Re: Bug#350399: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
Hi, All. On Apr 15 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote: Azureus, the Java bit torrent client, ran using the most recent version of GIJ 4.1 from experimental. It does not, however, run with the version of GIJ 4.1 in testing/unstable. Thanks for the confirmation of the symptoms. I haven't looked into this much further. If there happens to be a Debian GCC maintainer interested in Azureus, I'd be keen to hear from him or her. I'd love to know this also. I'm trying to get rid of all non-free software that I possibly can. Right now, I've fallen back to using rtorrent, but the ability of using Java applications would be a nice thing. Regards, Rogério. -- Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito Homepage of the algorithms package : http://algorithms.berlios.de Homepage on freshmeat: http://freshmeat.net/projects/algorithms/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
* Mladen Adamovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-14 10:16]: Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely useless. Shame on them. Did you file bugs? I know we've improved in FC5 but I honestly don't think we were worthy of shame with our FC4 stuff. Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mladen Adamovic wrote: [...] Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely useless. I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, the package from Michael and I use it everyday now. It's really impressive and I don't have problems no more. I got problems but when trying to find out what it was, it was the latest WTP Eclipse plugin that causes crashes... on the IBM vm too. Ah yes, I forgot, I'm on ppc (Debian) ;-) Shame on them. Oh! Bad attitude! Shame on you! :-D - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEGWGc4vzFZu62tMIRAiXnAKClV+lYoN+oMG+OePzMa483oiouCACggv5l ABA88WU3vPizeVuY/Nz7hbQ= =jtdr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, the package from Michael and I use it everyday now. It's really impressive and I don't have problems no more. I got problems but when trying to find out what it was, it was the latest WTP Eclipse plugin that causes crashes... on the IBM vm too. Ah yes, I forgot, I'm on ppc (Debian) ;-) I'm glad to hear it is improved. When I tried Native Eclipse on Fedora Core 4 it broke when I tried to create my first class. Shame on them. Oh! Bad attitude! Shame on you! :-D Yes, you might have right. It might be seen as a bad attitude. I mean, those people are trying and working... I'm apologizing to Andrew and rest of Red Hat crew. -- Mladen Adamovic http://home.blic.net/adamm http://www.shortopedia.com http://www.froola.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#350399: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
[Robin Putters] How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? Does it only work with gij? What about the latest classpath release and jamvm or cocoa? If it work with those, it can to into unstable directly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
robin putters wrote: How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely useless. Shame on them. -- Mladen Adamovic http://home.blic.net/adamm http://www.shortopedia.com http://www.froola.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
Mladen Adamovic writes: robin putters wrote: How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely useless. Shame on them. Excuse me while I go behind the outhouse and shoot myself. Mladen Adamovic http://home.blic.net/adamm http://www.shortopedia.com http://www.froola.com The site is temporary down. We are sorry about this inconvenience. :-) Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
Andrew Haley wrote: Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely useless. Shame on them. Excuse me while I go behind the outhouse and shoot myself. I hope you are kidding about that shooting! Don't find me wrong, I really appreciate all effort (your guys from) Red Hat and others are giving in gcj. I see that there are few Red Hat employees working full time for gcj and there are more people also, and hopefully gcj one day will be as stable as Sun's Java and I really think it would make big positive influence on Linux and big negative influence on Vista. I really believe that gcj could be really really important. It could break MS domination on the market. But sometimes gcj used to make bad impressions and I think that Red Hat should avoid making those bad impressions, when possible. I will see what Fedora 5 have to offer this week (waiting to FTP final release) and take better look inside new gcj. http://www.froola.com The site is temporary down. We are sorry about this inconvenience. :-) :) Nobody is perfect. -- Mladen Adamovic http://home.blic.net/adamm http://www.shortopedia.com http://www.froola.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.
Mladen Adamovic writes: Andrew Haley wrote: Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely useless. Shame on them. Excuse me while I go behind the outhouse and shoot myself. I hope you are kidding about that shooting! Don't find me wrong, I really appreciate all effort (your guys from) Red Hat and others are giving in gcj. I see that there are few Red Hat employees working full time for gcj and there are more people also, and hopefully gcj one day will be as stable as Sun's Java and I really think it would make big positive influence on Linux and big negative influence on Vista. I really believe that gcj could be really really important. It could break MS domination on the market. But sometimes gcj used to make bad impressions and I think that Red Hat should avoid making those bad impressions, when possible. So do I. I regret the fact that you had a bad experience. I will see what Fedora 5 have to offer this week (waiting to FTP final release) and take better look inside new gcj. Thank you for displaying a slightly more reasonable attitude this time around. We make the best decisions we can, based on the information that we have. I cannot guarantee that we will always make the same decisions that you would have made, but, despite whatever you may think, we do test things and we are not cavalier about stability. If we believed that Eclipse was as unstable as you say it was, we would not have included it. http://www.froola.com The site is temporary down. We are sorry about this inconvenience. :-) :) Nobody is perfect. No kidding. Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
