Re: byte-buddy

2017-08-25 Thread Felix Natter
Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net> writes:

> tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> writes:
>
> hello Tony,

hello debian-java,

>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile 
>>> (default-compile) on project byte-buddy-dep: Compilation failure
>>> [ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor 
>>> 'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider'
>>
>> Which is essentially the same thing.  Is the package building for you in
>> a clean sid chroot?
>
> Sorry, I see this in a pbuilder chroot as well. I also tried the patch 
> mentioned
> in [1], and I got:
>
> [ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor
> 'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider$AnnotationProcessor'
>
> This class is in the Debian lombok jar.
>
> I also tried to change the scope of lombok from provided to compile.
> I do not think it is related to the lombok version (1.16.16 vs 1.16.8).
>
> Has anybody got an idea?

As Tony is already the liblombok-java maintainer, shall I ask upstream?
Any other idea?

Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter



Re: byte-buddy

2017-08-15 Thread Felix Natter
tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> writes:

hello Tony,

>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile 
>> (default-compile) on project byte-buddy-dep: Compilation failure
>> [ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor 
>> 'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider'
>
> Which is essentially the same thing.  Is the package building for you in
> a clean sid chroot?

Sorry, I see this in a pbuilder chroot as well. I also tried the patch mentioned
in [1], and I got:

[ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor
'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider$AnnotationProcessor'

This class is in the Debian lombok jar.

I also tried to change the scope of lombok from provided to compile.
I do not think it is related to the lombok version (1.16.16 vs 1.16.8).

Has anybody got an idea?

Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter



Re: byte-buddy

2017-08-13 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 07:48:29PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> Also, could we do a new upload of 1.7.1+dfsg1-1?
> 
> byte-buddy (1.7.1+dfsg1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> 
>   * fix watch file (releases instead of tags, dversionmangle)
>   * remove precompiled content from orig-source
> 
>  -- Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net>  Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:03:14 +0200

Hi Felix,

The packaging in the repo fails to build for me in a clean sid chroot:

> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile 
> (default-compile) on project byte-buddy-dep: Compilation failure
> [ERROR] Bad service configuration file, or exception thrown while 
> constructing Processor object: javax.annotation.processing.Processor: 
> Provider lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider$AnnotationProcessor could not 
> be instantiated: java.lang.RuntimeException: 
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: lombok.core.AnnotationProcessor

This looks very similar to [0] and [1], although it's not clear to me
what is needed to resolve [0] and the work-around for [1] did not change
the situation - instead of a RuntimeException above, I get:

> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile 
> (default-compile) on project byte-buddy-dep: Compilation failure
> [ERROR] Could not instantiate an instance of processor 
> 'lombok.launch.AnnotationProcessorHider'

Which is essentially the same thing.  Is the package building for you in
a clean sid chroot?

Thank you,
tony

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814876
[1] https://github.com/rzwitserloot/lombok/issues/905


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: byte-buddy

2017-08-13 Thread tony mancill
Hi Felix,

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 07:48:29PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> hello Debian-java,
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libbyte-buddy-java.git
> has been superseded by:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/byte-buddy.git

+1 for naming the repo to match the name of the source package.
 
> How can I remove the first one?
> Just do a:
> - cd /git/pkg-java
> - mv libbyte-buddy-java.git /tmp
> on git-debian.org?

Sure.  Or if we no longer need the contents, we can simply delete the
old repo.  Let me know if this is appropriate and I will take care of
it.

> Also, could we do a new upload of 1.7.1+dfsg1-1?
> 
> byte-buddy (1.7.1+dfsg1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> 
>   * fix watch file (releases instead of tags, dversionmangle)
>   * remove precompiled content from orig-source
> 
>  -- Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net>  Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:03:14 +0200

Yes.  I will do this momentarily.

Cheers,
tony


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


byte-buddy

2017-08-13 Thread Felix Natter
hello Debian-java,

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libbyte-buddy-java.git
has been superseded by:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/byte-buddy.git

How can I remove the first one?
Just do a:
- cd /git/pkg-java
- mv libbyte-buddy-java.git /tmp
on git-debian.org?

Also, could we do a new upload of 1.7.1+dfsg1-1?

byte-buddy (1.7.1+dfsg1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium

  * fix watch file (releases instead of tags, dversionmangle)
  * remove precompiled content from orig-source

 -- Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net>  Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:03:14 +0200

Many Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter