Re: KDevelop
The Potato version is getting quite old and is no longer supported. For version 2.0.1, did you install it and the rest of KDE from the packages in Sid, and are they up to date? Does KDevelop load up properly and load your project properly? If so, can you open different files etc. before it crashes? If you would like, I can send you packages with Debugging support. You could then send me the output from KDE crash monitor. By the way I have KDevelop working properly in Sid on two computers, both up to date. On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:28:49PM -0400, Krystian Bates wrote: I've got an odd problem with KDevelop. Both versions(1.4 and 2.0.1) SIGSEV when I attempt to edit anything. No other KDE editors do this, including Kate, KWrite, ect. I am guessing I have a bad lib/wrong lib in here somewhere... but I am at a loss. Both KDev's are installed via apt-get install, one from potato, and one from sid. ANy ideas? -- Rykard http://www.i-star.com/users/blackstaff/ http://www.worldforge.org/ pub 1024D/17FBE8FE 2001-10-10 Krystian G Bates (Rykard) [EMAIL PROTECTED] sub 1024g/927996F1 2001-10-10 -- Norman Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG public key available at http://rtfm.phpwebhosting.com/gnupg_key.txt Fingerprint: 1024D/095918D0 807B A7C5 0D7D 81C0 C21F 1D36 775A C806 0959 18D0
Re: kdevelop broken ??
On Friday, 19. October 2001 11.06, Norman Jordan wrote: I will look at the linking problem tomorrow. I just tested it, and I am having the same problem. For the problem with your Makefile.am, you should install the kdevelop-doc package and read the file /usr/share/doc/kdevelop/README-automake1.5.Debian *thx* works... but i've still an Error when I want to compile my Project: In file admin/em_edit.pl: : defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake 1.4 this is not supportet !!
Re: ok...my curiosity is getting to me...
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, David Bishop wrote: Marc Schaefer and Assorted Swiss People becomes Debian Switzerland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Andreas Trottmann, Marc Schaefer and Debian Switzerland.
Re: kmail and gpg
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:05, David Bishop wrote: You probably had that problem before I remembered I hadn't uploaded my key to the keyservers :-) I put all three of them on the mit keyserver about three weeks ago, so anyone that uses it or any mirrors should be okay. Of course, if you add the options in your .gpg/options file that Chris was talking about, you won't have this problem either :-) But just to take the load of your sholders, I'm attaching my public key so you can just save and import it manually. OK, it gets downloaded now and things are fine. Also I think that I am being hit by the performance problem you mention, I'm using a P3-650 with 66MHz FSB (Thinkpad). It's not a really fast machine by todays standards... -- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Re: Save Link as... in ftp-mode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Konqureror could simply provide the link handling functionality (save link as, copy link location) when right-clickig filesystem objects. This would make things a lot easier even when working with local files. Sönke Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2001 20:14 schrieb Josh Hansen: I guess the reasoning is that in FTP mode you're really just reading a virtual filesystem via the ftp IO slave. So in other words, HTTP is like your normal web browser, FTP is like your normal file manager program. It's just a matter of paradigm. Does that makes sense??? - Josh it is possible to extent the context menu of the konqueror's ftp-mode by an item Save Link as...? It disturbs me that in html-mode files can be saved by Save Link as... and in ftp-mode I have to copy-and- paste the file. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjvQDbIACgkQUHsyYAmAYTXdNwCeLFd9GykkpasnplBHpICInsly yPUAn3AhGXbyfviqOqjXfVD0yFbCUsGA =nuFJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: prelink update
For those of you interested in the progress of the prelink implementation here you go. I got word from the binutils maintainer (Chris) on his pieces and this is what he had to say: Oh, and I'm working on prelinking support as soon as the changes to glibc get accepted upstream. Jakub Jelinek has done a really nice job so far. There's still a few bugs to be fixed, but I do have prelink packaged already and the binutils that I just uploaded enables -z combreloc by default. So we'll probably see all of this finalized and in place for kde3..but that's all depending on the glibc stuff and from what Ben Collins told me that'll be post-woody. Ivan I can't compile the KDE 2.2.1 with objprelink enabled. kde-config segfaults after compiling kdelibs. Could this be related to the binutils updates made by Chris ? Philipp -- Philipp Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pp-services.de
Search engine in kcontrol
Since I updated to woody + sid with KDE 2.2.1 I am missing the module Help in the KControl Center. The funcionality was to provide a search engine on some issues using htdig. Why has it disappeared from KDE 2.2.1 in Debian?. Have I forgot to install something? Pablo de Vicente KDE Spanish translatin team
kde objprelink and new binutils
Hi, I tried to compile KDE 2.2.1 with the latest Debian/unstable. The kdelibs compile without problems but the kde-config program which is located in kdelibs/kdecore/kde-config segfaults on my two tested machines. This program is needed for all other packages in the configure script. I never had this problem with earlier Debian versions. Unfortunaly I can't find any older binutils versions on the debian ftp-server and I can't verify that the binutils are the real problem. Chris, could you send me a location where to download older binutil packages ? Regards Philipp -- Philipp Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pp-services.de
Re: kde objprelink and new binutils
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Philipp Siegert wrote: I tried to compile KDE 2.2.1 with the latest Debian/unstable. The kdelibs compile without problems but the kde-config program which is located in kdelibs/kdecore/kde-config segfaults on my two tested machines. This program is needed for all other packages in the configure script. I never had this problem with earlier Debian versions. Unfortunaly I can't find any older binutils versions on the debian ftp-server and I can't verify that the binutils are the real problem. Chris, could you send me a location where to download older binutil packages ? I'll put them up somewhere. Objprelink shouldn't be used, IIRC. I'm working on getting the necessary changes done for using Jakub Jelinek's prelink work, though. What version of binutils would you like and also, what architecture are you having problems on? C
Re: Search engine in kcontrol
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:14:50PM +0200, P. de Vicente wrote: Since I updated to woody + sid with KDE 2.2.1 I am missing the module Help in the KControl Center. The funcionality was to provide a search engine on some issues using htdig. Why has it disappeared from KDE 2.2.1 in Debian?. Have I forgot to install something? because upstream no longer installs it. I do not know why and have not gone to find out. Ivan -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
Re: kde objprelink and new binutils
Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2001 22:24 schrieben Sie: On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Philipp Siegert wrote: I tried to compile KDE 2.2.1 with the latest Debian/unstable. The kdelibs compile without problems but the kde-config program which is located in kdelibs/kdecore/kde-config segfaults on my two tested machines. This program is needed for all other packages in the configure script. I never had this problem with earlier Debian versions. Unfortunaly I can't find any older binutils versions on the debian ftp-server and I can't verify that the binutils are the real problem. Chris, could you send me a location where to download older binutil packages ? I'll put them up somewhere. Objprelink shouldn't be used, IIRC. I'm working on getting the necessary changes done for using Jakub Jelinek's prelink work, though. What version of binutils would you like and also, what architecture are you having problems on? C Not sure about the version, let's try 2.11.90.0.31-2. Architecture is i386. Phil -- Philipp Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pp-services.de
Re: kde objprelink and new binutils
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:24:37PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Philipp Siegert wrote: I tried to compile KDE 2.2.1 with the latest Debian/unstable. The kdelibs compile without problems but the kde-config program which is located in kdelibs/kdecore/kde-config segfaults on my two tested machines. This program is needed for all other packages in the configure script. I never had this problem with earlier Debian versions. Unfortunaly I can't find any older binutils versions on the debian ftp-server and I can't verify that the binutils are the real problem. Chris, could you send me a location where to download older binutil packages ? I'll put them up somewhere. Objprelink shouldn't be used, IIRC. I'm working on getting the necessary changes done for using Jakub Jelinek's prelink work, though. and packages built with the current binutils/glibc without objprelink run faster that those built with objprelink. objprelink's use is outdated really. Ivan -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
Re: Finally get to see what KDE2.2 looks like?
On Friday 19 October 2001 01:00, Fred K Ollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the recent death of Progeny, I am currently upgrading to woody/testing following the instructions kindly provided by Progeny. Looks like I'll finally get to see what KDE2.2 is like! I had been waiting for the freeze to reach a comfortable level, but with Progeny dead and KDE2.1 also stopped I figured it's about time I got me head out of the sand. I hope this does not break too much on my system. I hope you've been reading the list. kde2.2 is great, but it's still not stable, IMHO, so I'd go to potato, first. Fred I've used Potato in the past and have been enjoying Ivan's Potato KDE2.1 on Progeny for quite some time now. I have been reading the list, and although I've seen a few issues, I've not seen anything that should be a show stopper for me. I've been itching to upgrade for a while now, this jsut gives me an excuse ; ). Since the upgrade is so large, and I'm only connected via modem, I'll have to settle for building up my apt-cache over a period of days before I can see whats in testing. Thanks for the advise and others for offers of help. Cheers, John Gay
Re: kde objprelink and new binutils
Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2001 22:59 schrieben Sie: On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:24:37PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Philipp Siegert wrote: I tried to compile KDE 2.2.1 with the latest Debian/unstable. The kdelibs compile without problems but the kde-config program which is located in kdelibs/kdecore/kde-config segfaults on my two tested machines. This program is needed for all other packages in the configure script. I never had this problem with earlier Debian versions. Unfortunaly I can't find any older binutils versions on the debian ftp-server and I can't verify that the binutils are the real problem. Chris, could you send me a location where to download older binutil packages ? I'll put them up somewhere. Objprelink shouldn't be used, IIRC. I'm working on getting the necessary changes done for using Jakub Jelinek's prelink work, though. and packages built with the current binutils/glibc without objprelink run faster that those built with objprelink. objprelink's use is outdated really. Ivan Ivan, are your latest packages built with these binutils/glibc or do I have to compile them myself ? Chris, I think we'll skip the test with older binutils then. You don't have to make them available. Philipp -- Philipp Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pp-services.de
Re: kde objprelink and new binutils
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:36:40PM +0200, Philipp Siegert wrote: Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2001 22:59 schrieben Sie: On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:24:37PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Philipp Siegert wrote: I tried to compile KDE 2.2.1 with the latest Debian/unstable. The kdelibs compile without problems but the kde-config program which is located in kdelibs/kdecore/kde-config segfaults on my two tested machines. This program is needed for all other packages in the configure script. I never had this problem with earlier Debian versions. Unfortunaly I can't find any older binutils versions on the debian ftp-server and I can't verify that the binutils are the real problem. Chris, could you send me a location where to download older binutil packages ? I'll put them up somewhere. Objprelink shouldn't be used, IIRC. I'm working on getting the necessary changes done for using Jakub Jelinek's prelink work, though. and packages built with the current binutils/glibc without objprelink run faster that those built with objprelink. objprelink's use is outdated really. Ivan Ivan, are your latest packages built with these binutils/glibc or do I have to compile them myself ? Chris, I think we'll skip the test with older binutils then. You don't have to make them available. yes. they are built using the latest in fact I'm about to upload another set that will be built with the binutils that was uploaded a few days ago. Ivan -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
Re: kde objprelink and new binutils
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Philipp Siegert wrote: and packages built with the current binutils/glibc without objprelink run faster that those built with objprelink. objprelink's use is outdated really. That's good news :-) Wait until the glibc patches get integrated and I upload the prelink binary...it should be faster even still :-) Ivan, are your latest packages built with these binutils/glibc or do I have to compile them myself ? Chris, I think we'll skip the test with older binutils then. You don't have to make them available. Ok, thanks. C
Re: how to make Lexmark Z11 work with Debian?
On Friday 19 October 2001 21:07, Jerry Wang wrote: On Sat, 2001-10-20 at 02:48, Bob Underwood wrote: On Friday 19 October 2001 11:49, Jerry Wang wrote: now the following packages are installed on my Debian -- cupsomatic-ppd, cupsys, cupsys-pstoraster, xpp, apsfilter, lpr when I execute xpp, it shows No printer found, aborting. within an alert dialog box. what should I do next step? thank for ur help Jerry i just checked the cupsomatic-ppd package and it does include the z11. so it appears that all you need to add is the cupsys-client and cupsys-bsd packages; then configure with a browser at localhost:631 as noted by the earlier poster. the gimp1.2-print package has a different driver that will also work. either cupsomatic-ppd or gimp1.2-print should suffice, although the quality may vary on individual machines. the lpr and apsfilter packages are not necessary and can be safely removed/purged from your system before adding the cupsys-client package. hth bob
Re: how to make Lexmark Z11 work with Debian?
my apologies for sending the previous message to the wrong list bob
