Are gcj/gij/java-gcj-compat ok on armel?

2008-05-01 Thread Martin Guy 
Hi!
   I see gcj/gij/java-gcj-compat are now disabled on arm, and that
dependent packages are being asked to exclude them as Build-Deps to
eliminate java library bindings.
   Are they believed to work in the armel port? I was just going
through the package lists finding that they have also been excluded on
armel/armeb in some cases and not in others; for what it's worth, the
others have almost all built ok on armel. Am I right in thinking
that these clauses were either added automatically in an early
armel==arm phase, or before gcj worked on armel, and that I should now
ask for the armel exclusions to be reversed?

thanks

M

Please cc replies as I'm not subscrived to debian-java


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Are gcj/gij/java-gcj-compat ok on armel?

2008-05-01 Thread Andrew Haley 
Martin Guy wrote:
 Hi!
I see gcj/gij/java-gcj-compat are now disabled on arm, and that
 dependent packages are being asked to exclude them as Build-Deps to
 eliminate java library bindings.
Are they believed to work in the armel port?

Yes.  As far as I'm aware gcj works 100% on armel.

Andrew.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]