; thanks tony mancill for the pointers --- debian/changelog| 6 ++ debian/maven.publishedRules | 2 +- debian/maven.rules | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 35cbff7..8bfb71d 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +jackson-core (2.3.3-0tarent2) tarent; urgency=medium + + * Fix version mangling for Debian (use 2.x not debian) + + -- Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:54:58 +0200 + jackson-core (2.3.3-0tarent1) tarent; urgency=medium * Upstream version jackson-core-2.3.3 diff --git a/debian/maven.publishedRules b/debian/maven.publishedRules index b3d7f41..07774aa 100644 --- a/debian/maven.publishedRules +++ b/debian/maven.publishedRules @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -com.fasterxml.jackson.core jackson-core jar s/2\..*/2.x/ * * +com.fasterxml.jackson.core jackson-core * s/2\..*/2.x/ * * diff --git a/debian/maven.rules b/debian/maven.rules index 7c1f5d3..ab69877 100644 --- a/debian/maven.rules +++ b/debian/maven.rules @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -com.fasterxml.jackson.core jackson-core jar s/2\..*/2.x/ * * +com.fasterxml.jackson.core jackson-core * s/2\..*/2.x/ * * junit junit jar s/4\..*/4.x/ * * org.apache.maven.scm maven-scm-manager-plexus jar s/.*/debian/ * * org.apache.maven.scm maven-scm-provider-gitexe jar s/.*/debian/ * * -- 2.0.0 bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.10.1406251007560.6...@tglase.lan.tarent.de
Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:17:09AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 25/05/2014 03:06, Miguel Landaeta a écrit : Is there any news on this? No, Matthias told me he was working on it but he hasn't committed anything yet. The package has been on hold for 3 weeks now :/ It's me again. I'm still wondering why after so many weeks we don't have an openjdk-8 package available in sid if Emmanuel already prepared it and is actively working in the associated transition. IMO, it's not fair to block this. I have simpler packages than this one waiting for NEW processing for weeks so at this point I really wonder if a more complex package like openjdk-8 will be accepted in before the freeze. -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)
Am 25.06.2014 14:51, schrieb Miguel Landaeta: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:17:09AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 25/05/2014 03:06, Miguel Landaeta a écrit : Is there any news on this? No, Matthias told me he was working on it but he hasn't committed anything yet. The package has been on hold for 3 weeks now :/ It's me again. I'm still wondering why after so many weeks we don't have an openjdk-8 package available in sid if Emmanuel already prepared it and is actively working in the associated transition. IMO, it's not fair to block this. it is not blocked, it is work in progress. Emmanuel did decide to change the packaging, and did decide to drop support for most Debian architectures. Dropping support for Debian architectures will automatically block this package later on. I'm still in progress looking at his commits and applying these to a source package which builds on all architectures currently supported by openjdk-7. Afaics, fixing build failures with openjdk-8 as the default is not blocked. I have simpler packages than this one waiting for NEW processing for weeks so at this point I really wonder if a more complex package like openjdk-8 will be accepted in before the freeze. debian-java is not the place to speculate about NEW processing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aad2f4.7080...@debian.org
OpenJFX 8 package available for review
Hi all, I packaged OpenJFX 8 and I'd like to get your feedback before uploading it. The source is available on alioth: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/openjfx.git and binaries for amd64 can be fetched from this APT repository: http://87.98.165.193/debian/repo/ I'd like to thank Kirill Kirichenko from Oracle who quickly provided a patch fixing the compatibility issue with the latest version of libav. There is still a difference between OpenJFX 8 and JavaFX 8, the former lacks the closed source VP6 decoder used to play Flash videos, but it supports the h264 format. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aad738.8070...@apache.org
Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)
Le 25/06/2014 15:47, Matthias Klose a écrit : it is not blocked, it is work in progress. Emmanuel did decide to change the packaging, and did decide to drop support for most Debian architectures. I'm not sure to understand what you mean here. I haven't been able to test on other architectures but I removed nothing in debian/rules or in the patches that was related to other archs support, precisely because I expected porters to start from the openjdk-7 patches to support openjdk-8. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aadd4b.2090...@apache.org
Github mirrors
Hi all, I've set up mirrors of some of our repositories on Github, I hope this will facilitate external contributions. Here are the repositories currently mirrored, let me know if you'd like to add more: https://github.com/Debian/java-package https://github.com/Debian/maven-repo-helper https://github.com/Debian/maven-debian-helper https://github.com/Debian/openjdk-8 https://github.com/Debian/openjfx Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ab09ea.5040...@apache.org
Re: Github mirrors
On 25/06/2014 10:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Hi all, I've set up mirrors of some of our repositories on Github, I hope this will facilitate external contributions. Here are the repositories currently mirrored, let me know if you'd like to add more: https://github.com/Debian/java-package https://github.com/Debian/maven-repo-helper https://github.com/Debian/maven-debian-helper https://github.com/Debian/openjdk-8 https://github.com/Debian/openjfx Please, don't do that ... We have our own infra and github is a proprietary platform :( Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ab0a88.20...@debian.org
Re: Github mirrors
Le Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:44:40AM -0700, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : On 25/06/2014 10:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Hi all, I've set up mirrors of some of our repositories on Github, I hope this will facilitate external contributions. Here are the repositories currently mirrored, let me know if you'd like to add more: https://github.com/Debian/java-package https://github.com/Debian/maven-repo-helper https://github.com/Debian/maven-debian-helper https://github.com/Debian/openjdk-8 https://github.com/Debian/openjfx Please, don't do that ... We have our own infra and github is a proprietary platform :( Hello everybody, As the person who has created the Debian group account on GitHub, I would like to add that the main goal for me is to ease interactions with Upstream when their primary repository is on GitHub. (and it works) Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140625225419.ga4...@falafel.plessy.net
