kwin, ctrl:nocaps and caps-tab messes up keyboard
Thanks everybody for helping me with the kword crash issue. I learned to report bugs, got the courage to borrow kword from sid and the crash is gone. Now I'm wondering whether anybody has noticed this and has a solution: I'm running XFree86 4.1 and have the XkbOption "ctrl:nocaps" enabled, i.e., my Caps-Lock should behave exactly as Ctrl. This used to really be so until the last KDE upgrade in woody, my kwin now is version 2.2.2-1. If I do desktop-switching through Ctrl-Tab, everything is fine. If I do it through Caps-Tab then things get quite messed up: the keyboard no longer works at all, the mouse pressed in xterm-s behaves as if Ctrl was being held down (gives VT menus, which seem to work), and the only way I've found out of this is to use the mouse to open yet another xterm and then click some more and then... well not sure due to what but eventually things get back to normal in most cases. I believe I tried this with some other window managers and I think I once ran xev on this---the problem does seem to be kwin specific and I don't think I got much smarter from xev. This is kind-of along the lines of some reported problems about alt-tab switching in older kwin-s but different. Does anybody know what's going on? Is kwin trying to do something funny with what xkb should be taking care of? I guess I should enter a bug, right? Thanks, Martins
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:58:26AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > aula-linux:~# apt-get install kpackage > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > > Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that > the package is simply not installable and a bug report against > that package should be filed. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > kpackage: Depends: librpm0 (>= 4.0.2-18) but it is not installable > E: Sorry, broken packages A new kdeadmin, complete with kpackage built against librpm4, is coming soon. Sit tight. -- Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> we're calling 2.2 POTATO?? pgpro2iuIB1vt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Evolution einbinden
On Friday 11 January 2002 04:15 pm, Denny Schierz wrote: > hi, > > gibt es einen Weg, evolution als standard Mail Programm im Konqueror zu > registrieren? Sprich, ich klicke auf eine Mailadresse, und Evolution > übernimmt die mailadresse und macht ein Create Message Fenster auf, so > halt wie bei kmail. > > cu denny control center, file associations, message--da sollte man sowas eintragen koennen. kde kenne ich nur auf englisch. keine ahnung ob die vorgenannten bei dir auf deutsch umgesestzt sind.
Evolution einbinden
hi, gibt es einen Weg, evolution als standard Mail Programm im Konqueror zu registrieren? Sprich, ich klicke auf eine Mailadresse, und Evolution übernimmt die mailadresse und macht ein Create Message Fenster auf, so halt wie bei kmail. cu denny
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:58:26AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello !! > > I have a little dependency problem on Debian GNU/Linux Sid 3.0 (yes, I know, > that's unstable...) : -snip- > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > kde: Depends: kpackage but it is not going to be installed > E: Sorry, broken packages I will get Daniels to give me an updated diff.gz and try to rebuild it asap. My system decided to eat its hard drive last night though so it might be a few days. :< Chris Cheney
Re: kde.debian.net website
> > And this is NOT just for .deb(ian) We also need to support apt-rpm if we can. > > I'd like to see some archives for the (don't scream at me!!) apt-rpm sites > > too. I don't 'like' RedHate, but with the new apt that is in it, it sure > > would be sweet if we could support it. (convert those fadora wearin' > > strangers!) > > How would supporting RedHat help convert them to Debian? :) Isn't KDE already > in RedHat anyway? If RedHat wants to use apt-rpm then they are free to > setup their own mirrors to use with it. why would puting our deb's out there help support apt-rpm anyway? that uses rpm's redhat has its own setup, its own dependancies and its own directory structure.
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 January 2002 01:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello !! > > I have a little dependency problem on Debian GNU/Linux Sid 3.0 (yes, I > know, that's unstable...) : > Well !! This package works !! But the rest still don't works !! The problem > isn't resolved... > if I tape the command apt-get install kpackage, the same error message is > displayed... > If anyone has an idee, thanks a lot !! Well, I won't comment on your sources.list, because everyone else already has :-) I'll just mention that this particular dependency problem has been noted before and a new package upload with fixed depends: is planned very soon. Hope that helps - -- D.A.Bishop -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8PvykEHLN/FXAbC0RAlqxAKDMkZl+02TBRMewprEawQDouN3ekACgsjFn QjjKeb6U96vrCyg3A5OqpxA= =GMiI -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:26:43PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists > wrote: > > > mirror: B_more_in_sync > > -- > > Package: A > > (has been replaced by Aplus or is not available any more) > > Depends: B ( = 0.2) > > So package A which does not exist depends on B=0.2? Huh? Scratch that "Depends" line. Sorry. *t Tomas Pospisek SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions http://sourcepole.ch Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Friday 11 January 2002 12:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello !! > > I have a little dependency problem on Debian GNU/Linux Sid 3.0 (yes, I > know, that's unstable...) : > > My sources.list file : > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib > non- free > deb ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/debian unstable main contrib > non-free > From my experience, using "stable", "unstable", "frozen/testing" is a bad idea. Use the release name. It's safer. This way, if/when frozen goes stable, you won't find yourself running a fully beta release, unexpectedly. There's conversation later on in the list about multiple mirrors. I won't comment on the validity of it, but using multiple mirrors bit me in the arse months and months ago. First recommendation is to edit the sources.list and run an apt-get update to bring your package list up to current. Then try something like this: Dir=~ pts/4$ apt-cache search kde | grep "kde " fluxbox-kde - Highly configurable and low resource X11 Window manager for KDE junior-kde - Debian Jr. for KDE kde - The K Desktop Environment licq-plugin-kde - Graphical front-end plugin for LICQ using Qt2+KDE wordtrans-kde - Multi Language Word Translator for Linux As you see here, kde DOES exist (on my box). But you could be running into some conflicts with the multi-mirror stuff. (shrug) Once your available packages list is current/correct, you 'should' be able to run the 'apt-get install kde' w/o complaint. Good Coding [snip] - -- __ OutCast Computer Consultants of Central Oregon http://outcast-consultants.redmond.or.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] (541) 504-1388 Toll Free (866) 562-7160 Via IRC at; 205.227.115.251:6667:#OutCasts Via ICQ: UIN 138930 "Failure is not an option...it's bundled with Microsoft" -anonymous- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! "Software is like sex. They're both better when they're free!!" - Linus Torvalds "As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product."
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:26:43PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: > mirror: B_more_in_sync > -- > Package: A > (has been replaced by Aplus or is not available any more) > Depends: B ( = 0.2) So package A which does not exist depends on B=0.2? Huh? -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." pgpXe0agRJAWk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:17:16AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists > wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free > > > deb ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/debian unstable main contrib > > > non-free > > > 1) and 2) are the same but you are mixing two mirrors. What for? Use only > > one and then you should be offered a more consistent package choice. If > > you are using 1) and 2) simultaneously than you can end up in strange > > situations where you install stuff from 2) that depends on stuff that is > > overwritten by 1) etc. > > How exactly do you expect that to happen? apt supports multiple sources > for the same package perfectly well - by default it will simply go with > the highest version avaliable. If you point at two repositories one of > which is not a Debian mirror you might get into trouble but otherwise > nothing bad will happen (except for a bit of wasted bandwidth > downloading two copies of the Packages files). Lets suppose the following (a situation that happens frequently here, I'm sitting in Switzerland btw. just like the original poster). Installed: -- Package: A Version: 0.1 Package: B Version: 0.1 Package: C Version: 0.1 mirror: A_out_of_sync - Package: A Version: 0.1 Depends: B ( = 0.1) Package: B Version: 0.1 Package: C Version: 0.1 Depends: B ( = 0.1) mirror: B_more_in_sync -- Package: A (has been replaced by Aplus or is not available any more) Depends: B ( = 0.2) Package: B Version: 0.2 Package: C Version: 0.2 Depends: B ( = 0.2) If you list available packages you'll see all the new versions. And if you update C you'll get a problem, since A is hanging in the air. Situations like this do occur. *t Tomas Pospisek SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions http://sourcepole.ch Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:17:16AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free > > deb ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/debian unstable main contrib > > non-free > 1) and 2) are the same but you are mixing two mirrors. What for? Use only > one and then you should be offered a more consistent package choice. If > you are using 1) and 2) simultaneously than you can end up in strange > situations where you install stuff from 2) that depends on stuff that is > overwritten by 1) etc. How exactly do you expect that to happen? apt supports multiple sources for the same package perfectly well - by default it will simply go with the highest version avaliable. If you point at two repositories one of which is not a Debian mirror you might get into trouble but otherwise nothing bad will happen (except for a bit of wasted bandwidth downloading two copies of the Packages files). -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." pgp28s5dmDJIs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a little dependency problem on Debian GNU/Linux Sid 3.0 (yes, I know, > that's unstable...) : > > My sources.list file : > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free 1) > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non- > free > deb ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/debian unstable main contrib non-free 2) 1) and 2) are the same but you are mixing two mirrors. What for? Use only one and then you should be offered a more consistent package choice. If you are using 1) and 2) simultaneously than you can end up in strange situations where you install stuff from 2) that depends on stuff that is overwritten by 1) etc. I suggest you delete line 1) For the rest - go and check packages.debian.org and search for the missing packages there. Sometimes, if you are tracking woody/sid you need to do that, especially if you are getting your stuff from mirrors. *t Tomas Pospisek SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions http://sourcepole.ch Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11
KDE dependency problem on a Debian Sid 3.0
Hello !! I have a little dependency problem on Debian GNU/Linux Sid 3.0 (yes, I know, that's unstable...) : My sources.list file : deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non- free deb ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/debian unstable main contrib non-free * When I want to install kde : * aula-linux:~# apt-get install kde Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: kde: Depends: kpackage but it is not going to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages ** So, I tape the following : ** aula-linux:~# apt-get install kpackage Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: kpackage: Depends: librpm0 (>= 4.0.2-18) but it is not installable E: Sorry, broken packages OK, so now : aula-linux:~# apt-get install librpm0 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package librpm0 has no available version, but exists in the database. This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents of sources.list However the following packages replace it: librpm4 E: Package librpm0 has no installation candidate *** Just a little new command : *** aula-linux:~# apt-get install librpm4 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Sorry, librpm4 is already the newest version. 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Well !! This package works !! But the rest still don't works !! The problem isn't resolved... if I tape the command apt-get install kpackage, the same error message is displayed... If anyone has an idee, thanks a lot !! Cédric Rochat Ch. du Commonet 4 1341 L'Orient (CH) mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rte des Monts 20 2400 Le Locle (CH) mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage: http://www.younics.org
